Sesuit Harbor upgrade approved at Dennis election, after fail at town meeting. Now what?

The Dennis town election on May 13 had some surprise results.
A controversial proposal to reconstruct Sesuit Harbor in Dennis at a cost of $8 million that failed at the May 6 town meeting passed by 38 votes — 1,288-1,250 — in the town election. In other votes, a longtime town moderator was defeated and the constable race had unusual results.
Robert Chamberlain, who ruled the town meetings with a firm hand as Dennis town moderator for many years, was defeated by challenger William L. Carmichael with 1,403 votes to 1,167, for the three-year term. Chamberlain was defeated in all five precincts.
Another incumbent, Diane Chamberlain of the Water District Commission, lost to Joseph P. Walker II for the one-year term, 1, 770-870.
In the three-year terms for three constables, two write-in candidates won with fewer than six total votes. Gerald M. DeSalvatore, who was on the ballot as an approved candidate, garnered 1,964 votes while write-in candidates Korrin Dean got four votes and Timothy Bunce got two.
Town Clerk Terri Bunce explained Wednesday that Dean and Timothy Bunce will also be sworn in Friday along with DeSalvatore since there were three positions available, and under the rules, they have accepted the positions.
The question on the redesign and reconstruction of Sesuit Harbor West was debated extensively at the May 6 town meeting after Select Board member James Plath spoke against the article that the rest of the Select Board had recommended.
'The necessary financial planning was lacking,' Plath said at the meeting as one reason for opposing the project. While he said free cash is appropriate for various uses, he objected to using $1 million on dock spaces for pleasure boat and dock owners. He also said the project did not have a bid and the cost is only an estimate.
The Sesuit Harbor vote for the Proposition 2 ½ debt exclusion was defeated soundly at town meeting, 235-79. Because of the affirmative election vote, however, the proposal may be allowed to be on the fall town meeting warrant if it is in the same wording, Bunce, the town clerk, said after consulting with town counsel. However, it could not be confirmed Wednesday, May 14, with other town officials if the proposal would be on the fall town meeting.
Another debt exclusion question to allow borrowing of $7.5 million for irrigation system replacements at Dennis Highlands and Dennis Pines golf courses passed: 1,607 to 868. The question also passed at the May 6 town meeting.
The purchase of a pumper truck and a brush truck for the Dennis Fire Department for $2 million as a debt exclusion also passed easily 1,960-604. Town meeting voters OK'd the debt exclusion at the May 6 session.
A fourth question to establish a special Municipal Water Infrastructure Investment Fund under a state law was approved. The fund can be used on maintenance, improvements and investments to municipal drinking, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure. The question passed at the last fall town meeting as required in order to be on the May 13 ballot.
In other races, Select Board Chair Christopher Lambton won for a third three-year term with 2,115 votes and Plath won for a second three-year term with 1,484 votes.
Jeni Landers, incumbent on the Dennis-Yarmouth Regional School District Committee, pulled in 2,043 votes in an uncontested seat for another three years.
James M. Pazakis Jr. also got 1,421 votes in an uncontested seat on the Old King's Highway Regional Historic District Commission.
Twenty percent of the town's 13,406 eligible voters cast a total of 2,687 votes, according to official results from Bunce.
Susan Vaughn writes about transportation and other local community issues affecting Cape Cod residents and visitors. She can be reached at smharris@gannett.com.
Thanks to our subscribers, who help make this coverage possible. If you are not a subscriber, please consider supporting quality local journalism with a Cape Cod Times subscription. Here are our subscription plans.
This article originally appeared on Cape Cod Times: Ballot votes in Dennis on $8M harbor upgrade go against town meeting

