Popular bakery owes staff almost $250,000 in super, but 'payday' super could protect workers

Popular hospitality group All Are Welcome owes almost a quarter of a million dollars in superannuation to its current and former employees, with many staff feeling worried and concerned they won't see the money they are owed.
The Insta-famous bakery — with locations in Melbourne's Northcote, Thornbury and East Ivanhoe — entered voluntary administration in February this year after accruing more than $1 million in debts.
Documents shared with the ABC reveal staff are owed $243,000 in superannuation and $125,000 in leave entitlements, with the total amount owed to the ATO standing around $1.4 million.
But, according to the administrator's report, the original director — Boris Portnoy — bought back the business after it entered into voluntary administration, with question marks over whether he will carry over the former business's liabilities.
"[It's] quite concerning because I don't have confidence that I'm going to see that money," one former employee told the ABC.
The former staff member, who has asked not to be named, says they found out about the lack of super payments in March this year.
"When we received a correspondence from the administrators on the 12th of March which had some information about the business, including a section that stated how much money was owed in super, which prompted myself and others to go and check our super accounts properly."
They say, despite their pay slips including superannuation contributions, this money was not reflected in their accounts.
"It was clear that we hadn't been paid any super payments since around sort of September last year, which is around sort of eight or nine months worth of no super payments," they say.
Multiple former staff from the bakery have told the ABC they are each owed thousands of dollars in superannuation.
"[I felt] disappointed because we were led to feel quite responsible for the financial situation of the business in that there was a lot of pressure put on all of us as employees in terms of keeping the roster as tight as we can and ordering as tight as we can in order to sort of get the business across the line," said one former worker.
"Then to find out that we've been withheld entitlements and hadn't been told, felt like a bit of a blindside."
The former employee says there was no communication from the director and when they tried to seek answers from him, nothing was clear.
"The explanation of why we weren't paid super was that the business had been struggling financially and that was a method that he was able to use in order to help him with cash flow for the business," they said.
But they say nothing was provided in writing, and there was no clear timeframe on when staff may see their money.
"I'm not sure what's changed in order to allow him to pay that moving forward in a different manner."
During this period, Mr Portnoy also lent himself $235,028 through his family trust, which documents reveal "were made to him in lieu of a wage".
In a statement to the ABC, Mr Portnoy said: "As part of the business purchase all outstanding employee entitlements are to be assumed by the new company.
"The timing for the payment of the superannuation is being determined by the administrators and we will have a firm timeline after finalisation of the liquidation," he said.
The administrator did not respond to the ABC's request for comment.
Superannuation advocates have been pushing for "payday super" to help minimise this problem.
"Payday super, as it sounds on the tin, is your super paid on the same day as your wages," said Mary Delahunty, chief executive officer of the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).
Some employers already do this, but it's not a requirement. If the law changes, everyone will get their superannuation payments at the same time as their wages.
If it had been in place, the former staff of All Are Welcome are unlikely to have had such a large amount of super owing to them.
Superannuation is not covered under the Fair Entitlements Guarantee, which protects some of the money owed to workers when a business goes under.
"They are due to be paid. Unpaid super is an obligation still, even through a liquidation process. And they have a priority sort of setting in the liquidation processes," Ms Delahunty said.
She said the most common way people were paid wages was fortnightly, "but monthly is also very common". Payments to superannuation however are most commonly paid either quarterly or monthly.
Because of this, some small businesses use superannuation payments as a kind of overdraft or "credit card", helping them to smooth cash flow issues — when the timing of income and payments doesn't line up.
Payday super should allow such problems to be seen sooner, she adds.
"It would allow for non-compliance with payments to be seen more regularly … [people] could chase it up and the ATO could do their reckoning of that non-compliance in a more timely manner."
Essentially, flagging problems before they get bigger.
The laws, which are meant to take effect in July 2026, haven't even passed Parliament yet and a lobby group representing accountants is asking for a two-year delay.
Richard Webb, superannuation lead at CPA Australia, says the industry supports the intent of payday super and the idea that people should have their deferred remuneration — such as superannuation — paid at the same time as their wages.
"But the reality is that the infrastructure and the spend that many businesses will need to do to make sure that their systems are up for it is simply not doable by that time," he argues.
Most workers simply receive their pay in their bank account.
But for the people on the other end pushing money through the financial pipes, it's a lot harder.
The Single Touch Payroll system means, for the vast majority of Australian employees, data is sent to the Australian Tax Office (ATO) at the same time the wages or salary are paid to the employee's bank account.
"But in the case of superannuation contributions, there's a lot more data needed to be sent at the same time as contributions themselves," Mr Webb says.
"So the cash goes one way, the data goes the other. It meets at an intermediary who mixes the data and the cash together and makes sure they all match up. And then it sends the data the various separate ways to various separate super funds [for individual employees]."
That's not the only problem. Many Australians work in roles that attract penalties and bonuses, such as extra pay for unsociable hours and weekend work.
Others receive commissions on sales that can take time to be calculated — such as when the product is delivered or when the client pays — making the amount of super for a defined period like a fortnight difficult to accurately calculate.
CPA Australia represents 170,000 accountants dotted throughout the world, with members working in different areas of accounting, finance and regulation.
Mr Webb agrees the current system needs to change.
When it goes bad and employees are short-changed, Mr Webb adds, the delay can make it harder to ascertain the figures owed.
"So we think that having them paid near each other makes it a lot easier ultimately for employers, who are paying smaller amounts out rather than one big lump sum at the end of the quarter," he said.
"It means that everyone can have everything nicely and neatly bundled in the same place where they can see it."
But he doesn't see the industry ready by the mooted deadline of July 1, 2026.
Even workers who don't suffer the misfortune of their employer going under could benefit.
Due to the effect of compound interest — the returns from investments and interest building on top of itself — just the shift to more frequent payments will boost the retirement savings of millions.
ASFA's Mary Delahunty says a shift from being paid superannuation quarterly (once every three months) to every fortnight will add up.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

