All Sharks Follow This Centuries-Old Mathematical Rule
Townsville, Australia:
From hand-sized lantern sharks that glow in the deep sea to bus-sized whale sharks gliding through tropical waters, sharks come in all shapes and sizes.
Despite these differences, they all face the same fundamental challenge: how to get oxygen, heat and nutrients to every part of their bodies efficiently.
Our new study, published today in Royal Society Open Science, shows that sharks follow a centuries-old mathematical rule – the two-thirds scaling law – that predicts how body shape changes with size. This tells us something profound about how evolution works – and why size really does matter.
What Is The Two-Thirds Scaling Law?
The basic idea is mathematical: surface area increases with the square of body length, while volume increases with the cube. That means surface area increases more slowly than volume, and the ratio between the two – crucial for many biological functions – decreases with size.
This matters because many essential life processes happen at the surface: gas exchange in the lungs or gills, such as to take in oxygen or release carbon dioxide, but also heat loss through skin and nutrient uptake in the gut.
These processes depend on surface area, while the demands they must meet – such as the crucial task of keeping the body supplied with oxygen – depend on volume. So, the surface area-to-volume ratio shapes how animals function.
Despite its central role in biology, this rule has only ever been rigorously tested in cells, tissues and small organisms such as insects.
Until now.
Why Sharks?
Sharks might seem like an unlikely group for testing an old mathematical theory, but they're actually ideal.
For starters, they span a huge range of sizes, from the tiny dwarf lantern shark (about 20 centimetres long) to the whale shark (which can exceed 20 metres). They also have diverse shapes and lifestyles – hammerheads, reef-dwellers, deep-sea hunters – each posing different challenges for physiology and movement.
Plus, sharks are charismatic, ecologically important and increasingly under threat. Understanding their biology is both scientifically valuable and important for conservation.
How Did We Test The Rule?
We used high-resolution 3D models to digitally measure surface area and volume in 54 species of sharks. These models were created using open-source CT scans and photogrammetry, which involves using photographs to approximate a 3D structure. Until recently, these techniques were the domain of video game designers and special effects artists, not biologists.
We refined the models in Blender, a powerful 3D software tool, and extracted surface and volume data for each species.
Then we applied phylogenetic regression – a statistical method that accounts for shared evolutionary history – to see how closely shark shapes follow the predictions of the two-thirds rule.
What Did We Find?
The results were striking: sharks follow the two-thirds scaling rule almost perfectly, with surface area scaling to body volume raised to the power of 0.64 – just a 3% difference from the theoretical 0.67.
This suggests something deeper is going on. Despite their wide range of forms and habitats, sharks seem to converge on the same basic body plan when it comes to surface area and volume. Why?
One explanation is that what are known as 'developmental constraints' – limits imposed by how animals grow and form in early life – make it difficult, or too costly, for sharks to deviate from this fundamental pattern.
Changing surface area-to-volume ratios might require rewiring how tissues are allocated during embryonic development, something that evolution appears to avoid unless absolutely necessary.
But Why Does It Matter?
This isn't just academic. Many equations in biology, physiology and climate science rely on assumptions about surface area-to-volume ratios.
These equations are used to model how animals regulate temperature, use oxygen, and respond to environmental stress. Until now, we haven't had accurate data from large animals to test those assumptions. Our findings give researchers more confidence in using these models – not just for sharks, but potentially for other groups too.
As we face accelerating climate change and biodiversity loss, understanding how animals of all sizes interact with their environments has never been more urgent.
This study, powered by modern imaging tech and some old-school curiosity, brings us one step closer to that goal.
