When Abroad, NDA Delegates Forced to State the Opposite of Their Exclusionary Politics at Home

New Delhi: The Modi government dispatched seven all-party parliamentary delegations – including former diplomats – to 33 countries to project India's collective resolve and 'zero tolerance' policy on terrorism in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, Operation Sindoor and the military conflict with Pakistan. Whether it was portraying India as a 'secular' country or one where Muslims enjoy equal rights and face no persecution, delegation members from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party and its Shiv Sena alliance partner went out of their way in their interactions with these countries to speak in a language that is contrary to the politics they practice at home. Opposition members who were part of the delegations, on the other hand, were seen ridiculing Pakistan in a language that is often used by the BJP at home. Clearing 'misconceptions' about Muslim persecution, stance on PalestineBJP MP Nishikant Dubey – known for his sharp, often Islamophobic, comments and who just weeks earlier in April had called former Chief Election Commissioner S.Y. Qureshi a 'Muslim Commissioner' for criticising the Waqf Amendment Act – spoke about how Muslims in India enjoy equal rights, pointed to the religious diversity of the delegation he was part of, and claimed that India had always supported the 'two-nation theory' with regard to Israel's ongoing genocide in Palestine.'On this visit, the misconception that is there about what are we doing about Palestine and Israel, what are the conditions of Muslims… Owaisi (AIMIM MP Assadudin Owaisi, who was also part of the same delegation) said we have more Muslims than Pakistan,' said Dubey while speaking to ANI in Algiers, Algeria.'Is there any house that doesn't have problems? Don't Hindus have problems with each other. But our delegation had members of five religions and were all speaking in one voice. We all supported each other,' he said.Dubey – who was part of the delegation led by Baijayant Panda (also a BJP MP) – visited four Muslim countries: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain and Algeria. There, he paid tribute to a 'secular' India – a country supposedly at ease with its pluralism, extending equal status to all, de jure and de facto – that even ruling party MPs felt compelled to praise.While the BJP has criticised those supporting Palestine, Dubey said that the delegation had clarified that 'with regards to Palestine, we believe in the two-nation theory. We said that we are against Hamas, we don't support terrorism, but we are with the people of Palestine.' 'Second, the condition of Muslims in India is better than other secular nations. Owaisi also said that Article 25 gives equal rights. Third, Pakistan is the epicentre of terrorism whether it is Sudan, Turkey, or US – it is all emanating from Pakistan and therefore, they must be placed on the FATF grey list.'We have put forward our prime minister's view of the new normal that we will not tolerate any act of terror. We also pressed on the point that Pakistan doesn't have money to give food to its people. We have requested these countries that whenever Pakistan speaks to you, these countries have to say that they have to stop terror activities otherwise we will not be able to save you. Any country that is giving money to Pakistan, whether it is the US or IMF or World Bank, it is all going down the drain in the corruption of the military and their citizens are suffering,' he added.Previous governments 'tried' talksIn Bahrain's Manama, Panda, who was leading the delegation that Dubey was a part of, took a cautious and even soft note in explaining India's 'new normal' stance. While he did use the lines being used by the BJP's top leadership – including 'talks and terror cannot go on' and 'blood and water cannot flow together' (referring to the Indus Water Treaty being held in abeyance) – he followed it up with a cautious note that India wants 'friendly relations'.'My colleagues are from across the country, we speak different languages, we have different religions. This is true India. This is the largest democracy ever in human history. This is the biggest message. We have taken certain steps – we have put in abeyance the Indus Waters Treaty, we have stopped visas, trade through ships coming in. Because the old thing – we have tried that for many decades – that we will keep playing cricket, cultural events, that has changed,' said Panda.In a departure from the BJP's campaign during Operation Sindoor where it attacked previous Congress-led governments for holding talks with Pakistan despite terror attacks, Panda cited those efforts as an alibi to say that India had 'tried' it and that is ready to meet Pakistan 'more than halfway' if it takes credible steps against terrorism.'Talks and terrorism cannot go on at the same time. Blood and water cannot flow at the same time. But we make it very clear. We want friendly relations. But talks have not helped, cultural exchanges have not helped. This has been going for decades since 1947. So the message is very clear, you stop shooting, we stop shooting. All these steps show that we will meet you more than half way. If Pakistan takes credible steps to undo its terror infrastructure and take action against the terrorists – which the whole world is saying are terrorists – we will be more than happy to respond with friendly steps,' he said.While no less than Prime Minister Narendra Modi in India has warned the civilians of Pakistan of his 'goli' (bullet), these delegations emphasised that India does not have anything against the people of Pakistan.'We know civilians want peace in Pakistan but everybody knows the army has disproportionate control and their incentives must change,' Panda said.Panda was also full of praise for former Congress leader and Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Ghulam Nabi Azad, who was also part of the delegation, citing his ties and contact with the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organisation) as coming in handy, as well as his connect with NAM, or the Non-Aligned Movement. 