Tens of thousands of pro-Palestinian protesters march in London

Protesters waved Palestinian flags, donned keffiyeh scarves and carried signs including "Stop arming Israel" and "No war on Iran" as they marched in the sweltering heat in central London.
"It's important to remember that people are suffering in Gaza. I fear all the focus will be on Iran now," said 34-year-old Harry Baker, attending his third pro-Palestinian protest.
"I don't have great love for the Iranian regime, but we are now in a dangerous situation," he added.
There have been monthly protests in the British capital since the start of the 20-month-long war between Israel and Hamas, which has ravaged Gaza.
Saturday's march comes amid heightened global tensions as the United States mulls joining Israel's strikes against Iran.
Cries of "Palestine will be free" rang out as protesters carried signs saying "Hands off Gaza" or "Stop starving Gaza".
Gaza is suffering from famine-like conditions according to UN agencies in the region following an Israeli aid blockade.
Gaza's civil defence agency has reported that hundreds have been killed by Israeli forces while trying to reach the US- and Israeli-backed aid distribution sites.
"People need to keep their eyes on Gaza. That's where the genocide is happening," said 60-year-old protester Nicky Marcus.
"I feel frustrated, angry because of what's happening in Gaza," said 31-year-old data analyst Jose Diaz.
"It's in everyone's eyes. It's still on after so many months," Diaz added.
'Scared'
The overall death toll in Gaza since the war broke out has reached at least 55,637 people, according to the health ministry.
Israel has denied it is carrying out a genocide and says it aims to wipe out Hamas after 1,219 people were killed in Israel by the Islamist group's October 7, 2023, attack.
A 31-year-old Iranian student who did not want to share her name, told AFP she had family in Iran and was "scared".
"I'm worried about my country. I know the regime is not good but it's still my country. I'm scared," she said.
Tehran said over 400 people have been killed in Iran since Israel launched strikes last week claiming its arch-foe was close to acquiring a nuclear weapon, which Iran denies.
Some 25 people have been killed in Israel, according to official figures.
Meanwhile, British media reported that the UK government was planning to ban a pro-Palestinian campaign group, which on Friday broke into the UK's largest air force base and vandalised two planes.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was planning to begin the process on Monday to proscribe Palestine Action -- effectively designating it a terrorist organisation and making it illegal to join, according to UK media.
Britain has announced sanctions against two Israeli cabinet ministers, suspended free-trade negotiations with Israel and summoned its ambassador over the conduct of the war in Gaza.
It has also urged de-escalation in the Iran-Israel war, while expressing concerns about Tehran's nuclear programme.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Euronews

2 hours ago

• Euronews

Houthis threaten to target US ships in the Red Sea if they participate in any attack on Iran

Yemen's Houthi's said they will target US ships in the Red Sea if Washington participates in any potential attack against Israel in co-operation with Israel, the group announced on Saturday. "We will target US ships and battleships in the Red Sea if Washington participates in theattack on Iran," the group's military spokesperson Yahya Saree said in a statement published by the group's media outlet. Saree emphasised that the group is closely monitoring movement in the region, including what he described as "hostile movements," and will take the necessary measures to protect itself. The group considers any potential Israeli attack on Iran to be aimed at "removing Tehran as an obstacle to an Israeli plan to dominate the region," Saree said, adding that the group will not allow this plan to be implemented. The remarks come a day after the US imposed new sanctions targeting key economic entities linked to the Houthi group. It also comes amid escalating tensions between the US and Iran, where there is speculation about a possible US military strike targeting Iran's nuclear programme. The US military website "The Aviationist" reported that two squadrons of B-2 strategic bombers, which are capable of carrying bunker-busting bombs, left Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri on Friday morning. They are headed in the direction of the island of Guam in the Pacific Ocean, without indicating movements towards the Diego Garcia base in the Indian Ocean, which was previously used in similar operations. US President Donald Trump announced in May that he had reached an understanding with the Houthi group through Omani mediation to stop naval operations against commercial ships in the Red Sea in exchange for an end to US airstrikes on the group's positions and areas under its control. The Red Sea is a strategically vital area, through which roughly 10 per cent of global trade passes, escalation in the area can have wide economic and security repercussions.

France 24

3 hours ago

• France 24

Iran's foreign minister says aggression must stop so diplomacy can resume

11:29 21/06/2025 Israeli strikes kill Iranian commander: the latest on the ground in Tehran Middle East 21/06/2025 Israel claims its strikes have set back Iran's nuclear program by two or three years Middle East 21/06/2025 Iran: Israel strikes key nuclear site of Isfahan, authorities report no hazardous leak Middle East 21/06/2025 Iran: Israel vows to press offensive amid failing diplomacy Middle East 21/06/2025 Israel says strikes Iran's military infrastructure and nuclear sites Middle East 21/06/2025 Israeli military says killed Iran's Hamas coordinator Middle East 21/06/2025 Iranians flee war-torn country in long and dangerous journey Middle East 21/06/2025 Former member of the Iranian nuclear negotiating team speaks to FRANCE 24 Middle East 21/06/2025 Israel-Iran war: Will Trump lose part of his supporters whatever he decides to do? Middle East

Euronews

3 hours ago

• Euronews

'Iran didn't want a result' - Was Iran just playing with Wadephul?

