Eskom financial report reveals board fees over R10 million and R3 billion in employee overtime
Electricity and Energy Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa has disclosed that R10 million was paid to Eskom board members and R3 billion in overtime to employees.
Image: File
The Eskom board of directors was paid more than R10 million in board fees during the 2023/24 financial year, while the entity's employees pocketed R3 billion in overtime during the same period.
This was disclosed by Electricity and Energy Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa when he was responding to parliamentary questions from EFF MP Mandla Shikwambana, who enquired about the annual expenditure on overtime for Eskom employees and the circumstances under which overtime was paid.
Shikwambana also wanted to know whether the 22 board meetings, averaging two meetings per month, as reported in the 2024 annual report, were pre-planned and the reasons for not planning them.
He also asked the total remuneration of each board member and whether the board members were subject to individual performance reviews.
In his written response, Ramokgopa said employees pocketed R3.03 billion during the 2023/24 financial year
He said the payment was for work outside the normal working hours that was approved for an emergency during a standby period, breakdown of plant, pre-arranged plant maintenance, commissioning of plant, authorised construction work on site or critical personnel shortages only for short periods not exceeding one month, among other things.
'Approximately 92% of the workforce is eligible for overtime,' Ramokgopa said.
He said 22 board meetings were held, and at least 10 were pre-scheduled for the period between April 2023 and March 2024.
He said non-executive directors had not been paid per meeting but had received a fixed annual fee based on their committee allocations.
'This fixed fee implicitly covered participation in up to eight scheduled board meetings. The remaining 14 meetings that exceeded the planned schedule did not attract any additional fees.'
Ramokgopa also said the additional meetings had been convened on an ad hoc basis to address urgent and time-sensitive matters that had required the immediate attention of the board.
'Several of these engagements had been necessitated by unforeseen and evolving developments. These additional meetings had not resulted in any additional payment of fees to the non-executive directors,' he said.
The additional meetings had primarily dealt with the group chief executive recruitment, National Transmission Company of South Africa board of directors recruitment, and the unbundling matters.
Board chairperson Mteto Nyati was paid R1.3m, Fathima Gany R1,081,000, Claudelle von Eck R1,061,000, Clive Le Roux R1 058 000 and Tryphosa Ramano R1,018,000.
Other board members - Leslie Mkhabela, Busisiwe Vilakazi, Bheki Ntshalintshali, Tsakani Mthombeni, Ayanda Mafuleka and Lwazi Goqwana - were paid amounts ranging from R933,000 to R676,000.
Ramokgopa said the amounts paid included fees for both board meetings and sub-committee meetings.
'The non-executive directors were remunerated by way of a fixed annual fee, which was determined based on their allocation to specific committees. This fee structure was not linked to the number of meetings attended. In addition to the fixed fee, non-executive directors were reimbursed for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the execution of their duties,' said the minister.
He further said that a collective assessment approach was currently in place based on the principle of a board of directors functioning as one unit.
'The last collective performance assessment of the board was undertaken in the financial year of 2024, and the outcomes of this assessment were shared with the shareholder representative.'
[email protected]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Will SA bear the cost of Eskom's R257bn air quality compliance?