'One of our delegation members is Ghulam Nabi Azad, very senior politician, who has had a particular role to play from the Non Aligned Movement (NAM) days, when he used to interface with people like late Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) chief Yassar Arafat. That carries a huge credibility,' he said.What he brushed over was the fact that the Modi government has minimised India's Palestinian connect and NAM background. 'Human rights of victims of terror'BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad, who was leading the delegation to the UK, France, Germany, EU, Italy and Denmark, spoke about the human rights of the 'young bride' who lost her husband in the Pahalgam terror attack, in an apparent reference to Himanshi Narwal. He made no reference to the fact that Narwal – whose husband Lt Vinay Narwal was killed in the terror attack – was brutally trolled by the right wing social media ecosystem for advocating peace and warning that the attack not become an excuse to target Muslims or Kashmiris. 'Who are human rights for? Do the victims of terror have human rights or not? Does that young bride who lost her husband just after 10 days of her marriage by the bullet of a terrorist have human rights or not? The whole concept of human rights must be properly understood and appreciated. We stand firmly for the human rights of the victims of terror,' he said while speaking in Brussels.'We are a democracy, we are a stable country. But this new dialogue must be conveyed in Belgium in the European Union. They don't have an answer to this. Enough of the human rights of terrorists. This must stop,' he added.'India a secular country'On being re-elected in 2019, Modi went to the extent of open mockery, saying, 'In this election not even a single political party could dare to mislead the country by wearing the mask of secularism.' But in the delegations they were part of, the BJP – and its ally both at the Centre and in Maharashtra, the Hindutva-focused Shiv Sena – were forced to champion the fact that India is a 'secular' country.'We are carrying a message against terrorism. India has been fighting this terrorism for a very long time.. But this what happened on April 22 in Pahalgam innocent families were killed who were there on vacation,' said Shiv Sena MP Shrikant Shinde while speaking to Speaker of the House of Representatives of Liberia, Richard Nagbe Koon.'Young couples.. newly married couples..fathers who were there with their children were killed. Husband was killed before their wives. They were killed on the basis of their religion. The terrorists asked them which religion they belong to because their motive was to destabilise regional harmony in India. As you know India is a secular nation. All religious communities stay together in peace and harmony… Nobody wants war.''Stupid jokers'Not just MPs from the government, even opposition parties took to speaking a language not usually used by them in their domestic politics in India.AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi who has often been targeted by the BJP and by big media for speaking out against the targeting of Muslims – a senior BJP MP once taunted him to 'go to Pakistan' – was seen adopting a language that would please his BJP critics at home.Speaking in Kuwait, Owaisi responded to Pakistan's allegations that Muslims in India are persecuted.'Pakistan can't take up this issue of Muslims facing threats in India. India has a larger Muslim population than Pakistan and we are more sincere than them (Pakistan). This is their fake propaganda,' he said.Owaisi has himself spoken in parliament on a number of occasions about how the BJP government is using state machinery to curtail Muslims' rights in the country.The language of mockery while talking about Pakistan is usually associated with the BJP but Owaisi went on to call Pakistanis 'stupid jokers' as he mocked Pakistan's leadership after the country's newly promoted Field Marshal Asim Munir reportedly gifted a 'fake' picture to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif at a dinner event in Rawalpindi'The Pakistani army chief gifted a photo to the Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif, the President was also there…These stupid jokers want to compete with India, they had given a photograph of a 2019 Chinese Army drill claiming it is a victory over India. This is what Pakistan indulges in,' said Owaisi.Earlier, Owaisi had told The Wire that despite disagreements with the government at home, delegates will cooperate when abroad.'Breaching LoC for first time in Uri 2016'Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, who has been at the centre of a storm in his own party since the delegations were first announced, stoked fire again when he said in Panama that India had breached the LoC (Line of Control) between India and Pakistan to conduct a surgical strike for the first time in September 2016, during the Uri strike.Tharoor made the remarks while leading one of the all party delegations in Panama but his own party leaders put out excerpts from his 2018 book'The Pradoxical Prime Minister in which he had criticised the BJP's 'shameless exploitation' of the 2016 strikes and said Congress had authorised such operations during its tenure.Despite the delegates putting up a united front, it is learnt that in West Asia – an important region for the Modi government, particularly in the present context – pointed queries regarding the state of India's minorities and what evidence was there that the attackers were from Pakistan, dogged the delegates in open meetings.Foreign policy watchers, including former foreign secretary Shyam Saran have also questioned why the government excluded the region, its other neighbours in South Asia, where India needs maximum support.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

