Ford Recalls Nearly 200,000 Mustang Mach-E SUVs Because of Lock Malfunction
Ford is recalling 197,432 Mustang Mach-E SUVs from 2021 through 2025 model years over an issue that could trap children in the vehicle.
The door locks may not open from the exterior when battery power is low, potentially leaving back-seat occupants who can't use the inside door release—particularly children—unable to get out of the vehicle.
According to recall documents , the powertrain control module will need to be replaced on the affected vehicles.
Ford has issued a recall of nearly 200,000 Mustang Mach-E SUVs from 2021–2025 model years to fix a problem that could unexpectedly lock rear passengers in the vehicle.
The problem stems from a software glitch that appears when the car battery is low. The driver and front passenger may become locked out after leaving the vehicle and without the ability to open the doors from the outside. The issue is particularly concerning when rear-seat passengers are children who are unable to open the door latches from the inside.
An indication that can warn owners is that, with the key off, the Sync infotainment screen displays a "system to save power" warning or a blank screen. Another indication is that when exiting the vehicle through a front door, the customer could notice that the inside release handle needs to be pulled farther than normal to unlatch the door. There have been no reports of accidents or injuries related to the issue, although several owners have reported that they have been locked out of their vehicles because of it.
Ford states, in documents filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), that 100 percent of the vehicles have this defect. The affected models entered production in February 2020 through June 2025.
According to NHTSA, Ford plans to reach out to affected owners by mail starting June 23. In the meantime, Mustang Mach-E owners can get information on the NHTSA recalls website.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
37 minutes ago
- Forbes
250 Million Acre Public Land Sale Would Ruin The Off-Road Industry
Ford Performance at the 2025 King of the Hammers in Southern California's Johnson Valley. Since President Trump took office in January, the amount of threats to anything considered public—from a large slice of our nation's workforce to the media—have been unrelenting. Earlier this month, these threats took on a new form: potentially robbing the American people of millions of acres of public land. Unveiled on June 11th and revised on the 14th, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee's budget reconciliation bill outlines over 250 million acres, to be slightly more exact, that could be offered up for sale to private business. As reported on by Jonathon Klein of Ride Apart, this could have a tremendous negative impact on not just our natural resources, but every corner of the outdoor industry as well. For those amongst us who enjoy off-road driving (or hiking, camping, fishing, hunting, cycling, climbing, etc.), the possibility of being cut-off from lands where we savor such activity is very real. Klein points out one particular swath of land in Southern California, Johnson Valley—home to one of the world's top off-road racing events, King of the Hammers—is on the chopping block, which would not only be detrimental to this event, but every single industry that's involved in it. Automakers, the aftermarket performance and racing industries, tourism, general outdoor equipment industries; the list goes on. Take that same scenario and multiply it by every other parcel of land that outdoor enthusiasts could lose access to, and the damage would be extensive. For a good overall picture of what's on the chopping block, The Wilderness Society has created a handy map. Competitors at the 2020 King of the Hammers in Johnson Valley, California. But why is all of this land potentially for sale? As stated in the bill itself, as much as $15 billion in revenue could come from expanded oil, gas, coal, and geothermal leasing. Other aims include increased housing production, domestic energy security and timber production, as well as, in the bill's summarized words, 'ensuring states and counties benefit from energy projects on federal lands.' The Wilderness Society has also outlined a handful of counter arguments. In its words, 'research suggests that very little of the land managed by the BLM (Bureau of Land Management) and USFS (US Forest Service) is actually suitable for housing.' It also explains that the federal government can revoke national monument status and that certain changes would negatively impact sovereign Tribal Nations. We can't forget the fact that increased energy production carries its own environmental hazards, too. It's all bad and very unnecessary. One thing that truly makes America great is its beautiful natural land that's here for all of us to savor, and this bill could cut off a very significant portion of it. And again, there's the immense adverse effect on every single outdoor industry, especially off-road driving and racing, and the massive amount of American companies that feed it. Contact your US senator and let them know how you feel. Especially if you live in Utah, which is Senator Mike Lee's turf. He's Chairman of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and the creator of this bill—ironically, as many as 18 million acres of his state's land could potentially be up for sale. That's a lot of territory for off-road driving, hunting, shooting, fishing, climbing, camping, hiking, mountain biking, and so on.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
North Texas woman alleges discrimination, retaliation in lawsuit against Copart
For the first time, Christine Arnold is speaking publicly about her legal battle with Copart Inc., a North Texas-based Fortune 500 company and global leader in car auctions with locations in 11 countries. Arnold says it took years to rise to the position of vice president of human resources, a role she claims brought both authority and adversity. She alleges she experienced harassment and gender discrimination during her time at the company. Copart has described her allegations as baseless. "I'm angry," she told CBS News Texas, "We shouldn't be having conversations like this in 2025." Arnold says that in her role overseeing employee conduct, she was routinely dismissed whenever she tried to report misconduct by fellow executives, according to a new lawsuit. "There were just instances of just grossly unprofessional behavior; intoxication at work and leaving work, and obviously going somewhere where we became intoxicated and came back. [I was] unable to track someone down because they were at a club of, you know, a certain type," Arnold described in the lawsuit and to CBS News Texas. Allegations of unequal pay and stock disparities Arnold says she was also in charge of salaries, and claims in the lawsuit, the company withheld millions of dollars in stocks from her and her female colleagues. "In my position, I was given those documents. So, in looking at it, I noticed that there were only male names on that document. Five female vice presidents were left off that list. We received nothing. Myself being one of them," she said. Christine Arnold CBS News Texas Arnold says she complained about the stocks and was given a package worth around $200,000. She then alleged she complained about discrimination and harassment and was fired months later. "It's about making sure someone is held accountable for how myself and other women were treated at that company. I am a mother, and I have a daughter. I don't want her to go through this," she said. Copart denies allegations in legal filing CBS News Texas contacted Copart repeatedly for an interview or response to our questions, and has not heard back. However, Copart's law firm filed a response to her initial EEOC complaint in 2023. In that filing, the law firm states in part: "Copart fired Arnold because, on multiple occasions, Arnold used her position of significant authority and access to sensitive and sometimes personal employee information to violate — and threaten to continue violating — Copart's confidentiality policy. [BUTT] "At no point during Arnold's entire employment with Copart did Arnold ever assert a complaint of any alleged gender discrimination" .. and that Arnold created several fictional complaints." Text messages and testimony support claims, attorney says "What makes this case particularly compelling is the documentary evidence," Arnold's attorney, Rogge Dunn, said. He shared what he says is a text message from Arnold, which he argues, confirms she did complain to Copart's COO of gender discrimination in August of 20-21, 14 months before she was fired in October of 2022. He also says other women have since come forward anonymously, sharing similar stories. A copy of one of those alleged messages reads, "Thank you for making them take accountability. I wish I could." Hoping for change "The fact that she was head of HR, she complained, and they kept repeatedly telling her 'Stand down, we've got it handled.' Then, when you see the disparity of the millions of dollars of stock options and equity, that's compelling evidence," Dunn said. Arnold hopes her story inspires other women to come forward and creates what she argues is a better culture in her former company. "It felt like a family at one point. I hope someday they make the changes that they need to," Arnold said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla is set to launch its robotaxi service in Austin this weekend, entering a crowded autonomous vehicle field
The launch of Tesla's robotaxi service is tentatively set for this weekend in Austin, Texas, entering a crowded arena of autonomous vehicles already operating in the city. Tesla is competing with driverless Waymo taxis that are already transporting people around the city, while Amazon's Zoox and Volkswagen are testing robotaxis there too. Tesla's driverless taxi service launch has been highly anticipated by investors and fans, however, officials and lawmakers have expressed automotive safety concerns. On Wednesday, Texas lawmakers sent a letter to Tesla urging the company to delay its robotaxi service launch until September, when a new state law regulating autonomous vehicles takes effect. It adds to another letter, sent by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to Tesla last month, asking for additional safety information about its robotaxi rollout. That same month, Elon Musk, Tesla's chief executive, acknowledged the need for national regulations around autonomous vehicles. 'It's going to be important to have a unified set of national regulations for self-driving cars,' he told CNBC. 'Otherwise, you're going to get into this weird situation where, if you're driving from Maine to New York, you're going to go through 10 different sets of regulations. Cars are going to behave differently. It's not going to make any sense.' Here's what we know about the driverless service set to launch this weekend. For the initial launch of the fully autonomous ride-hailing robotaxi service, Tesla will use its internal fleet of Model Y electric vehicles, updated with the company's Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, without a driver. If the autonomous cars run into a safety issue, a remote driver can step in and take control of the vehicle. The Cybercab is Tesla's driverless taxi that will also rely on the FSD software without a human driving the vehicle. The initial launch of Tesla's robotaxi service won't include the Cybercab because it isn't expected to go into production until at least 2026. Musk says each Cybercab will likely cost less than $30,000 to produce. The fully autonomous vehicle won't have a steering wheel or pedals and will have a large center touchscreen. The two-passenger vehicle won't have a backseat or a rear window but will have a rear cargo area. Musk says it won't have a traditional charging port and will rely on inductive (wireless) charging, which will charge by parking over a pad embedded in a designated charging area. Musk said earlier this year that the service would launch sometime in June. Bloomberg News then reported the launch was poised to happen on June 12, citing a person familiar with the matter. Two days before the anticipated launch, Musk reposted a video on X that showed Tesla testing a self-driving Model Y car in Austin, with what appeared to be no driver. Later that day, Musk replied to a user on X that the tentative rollout of the robotaxi service was June 22. 'We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift,' Musk said. He also indicated that the first driverless trip from the Tesla factory to a customer's house will take place on June 28, which is the billionaire's birthday. The letter that Texas Democratic lawmakers sent Wednesday to Tesla's director of field quality urged the company to delay the robotaxi service launch until a new Texas law takes effect, on Sept. 1. The law revises previous state guidelines for autonomous vehicles and requires the operators to receive prior authorization from the Department of Motor Vehicles. The letter states that in order to get that authorization, Tesla needs to show: that the vehicles can operate while abiding by state traffic laws, have a recording device, comply with federal standards, are properly registered and insured, and can 'achieve a minimal risk condition' if the autonomous system stops working. The Texas lawmakers asked the company to provide 'detailed information demonstrating that Tesla will be compliant with the new law upon the launch of driverless operations in Austin' if they decide to proceed with the launch over the weekend. Yahoo News has reached out to Tesla for comment. In addition to the Model Y taxis being remotely monitored at first, Musk told CNBC that the vehicles will also be 'geofenced' to certain areas of Austin that Tesla considers the safest to navigate. 'We want to deliberately take it slow,' Musk said. 'I mean, we could start with 1,000 or 10,000 [robotaxis] on day one, but I don't think that would be prudent. So we will start with probably 10 for a week, then increase it to 20, 30, 40.' For the initial launch, the robotaxi service is expected to only be available to Tesla employees or by invite. 'The service will probably not be available to the general public for several months, analysts said,' according to the New York Times. Musk says he hopes to have by the end of 2026 'over a million Teslas' doing 'unsupervised full self-driving, where you do not need to pay attention.' Musk had originally promised in 2019 that there would be 1 million self-driving robotaxis on the road by 2020.
