Have Belgian troops been deployed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo?
ADVERTISEMENT
News reports and social media posts have been circulating online claiming that Belgium has deployed troops to the east of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) to fight against rebels in the region.
They allege that between 300 and 400 Belgian commandos are expected to engage the M23 rebels alongside the Congolese army and militia groups and that Belgium and the EU in general are supporting the DRC to the detriment of Rwanda.
Belgium however strongly denies the claims and has accused Rwanda of mounting a disinformation campaign, amid rising tensions between Brussels and Kigali that have led to the
severing of diplomatic ties
.
Rwanda has pointed the finger at Belgium for allegedly taking sides against it in the ongoing conflict in the DRC's east, which has seen violence for more than three decades since the Rwandan genocide in 1994.
Belgium's Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Maxime Prévot said the online claims were "grotesque fake news."
"A Belgian contingent of 6 (!) soldiers is indeed present in Kindu for the implementation of European support in non-lethal equipment to the Congolese army,"
he said in a 26 March post on X
. "There is therefore NO deployment to take part in any operations whatsoever, and Belgium has no intention of doing so!"
"As for the rest, everything about this tweet rings hollow, as it clearly seeks to stir up trouble and escalate tensions," Prévot added.
His post came on the same day that he told Belgium's parliament that the claims were made as part of a disinformation campaign brought by Rwanda and "actors sympathetic to the Rwandan cause."
He said the campaign was designed to "undermine Belgium's image, exacerbate tensions and legitimise a certain interventionism."
Counterclaims later emerged online, alleging that eight Belgian troops had died fighting and that numerous military flights between Belgian and Congolese cities had taken place.
But Belgium has issued its own counterclaims: when approached by EuroVerify, the defence ministry referred back to a press release that it published in late March.
It said that around 10 Belgian soldiers are in Kindu as part of the EU's European Peace Facility project.
"This initiative aims to strengthen the EU's capacity to prevent conflict, consolidate and preserve peace, and enhance international security and stability," the press release said. "The beneficiary partner of this project is the DRC, with funding of €20 million from the EU."
"Belgium is committed to this EPF project in Kindu until December 2027 at the latest," it continued.
Related
Rwanda cuts diplomatic ties with Belgium over DRC conflict
M23 rebels withdraw from DR Congo peace talks as EU imposes sanctions
Specifically, Belgium's role in the initiative is comprised of two parts, according to the Ministry of Defence: the purchase of equipment, including engineering equipment for the 31st Brigade of Rapid Reaction Units, and infrastructure work at Camp Lwama in Kindu, which houses the same brigade.
ADVERTISEMENT
It added that Falcon 7X aircraft have flown between Belgium and the DRC, but in the context of separate missions that have nothing to do with a new military deployment.
"It is also important to point out that a Falcon 7X has a maximum capacity of 14 people, and that any deployment of Belgian military personnel as part of an operation must be approved in advance by the government," the defence ministry said.
This is not the first time that the Rwandan government has been accused of launching a widespread disinformation campaign to achieve its aims.
South Carolina's Clemson University Media Forensics Hub
released a study in June 2024
in which it found that President Paul Kagame's government was using artificial intelligence to generate and spread political propaganda during the presidential campaign.
ADVERTISEMENT
It said that hundreds of X accounts shared hundreds of thousands of posts using AI to push different propaganda narratives, most of which centred on the DRC conflict.
Rwanda's Ministry of Foreign Affairs didn't respond to our request for comment, while the DRC's Ministry of Foreign Affairs couldn't be reached.
Belgium and Rwanda's crumbling relations
Rwanda
cut diplomatic ties
with Belgium in mid-March over the conflict in the DRC, ordering all Belgian diplomats to leave the country within 48 hours.
It said that doing so would protect its national interests because Belgium had "clearly taken sides in a regional conflict and continues to systematically mobilise against Rwanda in different forums."
ADVERTISEMENT
Kigali accused Brussels of "pitiful attempts to sustain its neo-colonial delusions", pointing at Belgium's "deep and violent historical role" in the violence in the DRC.
Belgium responded, cancelling all governmental cooperation agreements between the two countries.
It said that it refuted the statements made by Rwanda to justify its decision.
"Belgium is not seeking to punish or weaken Rwanda, still less on the basis of a colonial past from which it distanced itself a long time ago,"
the foreign affairs ministry said
. "This is a complete distortion of the facts."