ABC News

2 hours ago

• ABC News

Victorian Liberal leader Brad Battin says party infighting is over as focus shifts to 2026 election

Victorian opposition leader Brad Battin has conceded some Liberal Party MPs have focused more on internal rivalries than voters, but has said his team will be unified heading into the election in 2026. Mr Battin described the party's decision to provide former leader John Pesutto a $1.55 million loan to avoid bankruptcy, a policy he supported, as a "line in the sand" that signalled a renewed focus on winning government. The long-running fight between Mr Pesutto and fellow Liberal MP Moira Deeming, who successfully sued her former leader for defamation, has divided the party. It became a proxy battle in a broader ideological struggle for control of the party. In an interview with the ABC, Mr Battin said he was speaking to every MP individually following the decision to provide Mr Pesutto a financial lifeline, stressing the need for unity. "You've been elected as a local member of parliament. You've got the self-discipline to get there. You just need now to put that into team unity." Asked whether MPs who failed to be team players would face consequences, Mr Battin said voters would ultimately decide. "The consequences are, you lose the election. It's a pretty simple consequence." The Coalition has not won a Victorian election since 2010 and has been crippled by infighting. A common criticism is that too many MPs are focused more on getting to parliament rather than winning government. "I think there's always an element of that, because it's been publicly perceived as that,'' Mr Battin said. The Berwick MP said it was incumbent on MPs to reflect on why they were elected. "What things did you want to see change in the state? And can you do it from opposition? If the answer is yes … then you're probably in the wrong job." Mr Battin challenged Mr Pesutto's leadership six months ago after his supporters undermined Mr Pesutto's position, but Mr Battin reiterated throughout the interview that his team was now united. He hinted that the frontbench team could change but would not say if Mr Pesutto or Ms Deeming would be included in a revamped shadow cabinet. Ms Deeming had proposed an alternative to the party loaning Mr Pesutto money, including delaying his court order debt if her preselection was guaranteed. Mr Battin declined to comment on that or complaints to the state's anti-corruption watchdog, citing legal advice not to speak publicly on the matter. While expressing confidence in the team he would take to the election, Mr Battin said some MPs would need to reflect on their future. "People have to make decisions about time served in parliament, if they want to stay or not,'' he said. The Coalition must add 16 seats at next year's November election to win office. The task is big, but after three terms of Labor, there is a genuine chance for the Liberals, Mr Battin believed. "We've got one chance coming up in about 16 months. It's our opportunity to ensure we prove to Victorians we're ready." He said the party would now focus on policy, with internal disputes hopefully behind him. Mr Battin admitted the long-running conflict between Mr Pesutto and Ms Deeming took a toll on him, including sleepless nights. "It takes a physical and mental challenge on you … but it's resolved my drive. I know what I need to do to win at the next election." He doesn't regret how he handled the matter, stressing that it was a dispute between two individuals. Some MPs criticised Mr Battin for a lack of leadership in failing to resolve the crisis sooner, while others were angered by his decision to support the loan to Mr Pesutto, highlighting the party's ongoing divisions. "I know what I need to do to win at the next election. I need to get the right policy settings, have the right processes with my team, ensure we're a united front, and send a message to Victoria that we're ready to govern."

