NSW suburbs that outperform top super fund
NSW homeowners in over 200 suburbs could be building retirement wealth faster than their super fund, new research reveals.
Comparison site Finder has revealed how Australia's super funds compared to that of property price growth over the past ten years.
The research found that a shocking 23 per cent – equivalent to around 4.6 million people – said they didn't have enough money in their super fund or other investments to get by in retirement.
Australian Retirement Trust's super savings high growth fund had the highest returns, with a 8.79 per cent annual 10 year return, yet there were over 200 suburbs in NSW that out performed that.
Houses in Millfield, Lockhart, Brunswick Heads and Clareville were among the top performers, growing by an average of 11-16 per cent annually over the past 10 years.
MORE: 'They're off': $962m king's look into real estate woes
Retired publican lists $12m apartment
How you can save this end of financial year
The average 10-year performance across all super funds is 5.7 per cent a year, according to Finder, while Sydney's 10 year annual compound property growth rate was 6.4 per cent.
Finders money expert Richard Whitten said the more attention you give your superannuation now, the better off you'll be.
'It's truly a shame to reach retirement age only to find you have 'too little too late.' You can avoid this by taking proactive steps to engage with your super as soon as possible,' he said.
He added that to have a comfortable retirement, a single person might need around $595,000 in their super by 67.
'Many Australians are still well below the amounts suggested for a comfortable retirement, making proactive engagement even more critical.'
Ben Kingsley, managing director of Empower Wealth Advisory and co-author of 'How to retire on $3,000 a week,' said your return on investment could be higher with property, but warned there were always risks involved.
'If you're going to invest in property you don't want to be speculating, you want to be investing for the decades, not the short period of time,' he said.
MORE: Singles face impossible property reality
'One of the advantages of investing in property is it isn't locked away until you're in your 60s. It gives you the ability to leverage from those returns, to accelerate some growth in further returns – use the proceeds or equity to add to your initial property portfolio, which is something to consider.'
'(Super) is a sort of set and forget for most Australians, with property when you do have ownership you have control, you can tinker with the property itself you can add value to the property,' he added.
He noted it was important to diversify when it came to setting up for retirement.
'You can't save your way to retirement, you need to put your money to work, whether that's additional contributions to super, or investing in shares or property, you're better off starting to think about it in your 30s,' he said.
Canstar's director of data insights, Sally Tindall, said Aussie's shouldn't be choosing between a healthy super amount and a property, but should aim to invest in both.
'It comes down to personal preference, but open your mind to achieving both. Don't put all your eggs in one basket,' she said.
'It's not a simple comparison and there's a multitude of factors, there's tax implications on both sides, and whether you're purchasing as an investor or an owner-occupier,' she said.
Recent Labor government tax changes, which apply an additional 15 per cent tax on earnings for super balances exceeding $3 million, would affect an estimated 80,000 Australians (0.5% of super account holders).
MORE: Rare backyard find that can kill you
'It will be interesting to see how that plays out over time, as the government has said that $3m won't be indexed, which could then start to impact many more people in many years to come as the number of people with that sum starts to increase, so that's another factor in the equation.'
With the super guarantee increasing to 12 per cent on July 1, Ms Tindall said this may encourage some people to take the property route, knowing their employee is contributing more to their super.
'It's also not just the super vs. mortgage, there are plenty of other things like shares people could be putting their money into. It's important to understand what the mix is and understand the pros and cons and the sacrifice you might have to make, as well as the benefits you can get from each one.'