ADVERTISEMENT
Kigali has been criticised by countries including Belgium for backing the M23 rebels, who in recent months have seized Goma and Bukavu, the two largest cities in eastern DRC.
M23 is one of about 100 armed groups grappling for control in the mineral-rich region close to the Rwandan border.
The group's fighters claim they are protecting the rights of the region's ethnic Tutsis, but the DRC has accused Rwanda of supporting the rebels in a bid to control land in the area, while Belgium has accused it of undermining the DRC's territorial integrity.
The severing of the countries' diplomatic ties came as the EU slapped sanctions on five Rwandans linked to violence in the DRC.
ADVERTISEMENT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Israel, Iran trade fresh strikes as conflict enters ninth day
The conflict between Israel and Iran has entered its ninth consecutive day, with reports of strikes emerging from both countries overnight. It comes after a meeting between European foreign ministers and their Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, in Geneva on Friday yielded no concrete results, with Araghchi ruling out further talks on Iran's nuclear programme until a ceasefire is agreed. Aragchi arrived in Istanbul early on Saturday for a meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), according to media reports. Meanwhile, Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said that another commander from the Iranian Revolutionary Guards had been killed overnight. Euronews brings you rolling coverage and updates throughout the day.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Von der Leyen's return as China hawk ends talk of diplomatic reset
Summer has arrived in Brussels with a new trend: the doves are out, the hawks are in. After weeks of telegraphing signs towards a diplomatic rapprochement with China, or at least a thaw, Ursula von der Leyen made an abrupt volte face at the G7 summit with a broadside attack against Beijing's "pattern of dominance, dependency and blackmail" vis-à-vis its trading partners, including the European Union and the United States. "China has largely shown its unwillingness to live within the constraints of the rules-based international system," von der Leyen said in her intervention. "While others opened their market, China focused on undercutting intellectual property protections, massive subsidies with the aim to dominate global manufacturing and supply chains," she went on. "This is not market competition – it is distortion with intent." The president of the European Commission declared, point blank, that the source of "the biggest collective problem" in the global trading system lay in China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001. Beijing's entry into the WTO has been highly controversial as it opened international markets to a wave of low-cost exports. The admission is linked to the so-called "China shock" and a decline in manufacturing jobs in both the EU and the US. At the G7 summit, von der Leyen warned a "new China shock" was underway. It was a gloves-off denunciation that laid bare the state of mind of the Commission chief, her mounting displeasure and exasperation. In many ways, it was a return to the hawkish stance of her first mandate, during which she famously promoted the concept of "de-risking" to slash vulnerable dependencies that China could exploit. Beijing was quick to hit back at von der Leyen's invective. Guo Jiakun, the spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry, called her remarks "baseless" and "biased". Guo, however, did not miss the chance to offer a new olive branch. "China stands ready to increase communication and coordination with the EU, properly handle trade differences, and achieve win-win and shared prosperity," he said. "That said, we firmly oppose any attempt to hurt China's right to development or even assert one's own interests at China's expense." The reset that never was The conciliatory attempt fits in with Beijing's "charm offensive", as diplomats call it, towards the bloc in response to the disruptive policies of US President Donald Trump, who has imposed punitive tariffs on allies and adversaries alike. Sensing an impending rupture in the Western alliance, China has made several overtures to curry favour with Brussels, including lifting controversial sanctions on lawmakers, ahead of a much-anticipated EU-China summit in late July. Last month, Chinese President Xi Jinping hailed the 50th anniversary of bilateral relations as an opportunity to "open up a brighter future" in diplomacy. Von der Leyen replied: "We remain committed to deepening our partnership with China. A balanced relationship, built on fairness and reciprocity, is in our common interest." But in her G7 intervention, delivered with Trump in the room, this commitment was conspicuous by its absence. Instead, she let the hawk fly free and wild. At the core of her speech was Beijing's recent decision to restrict the sales of seven rare earth materials, which she said amounted to "weaponising" trade. China holds a quasi-monopolistic position over rare earths, the 17 metallic elements that are essential for building cutting-edge technologies. The country commands roughly 60% of the world's supply and 90% of the processing and refining capacity. Although the restrictions have eased in recent days, von der Leyen cautioned "the threat remains" and called on the G7 to close ranks to pile extra pressure on China. Rare earths are just the tip of an iceberg made up of commercial disputes that have driven a stark wedge between Brussels and Beijing. The past few years have seen the bloc impose steep duties on China-made