Who was Gilbert? Minnesota lawmaker's beloved golden retriever euthanized after tragic shooting, here's why
Melissa Hortman, a senator from Minnesota, was assassinated by a suspected assassin who also severely wounded her cherished golden dog, forcing his euthanasia.
The Minnesota shooter identified as Vance Boelter killed the Democrat and her husband Mark. He also shot Gilbert, who was adopted by the Hortmans in 2021.
State Representative Erin Koegel disclosed that the couple's kids put him down when they discovered 'Gilbert wasn't going to survive.'
Democratic National Committee chair Ken Martin also condemned Gilbert's demise, adding that Boelter's 'cruelty knows no bounds,' as per Daily Mail.
Boelter, 57, who is accused of posing as a police officer, is also suspected of shooting and injuring state Senator John Hoffman and his spouse, Yvette, at their residence.
The congressman met Gilbert while working as a foster home trainer for the neighborhood shelter Helping Paws.
Also Read: US lawmaker Melissa Hortman broke down in tears hours before fatal Minnesota shooting: Watch viral video here
She and Mark, 58, began training Gilbert following the successful training of another dog, Minnie, to become a service animal.
Koegel clarified that Gilbert 'flunked out of school' and he instead joined the Hortman family.
Boelter's motivation for shooting Gilbert is still unclear, however the dog was fatally wounded when his master was killed.
After learning about Gilbert's death from Koegel, Martin slammed Boelter over the 'unspeakable' act of violence.
'Vance Boelter shot the dog while assassinating Melissa and Mark. The cruelty knows no bounds. My heart aches,' Martin wrote on social media.
A criminal complaint filed in Hennepin County was released from seal on Sunday, charging Boelter with two counts of second-degree murder and two counts of second-degree attempted murder.
Three of those offenses carry maximum 40-year prison sentences. According to jail records, his court date is set for Monday at 1:30 p.m. local time.
In the early hours of June 14, Boelter visited the residences of two more congressmen with the intention of killing them, as per Acting US Attorney Joseph Thompson, who also declared six new federal charges against him for assassination stalking, and shooting offenses.
If found guilty of federal murder or terrorism charges, Boelter might be put to death. In 1911, Minnesota eliminated the death penalty for state charges.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Biden rides Amtrak to DC office; asks for ice cream; spotted 'talking in the quiet car'
Former President Joe Biden has been making weekly trips via Amtrak to his government-assigned office in Washington, DC, though little is publicly known about the nature of his work there. During one of these trips, an Amtrak passenger expressed frustration to The New York Post, saying, "He was talking in the quiet car!" — a major etiquette breach for regular riders. The 82-year-old, who frequently travelled this route to Delaware throughout his 36-year Senate tenure, seems unfamiliar with current cafe car selections. When he requested ice cream, his preferred treat, but had to settle for a muffin instead. The Acela's "quiet car" is positioned second, after first class, where conductors and passengers strictly maintain silence by hushing violators. Another passenger who observed Biden conversing in the quiet car defended him. "If he's talking, it's because he's constantly approached," the individual explained, noting that whispered conversations are permitted. — BidenActivities (@BidenActivities) Fellow passengers have documented his journeys through photographs, including a May 8 brief conversation with CNN's Dana Bash. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Stunning 2-Bed Senior Houses: Take A Peek Inside! GoSearches | Search Ads Undo Last week, when his Amtrak train halted due to track problems near Baltimore, passengers gathered around the Democrat for photographs. Biden, who abandoned his re-election campaign last year following allies' concerns about his cognitive state, visits DC approximately weekly for meetings, according to the Wall Street Journal's report last month. According to the New York Post, various former Biden White House staff members express curiosity about his activities at his temporary office near DC's Union Station. A person knowledgeable about Biden's schedule indicated he holds meetings with current and former staff, and communicates with Congressional members and Democratic leadership. "He's also been attending events which are sometimes coordinated through the office," the person said. "He was just in Galveston, Texas, to attend a Juneteenth service as a recent example. Separately, he's working on his book and library and foundation phases of post-presidency," the person added.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Republican lawmaker sparks outrage with plan for ICE facility surrounded by alligator-filled moat
A Republican lawmaker from Florida, Attorney General James Uthmeier, has shocked many people with a wild new idea. He wants to build an immigrant detention center in the middle of the Everglades, surrounded by a moat full of alligators. He's calling it 'Alligator Alcatraz', and says it would help carry out mass deportations for ICE. The plan has sparked outrage and strong reactions from both supporters and critics, as per reports. He shared the idea on X in a short 1-minute video. Uthmeier said the Miami-Dade Collier Training Facility is a good place for this, it's 39 square miles and not being used much. He said it could hold 1,000 migrants within 1–2 months. He said it's cheap because they wouldn't need a big fence, alligators and pythons act like natural guards. His words, 'People get out, there's not much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons. Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide', as stated by Newsweek. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 'Swing is King': Mr. Hemant's Strategy Finally Explained in Free Session TradeWise Learn More Undo He strongly supports Trump's immigration and deportation plans, and said Florida will keep helping. 'This presents a great opportunity for Florida to work with Miami-Dade and Collier counties,' he said. The Department of Homeland Security reposted Uthmeier's video and seems to agree with the plan. DHS posted on X, " ALLIGATOR ALCATRAZ " will help state and local law enforcement arrest and detain immigrants under the 287g Program. Florida has 43% of all 287g ICE agreements in the U.S., followed by Texas with 14%, as stated in the report by Newsweek. Live Events What are people saying Tom Homan, Trump's former border chief, praised Trump: said the U.S. had the most secure border ever, and only 95 illegal border crossings were reported in 24 hours. Rep. Maxwell Frost, Democrat from Florida, said Trump's immigration plan is a 'taxpayer-funded kidnapping operation.' Sen. Alex Padilla, Democrat from California, said Trump's ICE is not focused on criminals, but going after families and taxpayers, according to the report by Newsweek. FAQs Q1. What is 'Alligator Alcatraz'? A proposed ICE detention center in the Everglades, surrounded by alligators. Q2. Who is planning the alligator moat ICE facility? Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, a Republican.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Israel-Iran War: Can Trump bomb Iran without asking? Capitol Hill says no, invokes War Powers Act