MORE: New builds vanish amid loan slump
TOP 20 NSW GROWTH SUBURBS OVER 10 YEAR AVERAGE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
27 minutes ago
- News.com.au
How rentvesting helped this couple build real wealth
Smart buyers aren't choosing between super and property, and this Melbourne couple proves the most successful investors aren't picking between super and property, they're doing both. And Rob Bright and Siobhan Freeman are living proof. The Melbourne couple, who rent in Hampton but own in booming Ripley, Queensland, say they've already seen the pay-off of thinking differently, and they're not done yet. Buyers eyeing forgotten Melb Woolies store 'We live in Hampton and own in Ripley in South East Queensland,' they said. 'We bought in Ripley as a rentvestment in March 2021 and have lived in Hampton the whole time.' According to PropTrack data, Ripley house prices have jumped from $320,000 to $749,900 over the past decade, an average annual increase of 8.9 per cent, beating the 5.7 per cent average return delivered by Australia's top-performing super funds in the same period, according to SuperRatings. And with Melbourne's market rebounding, the couple said they could now be eyeing suburbs like Cobblebank, 11 per cent, Weir Views, 10.9 per cent, Aintree, 10.4 per cent, and Mickleham 9.9 per cent for their next investment. 'We definitely feel the market has changed and we are eager to get back in,' they said. For the couple, the strategy has always been about flexibility and smart planning, not chasing the status quo. 'Rentvesting was always part of our plan. It works for us.' OpenCorp chief executive Cam McLellan said the most successful investors weren't choosing between superannuation and property they were combining both. 'You don't have to choose super or property. Smart investors are doing both,' Mr McLellan said. 'That's how you future-proof, multiple levers working together.' Mr McLellan added that many buyers underestimated the leverage and tax benefits of owning strategically, especially in growth corridors. For Rob and Siobhan, the focus is on what works, not what looks good on paper. 'We've just found that rentvesting gives us the best of both worlds,' they said. 'We love where we live, and we're building equity somewhere with strong returns.'
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
The truth about Melbourne, Sydney ‘exodus'
In the years since the pandemic first began to unfold, the perception of Melbourne and Victoria more broadly in the nation's collective imagination has changed dramatically. Prior to the pandemic Victoria had the fastest rate of population growth in the nation in both nominal and per capita terms, while the state's economy was one of the fastest growing of any in the nation. Yet despite Victoria's relative economic strength prior to the pandemic, today the perception of Melbourne and Victoria could scarcely be more different. But is that reputation deserved? Or is Victoria experiencing a hangover of pandemic era perceptions that are no longer reflective of reality, years after the pandemic drew to a close. In an attempt to provide a concrete answer to this question, we'll be looking at three quantifiable metrics, comparing today's Victoria not only with the other states and territories, but also with where Victoria was at the eve of the pandemic. Housing In recent years Victoria has often made headlines for an exodus of property investors. Weaker than average growth in housing prices, a lowering of the land tax threshold and higher land taxes have all been put forward as reasons for investors exiting the market. For the sake of argument, we will assume that the rental bond data used to underpin claims of an exodus is correct, despite the extremely high likelihood of seeing the number of rentals in Victoria revised upward. If there has been an exodus of property investors from Melbourne, no real downside is being realised relative to other states and territories. As of the latest data from property data firm SQM Research, Melbourne has the highest rental vacancy rate of any the nation's capital cities and in relative terms has a vacancy rate 83 per cent higher than the average rate of the nation's other capital cities and 42 per cent higher than the national average. This not what you would expect to see if an exodus of property investors was negatively impacting Melbourne's renters. In recent years, an increasingly widespread perception of a mass exodus from Melbourne has developed, arguably as a response to the state's more protracted and more severe lockdowns than the national average. It is correct that population flows in and out of Melbourne have shifted since the pandemic. During the 2021-22 financial year, 24,450 people left Melbourne in net terms as a result of domestic migration. However, the largest loss of residents to domestic migration of any city during 2021-22 was experienced by Sydney, where 49,800 people exited the harbour side city in net terms. Fast forward to the latest data from the ABS which covers up to the end of the last financial year, Melbourne saw a loss of 7580 residents to net internal migration. Meanwhile, Sydney saw a significantly larger exodus of residents to domestic migration, with 41,100 