(Authors: Jodie L. Rummer, Professor of Marine Biology, James Cook University and Joel Gayford, PhD Candidate, Department of Marine Biology, James Cook University)
(Disclosure Statement: Jodie L. Rummer receives funding from the Australian Research Council. She is affiliated with the Australian Coral Reef Society, as President. Joel Gayford receives funding from the Northcote Trust.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
a day ago
- NDTV
All Sharks Follow This Centuries-Old Mathematical Rule
Townsville, Australia: From hand-sized lantern sharks that glow in the deep sea to bus-sized whale sharks gliding through tropical waters, sharks come in all shapes and sizes. Despite these differences, they all face the same fundamental challenge: how to get oxygen, heat and nutrients to every part of their bodies efficiently. Our new study, published today in Royal Society Open Science, shows that sharks follow a centuries-old mathematical rule – the two-thirds scaling law – that predicts how body shape changes with size. This tells us something profound about how evolution works – and why size really does matter. What Is The Two-Thirds Scaling Law? The basic idea is mathematical: surface area increases with the square of body length, while volume increases with the cube. That means surface area increases more slowly than volume, and the ratio between the two – crucial for many biological functions – decreases with size. This matters because many essential life processes happen at the surface: gas exchange in the lungs or gills, such as to take in oxygen or release carbon dioxide, but also heat loss through skin and nutrient uptake in the gut. These processes depend on surface area, while the demands they must meet – such as the crucial task of keeping the body supplied with oxygen – depend on volume. So, the surface area-to-volume ratio shapes how animals function. Despite its central role in biology, this rule has only ever been rigorously tested in cells, tissues and small organisms such as insects. Until now. Why Sharks? Sharks might seem like an unlikely group for testing an old mathematical theory, but they're actually ideal. For starters, they span a huge range of sizes, from the tiny dwarf lantern shark (about 20 centimetres long) to the whale shark (which can exceed 20 metres). They also have diverse shapes and lifestyles – hammerheads, reef-dwellers, deep-sea hunters – each posing different challenges for physiology and movement. Plus, sharks are charismatic, ecologically important and increasingly under threat. Understanding their biology is both scientifically valuable and important for conservation. How Did We Test The Rule? We used high-resolution 3D models to digitally measure surface area and volume in 54 species of sharks. These models were created using open-source CT scans and photogrammetry, which involves using photographs to approximate a 3D structure. Until recently, these techniques were the domain of video game designers and special effects artists, not biologists. We refined the models in Blender, a powerful 3D software tool, and extracted surface and volume data for each species. Then we applied phylogenetic regression – a statistical method that accounts for shared evolutionary history – to see how closely shark shapes follow the predictions of the two-thirds rule. What Did We Find? The results were striking: sharks follow the two-thirds scaling rule almost perfectly, with surface area scaling to body volume raised to the power of 0.64 – just a 3% difference from the theoretical 0.67. This suggests something deeper is going on. Despite their wide range of forms and habitats, sharks seem to converge on the same basic body plan when it comes to surface area and volume. Why? One explanation is that what are known as 'developmental constraints' – limits imposed by how animals grow and form in early life – make it difficult, or too costly, for sharks to deviate from this fundamental pattern. Changing surface area-to-volume ratios might require rewiring how tissues are allocated during embryonic development, something that evolution appears to avoid unless absolutely necessary. But Why Does It Matter? This isn't just academic. Many equations in biology, physiology and climate science rely on assumptions about surface area-to-volume ratios. These equations are used to model how animals regulate temperature, use oxygen, and respond to environmental stress. Until now, we haven't had accurate data from large animals to test those assumptions. Our findings give researchers more confidence in using these models – not just for sharks, but potentially for other groups too. As we face accelerating climate change and biodiversity loss, understanding how animals of all sizes interact with their environments has never been more urgent. This study, powered by modern imaging tech and some old-school curiosity, brings us one step closer to that goal. (Authors: Jodie L. Rummer, Professor of Marine Biology, James Cook University and Joel Gayford, PhD Candidate, Department of Marine Biology, James Cook University) (Disclosure Statement: Jodie L. Rummer receives funding from the Australian Research Council. She is affiliated with the Australian Coral Reef Society, as President. Joel Gayford receives funding from the Northcote Trust.)
