Tuesday briefing: What Israel really wants in Iran – and what might come next

Good morning. As the conflict between Iran and Israel has heated up in the days since Israel's surprise attack last week, a consensus has emerged that, while Tehran's nuclear ambitions have been severely compromised, it is all but impossible for Israel to extinguish them permanently without American support.
Nonetheless, Israel hopes that scuttling Iran's nuclear talks with the US and severely weakening the regime as a military threat will make its gambit worthwhile. And there is another goal that Benjamin Netanyahu appears to believe is possible: regime change.
That phrase, associated as it is with the US-led coalition's disastrous military adventure in Iraq, is something of a taboo in western capitals. But Netanyahu has been publicly bullish about the end of Ayatollah Khamenei's rule: 'I can tell you this, we have indications that senior leaders in Iran are already packing their bags,' he said on Saturday. 'They sense what's coming.'
In other statements, Netanyahu has been more ambiguous – and there are good reasons to think that Israel's attacks, extending yesterday to Iran's state broadcaster, may have the opposite effect. For today's newsletter, I spoke to Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and north Africa programme at Chatham House, about what Israel really wants, and why a sudden transformation in Tehran still looks very unlikely. Here are the headlines.
Grooming gangs | A culture of 'blindness, ignorance and prejudice' led to repeated failures over decades to properly investigate cases in which children were abused by grooming gangs, a report has said. Louise Casey said that the authorities had shied away from collecting data on the ethnicity of perpetrators.
Gaza | At least 37 Palestinians were killed on Monday in new shootings near food distribution centres run by private US contractors, local authorities said. The death toll, blamed by witnesses on Israeli troops, was the highest yet reported in the near-daily shootings since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation began operations three weeks ago.
India | Investigators are preparing to study the pilots' last words for clues as to the cause of the Air India plane crash, after recovering the cockpit voice recorder from the wreckage. The voice recorder was in the Boeing 787 aircraft's second black box, which Indian authorities said they had found on Sunday.
Carers | The mother of a teenager with cerebral palsy has demanded an end to the 'sickening harassment' of unpaid carers after a significant legal victory against the government. Nicola Green was pursued by the Department for Work and Pensions for more than a year after she was accused of fraudulently claiming nearly £3,000 in carer's allowance.
UK news | A second person who died in a tandem skydiving incident in Devon has been identified as Adam Harrison, 30, from Bournemouth. Emergency services were called to the area around Dunkeswell aerodrome on Friday. Harrison, who was a tandem skydive instructor, and Belinda Taylor, 48, from Totnes, were confirmed dead at the scene.
In much of the discussion around the 'existential threat' that Israel says it faces from Iran, the focus has been on the risk of Tehran developing nuclear weapons. Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that nuclear weapons and Iran's existing ballistic missiles were the primary targets of the Israeli operation.
But his comments have also left plenty of space to ask whether there is another goal: the removal of the Iranian regime. Israel acted 'to not only protect ourselves, but protect the world from this incendiary regime', he said. And after the first wave of attacks, he called for 'the Iranian people to unite around its flag and its historic legacy, by standing up for your freedom from the evil and oppressive regime'.
So is that a serious aim – and what might Iran's future look like if it happened?
Does Israel want regime change in Iran?
There is little doubt that it 'would be a dreamlike scenario for the Israeli political establishment', Sanam Vakil said. But there is a difference between a dream outcome and a realistic strategic goal. 'Since the 7 October attacks, there has been a consensus in Israel that Iran has to be cut down to size. But privately, military and intelligence officials tend to see regime change itself as very hard to achieve.'
What is less clear is what Netanyahu and his political allies really want, or believe to be feasible. 'Seeing Iran as the primary security threat and enemy of Israel is something he's spoken about for two decades,' Vakil said.
His foreign policy has generally focused on containment rather than direct confrontation – but that is partly because previous US presidents, and even Trump in his first term, have been less tolerant of Israeli aggression than the White House now appears. 'Since October 7, Israel's calculations have shifted, and it's unclear how serious he is about this now. At best, they can try to weaken the regime and let the dominoes fall.'