SBS Australia

2 hours ago

• SBS Australia

Amy thought she had a secure job as an international student

Back in 2023, international student Amy - not her real name - thought she had found a secure job in Darwin. The then 30-year-old was hired as a student service officer, by vocational education provider International House Sydney, where she was studying for an Advanced Diploma in Program Management. And unlike cash-in-hand casual jobs that many international students and new migrants often take, Amy felt secure with the position. "It was a part-time permanent job, because I was on a student visa, so I could only work part-time, but it was a permanent contract." But in January 2025 the company went into liquidation. Amy's Australian colleagues were able to access the Australian government's Fair Entitlements Guarantee, or FEG. The Guarantee allows people to claim back wages, redundancy payments and other entitlements after a company closes. But because Amy was an international student, she wasn't eligible for the scheme meaning that until today, she still hasn't been paid some wages or other entitlements after the company closed. "So I thought that I would be more protected if I had a permanent contract. But then, when this happened, I realised that as an migrant, I do not have the same rights. I cannot access the same, yes, the same safety net as an Australian or a (permanent) resident." According to International House Sydney's liquidator, PKF Melbourne, the education provider had been trading at a loss from at least June 2022. By the time it went into administration, it had around 3,800 students and 318 staff. Amy says they were informed by the liquidator that if funds remained after the liquidation, staff who couldn't access the FEG would be prioritised for repayment. SBS News have put questions about follow-up payments with migrant staff to PKF Melbourne, but they didn't reply specifically to the question. It's an issue facing many small and medium-size education providers after the federal government tightened international student enrolments last year. Felix Pirie is the chief executive of Independent Tertiary Education Council Australia. "We saw a big downturn for students to apply, to come or even consider lodging an application to come to Australia to undertake skills training courses but also English language programs." According to a report by the ITECA, in 2021 there are around 162,000 students enrolling in independent higher education providers with over half of them international students. Mr Pirie says the increased fees for visa applications and the slowdown of visa process hit his sector most. "The outcome of these things is that independent providers are the ones singled out at the end of the day, or they are the one that certainly feels the biggest impacts, and it's the people they employ. So they employ significant workforce, and when their business start to suffer, those people lose their jobs." If an international student finds their education provider goes into administration, they have the right to access the government's Tuition Protection Service. This helps students find alternative course options and get a full refund from the provider. Matt Kunkel is the Chief Executive Officer of Migrant Workers Centre in Victoria. He says many international students are also employed in the sector. "What the other impact on this is for many migrant workers is that once they complete their education in Australia, many of them are moving into the education sector themselves, and in particular the international education sector. So for those workers who have come to build a life, to get an education and build a life in Australia, these international caps are putting pressure on jobs in the sector." In 2019, the then Coalition government released the final report from the government's Migrant Workers' Taskforce, which recommended an expansion of the FEG to all migrant workers. The Migrant Workers' Taskforce was established in 2016 to tackle migrant worker exploitation but since the 2019 report - the FEG has yet to be expanded. In 2025 the Albanese Labor government announced a consultation process looking into reforms to the FEG, after some businesses were found to have misused the scheme. Mr Kunkel says the federal government needs to allow international students and migrant workers to access the FEG as soon as possible. "Our visa system is built around this idea that international students are here just to study. But the reality is that many of those international students are here working and studying in Australia, and we need a visa system that allows those workers who are coming, those international students who are coming to Australia to be able to live a dignified life as they study and get that education." Seri Feldman-Gubbay is a senior solicitor at Redfern Legal Centre. She also agrees that there's a gap between the safety net for local workers and international students. "I think that the biggest thing is that a lot of Australian employing businesses rely on the fact that international students will be unfamiliar with the legal system and the rules in Australia. And so there will be, I guess, a false sense of confidence that is this employer is going to do right by me, when, in actual fact, a lot of employers take advantage of that lack of knowledge to then do the wrong thing and leave people in a really bad position." And without the FEG scheme, Ms Feldman-Gubbay says for employees like Amy taking claims to court is one option. Amy wants to see a change. "I don't think I will ever be compensated, because I doubt there's money to be found, but I would really hope that in the future, nobody else has to go through this situation, or also for there to at least be something that is more talked about. I have not heard about this until it happened to me. I think that every migrant should know that this is something that could happen to them."