Time of India
27-05-2025
- Time of India
Can mushrooms really talk? Study suggests fungi have a vocabulary of 50 words
For decades, the concept of communication has largely been reserved for humans, animals, and occasionally plants. From birdsong to bee dances, the idea that living organisms can share information is well-established. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now However, a groundbreaking study has opened the doors to a new realm of communication—one that takes place underground, in the hidden world of fungi. Until now, we've marveled at robotic chefs and AI-driven food technologies. But few could have imagined that mushrooms—yes, the same kind you might toss into your salad—could potentially "talk" to one another using a language-like system. This might sound like science fiction, but recent research conducted by Professor Andrew Adamatzky from the University of the West of England challenges our understanding of intelligence in non-human life forms. By analyzing the electrical signals passed through fungal networks called mycelium, Adamatzky found patterns that closely resemble the structure and complexity of human language. According to the study, these signal patterns can be grouped into "words" and may serve as a form of communication between fungi. The findings, published in Royal Society Open Science, propose that mushrooms may not only be sentient in some form but could also possess a rudimentary vocabulary of up to 50 distinct "words." The implications of such a discovery are immense, potentially redefining how we perceive intelligence, communication, and life itself in the natural world. Do mushrooms have a language? 50 'words' found in fungal signals At the heart of this discovery lies mycelium, a vast network of fungal threads that not only facilitate nutrient exchange but may also serve as a communication superhighway. Often likened to the internet for plants, mycelium connects various organisms across forest ecosystems. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It is through this web that fungi transmit electrical impulses—signals that are now believed to carry complex information. To explore these signals, Professor Adamatzky and his team monitored the electrical activity of four mushroom species: Enoki (Flammulina velutipes) Split gill (Schizophyllum commune) Ghost fungus (Omphalotus nidiformis) Caterpillar fungus (Cordyceps militaris) Using a set of microelectrodes inserted into the mycelium, researchers recorded electrical spikes over several days. They then used computational models to analyze the data, identifying spike clusters that resembled word-like structures. Remarkably, some of these patterns shared statistical properties with human language, including average word length and recurrence of certain "core" signals. The research revealed that: The fungi produced spike clusters resembling up to 50 distinct "words". The average word length was 5.97 characters, compared to 4.8 characters in English. The core vocabulary—the most frequently used signals—consisted of 15 to 20 recurring patterns. Electrical activity increased when fungi encountered food sources or damage, suggesting the signals could indicate environmental status or alert other fungi. This structured communication implies a level of complexity not previously attributed to fungi. While not equivalent to human language, the findings suggest that fungi might share information about resources, environmental conditions, or danger—fundamental aspects of any form of intelligent communication. Mushroom communication: Fascinating insight or scientific overreach? Despite the groundbreaking nature of the study, Professor Adamatzky himself remains cautious. He acknowledges that while the patterns resemble human speech statistically, there's no definitive evidence that fungi are conscious or possess language as we define it. 'I do not claim they are talking in the same way humans do,' Adamatzky stated. 'But there are lots of similarities in information processing.' Skepticism is natural with a discovery this bold. Some researchers argue that calling these electrical spikes "words" is misleading and anthropocentric. Fungal communication, they argue, could be a byproduct of basic biological processes, rather than deliberate messaging. Others believe the study is a significant first step, but caution that further peer-reviewed work is essential to validate these conclusions. Fungi talk? Rethinking intelligence and consciousness If fungi can indeed communicate using a vocabulary-like system, it challenges our traditional definitions of intelligence and consciousness. It also raises ethical and philosophical questions about how we interact with the natural world. Could forests be engaging in silent dialogues below our feet? Understanding fungal communication could inspire new bio-mimetic technologies. Electrical signal-based messaging systems in fungi might pave the way for environmentally sensitive AI, sustainable agriculture practices, and even new forms of computing modeled on biological substrates. What comes next? Future research and exploration The study has already prompted calls for deeper investigation into fungal intelligence and cross-species communication. Future research may include: Real-time monitoring of fungal networks in natural ecosystems. Exploring whether fungal signals influence plant behavior. Decoding the "syntax" or order of fungal words. Investigating potential responses to music, light, or human speech. With thousands of mushroom species still unstudied in this context, the field of fungal linguistics is only just beginning.