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Boston Globe

4 days ago

• Boston Globe

After multi-year saga, Milton finally approves a state housing plan

Tuesday night's vote may finally be the end of a saga that has flamed political tensions in Milton since 2023, and, MBTA Communities supporters say, could mark a broader shift in the fight over the law. A year ago, 'Tonight's decision by Milton Town Meeting to advance a compliant plan is a strong signal that we are prepared to put the rancor of the past behind us and become a part of the solution to the housing crisis,' said Select Board Chair Ben Zoll, who has been pushing for the town to comply. Related : Advertisement Still, it was not without controversy. The plan passed at a special Town Meeting that went on for two nights, during which some community members gave impassioned speeches against complying with the law, and argued the town should continue its 'In every neighborhood, I meet people who tell me they saved up everything they had to move out of the city to live in Milton,' Denny Swenson, who helped organize the referendum in 2024, said at the meeting Tuesday. 'Many left the city and stressed the importance and value they place on having their own driveway, that tree by the sidewalk, that stitch of land in their backyard. They paid dearly to live in their neighborhood that is zoned as it is. This zoning article is changing that on them.' Denny Swenson campaigns against Milton's MBTA Communities plan ahead of a referendum in February of 2024. Erin Clark/Globe Staff There may still be one last push from opponents. Under the town charter, residents can trigger a referendum on a Town Meeting vote if they collect signatures from at least 5 percent of Milton's registered voters. There have been rumblings that opponents of the plan may try to force another town wide vote. The long fight over MBTA Communities in Milton began in 2023, when the Select Board passed a state-mandated zoning plan that would theoretically make room for 2,461 housing units. The plan was controversial, and after it The lead up to that vote in February 2024 was filled with intense campaigning, and some 54 percent of the 9,500 voters in the referendum Advertisement Milton's deadline to meet state guidelines was the end of 2023, so when voters rejected the plan, Attorney General Andrea Campbell In January, the Supreme Judicial Court ruled Related : After the ruling, the town's planning board designed two plans for Town Meeting to consider, one that would comply with the town's full requirement as a rapid transit community, and another, smaller plan designed for a scenario in which the town is reclassified to a different community category, and therefore a smaller housing requirement. It was the bigger plan that passed Tuesday night, while the smaller option was sent back to the planning board for further study. 'We have a housing crisis, there's no question,' said Anthony Cichello, a Town Meeting member. 'The MBTA Communities Act is an effort by the Legislature to try to address that housing issue. Its not going to fix the problem. But its a step, and its the law.' Advertisement The vote puts Milton with a growing list of communities that have fiercely debated, yet ultimately passed, an MBTA Communities plan. More than 75 percent of the 175 cities and towns covered by the law have enacted zoning plans intended to comply with it, state officials have said, and Earlier this month, a Superior Court judge Andrew Brinker can be reached at

CBS News

12-06-2025

• CBS News

Massachusetts town looking into ICE facility zoning violations after teen described conditions

The New England Regional Headquarters for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is supposed to be a processing facility where people stay for only hours, and the town of Burlington where the facility is located says that's how it is zoned. "What I'm just concerned about is fair and humane treatment for anybody in Burlington," said Mike Espejo, chairman of the Select Board, "and this doesn't seem like that's happening." Milford teen describes conditions He tells WBZ-TV the case of Marcelo Gomes da Silva has shined a new light on what is allegedly happening behind the doors. "No one deserves to be down there," Gomes da Silva told reporters when he posted bail last week. "You sleep on concrete floors, I have to use the bathroom in the open. It's humiliating." He described what he called inhumane conditions for six days, leaving the town now more than concerned. "We had no idea anything like that was happening," said Espejo. It is why town officials are now gathering information on the scope of the operations inside the building and whether the ICE facility is violating local zoning laws. "We are checking with our legal counsel to see if we can do any type of zoning enforcement, or health code violation enforcement," Espejo said. "Anything we can do to just make sure that people are at least being treated humanely." Town was told no one held overnight There was some opposition in the town when the facility first opened in 2008, but residents received assurances that no one would be held overnight. Espejo said they were told the same thing in recent weeks when local officials began inquiries amid rumors. In a statement ICE tells WBZ-TV, "There are occasions where detainees might need to stay at the Burlington office for a short period that might exceed the anticipated administrative processing time." The statement goes on to say, "detainees are given ample food, regular access to phones, showers and legal representation as well as medical care when needed." That's not what Marcelo Gomes da Silva said he experienced. "I haven't showered in six days. I haven't done anything," he said when he was released. Espejo says it's a gray area for the town. "It's a federal facility so we don't know how much jurisdiction we have over it," Espejo said. He says town officials feel misled about a building where they believed mostly paperwork was being done.