Some analysts have voiced the view that while it suits Israel to call for regime change now, as a way to destabilise Iran, it is less clear that it would be its preferred outcome in reality. In an X post that she acknowledged presented an 'increasingly unpopular opinion', Maryam Alemzadeh, a professor of Iranian politics at Oxford, argued that Israel 'wants a hardliner state who tries to retaliate and make Israel the victim, but fails to inflict much damage'. She said that regime change would ultimately mean that 'Iran as the straw man enemy that Israel relies on would disappear'.
Has Israel's attack changed the views of ordinary Iranians?
On its face, Netanyahu's appeal to the Iranian people would appear to suggest that he hopes the instability created by Israel's attacks will stoke the already significant discontent in Iran – and bring about a popular uprising.
In a country of more than 90 million people who have limited opportunities for public expression, it is obviously foolish to claim knowledge of what 'the Iranian people' want. 'I don't have a handle on the diversity of views in Iran, and I doubt that Israel does, either,' Vakil said. But it is perhaps more likely that the attacks will have the opposite effect.
The Iranian health ministry claims that 90% of casualties so far are civilians; the Israeli defence minister, Israel Katz, has threatened that 'the residents of Tehran will pay the price, and soon' for Iranian retaliation against Israeli residential areas.
'That doesn't play well in Iran,' Vakil said. 'There is, perhaps, an arrogance in asking people who have long been suppressed by their government to come out and topple the regime in response to an Israeli attack.' This piece by William Christou and Deepa Parent, reporting on emergency admissions to a Tehran hospital, gives a sense of how unconvincing a messenger Israel is now likely to appear to many Iranians.
In general, Iranians have not appeared supportive of their government's 'axis of resistance' anti-Israel strategy in recent years. But now there may well be a 'rebound effect', Vakil said: 'What Israel and Netanyahu are doing is creating more antipathy among a civilian population that wasn't very animated about Israel at all.'
Could Israel topple the regime without Iranian civilian support?
Set aside the slim prospects of a sudden popular uprising: Israel might also hope that its attacks will precipitate the regime's removal by other means. And, Vakil said, the Islamic republic has clearly been weakened by Israel's attack: 'This could certainly be the beginning of a transformation, and you can imagine a domino effect that leads to new people at the top.'
But while Israel's success in killing senior military leaders has shocked the Iranian establishment, there was little impact on civilian and clerical leadership. In any case, Vakil said, the Iranian state is not so shaky that the loss of individuals would be likely to precipitate a wholesale change. 'The symbolism of taking out the top echelon of the IRGC [Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps], which is enshrined in the Iranian constitution as the protector against external and internal threats, is not lost on people. It reveals a system that can not manage its own security.
'It is important and deeply traumatic and embarrassing for the Islamic republic, but it would be a little too triumphant to think that it means the regime is going to collapse as a result.'
There is another problem: the vector of the Israeli assault. The historic evidence of regime change brought about through war suggests that it is rarely the result of aerial attack alone, Vakil said. 'Unless the United States suddenly decides that it wants to roll in with boots on the ground, and that it is prepared to engage in a military operation like the one in Iraq, it is very hard to see the Islamic republic being toppled overnight.'
Would the death of Ayatollah Khamenei change that?
On Sunday, Reuters reported a remarkable claim from senior US administration officials: that Israel had a plan to kill the Iranian supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, but that it was vetoed by the White House. If such an operation had been successful – the same report said that Israel believed it had an opportunity to take Khamenei out – the rupture to Iran's political structures would clearly have been even more profound.
But, Vakil said, Iran is not like Iraq under Saddam Hussein or Libya under Muammar Gaddafi, where so much power was vested in a single person that their removal could be expected to bring about a fundamental change. 'Power in Iran is institutionalised, not personalised,' she said. 'It would be a massive blow, of course. But the regime would quickly convene and decide what to do.'
One good reason to be sceptical that Khamenei's removal would be transformative: Iran is already planning for a future without the 86-year-old. Under the pressure of international sanctions, there has been little public discussion of succession, Vakil said: 'Part of why the regime had agreed to negotiate with Trump is that they wanted to create the space for that process to play out in the public domain.'
