Trump Used 1 Particularly 'Gross' Term About Women During His Latest 'Nonsensical Ramble'
President Donald Trump recently inexplicably warned graduating cadets in a commencement address at the United States Military Academy at West Point about 'trophy wives' — a term that is 'toxic' and misogynistic, one gender studies expert said.
While delivering his speech on Saturday, Trump spent some time sharing a story about late real estate developer William Levitt, who is widely considered to be the pioneer of the suburbs. The president described the developer, whose legacy includes his policy to only sell properties to white buyers, as a 'great, great real estate man' who at some point lost his 'momentum.'
As Trump began to reference Levitt's eventual career downfall, he mentioned the developer's marital history, noting that Levitt sold his company and then 'had nothing to do' before he got divorced and then 'found a new wife.'
'Could you say a trophy wife? I guess we could say a trophy wife,' Trump said about Levitt's second marriage. 'It didn't work out too well. But it doesn't work out too well, I must tell you. A lot of trophy wives, it doesn't work out. But it made him happy for a little while at least. But he found a new wife.'
Levitt was married three times — just like Trump. And the president's scandal-ridden history as a husband does not fit traditional or conventional views of a devoted family man.
Trump then went on and talked about Levitt later feeling 'bored' with life, before the developer eventually 'lost a lot of momentum' in his career and 'lost everything.'
He ended the tangent about Levitt by speaking directly to the cadets — seemingly as a way to impart wisdom — saying: 'You got to have momentum, but you have to know [when] that momentum is gone. You have to know when to say it's time to get out.'
The term 'trophy wives,' which Trump used in his speech, is widely credited to Julie Connelly, an editor of Fortune Magazine. She used the term in an article in 1989 to describe a 'trophy wife' as a woman who works hard or 'has her own business.' The phrase has held different meanings, uses and interpretations over the years, and today, most people use it as a way to label an attractive woman who's married to a man who's very successful in his career.
Kari J. Winter, a professor of American studies at the University at Buffalo, said the term 'succinctly captures a toxic set of misogynistic ideas.'
'It implies that financially successful men deserve to acquire beautiful, sexy wives in the same way that they can purchase expensive cars, watches and other commodities,' she said. 'It demeans women by reducing their value to patriarchal beauty standards, as if success for a woman means becoming a desirable object for a wealthy man. Gross.'
Winter, whose expertise includes gender, feminism, race and class, told HuffPost that she believes Trump's 'word salad about trophy wives offers his personal experience as evidence for his assertion that 'a lot of trophy wives, it doesn't work out.''
'Maybe the message West Point graduates should take away is this: Reject Trump's misogynistic pursuit of serial trophy wives,' she continued. 'Pursue genuine, egalitarian relationships based on mutual respect and love if you want your personal life to work out well.'
'Listeners need to be wary of imposing a coherent meaning on a nonsensical ramble,' Winter told HuffPost. 'It might be more illuminating to view the speech as a window into Trump's state of mind. Is he telling himself, 'You have to sometimes know when you've lost momentum?''
Aside from Trump's mention of the misogynistic idea of a 'trophy wife,' Winter thinks that Trump's speech and his rant about Levitt are overall 'embarrassing for the United States.'
She pointed out that the purpose of commencement speeches is to acknowledge and honor the accomplishments of the graduates, and to offer words of wisdom and encouragement — not asides about trophy wives or losing momentum.
She said that Trump's apparent implication that having a 'trophy wife' helped lead to Levitt losing his momentum was one of the 'many incoherent passages in his speech.' And the president's choice, overall, to highlight Levitt, who died in 1994, was 'strange.'
It 'calls attention to Trump's advanced age and the way he is stuck in the past,' she said.
'As a teacher, I interact with hundreds of young people every year, and none of them dream of living in all-white, covenant-restricted, car-dependent suburbia any more than they want to live in apartheid South Africa,' Winter said.
After all, 'affordable housing is one of the most urgent issues in the United States and around the world,' she continued, before later adding, 'Why is it that Trump keeps returning to the worst design ideas of the 20th century?'
