logo
ENع
Texas tort reform proposal could curb pricey verdicts in personal injury cases. Here's why

Texas tort reform proposal could curb pricey verdicts in personal injury cases. Here's why

Yahoo21-04-2025

Texas Republican lawmakers are pushing to overhaul how juries award damages in personal injury and wrongful death cases, generating a flurry of spending on advertisements for and against the proposal by business and legal groups.
Senate Bill 30, by Sen. Charles Schwertner, R-Georgetown, aims to restrain a 'rise in substantial verdicts' by limiting the medical costs that plaintiffs can claim to 300% of Medicare reimbursement rates and raising the standard of evidence for noneconomic damages for mental anguish and physical pain and suffering.
The tort reform bill would address 'a fundamental unfairness in civil trials over torts' and 'an unstable legal environment that is driving up costs for Texas families and businesses,' Schwertner, an orthopedic surgeon, told his colleagues on the Senate floor.
The Senate passed the measure by a 20-11 party-line vote Wednesday evening, advancing the bill to the House.
Introduced soon after the state's new business courts began operating, SB 30 is part of a broader effort by Republican state leaders to make Texas more attractive to corporations by limiting avenues for costly litigation against businesses. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, the three-term Republican who presides over the Senate, has designated the bill a priority alongside SB 31, which would make it harder for shareholders to sue publicly-traded companies, and SB 39, which would change how and when trucking companies can be held liable for accidents involving their drivers.
All three bills are supported by Texans for Lawsuit Reform, an influential political action committee that received $1 million from Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk in October. Musk moved both companies' headquarters to the Austin area last year.
More: Will a Texas bill shield trucking companies from crash lawsuits? It depends on who you ask
Supporters of SB 30, such as the Lone Star Economic Alliance, say the bill will " bring balance back to the courtroom, protect small businesses, and reduce inflated costs that ultimately burden all Texans.'
But the legislation has generated significant controversy, as was shown during seven hours of public testimony at a Senate State Affairs committee hearing and two hours of debate on the Senate floor. Democratic lawmakers and civil plaintiff attorneys say the bill would let defendants escape proportional punishment for wrongs they commit, particularly in sexual assault cases.
Sen. Roland Gutierrez, D-San Antonio, argued that SB 30 would decrease potential awards low enough to keep lawyers from taking some cases.
'Your constituents, from Brownsville down to El Paso, are going to have to face the reality that they're not going to have access to the courthouse because lawyers are not going to do it,' Gutierrez said on the floor. 'They're not going to go through the expense of having to fund these things if these damages are going to be done in such a way that their clients are not going to be made whole in a real way.'
The Texas Trial Lawyers Association, a major donor to both Democrats as well as Republicans, is at the forefront of opposition to the measure. The organization's president, Jack Walker, told the American-Statesman that he believes the bill is a 'money grab' for insurance companies.
'The more severely injured or damaged a victim is, the more this bill prohibits their recovery,' Walker said in a phone interview.
Consumer watchdog group Texas Watch also testified in opposition to the bill.
Schwertner's proposal limits the medical costs that plaintiffs can claim to 300% of the 2025 Medicare reimbursement rate with an adjustment for inflation. The provision is meant to prevent lawyers from 'colluding with providers who overdiagnose, overbill and overtreat' victims to come up with inflated medical charges, the bill's author said. It would also require lawyers to disclose their relationship to doctors involved in treatment in certain cases.
Opponents of the bill pointed out that doctors sometimes refuse to treat accident victims who can't pay for their costs upfront.