United News of India

39 minutes ago

• United News of India

Wave of development has reduced Naxal menace to less than 20 districts: PM

Bhubaneswar, June 20 (UNI) Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday asserted that Naxalism will soon be completely eradicated from the country, crediting his government's developmental push in tribal areas for the decline in extremist violence. Addressing a gathering on the occasion of the BJP government's first anniversary in Odisha, the Prime Minister said that before 2014, more than 125 tribal-majority districts across India were impacted by Naxalite violence. He pointed out that these tribal regions were long unfairly labeled as part of the 'Red Corridor' and had been neglected by previous governments, which declared them backward and left them behind. 'In the last few years, our government has worked to bring tribal communities out of a climate of violence and onto a path of development,' Modi said. 'We have taken strict action against those who spread violence, and simultaneously, launched a new wave of development in these areas.' As a result, he stated, the influence of Naxalism has now been reduced to fewer than 20 districts across the country. Expressing confidence, Modi said that with the current pace of development and enforcement, tribal areas will soon be entirely free from the shadow of violence. 'This is Modi's guarantee,' he declared. The Prime Minister emphasised that empowering tribal communities, fulfilling their aspirations, and easing their hardships remains a top priority for his government. He highlighted that for the first time, two major national schemes have been launched specifically for tribal development, with a combined outlay exceeding Rs1 lakh crore. Modi elaborated on the first initiative — Dharati Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan, under which development work is on in more than 60,000 tribal villages across India. "In Odisha too," he noted, "we are building houses for tribal families, constructing roads, and providing electricity and clean drinking water." Discussing the second major scheme, PM Janman Yojana, the Prime Minister said the inspiration for the initiative came from Odisha itself, and acknowledged the guidance of the country's first tribal woman President, Droupadi Murmu, in shaping the program. He said the scheme focuses on supporting Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs), and that development work worth hundreds of crores is currently being carried out in remote tribal hamlets under this scheme. UNI DP SSP

