Dundee and VAR: Willie Collum insists ref was right on Ross County penalty that relegated St Johnstone
Willie Collum says Nick Walsh was right to award the penalty kick that denied Dundee a crucial victory over Ross County and relegated St Johnstone.
Heading into stoppage time in the penultimate fixture of the season, the Dark Blues were leading 1-0 at Dens Park.
A win would see the Dee safe from relegation and would also give Saints the opportunity to overtake the Staggies on the final day.
However, ref Nick Walsh controversially punished Antonio Portales for handball and Ronan Hale equalised from the spot.
The decision was branded 'an absolute disgrace'.
However, head of refereeing Collum has backed his official.
In the monthly VAR Review from the SFA on YouTube, audio from the incident has been released.
After the ball brushed Portales's arm, VAR Andrew Dallas said: 'I need to check that.'
Referee Nick Walsh: 'Penalty. Handball. I think the arm is above shoulder height.'
VAR: 'Slight touch on his head and then it hits off the hand.
VAR: 'Nick, it's Andrew. We're just going to check the APP (attacking phase of play). Just to tell you his team-mate's headed it and [Portales] has his back to him.
'But the arm is above the head, above shoulder height. It's close proximity but it does hit his hand and it's above shoulder height.
'There's no impact from the attacker on the defender.
'Confirming on-field decision of penalty kick. Check complete.'
Willie Collum defended the decision but admitted interpretation of the handball law may change for next season.
He said: 'We have listened to a lot of the perception of the decision. I won't ever just defend decisions in this show.
'I'll be open and transparent.
'In terms of the laws of the game, this is a correct interpretation because the arm is far too high above the head.
'The referee is right in his judgement to award the penalty kick.
'There is nothing in the law to say it should be ruled out. It says that anybody with an arm high in the air runs the risk of being punished.
'The referee was very clear, the VAR discuss the situation so when that is clarified there is no reason to bring the referee to the monitor here.
'People have said that but why?
'In terms of law this season, that is a correct interpretation.
'I would say we think we are in a better place in terms of handball. We looked at a lot of clips from last season to learn. This is a clip we need to look at again.
'We have a lot of discussion post-season with this kind of incident.
'There's a possibility next season [it isn't given]. We will listen to people's views. There are a lot of ifs and buts but in terms of law nobody can say that isn't given.'
The VAR Review also covered two other controversial decisions that went against the Dark Blues.
Collum admitted he was 'disappointed' in VAR's process to review a push by Kilmarnock's Kyle Vassell on Simon Murray not because it was a foul but because it was outside the area.
Another involving Antonio Portales proved far more controversial. The Mexican had already volleyed in one beauty against Motherwell and struck another into the top corner to put Dundee 2-0 up.
However, offside was given against Clark Robertson in the build-up, a decision then-Dee boss Tony Docherty blasted as a 'disgrace'.
Again Collum backed the decision but admitted the referee should have been brought to the monitor to review it personally.
He said: '[Clark Robertson] comes out to challenge the Motherwell player and moves his leg to challenge. Making that challenging motion, that was enough for the VAR team to say this was impact.
'We shared this clip far and wide. The KMI panel looked at it in detail, we looked at it with the referees.
'It was probably 60-40 in favour of offside. That means we want to review it, look at it in the close season with the clubs, players and coaches as well as the match officials to think about our direction of travel moving forward.
'We are content with the decision. Where we are not content is the process. Categorically, the referee should have been brought to the monitor.
'This is not a factual decision. It is factual that the player is offside, but subjective whether he impacts the move.