Trump Warns Of The Perils Of 'Trophy Wives' During West Point Commencement Speech
Trump Takes Credit For U.S. Military Might In West Point Commencement Address
Trump Brags About Shielding Putin, And It's Not Going Over Well On Social Media
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
12 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
The Latest: Trump muses about regime change in Iran after U.S. strikes on nuclear facilities
Israel's military said Monday it was striking around Iran's western city of Kermanshah, as fears of a wider regional conflict loomed large after the United States inserted itself into Israel's war by attacking Iranian nuclear sites. The operation raised urgent questions about what remained of Tehran's nuclear program and how its weakened military might respond. The price of oil rose as financial markets reacted. Iran lashed out at the U.S. for crossing 'a very big red line' with its risky gambit to strike the three sites with missiles and 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs . President Donald Trump, who has warned of additional strikes if Tehran retaliates against U.S. forces, has mused about the possibility of 'regime change ″ in Iran, despite administration officials earlier indicating they wanted to restart talks with Iran. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in an interview with CBS, said: 'Let's meet directly.' Ali Akbar Velayati, an adviser to Iran's supreme leader, said any country used by the U.S. to strike Iran 'will be a legitimate target for our armed forces,' the state-run IRNA news agency reported. Tens of thousands of American troops are based in the Middle East. Here is the latest: North Korea condemns U.S. strikes on Iran North Korea says it 'strongly condemns' the U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, calling it an egregious violation of Iran's territorial integrity and security interests. North Korea's Foreign Ministry said in a statement Monday that the United States and Israel were escalating tensions in the Middle East through the use of military force, and called on the 'just-minded international community' to raise a unified voice against their 'confrontational behavior.' During his first term, U.S. President Donald Trump met North Korean leader Kim Jong Un three times in 2018 and 2019, but their diplomacy collapsed over disagreements in exchanging the release of U.S.-led sanctions against North Korea and the North's steps to wind down its nuclear and missile program. Kim has since accelerated his arms development while ignoring talk offers by Washington and Seoul. He has shifted the priority of his foreign policy to Russia, sending thousands of troops and huge shipments of military equipment to fuel Russian President Vladimir Putin's war on Ukraine. Trump claims 'monumental damage' inflicted on Iranian nuclear sites President Donald Trump asserted on his Truth Social platform that Iran's nuclear sites sustained 'monumental damage' in the American attack, though a U.S. assessment on the strikes is still underway. 'The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!' he wrote. U.S. defense officials have said they are working to determine about just how much damage the strikes did. Iran as well has not said how much damage was done in the attack, though Tehran has not offered any details so far on the strikes it has faced from Israel in its war with that country. Iran likely filled in tunnels at nuclear sites ahead of U.S. strikes An analysis of satellite photos by a nuclear nonproliferation group based in Washington shows Iran likely filled in tunnels at its nuclear site at Isfahan ahead of U.S. strikes early Sunday. The Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security published satellite images taken by Airbus it assessed showed trucks dumping soil into tunnels at the site on Friday. The U.S. attack likely targeted the tunnel entries, the group said. 'At least three of the four tunnel entrances are collapsed,' it said. 'The status of the fourth one is unclear.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pakistan condemns Trump for bombing Iran a day after recommending him for a Nobel Peace Prize
ISLAMABAD (AP) — Pakistan condemned U.S. President Donald Trump for bombing Iran, less than 24 hours after saying he deserved a Nobel Peace Prize for defusing a recent crisis with India. Relations between the two South Asian countries plummeted after a massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir in April. The nuclear-armed rivals stepped closer to war in the weeks that followed, attacking each other until intense diplomatic efforts, led by the U.S., resulted in a truce for which Trump took credit. It was this 'decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership' that Pakistan praised in an effusive message Saturday night on the X platform when it announced its formal recommendation for him to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. Less than 24 hours later, however, it condemned the U.S. for attacking Iran, saying the strikes 'constituted a serious violation of international law' and the statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in a phone call Sunday with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, expressed his concern that the bombings had targeted facilities that were under the safeguards of the IAEA. Pakistan has close ties with Iran and supports its attacks on Israel, saying it has the right to self-defense. There was no immediate comment on Monday from Islamabad about the Trump Nobel recommendation, which also followed a high-profile White House lunch meeting between the president and Pakistan's powerful army chief, Asim Munir. Thursday's meeting, which lasted more than two hours, was also attended by the Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff, the U.S. Special Representative for Middle Eastern Affairs. According to a Pakistani military statement, a detailed exchange of views took place on the 'prevailing tensions between Iran and Israel, with both leaders emphasizing the importance of the resolution of the conflict.' While Pakistan was quick to thank Trump for his intervention in its crisis with India, New Delhi played it down and said there was no need for external mediation on the Kashmir issue. The Himalayan region of Kashmir is divided between Pakistan and India but claimed by both in its entirety. India accuses Pakistan of backing militant groups in the region, which Pakistan denies.


Bloomberg
34 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
What Does the US Strike on Iran Mean for Israel?
Live on Bloomberg TV CC-Transcript 00:00Walk us through how the Israeli public has responded to the US military intervention over the weekend. Good morning, Joumanna. Yes, well, this was a dramatic weekend, one of historic proportions in Israel as elsewhere in the region and in the world, especially countries that have a stake in this part of the world. And Israelis, I would say this is to judge by everything from television panelists to the people I've shared bomb shelters with during the Iranian retaliatory missile attacks appear to be relieved, jubilant, astonished at the fact that the world's great power, the United States, did intervene finally, and using its firepower for what appears to have been a knockout blow, at least as described by President Trump and by his staff to the Iranian nuclear program. Of course, the question is whether it was a knockout blow. And I think what you're going to see today is the discourse shifting to one of BDA. That's the refrain you'll be hearing a lot of battle damage assessments, whether indeed it was a knockout blow, whether indeed the damage was enough to end any credible work at those sites and effectively allow Israel to pack up and say that the war is over. The main threat, what it's described as the main threat to its existence going back decades has now been dealt with conclusively. I thought it was interesting. The Israeli prime minister gave a televised address yesterday where he said Israel is very close to reaching goals in Iran but will also avoid a war of attrition. How should we be reading those comments, Dan? Well, it's worth keeping in mind that the two countries are separated by something like a thousand miles of territory. I think three international borders, Iran is something like 70 times the size of Israel. There really is an asymmetry here in terms of disposition, geography, military standing. So for all the virtuosity of Israeli forces here, I don't think they could afford to sustain fighting in the long run, something akin to what we've seen in the last 20 months in Gaza, in Lebanon, in Syria, which are neighboring countries or neighboring territories. So the Israelis are looking logistically at this. I think they're also signaling to the American public, those Americans who are wondering whether this is a repeat of 2003 in Iraq, that this was a one time deal for Israel and for the United States, that perhaps the US role has begun and ended with this airstrike and that Israel, the country most involved in this, the U.S. ally, is really also trying to wrap things up as soon as it believes that its goals have been achieved and those goals may be achieved very soon.