President Donald Trump is keeping his cards close. When asked whether the United States would join Israel's escalating military confrontation with Iran, he simply said, 'I may do it. I may not.' That was on June 18, just days after Israel launched strikes on Iranian territory. Since then, speculation has grown over whether Trump might authorise a U.S. military operation—without getting the green light from Congress . According to Department of State spokeswoman Tammy Bruce, 'He is the singular guiding hand about what will be occurring from this point forward.' But many lawmakers disagree. And they're rushing to reassert control. Congress says, "Not without us" The U.S. Constitution is clear: only Congress has the power to declare war. Live Events 'This is not our war,' said Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky. 'Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution.' Massie has introduced a resolution under the 1973 War Powers Act to stop any unauthorised U.S. strikes on Iran. He's joined by Democrat Ro Khanna of California, who posted on X, 'Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq or do you stand with the American people?' Over in the Senate, Democrat Tim Kaine has introduced a similar resolution. 'This resolution will ensure that if we decide to place our nation's men and women in uniform into harm's way, we will have a debate and vote on it in Congress,' he said. The War Powers Act: What it actually does Passed in 1973 after the Vietnam War and President Nixon's secret bombing of Cambodia, the War Powers Act was designed to limit the president's ability to launch military action unilaterally. It says, The president must notify Congress within 48 hours of launching military action. Military deployment without congressional approval is limited to 60–90 days. Congress must be consulted 'in every possible instance' before troops are committed abroad. The law was passed over Nixon's veto—but almost every president since has found ways to work around it. Why it's back in the spotlight As Israeli airstrikes continue and Trump hints at joining in, lawmakers worry that the U.S. could be dragged into another prolonged Middle East war. That's exactly what the War Powers Act was supposed to prevent. Bernie Sanders, the independent senator from Vermont, has proposed the No War Against Iran Act , which would prohibit the use of federal funds for any attack on Iran without a formal declaration of war or congressional authorisation. 'The recent escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran could quickly pull the United States into another endless conflict,' Senator Kaine warned. Can the President Act without Congress? Technically, the president is commander-in-chief of the military. Under Article II of the Constitution, Trump can respond to 'sudden attacks' or threats. But the power to start a war—that belongs to Congress. Still, history tells a different story. Since World War II, U.S. presidents have authorised military operations in Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf, Libya, Somalia, and more—without formal declarations of war. They've relied instead on broad laws like the 2001 and 2002 Authorisations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs), passed after the 9/11 attacks and before the 2003 Iraq invasion. Trump used the 2002 AUMF to justify the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in 2020. So does the War Powers Act have any real power? It's complicated. Congress can vote to end military action, but the president can veto that decision. Overriding a veto requires a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate—a rare feat in a divided Washington. In 2019, Congress tried to end U.S. support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen. Trump vetoed it. Then again in 2020, after the Soleimani strike, Congress passed a bill to limit Trump's powers to launch war on Iran. Trump vetoed that too. The War Powers Act has been criticised for being more symbolic than effective. Even President Joe Biden once led a Senate subcommittee that concluded the law was falling short of its original purpose. Opinions split, even within parties Not all Democrats back Kaine's resolution. Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania has said he would vote against it. He believes Trump should retain the option to preemptively strike Iran's nuclear infrastructure. On the Republican side, some are more cautious. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky said: 'No president can bomb another country without the permission of Congress.' He added, 'It's always been my belief that you don't go to war without the approval of Congress and bombing other countries is obviously war.' But others support Trump's freedom to act. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas said, 'A single bombing run, historically, has not been understood to require congressional authorisation.' Sustained warfare, he agreed, would require Congress to act. Senator Lindsey Graham took it a step further. 'If diplomacy is not successful,' he said, 'I would urge President Trump to go all in… If that means flying with Israel, fly with Israel.' The House and Senate are currently on recess, but both will be forced to vote on the new resolutions once they return. The outcome will test the strength of Congress's war-making authority. Meanwhile, Trump has made it clear he's watching the conflict closely. After cutting short a G7 trip in Canada, he returned to Washington and declared, 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran.' He added, 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding... We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' At its heart, this isn't just a legal or political issue. It's about whether the people, through their elected representatives, get to decide when America goes to war. For decades, war decisions have been drifting away from Congress and towards the Oval Office . This moment could shift that balance—or cement it. With Iran's nuclear programme in the crosshairs, and Israel already striking, the next move could redraw the map of the Middle East—and reshape America's role in it. And if history is any guide, the decision could be made by one man, not 535 lawmakers.