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
What might a new regime look like?
In this thread on X on Saturday, Vakil laid out some scenarios that might unfold, ranging from a sectarian civil war with a power vacuum at the centre to a coup by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. A pluralistic democracy does not make the list.
'It's not readily apparent that it's a possibility,' she said, as there is no organised opposition in Tehran, while the exiled opposition has few friends at home. 'Even among the diaspora, there are so many opinions about what a revolutionary regime change moment should look like. And within the country there is paralysis. You can confidently say that the majority of the country is deeply unhappy with the leadership of the Islamic republic – but I don't have a sense that Iranians can articulate a coherent view of what they want instead.'
Over the past five days, the UK Aids Memorial Quilt, which commemorates those who have died of the disease, has been viewed by thousands of deeply moved people at London's Tate Modern – revealing it to be, argues Charlie Porter, one of the most significant artworks of the past 40 years. Alex Needham, acting head of newsletters
Ahead of Friday's vote on assisted dying, Gordon Brown writes that 'there is no effective freedom to choose if the alternative option, the freedom to draw on high-quality end-of-life care, is not available'. For MPs, he argues, that makes the moral duty to vote no inescapable. Archie
The fact that Donald Trump's military parade turned out to be a washout shouldn't cheer his opponents too much, writes Moira Doneghan. While we can laugh at his intensely naff attempts to ape strongman dictators, the sinister intent behind them is all too sincere. Alex
If you've spent any time on the internet, you've probably seen a competition to win a house in a raffle. Kate McCusker talks to some of the people who tried to sell their properties in this unconventional way – with mixed results. Alex
Ross Minor has a singular ambition: to make it possible for blind people to play any video game they want. This Wired profile is a totally fascinating read about accessibility, bloody-minded determination, and the life-changing power of Pokémon. Archie
Football | Pedro Neto and Enzo Fernández both scored and Liam Delap made his Chelsea debut as Chelsea beat Los Angeles FC 2-0 in the Club World Cup. The match was played in front of 22,137 fans in a 75,000 capacity stadium in Atlanta.
Tennis | Dan Evans opened up the men's tournament at Queen's Club with his biggest win for more than two years, toppling Frances Tiafoe – the world No 13 – 7-5, 6-2. Cameron Norrie, meanwhile, endured a difficult defeat against the 19-year-old eighth seed Jakub Mensik, losing 7-6 (6), 1-6, 6-1.
Athletics | The father of the double Olympic champion Jakob Ingebrigtsen has been found guilty of hitting the Norwegian runner's younger sister, Ingrid, with a wet towel, and handed a 15-day suspended sentence. However, Gjert Ingebrigtsen, who coached Jakob to 1500-metre gold at the Tokyo Games in 2021 before an acrimonious split a year later, was acquitted of charges of physical and verbal abuse against his son.
'Israel warns Iranians to flee as deadly air raids continue' says today's Guardian front page, while the Financial Times has 'Israel claims 'control' of Tehran skies'. Many other newspapers lead on the Casey report on grooming gangs. 'Blindness Ignorance Prejudice Defensiveness' – the four things that failed the victims, says the Metro, while the i paper reports 'Generation of girls let down by police, councils and MPs who ignored UK grooming gangs'. 'Conspiracy of silence over race doomed thousands of girls to abuse' – that's the Daily Mail, while the Express has 'Let's 'uncover a lot of truth' in sex gangs inquiry'. The Times runs with 'Ethnicity 'brushed aside' in grooming gang inquiries' while the Mirror insists 'Never again'. The Telegraph's version is 'Asylum seekers behind new grooming gang cases'.
Israel's war with Iran: what does it want?
It has been five days since Israel attacked Iran and the civilian death toll is rising, but its war aims seem to have changed. Julian Borger reports
A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad
Each one of the millions of parents and children who have enjoyed the books of Julia Donaldson will have their own unique ranking of her works. From The Gruffalo to Superworm, Room on the Broom to Zog, there are almost limitless combinations – but in this piece, Stuart Heritage gives it his best shot at naming the 15 very best.
And whether you agree or disagree with Stuart, here's a chance to tell the Guardian community team about the most revered Donaldson text in your household.
Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday
And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow.
Quick crossword
Cryptic crossword
Wordiply