Time of India

39 minutes ago

• Time of India

Lalu advises umbrellas for ‘downpour of lies' at PM event

1 2 Patna: On the day Prime Minister Narendra Modi criticised the 15-year rule of the RJD in Bihar for "jungle raj, mis-governance and dynastic politics", RJD chief Lalu Prasad launched a scathing and sarcastic counterattack, warning the public to carry umbrellas to protect themselves from a "downpour of lies, false promises and illusions" in the state. Sharing an AI-generated satirical video mocking PM Modi and Bihar CM Nitish Kumar, Lalu quipped, "There is heavy rain of lies in Bihar today. Hailstorms of false and tempting promises are falling along with thunder. So, be careful." The background score added to the satire, "Jhooth ki bijli kadkegi, ghoshnayon ka toofan garjega, karodo ke package-wala ola barsega… aaj milkar karenge Bihar ki janata se kursi ke liye gujarish… aaj hogi Bihar mein jumlon ki barish." Leader of the opposition in state assembly, Tejashwi Prasad Yadav , issued 12 questions to the PM, demanding answers during his Siwan speech. "Why did your friend Trump halt Operation Sindoor before consulting you? Who is Trump to interfere in India's decisions?" he asked, referring to an alleged ceasefire under US pressure. Tejashwi also asked about Bihar's position on the poverty index, crime levels and the Prime Minister's repeated visits without addressing core issues. He said railway engines now being exported from Marhaura to Guinea were from a factory set up by Lalu as railway minister. "Will you tell the people of Saran that Lalu Prasad established J P University and three major railway factories here?" he asked. Later, at the RJD office, Tejashwi alleged that the BJP is running a campaign funded by the hard-earned money of Bihar people. "Modiji's speech neither fills anyone's stomach nor provides employment," he said.

The Hindu

an hour ago

• The Hindu

BJP's Southward Surge: Can It Crack Tamil Nadu in 2026?