exiting during 2023-24. While Melbourne has certainly seen a major shift from the pre-pandemic norm of domestically driven population inflows, the outflows it is now experiencing are a fraction of what became the norm in Sydney over a decade ago. The labour market When it comes to the labour market Victoria's performance is significantly less impressive. But first some good news, Victoria's unemployment rate is 0.47 percentage points lower than it was at the end of 2019 (4.85 per cent then vs. 4.37 per cent today). The bad news is that despite the strong improvement in the labour market compared with pre- pandemic, its improvement is the weakest of the nation's five most populous states. As of the latest data from the ABS, Victoria also has the highest unemployment of the five most populous states, with 4.37 per cent of the labour force out of work compared the best performing state, Queensland where 3.69 per cent are unemployed. While things are not going as well for Victoria compared with the other states on this metric, there is a silver lining. Since January, the unemployment rate in Victoria has reduced by 0.3 percentage points, even while the unemployment rate in New South Wales and South Australia has increased. The takeaway While Melbourne has seen domestic migration turn negative since the onset of the pandemic, claims of a mass exodus are overstated, at least when put into context with Sydney, which saw 5.4x residents exit to elsewhere in Australia in 2023-24. On the other hand, the news from the labour market is more mixed, unemployment in Victoria is significantly lower than where it was prior to the pandemic, but is 0.31 percentage points higher than the national average. Meanwhile, the best news for Victoria stem from its housing market, where it holds the title of highest rental vacancy rate in the nation and simultaneously the lowest cost house rents of any major city. Victoria certainly faces challenges on the road ahead, most notably from its state budget, as the Allan government attempts to get the state on a more sustainable fiscal path after facing a particularly damaging period during the pandemic. Ultimately, despite its other challenges, Victoria is not facing the problems claimed to the degree that is often perceived and in some important ways Victoria is excelling to a degree unseen in the rest of the nation's large states.
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
MCoBeauty founder: ‘I didn't spend any time at home'
Just months after her headline-making exit from billion-dollar business MCoBeauty, the company she founded in 2016, Shelley Sullivan has opened up about the realities of building and running her brand while also raising two daughters. 'I had [my two daughters] Lucy [now 19] and Emily [now 18] when I started ModelCo [launched in 2002]. I didn't spend any time at home with the girls. I was working around the clock because I passionately loved what I did, but I wouldn't have been able to do that without family helping,' Sullivan told Stellar podcast Something To Talk About. 'I was working around the clock because I passionately loved what I did, but I wouldn't have been able to do that without family helping. Work-life balance is difficult. Anyone that says that they have a great work-life balance, I'm not sure I believe [them]. 'As a woman, I found it very challenging: work-life balance, having great friends, [a] great family, it's difficult. Plus, you've got this behemoth of a business that is almost running you, you're not running it. I was fortunate when I started MCoBeauty; the girls were in their teenage years, close to finishing school, so they were more independent. I don't know how I would have coped with the acceleration of MCoBeauty with babies.' Listen to the full interview with Shelley Sullivan on Something To Talk About below: Sullivan, who sold MCoBeauty earlier this year, points out that while the brand is valued at a billion dollars, she did not walk away with that amount of money. 'We all had a vision to create Australia's fastest growing beauty brand. We just drove those sales as hard as we could and the valuation is a multiple of base earnings. So the beauty landscape and the beauty industry drives that valuation, not us,' she told Stellar. 'The business could be valued at $1 billion but that's not necessarily a reflection on what the people that are exiting get... But I don't think myself, the family and the team ever thought beyond our wildest dreams that that's what we would create.' When asked what advice she would give to Hailey Bieber, who also recently sold her beauty and skincare brand Rhode for a reported billion dollars, Sullivan was gracious. 'I don't know [Hailey Bieber's] deal structure, so it's hard to give advice. We did work with Hailey — Hailey was the face of ModelCo for a minute,' she said. 'She's a great girl who was very much, from what I understand, involved in the product development [of Rhode]. That's a great brand. I actually purchased some of their products. She's done a great job.' Read the full interview and see the shoot with Shelley Sullivan in the new issue of Stellar out today inside The Sunday Telegraph (NSW), Sunday Herald Sun (VIC), The Sunday Mail (QLD) and Sunday Mail (SA).
