logo
Trump's secret pact with narco terrorist El Chapo

Trump's secret pact with narco terrorist El Chapo

Time of India15-05-2025

Against the backdrop of US President
Donald Trump
's increasingly stringent immigration policies, including deporting illegal immigrants to El Salvador and a program offering migrants a $1,000 'self-deportation' stipend, the administration has entered into a deal with a dreaded narco
terrorist
. The Trump administration secretly arranged for nearly 20 relatives of Sinaloa Cartel kingpin Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán to enter the United States under an undisclosed agreement with his son, Ovidio Guzmán López.
The secretive pact, which is opposite to what Trump has been showcasing, points towards the start of a disturbing trend where terror fountainheads can manipulate their way into the US.
Trump's approach to illegal immigrants
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Acesso rápido a dinheiro para os grandes momentos da sua vida!
finanzero.com.br
Leia mais
Undo
The Trump administration has pursued measures to curb migration and has openly advocated deporting illegal immigrants to Salvadoran prisons under bilateral agreements despite legal experts deeming such plans unconstitutional, and sought to deploy the Alien Enemies Act to expel alleged gang members to El Salvador for $6 million to that country's government.
They also unveiled a $1,000 stipend plus travel aid to encourage migrants to 'self‑deport,' a policy denounced by advocates as coercive and legally dubious.
Live Events
A federal judge has already blocked rapid deportations to third countries absent proper asylum screenings, underlining judicial checks on executive overreach
Entry of narco terrorist El Chapo's family into the US
During this turmoil, the family members of Cartel kingpin 'El Chapo' were granted entry into the United States under a secretive agreement between the Trump administration and
El Chapo
's son, Ovidio Guzmán López. The Sinaloa Cartel is designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the US government, and Trump's agreement with them has sparked an international controversy around the world.
Ovidio Guzmán López, known as 'El Ratón,' was extradited to the US in September 2023 and is currently facing federal charges related to drug trafficking and money laundering. His next court appearance is scheduled for July, where he is expected to change his plea to guilty.
The family members, including El Chapo's ex-wife, Griselda López Pérez, and their daughter, crossed the border from Tijuana into San Diego last week, carrying suitcases and reportedly $70,000 in cash. They were received by US agents, a move confirmed by Mexican Security Secretary Omar García Harfuch, who stated that the crossing was part of a negotiation between Guzmán López and US authorities.
Mexican government's reaction
The Mexican government, led by President Claudia Sheinbaum, expressed surprise and concern over the lack of transparency surrounding the deal.
Sheinbaum criticized the US for negotiating with individuals associated with a designated terrorist organization, stating, 'They have said they do not negotiate with terrorists.' She demanded respect and coordination, emphasizing that unilateral decisions by the Trump administration affect Mexico's sovereignty.
This development comes amid heightened tensions between the US and Mexico over drug trafficking and border security. While the Trump administration has taken a hardline stance against cartels, including classifying them as terrorist organizations and proposing military action, this secretive deal raises questions about the consistency and transparency of US policy.
As the US continues to grapple with the opioid crisis, largely fueled by fentanyl trafficked by cartels like Sinaloa, the implications of this agreement remain to be seen.
Critics argue that such deals undermine international cooperation and the rule of law, while supporters may view them as pragmatic steps toward dismantling powerful criminal networks.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Says Harvard Acted 'Extremely Appropriately' During Talks, Likely To Reach A Deal Soon
Trump Says Harvard Acted 'Extremely Appropriately' During Talks, Likely To Reach A Deal Soon

News18

time12 minutes ago

  • News18

Trump Says Harvard Acted 'Extremely Appropriately' During Talks, Likely To Reach A Deal Soon