Cooling towers at an Eskom coal-based power station in Duhva. Image: Mike Hutchings/Reuters SOUTH Africa's electricity crisis is about to get worse, not just because of load shedding, but because of the staggering cost of cleaning up Eskom's toxic air pollution. In a tense engagement with the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) Select Committee on Agriculture, Land Reform and Mineral Resources, Eskom executives dropped a bombshell: full compliance with stricter air quality laws would cost R257 billion in capital expenditure and R6.3bn per year in operational costs — potentially hiking electricity tariffs by 10%. Even more alarming? Without compliance, 22 gigawatts of Eskom's coal fleet — nearly half its capacity — could be forcibly shut down after 2030 due to sulphur dioxide violations. The revelations came as Eskom's chief executive, Dan Marokane, and Deputy Minister of Electricity and Energy, Samantha Graham-Mare, faced tough questions from MPs over the utility's financial constraints, its slow transition to cleaner energy, and the devastating health impacts of coal pollution on communities. Eskom has already spent R3bn on emission reduction projects, with another R15.6bn allocated over the next five years. But this is a drop in the ocean compared to what is needed. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Marokane admitted that while Eskom currently met SO² and nitrogen oxide limits, post-2030 regulations present an existential threat. The utility's proposed 'compromise' solution — focusing on SO² reductions at Kusile and Medupi, along with particulate matter upgrades at six other stations — would still require R77bn in capital and R2.1bn per year in operational costs. But even this plan is in jeopardy. Only R15.6bn has been budgeted for emissions projects over the next five years — far short of what's needed. Perhaps the most damning admission came from Deidre Herbst, Eskom's Senior Manager for Environment, who revealed that retrofitting the aging coal fleet for full compliance could take up to 14 years and more than R257bn — only for many of these plants to be decommissioned shortly afterward. 'Given the time frames, refitting most plants would be imprudent, constituting fruitless and wasteful expenditure,' Herbst said. Several power stations — Matla, Duvha, and Kriel — will shut down before flue-gas desulfurisation (FGD) plants can even be installed. Others, such as Lethabo, Tutuka, Matimba, and Kendal, will close shortly after FGD completion. 'Majuba and Matimba are in sparsely populated areas, limiting the health impact and cost benefit,' Herbst said — an utterance that drew sharp criticism from MPs who accused Eskom of downplaying the health risks to rural communities. MPs did not hold back in their criticism. DA MP Nico Pienaar demanded answers on why R40bn was being spent on diesel generation — money that could instead fund FGD plants. 'What happens if the new FGD plant isn't built and diesel turbines aren't closed, as per the World Bank agreement?' he asked. The DA's Sune Boshoff was even more scathing: 'Gauteng looks terrible when the wind blows. Is Eskom not wasting money on upgrading structures that won't exist much longer?' She slammed the projected 10% tariff hike to fund compliance, asking why alternative technologies and international funding were not being aggressively pursued. The EFF's Moses Kennedy pressed Eskom on whether independent health impact assessments had been conducted near Kendal, Matla, and Duvha stations, where residents suffer from chronic respiratory illnesses. Herbst admitted that while health benefits from cleaner stoves had been studied, power station health assessments were still lacking. Eskom's much-touted Just Energy Transition (JET) also came under fire. The state-owned utility's air quality offset programme — meant to provide cleaner energy alternatives to 96 000 households in Mpumalanga — has reached only 5 500 homes so far. Herbst claimed the rollout would accelerate, but MPs remained sceptical. Meanwhile, Northern Cape representatives Henri van den Berg (FF+) and Patricia Mabilo (ANC) pushed for green hydrogen and ammonia projects, arguing that they could create jobs. Deputy Minister Graham-Mare revealed that the EU had pledged €7bn for energy transition projects, including aviation sector decarbonisation. But with coal-dependent regions such as Mpumalanga facing massive job losses, MPs questioned whether the transition was truly 'just'. Marokane hinted at a controversial solution: nuclear energy. 'Most countries are building nuclear,' he said, suggesting that South Africa's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) should reconsider its stance. 'Nuclear stimulates economies and industrialisation.' Yet, with Eskom's finances in shambles and R50bn earmarked for new technologies — including a Medupi FGD plant — the feasibility of nuclear expansion remained doubtful. Eskom's dilemma is clear: Spend R257 billion to comply with air quality laws, raising tariffs by 10%. Risk 22 GW of shutdowns if they don't comply, plunging SA into darkness. Face public outrage over health impacts and job losses in coal regions. As Deputy Minister Graham-Mare admitted, 'This is about balancing interests with limited resources.' But for millions of South Africans choking on coal pollution and struggling with soaring electricity costs, that balance feels dangerously skewed. The question remains: Will Eskom clean up its act—or will South Africans pay the price for its failure? Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.
