Leo, the first US Pope, criticises nationalist politics
Pope Leo has criticised the emergence of nationalist political movements, calling them unfortunate, without naming a specific country or national leader.
Leo, the first Pope from the US, asked during a mass with a crowd of tens of thousands in St Peter's Square that God would "open borders, break down walls (and) dispel hatred".
"There is no room for prejudice, for 'security' zones separating us from our neighbours, for the exclusionary mindset that, unfortunately, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms," said the pontiff.
Leo, the former Cardinal Robert Prevost, was elected on May 8 to succeed the late Pope Francis as leader of the 1.4-billion-member church.
Before becoming pontiff, Prevost was not shy about criticising US President Donald Trump, sharing numerous disapproving posts about Trump and Vice President JD Vance on X in recent years.
The Vatican has not confirmed the new Pope's ownership of the X account, which had the handle @drprevost, and was deactivated after Leo's election.
Francis, Pope for 12 years, was a sharp critic of Trump.
The late Pope said in January that the president's plan to deport millions of migrants in the US during his second term was a "disgrace".
Earlier, Francis said Trump was "not Christian" because of his views on immigration.
"A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian," Francis said when asked about Trump in 2016.
Leo was celebrating a mass for Pentecost, one of the church's most important holidays.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
23 minutes ago
- CBS News
Mahmoud Khalil arrives in New Jersey after release from ICE custody
Mahmoud Khalil has arrived in New Jersey after a federal judge ordered his release from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention in Louisiana. The Columbia University graduate and activist arrived on a flight to Newark Liberty International Airport on Saturday after spending months in ICE custody as the Trump administration fights to deport him. He is speaking with reporters at the airport. Watch his remarks in the player above. Khalil released after being detained by ICE for months The Trump administration has been seeking Khalil's deportation for his role in Columbia campus protests against Israel. He has not been charged with any crimes, but the administration says he should leave the country due to activities it deems are aligned with Hamas. "Trump and his administration, they chose the wrong person for this," Khalil said, addressing reporters after leaving the facility on Friday to return to New York. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Michael Fabiarz ruled Khalil is neither a threat to his community nor a flight risk. He called Khalil's detention "highly unusual" and the federal government's actions "an effort to use the immigration charge to punish the petitioner" for his anti-Israel speech. Mahmoud Khalil, an Algerian citizen and U.S. permanent resident, center, speaks after his release from an ICE processing center in Jena, La., Friday, June 20, 2025. Matthew Hinton / AP The government had said in court papers that Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined that Khalil's "presence or activities [in the United States] would compromise a compelling U.S. foreign policy interest." Despite rejecting Rubio's determination to continue to hold Khalil on foreign policy grounds, the judge left open a path for the government to continue its effort to deport him for reasons such as problems with his green card application. Ultimately, the judge determined Khalil does not need to be detained while the deportation proceedings play out. He said he would not order electronic monitoring either. Khalil's arrest set off series of protests Khalil was arrested by federal immigration agents in the lobby of his Columbia-owned Manhattan apartment on March 8, setting off a series of protests and nationwide discussions over free speech. Hours after his arrest, he was transferred to a detention center in Jena, Louisiana, far from his legal team and pregnant wife. The government refused to release him to attend the birth of his son. Khalil's arrest was the first of several similar incidents across the country. Another Columbia activist, Mohsen Mahdawi, who has a green card, was arrested on April 14. Mahdawi was detained for allegedly posing a risk of "adverse foreign policy consequences." He was released about two weeks later by a federal judge who ruled that he was likely being punished for protected speech. He graduated from Columbia after his release. Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University graduate student, was released in May at the order of a federal judge after she was detained for more than a month. Her attorneys said she was taken into custody over to an op-ed she wrote for a campus newspaper. contributed to this report.