Yahoo

04-06-2025

• Yahoo

Worries fuel push to elevate water woes on policy agenda

BOSTON (SHNS) – The Joint Committee on Environment and Natural Resources got its feet wet Tuesday, diving into testimony on bills dealing with water. Water and water infrastructure generally do not grab the spotlight in the way that other policy areas like transportation, education and housing do, but lawmakers and advocates who testified before the committee stressed their major economic, public health and environmental implications. Testimony Tuesday touched on issues related to PFAS, lead and other contaminants; water quality standards for private wells; drought management strategies; and the future of the networks of pipes that move water to and from homes. 'Massachusetts is facing a growing water infrastructure crisis. The pipes that deliver drinking water, the systems that treat wastewater and the stormwater infrastructure that protects our neighborhoods is decades or even centuries old. The U.S. EPA estimates that Massachusetts needs almost $37 billion in drinking water and clean water investment over the next 20 years. That is billion, not million,' Jennifer Peterson, executive director of the Massachusetts Water Works Association, told lawmakers. Peterson pitched a bill (H 1022 / S 563) that would establish a program for upgrading and expanding water infrastructure and would call for $200 million in annual state funding. She said state assistance is critical since 'water infrastructure investment is a shared responsibility among rate payers, the state and the federal government.' Local ratepayers have been burdened by, in some cases, double-digit water rate increases in recent years and the Trump administration's fiscal 2026 budget proposes to reduce funding for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund by 90%, she said. The bill, filed by Rep. Ted Philips of Sharon and Sen. John Cronin of Fitchburg, would dedicate $2 billion to expand the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority's capacity with an emphasis on 'improving drinking water quality and increasing housing capacity,' designate $375 million for the HousingWorks infrastructure program, allocate $138 million for the Massachusetts Clean Water Trust, and provide $78.5 million for the Commonwealth Sewer Rate Relief Fund, according to a summary from Cronin. 'The infrastructure is aging, and we really need to start investing in it. And there's not enough money on the local level, there just isn't. Certainly not with Proposition 2 1/2, that makes it crushing,' Paul Anderson, vice president of the Barnstable County Water Utilities Association, told the committee. Sen. Becca Rausch, the Senate co-chair of the committee, pressed Peterson, Anderson and others on where the roughly $3 billion contemplated in the bill should come from. 'I'll be very frank, right, having done this role and for a number of years now … nobody ever wants to pay more taxes. So where would we get $3 billion for this?' she asked. Peterson responded that the bill calls for a revival of the Water Infrastructure Advisory Committee that was created in a 2014 water law but has been mostly dormant since about 2018. She said that group would 'discuss where the new revenue sources would come from.' She said the conversation in previous years revolved around taxes on products that have a connection to water infrastructure. 'Back in 2012 when Representative [Carolyn] Dykema and Senator [James] Eldridge were leading the Water Infrastructure Finance Commission, toilet paper tax, pharmaceutical tax — things that had a nexus to water — were discussed, but there was never any consensus around how to move those forward,' she said. Rep. Mike Connolly of Cambridge was joined by Middlesex District Attorney Marian Ryan to support legislation (H 920) that would require the Department of Environmental Protection to create and administer a voucher program to cover the costs of PFAS filtration equipment for households in municipalities where PFAS levels exceed the maximum contamination levels. Citing the Sierra Club, Connolly said 96 communities in Massachusetts had water systems that exceed that maximum containment level for PFAS as of February, up from 56 communities a few years earlier. 'There may be a question as to why the district attorney's office is involved in this water issue. It is what Representative Connolly referenced. I feel that part of the privilege of serving as the district attorney is to be looking at really a whole menu of prevention efforts,' Ryan said. 'We know, as the representative just mentioned, the problem with PFAS in water has grown by 47% in the last four years. Many of those communities are in my county.' The bill got a favorable report from the Environment Committee last session but then died in House Ways and Means, according to the committee's summary. Connolly said the version he filed this session has been updated to reflect feedback from key stakeholder groups. Ryan said the bill would provide vouchers for people to obtain two PFAS filtration devices in a five-year period, and it would cover the costs to change the filters every six months as recommended. She said the filters are placed at the point of water service, like faucets, washing machines, tub spouts and more. The district attorney said a set of filtration devices for a household costs about $300, and the replacement filters cost less than $50 each. Rep. Danillo Sena of Acton focused his testimony on well water, which he said is common throughout his district. Across Massachusetts, about 500,000 people rely on private wells for their water service, he said, but the state has no standards for private well testing or water quality. 'Because of this, many families don't know what is in their water. They purchase their home with no guarantee that their water is safe. Contaminants like lead, arsenic, bacteria and PFAS have been found in wells across Massachusetts. These have long-term effects on health, and with children at more risk than adults,' he said, testifying in support of a bill (H 1049) he filed. 'This legislation ensures that homeowners do not need to worry about the quality of their water through creating standards of wells [and requiring] testing. The Massachusetts Constitution established the right of clean air and water. We must uphold that right and protect 500,000 residents that currently do not have any legal protection.' Similar legislation from Sen. Jamie Eldridge and Reps. Natalie Blais and Meghan Kilcoyne (S 585 / H 900) was also on the committee docket Tuesday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.