Last Updated: Harvard had sued the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies against Trump's efforts to block international students and cut federal grants. US President Donald Trump on Friday said Harvard has 'acted extremely appropriately" during negotiations and a deal could be announced soon, signalling a shift in his administration's efforts to target the university as a US judge blocked his ban on international students. 'Many people have been asking what is going on with Harvard University and their largescale improprieties that we have been addressing, looking for a solution. We have been working closely with Harvard, and it is very possible that a Deal will be announced over the next week or so," he said on his Truth Social platform. 'They have acted extremely appropriately during these negotiations, and appear to be committed to doing what is right. If a Settlement is made on the basis that is currently being discussed, it will be 'mindbogglingly" HISTORIC, and very good for our Country," he added. A source told CNN that while the Trump administration is engaged in talks with a very small circle of Harvard leadership, a final agreement has not been reached. Such an agreement could potentially resolve outstanding legal battles between the administration and the university. Trump had targeted Harvard by revoking its ability to host international students and scholars and freezing federal funding, after his allies argued that they were cracking down on antisemitism on the campus amid the Israel-Hamas war. US Judge Blocks Trump Ban On Foreign Students After Trump's statement, a federal judge blocked Trump's bid to block Harvard from enrolling foreign students, while legal proceedings continue. Harvard had sued the Trump administration to block foreign students and funding, arguing that they were illegal and unconstitutional. Harvard previously secured two temporary restraining orders from Burroughs against the government's move to bar international students, and the judge extended it with a preliminary injunction on Friday. In court filings, Harvard argued that Trump's actions were 'retribution for Harvard's exercising its First Amendment rights to reject the government's demands to control Harvard's governance, curriculum, and the 'ideology' of its faculty and students." It is worth mentioning that international students are a major source of revenue for Harvard, accounting for 27% of total enrollment at Harvard in the 2024-2025 academic year. Last week, US Education Secretary Linda McMahon said the administration believes Harvard has taken steps to combat antisemitism on campus and that some progress has been made. (with agency inputs) First Published:

Kolkata HC stays Didi's relief to SSC staff sacked by SC
Kolkata HC stays Didi's relief to SSC staff sacked by SC

Time of India

time13 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Kolkata HC stays Didi's relief to SSC staff sacked by SC

Mamata Banerjee KOLKATA: Calcutta HC Friday stayed till Sept 26 WB govt's interim relief for Group-C and Group-D employees of state-run schools who lost their jobs following a Supreme Court order on April 3. The state had announced monthly interim relief of Rs 25,000 for Group-C employees and Rs 20,000 for Group-D staff. Another section of candidates, who were waitlisted, moved HC for a stay on the scheme, arguing it "frustrated" the SC order. Justice Amrita Sinha held that the people whose jobs were terminated by the SC order could not be provided such support after the apex court had decided the issue of illegal appointments conclusively and opined that the appointments were a result of "fraud". Getting refund of money already disbursed to the beneficiaries would be a problem if the scheme was found to be in violation of law after the final hearing on a state review petition, she reasoned. HC also took note of the fact that the state welfare scheme was announced for a particular group who would not be doing any work. "Paying persons gratuitously, who are not serving the state but are either sitting at home or are engaged elsewhere, does not appeal to the court," Justice Sinha held. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pennsylvania: These Walk In Tubs Are Cheap (See Prices) Walk In Tub Discounts Learn More Undo HC stressed that the state had applied a "pick and choose" method for determining the beneficiaries of the welfare scheme. "There are two sets of candidates. One set comprises appointed candidates whose jobs were terminated and the other waitlisted candidates. Both sets are jobless now," Justice Sinha said, holding that the scheme for a particular group "intended to provide succour to the tainted terminated candidates". Justice Sinha acknowledged the state's legislative competence to draft a welfare scheme but said it should apply equally. "Whether it is proper for the state to create a class of favoured candidates out of a bigger class of unemployed candidates is a matter to be decided after hearing (all) parties."

Israel-Iran conflict LIVE: Trump says two weeks is ‘maximum' for Iran decision
Israel-Iran conflict LIVE: Trump says two weeks is ‘maximum' for Iran decision

The Hindu

time14 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Israel-Iran conflict LIVE: Trump says two weeks is ‘maximum' for Iran decision

Israel and Iran traded strikes a week into their war on Friday (June 20, 2025) as President Donald Trump weighed U.S. military involvement and key European ministers met with Iran's top diplomat in Geneva in a scramble to de-escalate the conflict. But the first face-to-face meeting between Western and Iranian officials in the weeklong war concluded after four hours with no sign of an immediate breakthrough. To give diplomacy a chance, Mr. Trump said he would put off deciding for up to two weeks whether to join Israel's air campaign against Iran. U.S. participation would most likely involve strikes against Iran's underground Fordo uranium enrichment facility, considered to be out of reach to all but America's 'bunker-buster' bombs. Whether or not the U.S. joins, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel's military operation in Iran would continue 'for as long as it takes' to eliminate what he called the existential threat of Iran's nuclear program and arsenal of ballistic missiles. Meanwhile, Tehran is ready to 'consider diplomacy' again only once Israel's 'aggression is stopped', Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said following talks in Geneva with his European counterparts on Iran's nuclear programme.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store