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

2 hours ago

• The Independent

Two Middle East-related protests to be held in central London on Saturday

Protesters are set to rally at two high-profile demonstrations in central London on Saturday over flaring conflicts in the Middle East, the Metropolitan Police said. A protest organised by groups under the Palestine Coalition banner will gather in Russell Square from 12pm, before marching to Whitehall via Aldwych and the Strand for an assembly outside Downing Street. Former Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf, former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and musician Paloma Faith are among those set to give speeches at the assembly. Meanwhile, a static counter-protest organised by pro-Israeli group Stop The Hate will be held at the same time just north of Waterloo Bridge at the junction with the Strand. The group said it would meet at the location from 12.30pm onwards. Police have set out conditions for the first protest under the Public Order Act which demands that any person taking part in the procession must remain within Russell Square ahead of the protest and must not deviate from its specified route. Demonstrators must then stay in a specified part of Whitehall for the assembly, which must finish by 5.30pm, the force said. The Palestine Coalition is comprised of a number of different groups, including the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) and Stop The War. Stop The War said in an advertisement for the event on its website: 'Israel's attacks on Gaza and the West Bank are intensifying. Their starvation policy continues. And now Israel attacks on Iran seem intended to lead us into a full-scale war in the Middle East. 'The UK Government has at last accepted that Israel's actions in Gaza are unconscionable. Now they must act – words are not enough.' Discussions are ongoing regarding possible conditions for the Stop The Hate protest, the Met said. In a post on X, Stop The Hate said: 'Our families in Israel are under attack: standing bravely in the face of threats and ballistic missiles, whilst the people of Iran are bravely facing down their totalitarian government — now it's our turn to stand proudly in solidarity with them.' The demonstrations come after reports on Friday that the Home Secretary will ban Palestine Action after the group vandalised two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. Yvette Cooper has decided to proscribe the group, making it a criminal offence to belong to or support Palestine Action, after footage posted online showed two people inside the RAF base, with one appearing to spray paint into an aircraft's jet engine. PSC described the move on social media as 'outrageous', while the Campaign Against Antisemitism welcomed the news, saying: 'Nobody should be surprised that those who vandalised Jewish premises with impunity have now been emboldened to sabotage RAF jets.'