TimesLIVE
13 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
FAIS ombud upholds complaint against Luvuyo Burial and Consulting
The office of the ombud for financial services providers has issued a determination in favour of Pumelele Mantingani after financial services provider Luvuyo Burial and Consulting failed to honour a funeral policy claim. Luvuyo Burial's failure to honour the claim has also resulted in its licence as a financial services provider being suspended by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA). Mantingani, who took out a funeral policy with the company in September 2020, lodged a complaint with the ombud's office on October 28 last year after Luvuyo Burial and Consulting failed to honour a valid claim after the death of her uncle, Mbuyeni Katshi, on July 17 2024. Mantingani submitted her claim on July 27 2024. Luvuyo Burial and Consulting, based in Khayelitsha, Cape Town, acknowledged the claim and committed to payment, but only partially honoured the obligation, paying R5,000 of the R10,000 due. Despite further assurances, the balance remains unpaid. Numerous attempts were made by the ombud to resolve the matter amicably. Though Luvuto Burial undertook on more than one occasion to settle the outstanding balance, it failed to do so. During the investigation, it also came to light that Luvuyo Burial was operating without an underwriter, raising serious concerns regarding its compliance with regulatory requirements. In assessing the evidence, the office found that the policy was valid and that the deceased was listed as an insured life. However, Luvuyo failed to act in accordance with the policyholder protection rules, which require that: 'An insurer must, within two business days after all required documents in respect of a claim under a microinsurance policy or a funeral policy have been received, assess and make a decision whether the claim submitted is valid, and authorise payment of the claim, repudiate the claim or dispute the claim and notify the claimant of the dispute.' The ombud said the company's failure to process the claim appropriately reflected noncompliance with treating customers fairly outcome 6, which states that 'customers do not face unreasonable post-sale barriers when they want to change a product, switch providers, submit a claim or make a complaint'. As a result, the ombud upheld the complaint and ordered that Luvuyo Burial and Consulting pay the complainant the outstanding balance of R5,000 with interest at a rate of 11.25% per annum from the date of the determination until the date of final payment. 'Given the respondent's failure to comply with regulatory requirements, a copy of this determination was referred to the FSCA for its attention and possible enforcement action. 'As a result, the respondent's licence as a financial services provider was suspended by the FSCA on April 14,' the ombud said.
The Citizen
19 hours ago
- The Citizen
Denel presents its turnaround strategy to parliament, blames Covid-19 for poor performance
Retrenchments are on the cards for workers at Denel says CEO. The leadership of Denel appeared in front of the joint standing committee on defence. Picture: Reuters Workers at the state arms company Denel could be retrenched as part of the company's latest turnaround strategy. Denel CEO Tsepo Monaheng appeared before parliament on Friday to present his plans to save the ailing company. Since 2019, Denel has received around R10 billion in bailouts from the government. 'We are looking at restructuring the business so that we get cash into the business and one of those areas is to make sure that we go through the Section 189s and have the right people in the business,' he said. Despite Denel's ongoing battles with unions over wages, Monaheng said the company is forced to prioritise paying off its debt. Some of the debt goes as far back as 2019. 'Denel still has a lot of debt even when we make money the creditors take the money and the banks want their money so it makes it difficult for us to execute our turnaround strategy,' he said. He said the company had even considered selling some of its non-core assets to replenish its cash reserves. He said another part of the revenue-generating strategy is to ensure that the company secures more international contracts. 'The countries that are placing orders with us they have trust that Denel has turned a corner and we cannot disappoint by nonperformance, so performance is critical for us.' Monaheng said it is critical for the business to spend money in a justifiable manner as part of the turnaround strategy. 'Denel has incurred a lot of costs and in many cases, it is costs that we cannot even justify. If we had managed our money better at least we would be a break-even business.' He said the company hopes to derive more than 60% of its revenue from international contracts. 'Most of the export contracts if we execute them well the profits are good,' he said. He said another turnaround move is to ensure that customers all over the world trust the products that have been produced by Denel. When was the last time Denel made profit? Monaheng said the last time Denel was profitable was around 2016. 'The problem with loss making is that you are not generating cash so this means you are getting deeper and deeper into trouble because we do not have cash to fund our operations so that is why we had to go ask for money.' Monaheng blamed the Covid pandemic and internal problems for its poor performance over the years. He said the company depends on its foreign contracts which were difficult to obtain during the pandemic. He also pointed out that staffing problems in senior management positions had made accountability difficult. 'The other reason besides Covid that contributed to Denel's collapse in the past few years is the collapse of internal controls. 'So we are fixing that to make sure that there are no leakages in the business and we are doing what we are supposed to be doing at all times,' he said. ALSO READ: Adequate emergency reserves in place for occasional system constraints – Eskom MP's reaction to Denel's presentation Meanwhile, some parliamentarians demanded clarity on when Denel started failing since Monaheng had listed Covid as one of the factors. 'The first presenter said Denel started taking a nose dive in 2020 with Covid and that they have not been able to recover from Covid but it was also said the last time Denel was profitable was the 2015/16 financial year. 'But Covid happened in 2020 not in 2015 so what was the reason for the initial five years of Denel not being profitable?' said the parliamentarian. Wage increases This week workers at the company affiliated to the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (Numsa) protested outside the company's offices in Pretoria over the implementation of a past wage agreement They are demanding a 7% salary increase. NOW READ: Victory for Transnet: more cash incoming, union accepts salary increase
