Aid cuts forcing people in 70 countries to miss out on much-needed medical care, WHO warns
People in at least 70 countries are missing out on much-needed medical treatment thanks to aid cuts by the US and other nations, the head of the World Health Organisation (WHO) director has said – in a stark warning about the colossal impact of these moves.
The Donald Trump -sanctioned slashing of US-funded programmes under the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is the most prominent example. But Germany, France and the Netherlands have also taken an axe to aid spending. While the UK is set to cut foreign assistance spending by billions of pounds.
"Patients are missing out on treatments, health facilities have closed, health workers have lost their jobs, and people face increased out-of-pocket health spending," WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in an address to the World Health Assembly.
'Many ministers have told me that sudden and steep cuts to bilateral aid are causing severe disruption in their countries and imperilling the health of millions of people,' Dr Tedros added.
The Independent has previously reported how the US and UK cuts are projected to lead to millions more people dying from Aids, an increased risk of famine, and falling access to clean water and education as a result of aid cuts.
Meanwhile, the WHO itself is also facing more than a billion US dollar reduction to its budget over the next two years, as its biggest contributor the US is withdrawing funding as part of Trump's plans.
As part of the World Health Assembly, the 194 WHO member states will have to deal with an already slimmed-down budget of $4.2 billion (£3.1bn) for 2026 and 2027. That is 20 per cent less than the $5.3bn originally proposed and amounts to $2.1 billion a year.
"2.1 billion dollars is the equivalent of global military expenditure every eight hours," Dr Tedros told delegates.
But the cuts will mean lsoing staff, the WHO's director general confirmed, with a current plan to cut the agency from 76 departments to 34.
'The organisation simply cannot do everything member states have asked it to do with the resources available today,' he said.
As the United States prepares to exit the organisation, China is set to become the biggest provider of state fees - one of the WHO's main streams of funding alongside donations.
The WHO conducts a range of activities from developing treatment guidelines and checking the safety of medicines to coordinating countries' emergency responses. It was heavily criticised by the the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response for its response to Covid-19, in particular for not declaring a global emergency sooner. At the same time it has faced criticism - and swirling conspiracy theories - from people who believe global agencies have too much power over national governments.
Amid the chaos, there is a glimmer of opportunity, however, as 'many countries also see this as an opportunity to leave behind an era of aid dependency and accelerate the transition to sustainable self-reliance based on domestic resources,' Dr Tedros said.
In the UK, as in several other countries, aid cuts are being driven by a decision to spend more on defence. Dr Tedros asked the room to consider that his agency's budget shortfall represented the price of global military spending, 'every eight hours,' and urged countries to also consider preparing for, 'an attack from an invisible enemy'.
He pointed out that the Covid pandemic killed an estimated 20 million people and wiped $10 trillion from the global economy.