Time of India
19-05-2025
- Time of India
Paleontologists discover a ‘three-eyed' predator that once roamed Earth's oceans 500 million years ago
Image source: New York Times Paleontologists, aided by more than 60 fossil finds, discovered Mosura fentoni , an intriguing three-eyed predator that roamed in the oceans of Earth more than 500 million years ago. Also referred to as the "sea moth" because of its moth-like body, the ancient arthropod sheds important light on the early evolution and diversity of the arthropods. The discovery illuminates the diverse ecosystems of the Cambrian Era, underlining the influence of Mosura and other predators on ocean life. Mosura fossils provide an unprecedented peek into early arthropod anatomy, giving us a greater appreciation of ancient existence and evolutionary creation. 'Three-eyed' predator Mosura fentoni and the early history of arthropods Mosura fentoni was one of a group known as the radiodonts, a small but significant predator during the Cambrian Period. Radiodonts are part of an ancient lineage of the arthropod branch of the family tree, an important group that gives rise to today's living insects, spiders, and crustaceans. The research, done by scientists who wrote in the Royal Society Open Science journal, provides new insight into what these early arthropods were and how much like modern versions they look. The discovery of Mosura fentoni adds to the understanding of the history of arthropod evolution. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo Though extinct, radiodonts are crucial to studies of the evolution of current arthropods, which occupy over 80% of all living animal species. According to lead study author Dr. Joe Moysiuk, curator of paleontology at the Manitoba Museum, the fossils provide a rare glimpse into this extinct group's history. Mosura fentoni characteristics One of the most noticeable characteristics of Mosura fentoni is its then-unknown abdomen-shaped body segment, with 16 segments, such as gills at the rear. It is a then-unknown body characteristic in any other radiodont. It has a shape resembling structures in its modern relatives such as horseshoe crabs, woodlice, and insects, where respiratory organs are borne by segments. This feature likely helped Mosura to efficiently suck oxygen from its environment, potentially indicating evolutionary convergence—the mechanism by which bodily similarities develop in unrelated groups independently. Study co-author Dr. Jean-Bernard Caron, a Royal Ontario Museum curator, noted that Mosura's diverse anatomy demonstrates early flexibility of arthropods. Mosura's sea moth shape and its mysterious 'third eye' Mosura's "sea moth" nickname is because of its body shape and size resemblance to moths today—about as long as an adult human index finger. Although it resembles one, no living creature is in Mosura's full form. Although the animal possessed insect-like and crustacean-like jointed claws, its strangest feature was its third eye. Located in the middle of its head, this additional eye is distinct from the many eyes of present-day arthropods, in an orientation maintenance function. Moysiuk speculated that Mosura's significant third eye helped guide it through the underwater environment, as part of its life as a predator. Secondly, Mosura's swimming style would also be the same as a ray fish by using its several swimming flaps in a smooth wave-like manner to drive it forward in water. Its single pattern of locomotion along with its pencil-point mouth that was bordered by saw-like plates made Mosura stand apart from any other living being in the present world. How Mosura's unique claws and features helped it survive Although it is not known precisely how Mosura took its prey, front claws in some of the fossils are an indication. A fossil spiny claw was discovered by Dr. Jean-Bernard Caron while excavating one of the specimens with caution. Spiny claws were used by most related species to capture prey, but Mosura claws had smooth, extended sides and bifurcated ends, which might have assisted in grasping and moving small animals towards its mouth. It is presumed that Mosura likely preyed upon smaller arthropods and worms that lived in its habitat. However, it too could have been a victim of the sea's larger predators, such as the Anomalocaris canadensis, a radiodont that looked like a shrimp, or the giant jellyfish Burgessomedusa phasmiformis. The discovery of Mosura's unique features helps researchers to reimagine the evolution of early arthropods like radiodonts. Harvard invertebrate paleontologist Rudy Lerosey-Aubril highlighted the way Mosura's unique body form can help researchers glimpse the developmental pathways that existed prior to evolutionary changes leading to more symmetrical body forms in subsequent species. Mosura's fossils from the Burgess Shale reveal its inner structure The fossils that made the identification of Mosura fentoni arose were found in the Burgess Shale, a world-renowned fossil bed within the Canadian Rockies. The Burgess Shale is renowned for preserving beautifully detailed remains of ancient creatures in the Cambrian Period, approximately 508 million years ago. Additional evidence of over 60 more specimens of Mosura were collected between 1975 and 2022, providing researchers with ample information about this enigmatic creature. The biggest asset of the fossilised Mosura specimens is perhaps the ability to recognize impressions of the circulatory, digestive, and nervous systems. The soft tissues are not usually preserved in fossils, giving the initial opportunity to view the inner works of an ancient arthropod. Researchers were able to identify packs of nerves within the eyes, allowing Mosura to read visual cues, much like modern arthropods. Mosura also had an open circulatory system, where the blood was circulated into internal cavities with the reflective leftovers left behind that have been maintained in the fossil remains. Mosura's role in the Cambrian ecosystem revealed The discovery of Mosura fentoni not only enlightens us about the evolution of arthropods but also provides us with crucial information about life on our planet during the Cambrian Explosion—a time when the diversification of the animal kingdom was happening at high speed. In the view of Dr. Russell D.C. Bicknell, an American Museum of Natural History scientist, this discovery provides us with information regarding how early sea ecosystems functioned, particularly the role of predators like Mosura. The extraordinary fossils of Mosura fentoni are proof of the diversity of life in Cambrian times and the level of sophistication of primitive arthropods. The perfect preservation of these fossils, especially at the Burgess Shale, is a goldmine for researchers who wish to know more about the history of life on Earth. Also Read | King cobra vs desert kingsnakes: Key difference on the basis of features, diet, venom and more