'That should be left to the on-field match official.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Canelo Alvarez reveals why Terence Crawford is BETTER than Floyd Mayweather… but vows to learn from infamous loss
CANELO ALVAREZ believes Terence Crawford is a BETTER fighter than Floyd Mayweather - the man who handed him his first-ever loss. The Mexican superstar was outclassed over 12 rounds by undefeated great Mayweather in 2013 - while only 23 years old. Advertisement 3 Canelo Alvarez lost to Floyd Mayweather in 2013 Credit: Getty Images - Getty Fast forward 12 years and Canelo once again faces another undefeated American in Las Vegas - this time Crawford. The mega-fight - streamed on Netflix on September 13 - has drawn comparisons between Canelo's fight with Mayweather over a decade ago. But he said: "I think Crawford is better than Mayweather because he turns his guard to both sides, he's more intelligent. "I think he's better than Floyd Mayweather. That's what I think." Advertisement READ MORE IN boxing BRAWL OVER IT Crawford says there's 'nothing' Canelo can do to beat him even in the streets Canelo bounced back from defeat to Mayweather - who retired at 50-0 in 2017 - to carve out a Hall of Fame career. But the harrowing points loss is not the the only reason four-division champion Canelo improved so vastly. He said: "I learned in every single fight not just in the Mayweather fight but I learned everything and for every fight. "I'm gonna put all my experience there because I'm gonna need it." Advertisement 3 CASINO SPECIAL - BEST CASINO BONUSES FROM £10 DEPOSITS Canelo, 34, defends the super-middleweight titles he regained by beating Cuban William Scull, 32, in May in Riyadh. Crawford, 37, meanwhile returns for the first time since beating Israil Madrimov, 30, last August to win the 154lb WBA title. Advertisement Terence Crawford says there is 'nothing' Canelo Alvarez can do to beat him.. He is unbeaten at 41-0 having won belts from lightweight to super-welterweight - now attempting to become undisputed champ at THREE weights. And Canelo admitted: "He can use both guards. He can do everything he can counterpunch, move around, he's a complete fighter. "He's gonna be a difficult fight but you know it's nothing new for me." 3 Canelo facing off with Crawford Credit: AFP
Scottish Sun
10 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Terence Crawford says there is ‘nothing' Canelo Alvarez can do to beat him… even in a STREET fight
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) TERENCE CRAWFORD warned Canelo Alvarez there is nothing he can do to beat him - even in a STREET fight. The unbeaten American jumps two divisions to challenge for Canelo's undisputed super-middleweight world title on September 13 in Las Vegas. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 Terence Crawford says he would beat Canelo Alvarez even in a street fight Credit: AFP 4 Canelo faces Crawford on September 13 in Las Vegas Credit: Reuters Canelo once talked down the blockbuster bout - believing he had nothing to gain from beating a man who started his career at lightweight. So the Mexican great was probed on the damage a loss to two-time undisputed champ Crawford would have on his iconic record. But cool as ice Canelo, 34, replied: "He's not gonna beat me. Don't worry about it, he's not going to beat me. "I think this fight is going to be in the history books of boxing, for sure." READ MORE IN boxing CRAW TO BE KIND Crawford says Canelo bout biggest in 20 YEARS & lifts lid on sharing dinner Crawford, 37, snapped back: "For sure them belts are coming with me, they're coming home with me. "I'm taking them, and there ain't nothing you can do about it come fight night. I promise you. You see I'm different than all the others ones." Canelo - who has won titles all the way from 154lb to 175lb - countered: "You don't look different. Nothing different." Crawford has not returned since last August when he beat Israil Madrimov, 30, for WBA light-middleweight title. 4 CASINO SPECIAL - BEST CASINO BONUSES FROM £10 DEPOSITS Meanwhile, Canelo regained his undisputed 168lb throne with victory over William Scull, 32, in May in Riyadh. He now headlines on Netflix at the Las Vegas Raiders' £1BILLION 65,000-seater stadium against Crawford - who says there is no way he loses to Canelo - in the ring or otherwise. Terence Crawford opens up on dinner with Canelo Alvarez ahead of 'biggest fight in 20 YEARS' He said: "Come on, man. You know what I do. "I don't have to talk about it, on the streets me against anybody, I ain't ever gonna say another man can whoop me. That's your answer there." But Canelo hit back: "We're not talking about the streets we're talking about boxing, the beautiful sport of boxing."
BBC News
14 hours ago
- BBC News
SFA say Rangers fine 'in keeping with rules'
The Scottish FA say the imposition of a fine on Rangers following a comment by John Brown made on club media "was entirely in keeping with the application of the rules".Rangers said on Thursday the SFA "will be watched closely" after the £3,000 a match against Hibernian, Nicolas Raskin appeared to bundle the ball over the line, with the SFA's key match incident panel later ruling the goal should have Ibrox club feel there has been a "lack of consistency with the Scottish FA's policing of similar incidents".But the SFA said a recent "sanction imposed on Richard Foster of Motherwell FC for comments of a similar nature in the media, attests to" consistency. On 17 May at Easter Road, referee Nick Walsh and his on-field officials thought the ball had been kept out by Hibs defender Rocky Bushiri, and VAR Andrew Dallas ruled that there was no camera angle that proved Raskin's effort had gone equalised through Kieron Bowie moments later, with the match finishing said on the club's in-house TV channel: "I would say it is corrupt."Commentator Tom Miller replied: "Well, I'm not sure we can actually say that." However, Brown added: "Well, I am saying it."Rangers subsequently demanded the introduction of goal-line technology and said of the fine on Thursday: "If this is now the standard, they will be watched closely to ensure it is applied across the board, consistently, without exception and without favour."However, the SFA countered: "The sanction imposed by an independent panel was entirely in keeping with the application of the rules."Investigations were undertaken in previous cases outlined and that the compliance officers of the time saw fit to issue a censure by way of warning letter for potential breaches deemed insufficiently serious to be progressed to a notice of complaint."We have requested written reasons from the panel chair involved in the tribunal and in the interests of transparency will publish in due course."The SFA added that the relevant protocol had been introduced "in response to the referee strike of 2010, when match officials campaigned for greater protection after enduring sustained personal criticism from clubs and fans"."Ahead of a new season, we remind clubs of their responsibilities in this regard," the governing body said.