electric vehicles, exclude Chinese companies from public tenders of medical devices, label Huawei and ZTE as "high-risk suppliers" of 5G networks, and launch investigations into suspicious uses of industrial subsidies. Brussels has also accused Beijing of engaging in large-scale campaigns of foreign information manipulations and interference (known as FIMI), hacking into state agencies, fuelling military tensions in the Taiwan Strait, violating the human rights of the Uyghur population and acting as the "key enabler" of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Despite loud pleas from Europeans, Xi Jinping has doubled down on his "no-limits" partnership with Vladimir Putin, causing dismay and outrage across the continent. By offering no significant concessions and sticking to its long-standing practices, China has missed the opportunity offered by von der Leyen after Trump's inauguration, says Noah Barkin, a visiting senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund. "Von der Leyen's unvarnished criticisms of China at the G7 summit are a response to Beijing's intransigence. Unless China shows a willingness to address Europe's concerns, the summit in July is unlikely to produce any deliverables of substance," Barkin said. "The likelihood is that tensions between the EU and China will continue to grow. The closing of the US market to Chinese products will lead to a diversion of exports into Europe, increasing the threat to European industry. And the withdrawal of US support for Ukraine will turn China's support for Russia into an even bigger problem for Europe." Keeping it real Although von der Leyen has earned plaudits for her clear-eyed, matter-of-fact assessment of EU-China relations, her views have not become universally accepted by member states, the true guardians of political power. In April, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez flew to Beijing, held a bilateral meeting with President Xi and made a plea to turn the page on the confrontational approach. "Spain is in favour of more balanced relations between the European Union and China, of finding negotiated solutions to our differences, which we have, and of greater cooperation in areas of common interest," Sánchez said. The Spaniard's words immediately caught the attention of Brussels and sent speculation of a diplomatic reset into overdrive. But Alicja Bachulska, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), says the buzzy discourse was never credible. "Hopes of a possible reset, if any, were mostly projected by those who do not see eye-to-eye with von der Leyen's Commission," Bachulska told Euronews. "This Commission seems quite consistent in explaining its approach towards China and how it sees the threats, the challenges, and the very limited opportunities for cooperation with China under current conditions." Politics, of course, come with economics attached. For many countries, particularly those export-oriented, China remains an extraordinarily valuable market of 1.4 billion people, despite the multiple obstacles and hurdles that European companies face when doing business. With Trump threatening a whopping 50% tariff on the bloc if trade talks fail, having a cushion to fall onto is considered indispensable to avoid – or at least mitigate – the potential ravaging impact. Trade will be at the very top of the agenda at the EU-China summit, with both sides looking forward to having something to announce. Brussels is keen to put an end to China's probes into brandy, pork and dairy products, which it considers unjustified. But as the date nears, hopes for a trade breakthrough that can make a tangible difference on the ground and relieve some of the tensions are fading, as von der Leyen's hardened tone at the G7 demonstrated. "It's about being realistic: we still see China as a partner, competitor and rival," a senior diplomat said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We have to be perhaps more confident about our interests, what we can do to pursue them better, but also act when actions are taken that threaten the stability of our continent." A diplomat from another country kept a cool head to lower expectations ahead of the summit, arguing China's alliance with Russia and campaigns of foreign interference remain "serious" and "disturbing" factors with no sign of improvement. "If you want to really deepen ties with us, that's impossible if, at the same time, you behave like this," the diplomat said. "The EU needs to stand up for its own interests, no matter who's in the White House."
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Live: Israel strikes missile storage and launch sites in Iran
21/06/2025 - 06:59 22 arrested for links to Israeli spy services since start of conflict Police in Iran's Qom province said Saturday that 22 people "linked to Israeli spy services" had been arrested since June 13, Fars news agency reported. "22 people were identified and arrested on charges of being linked to the Zionist regime's spy services, disturbing public opinion, and supporting the criminal regime," the agency stated, citing the head of police intelligence in Iran's Qom province. 21/06/2025 - 06:58 Diplomatic breakthrough elusive as Israel-Iran war stretches into second week Hours of talks aimed at de-escalating fighting between Israel and Iran failed to produce a diplomatic breakthrough as the war entered its second week with a fresh round of strikes between the two adversaries. European ministers and Iran's top diplomat met for four hours Friday in Geneva, as President Donald Trump continued to weigh U.S. military involvement and worries rose over potential strikes on nuclear reactors.