Gutierrez — an attorney who founded a legal firm with offices in Austin, San Antonio and McAllen — said that in personal injury cases he has occasionally represented, 'I'd send (victims) to the one doctor that I knew that would sign a letter of protection and not take any money, because these people didn't have any money, they didn't have insurance,' he said.
Noneconomic damages are also a point of contention in the proposed legislation. Currently, juries can look at each of six different categories, including disfigurement, loss of companionship and loss of enjoyment, to determine noneconomic damages. SB 30 would combine those six into two — past and future 'mental or emotional pain and anguish' and 'physical pain and suffering' — and raise the standards of proof for each. Past and future reputation damage is also included in the law.
Plaintiffs would need to prove their injuries through medical records to back up claims of suffering, or, in the case of sexual assault victims, show they made a 'prior consistent statement' or have documents proving their injuries. Schwertner added the additional language regarding sexual assault victims in a floor amendment after Sens. Judith Zaffirini, D-Laredo, and Angela Paxton, R-McKinney, raised concerns during the committee hearing.
Walker, the Texas Trial Lawyers Association president, argues that the added language isn't enough to ensure fair compensation in such cases, in which decades may have passed between the assault and the litigation and thus medical evidence is difficult to obtain.
'In cases of grooming, most of the time, there is no consistent statement because the groomer requires silence,' Walker said. 'The victim, during childhood, often doesn't realize what is happening to them.'
Several pro-business interest groups are advocating for the bill, including Texans for Lawsuit Reform, a political action committee that is a top donor to Texas Republicans and contributed $25 million to lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in the 2024 elections.
Additionally, the Lone Star Economic Alliance and a national business group, Protecting American Consumers Together, each announced six-figure and seven-figure ad buys, respectively, this month.
'Informed juries are better juries,' reads a billboard sponsored by the Lone Star Economic Alliance.
Countering that, a new and little-known group called Citizens for Integrity and Accountability ran a television ad opposing SB 30 on Fox News, Brad Johnson of The Texan reported April 3. The ad says the bill 'limits damages that victims can get from Chinese corporations, drug companies and priests found guilty of child molestation.'
During floor debate, Schwertner and Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, rejected claims that the bill would prevent Chinese-owned companies from facing accountability in the U.S.
A major concern of the bill's supporters are so-called 'nuclear verdicts,' which happen when juries award damages of more than $10 million in a single personal injury or death case. In his intent statement for SB 30, Schwertner wrote that 'lack of clear guidance' in the law 'makes juries susceptible to being misled by arbitrary figures or comparisons to unrelated cases that distort their perception of fair compensation.'
To address this, the bill directs that noneconomic damages are 'prohibited from being used to penalize or punish a defendant, make an example to others, or serve a social good,' as distinct from punitive damages.
Opponents of the bill argue that it would limit their ability to force defendants to fix their behavior, whether through a major lawsuit or the threat of one.
'We can say, 'You have got to make policy changes, or this is what you're facing,'' Dallas-based attorney Charla Aldous said in the March 31 Senate hearing. 'Then, after we get a nuclear verdict, we can use that verdict to effectuate the policy changes.'
Rep. Greg Bonnen, R-Angleton, is carrying SB 30's companion, House Bill 4806, in the lower chamber. Bonnen is a close ally of House Speaker Dustin Burrows and chairs of the House Appropriations Committee. Like Schwertner, he is also a physician.
The bill has not yet been referred to a House committee.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Texas tort reform bill generates controversy, spending war