Daily Telegraph

3 hours ago

• Daily Telegraph

NSW suburbs that outperform top super fund

NSW homeowners in over 200 suburbs could be building retirement wealth faster than their super fund, new research reveals. Comparison site Finder has revealed how Australia's super funds compared to that of property price growth over the past ten years. The research found that a shocking 23 per cent – equivalent to around 4.6 million people – said they didn't have enough money in their super fund or other investments to get by in retirement. Australian Retirement Trust's super savings high growth fund had the highest returns, with a 8.79 per cent annual 10 year return, yet there were over 200 suburbs in NSW that out performed that. Houses in Millfield, Lockhart, Brunswick Heads and Clareville were among the top performers, growing by an average of 11-16 per cent annually over the past 10 years. MORE: 'They're off': $962m king's look into real estate woes Retired publican lists $12m apartment How you can save this end of financial year The average 10-year performance across all super funds is 5.7 per cent a year, according to Finder, while Sydney's 10 year annual compound property growth rate was 6.4 per cent. Finders money expert Richard Whitten said the more attention you give your superannuation now, the better off you'll be. 'It's truly a shame to reach retirement age only to find you have 'too little too late.' You can avoid this by taking proactive steps to engage with your super as soon as possible,' he said. He added that to have a comfortable retirement, a single person might need around $595,000 in their super by 67. 'Many Australians are still well below the amounts suggested for a comfortable retirement, making proactive engagement even more critical.' Ben Kingsley, managing director of Empower Wealth Advisory and co-author of 'How to retire on $3,000 a week,' said your return on investment could be higher with property, but warned there were always risks involved. 'If you're going to invest in property you don't want to be speculating, you want to be investing for the decades, not the short period of time,' he said. MORE: Singles face impossible property reality 'One of the advantages of investing in property is it isn't locked away until you're in your 60s. It gives you the ability to leverage from those returns, to accelerate some growth in further returns – use the proceeds or equity to add to your initial property portfolio, which is something to consider.' '(Super) is a sort of set and forget for most Australians, with property when you do have ownership you have control, you can tinker with the property itself you can add value to the property,' he added. He noted it was important to diversify when it came to setting up for retirement. 'You can't save your way to retirement, you need to put your money to work, whether that's additional contributions to super, or investing in shares or property, you're better off starting to think about it in your 30s,' he said. Canstar's director of data insights, Sally Tindall, said Aussie's shouldn't be choosing between a healthy super amount and a property, but should aim to invest in both. 'It comes down to personal preference, but open your mind to achieving both. Don't put all your eggs in one basket,' she said. 'It's not a simple comparison and there's a multitude of factors, there's tax implications on both sides, and whether you're purchasing as an investor or an owner-occupier,' she said. Recent Labor government tax changes, which apply an additional 15 per cent tax on earnings for super balances exceeding $3 million, would affect an estimated 80,000 Australians (0.5% of super account holders). MORE: Rare backyard find that can kill you 'It will be interesting to see how that plays out over time, as the government has said that $3m won't be indexed, which could then start to impact many more people in many years to come as the number of people with that sum starts to increase, so that's another factor in the equation.' With the super guarantee increasing to 12 per cent on July 1, Ms Tindall said this may encourage some people to take the property route, knowing their employee is contributing more to their super. 'It's also not just the super vs. mortgage, there are plenty of other things like shares people could be putting their money into. It's important to understand what the mix is and understand the pros and cons and the sacrifice you might have to make, as well as the benefits you can get from each one.' MORE: New builds vanish amid loan slump TOP 20 NSW GROWTH SUBURBS OVER 10 YEAR AVERAGE