BBC News

2 hours ago

• BBC News

Iran will consider diplomacy when Israeli aggression stops

Iran has said it will not resume talks over its nuclear programme while under attack, hours after Israel's defence minister warned of "prolonged" conflict against the Islamic of violence continued on Friday, as Iran fired another salvo of missiles at northern Israel, and Israel targeted dozens of sites in Iran. Israel's foreign minister, Eyal Zamir, said in a video address that his country should be ready for "ready for a prolonged campaign" and warned of "difficult days ahead."Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi met with European diplomats in Geneva who urged him to revive diplomatic efforts with the US over Tehran's nuclear programme. But Araghchi said Iran was ready to consider diplomacy only once Israel's "aggression is stopped".He went on to say that Iran's nuclear programme was peaceful, and that Israel's attacks on it are a violation of international law, adding that Iran will continue to "exercise its legitimate right of self-defence"."I make it crystal clear that Iran's defence capabilities are non-negotiable," he said. Israel's ambassador to the UN accused Iran of having a "genocidal agenda" and posed an ongoing threat, adding that Israel would not stop targeting nuclear facilities until they were "dismantled". Trump: Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Iran had a "maximum" of two weeks to avoid possible US air strikes, suggesting that he could take a decision before the 14-day deadline he set on Thursday."I'm giving them a period of time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum," Trump told added that the aim was to "see whether or not people come to their senses."The US president was also dismissive of the talks between Araghchi and foreign ministers from Britain, France, Germany and the EU."Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this," Trump said. UK Foreign Minister David Lammy said that the US had provided "a short window of time" to resolve the crisis in the Middle East, which he said was "perilous and deadly serious". French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said "we invited the Iranian minister to consider negotiations with all sides, including the United States, without awaiting the cessation of strikes, which we also hope for".Barrot added that "can be no definitive solution through military means to the Iran nuclear problem" and warned that it was "dangerous to want to impose a regime change" in Iran. As the Geneva talks took place, the exchange of fire between Israel and Iran was hit by a new round of Iranian strikes with the Israeli military reporting an attack of 20 missiles targeting Israeli woman died of a heart attack, bringing the Israeli total since the conflict began to Israel Defense Forces said it attacked ballistic missile storage and launch sites in western the last week, Israeli air strikes have destroyed Iranian military facilities and weapons, and killed senior military commanders and nuclear health ministry said on Sunday that at least 224 people had been killed, but a human rights group put the unofficial death toll at 639 on has launched hundreds of ballistic missiles at Israel in response to the air strikes.

Telegraph

2 hours ago

• Telegraph

‘She's wrong': Trump throws Tulsi Gabbard under the bus on Iran

Donald Trump has said that Tulsi Gabbard and the US intelligence community is 'wrong' about Iran's nuclear capabilities. The US president doubled down on his claim that his own government officials are mistaken about how close Iran is to building a nuclear bomb when challenged by a reporter on Friday. 'What intelligence do you have that Iran is building a nuclear weapon?', Mr Trump was asked outside Air Force One. 'Your intelligence community have said they have no evidence that they are at this point.' 'Well then my intelligence community is wrong,' Mr Trump responded, before asking: 'who in my intelligence community said that?' 'Your director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard,' the reporter replies, before the president retorts: 'She's wrong.' Mr Trump added: 'Within a matter of weeks, or certainly within a matter of months, they're going to be able to have a nuclear weapon. We can't let that happen.' In March, Ms Gabbard told Congress the intelligence community 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorised the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.' She also said the US was closely monitoring Iran's nuclear program, noting that the country's 'enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.' Its the second time Mr Trump has directly contradicted Ms Gabbard on the issue, with the US president saying on Thursday that he did not 'care what she thinks'. Speaking aboard Air Force One on his return from the G7 summit in Canada, Mr Trump told reporters: 'I think they were very close to having a weapon.' Ms Gabbard later told CNN that her comments had been taken out of context and that she was on 'the same page' as Mr Trump. General Erik Kurilla, who leads US forces in the Middle East, recently testified to Congress that Iran could produce enough nuclear material for 10 weapons in three weeks. However, he did not say how long it would take to assemble the pieces into a bomb. On Thursday, Mr Trump's press secretary said Iran could produce a nuclear bomb 'within weeks'. 'Let's be very clear, Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon,' she said. 'All they need is a decision from the Supreme Leader to do that, and it would take a couple of weeks to complete the production of that weapon, which would of course pose an existential threat not just to Israel, but to the United States and to the entire world.' A senior intelligence official said Mr Trump was right to be concerned because its uranium enrichment far exceeds what would be needed for domestic purposes. Another senior administration official said Iran was as close to having a nuclear weapon as it could be without having one. Both spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive issues. Mr Trump's contradiction of Ms Gabbard echoed his feuds with US spy leaders during his first term, when he viewed them as part of a 'deep state' that was undermining his agenda. Most notably, he sided with Vladimir Putin in 2018 when asked if Moscow had interfered in the 2016 election, saying Mr Putin was 'extremely strong and powerful in his denial.'