On Friday, all political observers looked to Geneva in Switzerland where talks with Iran took place at the Intercontinental Hotel. Together with France, Great Britain and Vice President of the European Commission Kaja Kallas, Germany's Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul (CDU) negotiated for four hours with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi about Iran's nuclear programme. Wadephul's mission: to dispel concerns about nuclear armament with a new nuclear deal in order to de-escalate the Israel-Iran conflict. Before the meeting, Wadephul demanded "serious readiness" from Iran and to renounce "any enrichment of nuclear material". "The ball is now in Iran's court," he said. Euronews learnt that Germany held the talks in confidential consultation with Israel and the US. However, neither country attended the discussions. Iran requires 'Israeli aggression to stop' for further talks "There is no room for negotiations with us until Israeli aggression stops," said Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi. Iran's ambassador to the UN, Ali Bahreini, told Euronews that Iran would present "points" in Geneva that would show Europe's "failure" in the conflict. Europe should stop supporting Israel, he added. Huge pressure on Tehran before the talks The pressure on Tehran increased before the meeting. Following the recent Iranian missile attacks, Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz said: "A dictator like Khamenei, who is at the head of a country like Iran and has made the destruction of Israel his mission, must not be allowed to continue to exist". Although political experts predicted "no breakthrough" from the outset, expectations rose due to US President Donald Trump leaving a window of opportunity open for possible de-escalation. He wants to make a decision within "two weeks" as to whether the US will intervene in the conflict alongside Israel. At the same time, Israel declared that they would be able to destroy deeply bunkered facilities militarily without the US - one of these bunkers is home to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Wadephul's Iran meeting ends without result After four hours of negotiations, Foreign Minister Wadphul said: "The good result today is that we left the room with the impression that the Iranian side is basically prepared to continue talking about all important issues". He added that it was important for the US to be involved in further negotiations and a solution. Iran's foreign minister hints at halting negotiations Following the Geneva meeting, the Iranian foreign minister said: "We support the continuation of talks with the three European countries and the European Union," said Foreign Minister Araghchi. "But as long as Israel's attacks continue, we will not negotiate with ANY party." In an interview with Euronews, political observer Carsten Ovens, head of the European Leadership Network (ELNET), summarises the outcome as follows: "Foreign Minister Wadephul's efforts are important," Ovens said. "However, Iran was clearly not interested in a result." Did Iran "play" with the West in Geneva? Ovens adds: "The talks in Geneva make it clear: Iran is playing with the West and wants to stall for time." He goes on to say that Iran is "continuing its efforts to develop offensive weapons to destroy the state of Israel and this devalues the diplomatic efforts of the past ten years." The Iranian regime has "repeatedly undermined the 2015 nuclear agreement and continuously expanded its nuclear capabilities as well as its ballistic missile programme", according to the Middle East expert. "The EU's adherence to the nuclear agreement was wrong" German-Iranian FDP politician Bijan Djir-Sarai told Euronews that the negotiations were hopeless from the outset. "Without the USA and Israel, the EU's negotiations are irrelevant," said the foreign policy expert. IDjir-Sarai believes that it is no longer possible to rely on old strategies such as nuclear treaties and that there needs to be a political rethink. "The EU's adherence to the nuclear agreement was wrong. A new strategy in dealing with the regime is necessary," he said. Ovens: "Iran threatens the region and Europe too" The head of the European Leadership Network is convinced that Iran will not stop increasing its nuclear capabilities. Ovens warns: "A nuclear-armed Iran poses an immediate and existential threat - for the region as well as for Europe." For some political observers, the German initiative for talks with Iran came as a surprise. A few days ago, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU) said that Israel was doing the "dirty work" for everyone with its military action against the Iranian regime. "Otherwise we might have seen months and years more of this regime's terror and then possibly with a nuclear weapon in their hands," said Chancellor Merz. On Thursday, Chancellor Merz then announced: "I support the intensive efforts of Foreign Minister Wadephul. Iran is called upon to negotiate an agreement quickly. We want to make our diplomatic contribution to this." Wadephul's Iran mission also caused irritation in the CDU/CSU's own ranks. This is because the CDU and CSU are divided on the extent to which negotiations with Iran on its nuclear programmes make sense. Many in the CDU in particular assume that Iran is continuing to build nuclear weapons in underground facilities despite official agreements. What's more, many in the CDU/CSU consider the nuclear agreement with the Iranian regime to be a "sham". CDU member of the Bundestag Roderich Kiesewetter criticised the agreement to Phoenix: "What are we negotiating about? The regime has the destruction of Israel as its state doctrine and is continuing to build a nuclear bomb. Instead of nuclear negotiations, Israel's actions should be "politically supported". CDU foreign policy expert Norbert Röttgen expresses a similar sentiment. He said: "The rulers in Tehran have led Europe around by the nose for years. The nuclear negotiations were not a way to find a solution, but a means of gaining time, building up pressure and obtaining concessions."