Published : Jun 20, 2025 21:05 IST - 10 MINS READ The date was November 22, 2020. Sitting in his Hyderabad office, a political analyst could not believe the survey findings in front of him: it predicted that the BJP was poised to win only about 30 seats in the 150-ward Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) election. The election was less than 10 days away, scheduled for December 1. The news was communicated to Union Home Minister Amit Shah. 'What happened next is unbelievable. Almost the entire top brass of the BJP landed up in Hyderabad. They campaigned home to home, apartment to apartment, and street to street,' the analyst said. Everyone available was roped in: Union Ministers Amit Shah, Smriti Irani (no longer part of the Cabinet), and Rajnath Singh divided the city among themselves and coordinated with ground crews. Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath was a prominent presence in a city known for its susceptibility to communal polarisation and violence. Even Prime Minister Narendra Modi made an appearance on November 28, ostensibly to 'review vaccine development for COVID' at the Bharat Biotech facility but also to campaign—for a municipal corporation election. No strategy was left unused. The campaign relied heavily on communal messaging, including the demonisation of Rohingya refugees living on the margins of Balapur and other suburbs. The right-wing Swarajya magazine had this to say: 'The party, which is ruling at the Centre, has caught its supporters by surprise by bringing in many heavyweights to campaign for the GHMC elections in which the stakes seem to be high for it.' Its then executive editor wrote on November 27: 'Hyderabad could be BJP's gateway to Telangana and observers say the GHMC poll is more of an 'ideological battle'.' From a mere four seats in 2016, the BJP increased its tally to 48 in 2020, forcing the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (Telangana Rashtra Samithi at that time) to join hands with Asaduddin Owaisi's All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen to run the corporation. A political adviser, who has worked for the BJP and other political parties, said that there are two factors that distinguish the BJP from others: 'First, the BJP tries various permutations and combinations starting with the Hindutva push, in any State or any election. While the Hindutva push will always remain in the background, it will keep working at the ground level, crunching numbers to figure out how to make inroads. Second, there is a critical number that the BJP's leadership wants to achieve in a survey before it pushes forward with all its resources. Once the number is achieved, the party reacts quickly, decisively, and pulls out all the stops,' he said. Three leaders from different political parties in the south, in different words, said the same thing: The BJP under Modi and Shah is an election-winning machine; it works very hard and looks for opportunities that could be exploited for votes. 'Can you imagine that every single leader—Amit Shah included—have a booth that he or she is responsible for. Show me a comparable system in any other party,' said one leader, requesting anonymity. In Tamil Nadu, where the Assembly election is due in April 2026, the BJP's strategy has been to align with the main opposition party, push the narrative that the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) is a corrupt party, and that only the 'first family' matters. 'The format which the BJP goes after is family rule, arrogance, and corruption. If they are not sure about the results, they will not touch it,' said one BJP sympathiser. Corruption and family rule are topics that the BJP has continuously harped on in Tamil Nadu. 'The DMK has crossed all limits of corruption with one scam after another,' Amit Shah told a public meeting on June 8 in Madurai, in Hindi, a language that not many speak or understand in the State. He was in the State for the party's core council meeting. Shah's other allegations were that the DMK had dishonoured Lord Murugan, and that under its rule, crime and drugs have surged in Tamil Nadu. Also Read | PMK's alliance with the BJP in Tamil Nadu defies logic For the BJP, the attack on dynasty or family is only one part of its project. The other part is seeking an alliance that will propel the saffron party to power. For this, it has tied up with the the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), which is the only major challenger to the DMK with its strong cadre base, a fact that best positions it to harvest any anti-incumbency votes. But the manner in which the alliance was stitched up has not gone down well even with second-rung AIADMK leaders. On April 11, Amit Shah arrived in Chennai and at a press conference with AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami, it was Shah who announced the news of the alliance and named Palaniswami as the leader of the alliance, but the AIADMK leader remained silent on stage. When asked if this amounted to a humiliation of the party, one AIADMK functionary curtly responded: 'No.' 'Every act has a context. Please do not forget how long Maharashtra leaders [Devendra] Fadnavis and others had to wait in Delhi for an appointment. Finally, they met Modiji after about five days. In the case of Andhra Pradesh leaders, they did not even get an appointment after two days. They were just given a letter of support. Contrast that with Palaniswami getting Amit Shah to come to Chennai to make the announcement,' he added. Then, there is the removal of former IPS officer K. Annamalai as the president of the BJP's State unit, reportedly at Palaniswami's insistence. While AIADMK leaders deny in public that the party made such a demand, they are more than happy to admit it in private and to claim that this incident proves that Palaniswami is not a pushover. On April 11, Annamalai was replaced by Nainar Nagendran, a former AIADMK Minister and current BJP MLA. Nagendran, who joined the party in 2017, contested from Tirunelveli in the 2021 Assembly election. Nagendran is soft-spoken compared with Annamalai and is expected to build rapport with alliance partners and smoothen the strained relationship. Tamil Nadu BJP leaders are excited about Shah's announcement that he will make frequent trips to the State. 