NATO strikes spending deal, but Spain exemption claim risks Trump ire
The claim by Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez sets up a potential clash with Trump, who has pressured allies to commit to that headline figure when they meet for the two-day gathering starting on Tuesday in The Hague.
Spain had been the last holdout on a compromise deal that sees allies promise to reach 3.5 percent on core military needs over the next decade, and spend 1.5 percent on a looser category of "defence-related" expenditures such as infrastructure and cybersecurity.
Multiple diplomats at NATO said the agreement -- set to be unveiled at the summit -- had gone through with the approval of all 32 nations and that there was no exemption for Madrid.
But within minutes Sanchez came out saying he had struck an accord with NATO that would see his country keep respecting its commitments "without having to raise our defence spending to five percent of gross domestic product".
"We understand the difficulty of the geopolitical context, fully respect the legitimate desire of other countries to increase their defence investment, if they so wish, but we are not going to do it," he said.
NATO diplomats now fear that Spain's position could undermine its carefully choreographed show of unity with Trump in The Hague, which already risks being overshadowed by the US decision to strike Iran.
"Not ok," one diplomat said, on condition of anonymity.
Madrid's claims came after Sanchez on Thursday threw a last-minute grenade into preparations for the gathering in the Netherlands by taking a strong stand against the agreement.
In a blistering letter to NATO chief Mark Rutte, Sanchez said that committing to a headline figure of five percent of GDP "would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive".
That prompted a warning from Trump that "Spain has to pay what everybody else has to pay."
"NATO is going to have to deal with Spain," he told reporters on Friday, calling the country "notorious" for spending less on defence than other alliance members.
'Flexibility'
The outburst from Madrid's centre-left leader also sparked fury from other NATO members desperate to keep Trump -- who has threatened not to protect allies spending too little -- on their side.
The pledge is seen as key both to satisfying Trump and helping NATO build up the forces it needs to deter Russia.
After several days of wrangling involving Sanchez and Rutte, officials said Spain on Sunday signed off on the pledge.
Diplomats said that language around the spending pledge in the summit's final declaration had been slightly softened from "we commit", to "allies commit".
They insisted the fundamentals of the deal remained intact and that it applied to Spain.
But government sources in Madrid said the linguistic tweak meant only those countries that opted-in were covered by the promise and that Rutte was set to send a letter to Sanchez saying that Spain will have "flexibility".
Sanchez is facing a difficult balancing act of aligning with NATO allies and cajoling his junior coalition partner, the far-left alliance Sumar, which is hostile to increasing military spending.
Spain has been one of the lowest-spending NATO countries on defence in relative terms.
The country is only set to hit the alliance's current target of two percent this year after a 10-billion-euro ($11.5 billion) injection.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
14 minutes ago
- France 24
'Almost non-stop sirens' across Israel as Iran fires missiles
03:28 23/06/2025 Did US strikes 'finish the job' of destroying Fordow plant? 23/06/2025 Turkey braces for refugees as Iranian flock to borders 23/06/2025 EU urges 'all sides to step back' after US strikes Iran, but can bloc find unified response? 23/06/2025 US warns against Iran retaliation as Trump raises 'regime change' 23/06/2025 Will US strikes be enough to derail Iran's nuclear programme? 23/06/2025 Residents shelter in Tel Aviv as Israel, Iran trade strikes 23/06/2025 How successful were US strikes on Iran? 23/06/2025 'I never expected he would be freed', wife of Belarus opposition leader tells FRANCE 24 23/06/2025 US reveals details of 'Operation Midnight Hammer'
France 24
44 minutes ago
- France 24
Did US strikes 'finish the job' of destroying Fordow plant?
08:58 23/06/2025 Turkey braces for refugees as Iranian flock to borders 23/06/2025 EU urges 'all sides to step back' after US strikes Iran, but can bloc find unified response? 23/06/2025 US warns against Iran retaliation as Trump raises 'regime change' 23/06/2025 Will US strikes be enough to derail Iran's nuclear programme? 23/06/2025 Residents shelter in Tel Aviv as Israel, Iran trade strikes 23/06/2025 How successful were US strikes on Iran? 23/06/2025 'I never expected he would be freed', wife of Belarus opposition leader tells FRANCE 24 23/06/2025 US reveals details of 'Operation Midnight Hammer' 22/06/2025 Iran: How is the war with Israel affecting civil society? Middle East
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Does Iran still have the means to retaliate against the US and Israel?
With Iran pushed into a corner on the military front, a shroud of uncertainty surrounds the Islamic Republic's intentions and capacity to respond to American airstrikes on Monday, June 23. Also unclear was the future of its nuclear program, which is likely intended for military purposes, after key sites suffered heavy blows overnight from Saturday to Sunday. "Monumental damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term," United States President Donald Trump declared on social media on Sunday, referring to the previous day's American airstrikes on the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan sites. "The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!" Trump added. Showing more caution, General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff, said the sites had suffered "extremely severe damage and destruction." Experts, however, said it was impossible at this point to determine the precise extent of the damage the bombings inflicted underground. Nor was it yet possible to know what had become of the stockpile of enriched uranium that Tehran has accumulated: 408 kilograms enriched to 60% in isotope 235, which if further enriched to 90% would be sufficient to produce several nuclear weapons. Iran claims to have placed its stockpile in a secure location.