Associated Press
32 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge blocks the Trump administration's National Science Foundation research funding cuts
BOSTON (AP) — A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump 's administration from making drastic cuts to research funding provided by the National Science Foundation. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston struck down on Friday a policy change that could have stripped universities of tens of millions of dollars in research funding. The universities argued the move threatened critical work in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, semiconductors and other technology fields. Talwani said the change, announced by the NSF in May, was arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law. An email Saturday to the NSF was not immediately returned. At issue are 'indirect' costs, expenses such as building maintenance and computer systems that aren't linked directly to a specific project. Currently, the NSF determines each grant recipient's indirect costs individually and is supposed to cover actual expenses. The Trump administration has dismissed indirect expenses as 'overhead' and capped them for future awards by the NSF to universities at 15 % of the funding for direct research costs. The University of California, one of the plaintiffs, estimated the change would cost it just under $100 million a year. Judges have blocked similar caps that the Trump administration placed on grants by the Energy Department and the National Institutes of Health.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Electric vehicle (EV) tax breaks may hit a dead end under Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
If you're considering buying an electric vehicle, now may be the time to act. A sweeping Republican-led proposal, referred to as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' is charging through Congress and threatens to wipe out the popular electric vehicle (EV) tax credit for most vehicles in 2025. The credit was originally launched in 2008, but received a major overhaul under former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. That legislation supercharged incentives, expanding the $7,500 credit for new EVs and rolling out a $4,000 credit for used electric vehicles. 'The purpose of the tax incentives was simply to spur EV adoption by giving a literal 'incentive' for people to buy EVs,' says Dave Thomas, director of content marketing and automotive industry analyst at CDK Global, a technology firm serving car dealerships. However, President Donald Trump and other Republicans have vowed to eliminate the credit, but analysts say the tax credit has been a driving force behind the EV boom. According to J.D. Power's E-Vision Intelligence Report, 87 percent of EV shoppers in 2024 took advantage of the tax credit — many citing it as a key reason for their purchase. That momentum could stall if the bill clears the Senate and makes its way to the president's desk. Here's what's at stake under the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Learn more: Should you buy an electric car? How to decide in 2025 Under the current law, which covers cars purchased in 2023 or later, taxpayers can claim the electric vehicle tax credit if they meet specific income and purchase requirements. For new electric vehicles, you may qualify for a credit of up to $7,500, as long as the vehicle is primarily used in the United States. To be eligible, your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) must fall below the following limits: $300,000 for married couples filing jointly or a surviving spouse $225,000 for head of household filers $150,000 for all other filers The IRS allows taxpayers to apply the income limit based on the year they take possession of the vehicle or the prior year — whichever is more favorable. For used electric vehicles purchased in 2023 or later, the credit is worth up to $4,000 or 30 percent of the purchase price, whichever is less. The vehicle's purchase price must not exceed $25,000, and you must buy the car from a licensed dealer. Also, the car must be at least two years old when you purchase it; for example, if you bought the car in 2025, it would have to be a 2023 model or older to qualify for the credit. Used EVs have lower income limitations than newer EVs as follows: $150,000 for married couples filing jointly or a surviving spouse $112,500 for head of household filers $75,000 for all other filers Another benefit: You can receive the credit at the time of the purchase instead of waiting until tax time to claim it, by transferring the tax credit to the dealer. If you choose this option at the dealership, you must still meet all the IRS requirements when filing your tax return. Learn more: 10 easy tax deductions and credits to cut your tax bill Much like the House-approved tax bill, the Senate proposal seeks to eliminate the electric vehicle tax credit for both new and used vehicles. But the Senate's timeline moves even faster. Here's how the two versions compare: House version Senate version Value of tax credit $0 for all EVs $0 for all EVs Expiration date End of 2025 for most EVs 180 days after bill becomes law for new EVs90 days after bill becomes law for used EVs New federal annual fee for EV owners $250 for EVs $100 for hybrids $0 The main difference between the House-approved bill and the Senate's version is how quickly the EV tax credit would end. Under the Senate's proposal, the $7,500 tax credit for new electric vehicles would expire 180 days after the bill becomes law. The $4,000 credit for used EVs would phase out even sooner — just 90 days after enactment. By contrast, the House bill would end the EV tax credit for most vehicles at the end of 2025. However, some vehicles could still qualify through the end of 2026. Plus, the House version includes a manufacturer-based phaseout. Automakers that have sold fewer than 200,000 EVs could still offer the credit until the end of 2026. 'So, Tesla for example will not have any incentives on its vehicles after the bill passes,' Thomas says. 'It will likely be hard for car shoppers to track this in real-time, and they will have to rely on research or their local car dealer to keep on top of it.' MORE: New charitable giving tax deduction worth up to $2,000 may be on way for millions While the House-approved bill includes a $250 annual fee, the Senate's version omits any mention of an annual EV charge. The House's proposed fee for electric vehicle owners is a measure aimed at ensuring all drivers contribute equally to maintaining the nation's roadways. Currently, owners of gas-powered cars help fund highway infrastructure through the 18.4 cents per gallon federal gas tax. But that tax has remained unchanged since 1993, even as the cost of maintaining roadways has skyrocketed. Plus, cars have become more fuel-efficient — and some drivers have switched to electric cars. But some experts argue the proposed $250 EV fee is excessive. The proposed fee would be nearly three times what the average driver pays annually in gas taxes, according to a Consumer Reports study. 'The proposal of an annual fee for EVs makes sense on its face as those owners don't pay the federal or local gasoline taxes,' Thomas says. 'However, most calculations say the average driver pays around $100 in gas taxes a year and this fee is clearly more than that.' And EV owners often do pay state and local fees tied to their cars, depending on the tax rules of the state where they live. While the Senate bill wouldn't charge EV owners an annual fee and the House includes it, both chambers agree on one thing: Eliminating the federal EV tax credit altogether. With the EV credit potentially ending soon, drivers considering an EV purchase may want to act quickly. Waiting could mean missing out on valuable tax incentives that can help lower the cost. Learn more: 5 tax deductions you can claim without itemizing Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