Hashtags

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Think you know the basics of retirement planning? Think again. ‘There's a lot of ignorance out there.'
Think you know the basics of retirement planning? Think again. ‘There's a lot of ignorance out there.'

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Think you know the basics of retirement planning? Think again. ‘There's a lot of ignorance out there.'

For years, Jim Sexton has led financial-education classes at a local library. He's often struck by gaps in attendees' knowledge of retirement planning. 'Very few people understand what they need to know to help them prepare financially for the future,' said Sexton, a certified financial planner in Hudson, Ohio. 'There's a lot of ignorance out there about financial planning and retirement.' Israel-Iran clash delivers a fresh shock to investors. History suggests this is the move to make. 'I'm at my wit's end': My niece paid off her husband's credit card but fell behind on her taxes. How can I help her? 'I prepaid our mom's rent for a year': My sister is a millionaire and never helps our mother. How do I cut her out of her will? As Trump blasts Fed to lower rates, it's the bond market in need of convincing I'm 51, earn $129K and have $165K in my 401(k). Can I afford to retire when my husband, 59, draws Social Security at 62? He administers a five-question 'retirement fluency' test to help pre-retirees assess their knowledge. The results prove his point: many people lack a basic understanding of money issues. For example, in Sexton's test, only 30% of respondents know how much of one's healthcare expenses in retirement are, on average, covered by Medicare and other government programs. The answer: about two-thirds. When it comes to money matters, ignorance is costly. As you age, your margin for error tightens up: You no longer have another few decades to earn income from work to offset any misguided (or disastrous) financial decisions. Aside from lacking a long-term horizon to make up for your mistakes, you need to lean on your own resourcefulness and knowledge to navigate financial uncertainties that can upend retirement. Examples include managing your investments to withstand ever-volatile markets, rebalancing your portfolio so you don't outlive your money and exercising sound, informed judgment amid aggressive attempts to sell you everything from annuities to Medicare Advantage plans. Read: I'm 55 with a state pension in my future. Do I have to save as much as other people? Social Security is another frequently misunderstood topic, Sexton said. Pre-retirees may overlook the 8% increase in benefits they get each year by delaying Social Security past their full retirement age (until they reach 70). 'They know that Social Security benefits are taxable,' he said. 'But they may not know claiming strategies or how benefits are calculated.' As you near retirement, you should receive a Social Security statement in the mail. It explains in plain English how Social Security works. A bar graph shows how much money you might collect based on when you claim benefits. Even well before retirement, workers should make sure they have registered for a my Social Security account as the agency migrates more of its services online. 'People still struggle with what role Social Security plays and when they should start it,' said David Shotwell, a certified financial planner in Lansing, Mich. 'They might say, 'I'll retire at 66 and start Social Security at 66'' without weighing all their options. It's also easy to underestimate the medical costs you can incur in retirement. Medicare helps, but it doesn't cover everything. The average couple will spend $12,800 in their first year of retirement at age 65. To estimate your total healthcare expenses during retirement years, use Fidelity's free estimator (but brace yourself for the shock!). Read: Medicare may actually be in more trouble than Social Security There are many so-called rules of thumb that preretirees treat as gospel. Like many advisers, Sexton scorns these rules. He calls the popular 100-minus-your-age rule 'absurd.' (It involves subtracting your age from 100 to determine the percentage of equities you should have in your portfolio.) With people living longer, there's more risk in prematurely shifting too many assets into bonds and cash equivalents. Investing more conservatively makes sense as you age. But that doesn't mean you should necessarily own more bonds at 75 than 65. Another misguided rule: Retirees should withdraw 4% of their total nest egg in their first year of retirement. From there, you supposedly withdraw an inflation-adjusted amount tied to the prior year. In theory, that means you should not run out of money over a 30-year retirement. But not so fast. 'People still rely on the 4% rule and they shouldn't,' said Thomas Van Spankeren, a Chicago-based certified financial planner. 'Just last week, a new client who was laid off in his mid-50s says, 'I did the 4% rule and I'll be OK.'' Read: I'm 48 and want to retire next year. Do I have enough money to last me until I'm 98? Instead, Van Spankeren suggested they customize a financial plan. The 4% rule is built on assumptions that may prove faulty, he says, so it can derail retirees' plans. Speaking of assumptions, you might assume seasoned investors in their 50s and 60s would acquire the wisdom to buy and sell stocks with prudence and patience. Again, not so fast. As they approach retirement, otherwise smart, successful investors can get caught up in mass psychology. If they missed the surge in stocks over the last 15 years or so, they may feel compelled to overload on equities now. 'For many years, it was all about TINA [there is no alternative],' Van Spankeren said. 'It's tough to stay disciplined, especially with performance-chasing' if you keep buying stocks and expecting big gains. Savvy investors, by contrast, adopt a broader perspective. They think in terms of TARA [there are reasonable alternatives], not TINA. Retirement fluency means keeping an open mind about all types of investments. If risk-free cash yields hover near 4% and investment-grade corporate bonds pay over 5%, exploring these and other alternatives can produce decent returns for retirees content to hit singles, not home runs. 'They should focus on the returns they need [in retirement], not the returns they desire,' Van Spankeren said. Read: The guy behind retirement's 4% rule now thinks that's way too low. Here's how much more money you could spend. Perhaps the most vexing issue for preretirees is predicting how long they will live. Consider one of Sexton's questions in his 'retirement fluency' test: 'On average in the U.S., how long will a 65-year-old man/woman live?' Only 32% of test takers pick the right answer: 84 for men, 87 for women. 'The biggest issue in financially planning for your retirement is your longevity,' said Ben Loughery, an Atlanta-based certified financial planner. That's why he analyzes a client's family medical history to predict their life expectancy. That serves as a starting point for estimating the portfolio performance they'll need to enjoy their retirement years. Read: Opinion: Annuities are looking good right now. So why aren't people buying them? I'm 75 and have a reverse mortgage. Should I pay it off with my $200K savings — and live off Social Security instead? 'I'm 68 and my 401(k) has dwindled to $82,000': My husband committed financial infidelity and has $50,000 in credit-card debt. What now? Why the biggest-ever 'triple witching' options expiration could deliver a jolt to Friday's trading Israel-Iran conflict poses three challenges for stocks that could slam market by up to 20%, warns RBC Tech companies lead list of double-digit gains in June for stocks in the S&P 500 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store