'From now, you will see how the BJP works when it sets its mind to something,' said a BJP State leader. Asked if this meant there would be more raids by Central agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department, he said: 'If someone is corrupt, then a raid is natural.' While these are obviously the BJP's strengths, the party also has its share of problems. One of its key concerns is the space that the ousted Annamalai continues to occupy within the Tamil Nadu unit. For instance, at a meeting in Madurai on June 8, it was evident that he remained the most popular leader among the cadres—so much so that he had to repeatedly urge them to stop cheering for him. Annamalai has also been freely expressing his views about the party and its alliance in press meets, often in contradiction with the party's stance. 'It will be a BJP rule,' he responded to a question on government formation after the 2026 Assembly election. This is different from what both Shah and Palaniswami had asserted. While Shah talked about a National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government in the State, the AIADMK made it clear that it would be an AIADMK government. There is no history of a coalition government in the State. In 2006, when the DMK fell short of a majority, the alliance partners supported the government from outside. The second problem for the BJP is the challenge that actor turned politician Vijay poses. The BJP expects his party, the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), to take away some of the minority and Dalit votes. This may not happen in the way the BJP desires it. Vanni Arasu, a Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi MLA, said that merely because Dalit youths watch a lot of movies does not mean they will vote for Vijay. 'Young people know who has stood up for them in the villages and towns. Movies are entertainment that last for a few hours,' he said. The third problem is that the natural allies of the NDA—the Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam (DMDK) and the Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK)—are yet to make up their minds about an alliance. In the case of the DMDK, party leader Premalatha has said that the party will decide only by January 2026. In her reasoning, since the election is only in April 2026, there is no need to rush into an alliance. The DMDK, which was launched by Vijayakanth, a popular film star, emerged as the principal opposition party in the State Assembly in 2011 but is now a pale shadow of its former self. It, however, still has some following and has the option of moving to the DMK alliance if its demands are not met or are watered down. The PMK is in the throes of an ugly battle between S. Ramadoss, the founder, and his son Anbumani Ramadoss. As of now, the son controls the party because he is the party president and almost all office-bearers are his loyalists. The challenge for Anbumani is that the Vanniyar community, which forms the party's main vote base, continues to place its trust in his father. The NDA is grappling with the dilemma, and it even sent S. Gurumurthy, editor of Thuglak magazine, to settle the family feud. It did not work. The BJP's strength, nationwide, lies in its ability to lure leaders from other parties, small and large. They are then used to bolster the BJP's strength and numbers in the respective States—from Himanta Biswa Sarma in Assam to Jyotiraditya Scindia in Madhya Pradesh, this list is long. In Tamil Nadu, this model has not worked in the manner that the BJP would have liked. In fact, one prominent person to move from the DMK to the BJP was Selvam, a former MLA from Thousand Lights, in 2020. He was a close associate of Chief Minister M.K. Stalin but parted ways when he was not accorded the importance he thought he deserved. Selvam blamed Stalin's son, Udhayanidhi, for his decision to quit the DMK. He lasted under two years in the BJP, before returning to the DMK in 2022. Selvam said he was cast aside in the BJP because of intra-party politics. However, two other prominent former DMK faces continue to be in the BJP: former Deputy Speaker V.P. Duraisamy and former agriculture wing head K.P. Ramalingam. Duraisamy was expelled from the DMK in May 2020 after an outburst against the leadership. The BJP is keeping both on the sidelines. Meanwhile, the DMK has been proactive in ensuring that disgruntled regional leaders do not leave the fold. In 2024, a prominent politician, who had held important portfolios in the DMK, expressed his interest in joining the TVK. What happened next was straight out of a movie script. According to one source, a TVK leader contacted a DMK leader close to Stalin and revealed what was under way. The matter was then discussed extensively among the DMK's top leadership, who decided the leader in question had to be retained. A few months later, at a party event, the DMK instituted a new award and presented it to the very leader who had contemplated the move. Also Read | How Tamil Nadu's political parties—except the BJP—united to condemn possible delimitation The DMK's strategy has left the BJP with no choice but to focus on its core strengths to gain a foothold in Tamil Nadu: through a mix of Hindutva slogans, relentless groundwork in coordination with the AIADMK, and the deployment of Central investigative agencies aimed at hampering the DMK and curtailing its finances. The 2026 Assembly election is crucial for all political parties in the State. For Palaniswami, who lost the 2019 and 2024 Lok Sabha elections as well as the 2021 Assembly election, this is the last chance to prove that he can lead the AIADMK to victory. If not, the party will certainly cast him aside. For Vijay, this is a litmus test. A poor show could impact his film career as well. For the DMK, it will be a referendum on Stalin's first term as Chief Minister. And for the BJP, this election will decide if the Modi-Shah combine can establish the BJP as a formidable force in Tamil Nadu.