The WHO member states are expected to finalise an agreement on Tuesday which will set out how the world should react to a future pandemic.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Medics arrested at eco protests should not be struck off, say doctors
Doctors who are arrested while demonstrating at climate change protests should not be struck off, a union is being urged to say. A series of motions to be put before the British Medical Association (BMA) are calling for unwavering support to be given to NHS staff who take part in 'non-violent' eco action. If successful, the union would call for a ban on disciplinary proceedings being brought against activist doctors who are arrested for protest stunts that may include inflicting criminal damage on property and businesses. One motion submitted to the annual representative meeting in Liverpool, which begins on June 23, says the BMA should recognise ' climate change is a public health emergency ' so doctors 'have an ethical duty to advocate for direct action'. It adds that medics should 'condemn' any complaints or disciplinary actions brought 'against doctors who engage in non-violent climate activism'. 'Non-violent climate advocacy' It also calls for 'explicit protections within employment contracts… to ensure doctors do not face career detriment for engaging in non-violent climate advocacy'. Another motion asks BMA members to formally recognise 'that it is a mark of tyrannical regimes that they seek to destroy the careers of those who challenge them' and for the union to refuse to take part in any disciplinary action against medics convicted of 'forms of civil disobedience which do not involve violence to the person'. The moves follow a series of high-profile court cases that have seen doctors sanctioned for taking part in climate activism. In January, Dr Sarah Benn lost an appeal against the suspension of her medical license after she was jailed for breaching a court order by taking part in climate protests. She took part in three Just Stop Oil protests at an oil terminal in Warwickshire in 2022 before being suspended from practising for five months by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) in April 2024. Dr Benn, who had worked in Birmingham and has since retired, sought to challenge the tribunal's findings at the High Court. However, a judge rejected her case after concluding she 'intended to act in a way that did not meet the standards of behaviour to be expected of a doctor'. Also in January, Dr Patrick Hart was jailed for a year after being found guilty of causing criminal damage after damaging petrol pumps with a hammer and chisel at an M25 service station. In total, 16 fuel pumps at Thurrock Motorway Services, in Grays, Essex, were attacked by Hart on Aug 24, 2022. When the doctor is released from prison, he will face a tribunal after being referred for a disciplinary hearing by his medical regulator, the General Medical Council. A spokesman for the GMC said at the time that Dr Hart was not currently suspended. Before he was sentenced, Dr Hart told the court: 'Right now, the greatest health threat to all of us is the unfolding climate catastrophe. 'It is the greatest health threat we have ever faced. All healthcare workers have a responsibility to protect the health of their patients. 'If we do not stand up to the oil and gas executives who are wreaking havoc on our climate and the politicians who enable them, if we do not end the burning of fossil fuels, then we will have failed as a profession and the health systems that we have developed over centuries will collapse. 'I will continue to fight against the death sentence of fossil fuels for as long as I have strength in me. I have no greater duty as a doctor at this moment in history.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Rhian Sugden reveals her son George, 14-months, has caught hand, foot and mouth disease as she asks fans for help
Rhian Sugden revealed her son George has caught hand, foot and mouth disease on Saturday. The model, 38, shared an update to her Instagram Story and asked her followers for some tips. Rhian welcomed George, her first child, with her husband Oliver Mellor in April last year. Uploading a photo of the 14-month-olds rash, she wrote: 'My little man has caught hand, foot and mouth from nursery 'Spoken to the Dr but if anyone has any tips to settle him... fire away.' Hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD) is a viral disease that can lead to painful lesions forming on the hands, mouth and feet. The virus can also cause flu-like symptoms, such as sore throat, diarrhea, dehydration, and loss of appetite. Because it cannot be treated with antibiotics, patients must ride it out until it resolves on its own, typically seven to ten days. Rhian spent over £150,000 to go through eight gruelling rounds of IVF over five years to get pregnant. She opened up on her arduous journey to motherhood, admitting she suffered from depression, anxiety and an eating disorder, while trying to get pregnant. She said: 'I'd dread Mother's Day or when friends shared news about their pregnancies because it wasn't working for me. I became brainwashed. 'Every time I had my period, I'd be like, "Ugh – I'm not pregnant again", and felt low for the rest of the month.' Rhian added that her and Oliver convinced themselves they weren't going to be able to conceived and 'started to plan a good life without kids'. After finally falling pregnant, she gushed that their son was 'a miracle' and that she wants to have another child as soon as possible. She said: 'I'm loving pregnancy so much. It feels like a miracle and helped to heal my pain. I've said to Oliver, "I can't bear the thought that this is the last time I'm pregnant, we've got to go again". 'I do want to try for IVF again to have a second baby. I'm not old by any means, but time is ticking is for me, so I'd want to start soon. 'I'd love to leave a gap but I can't afford to wait too long.' The television personality's OnlyFans page funded her £150,000 IVF treatment, with Rhian previously explaining she was earning up to £1,000 a day for posting topless or nude photos on the site. She told The Sun: 'I've got good boobs and I'm not ashamed of OnlyFans. 'I've made more money on OnlyFans than I have in my whole career. 'There are so many topless pictures of me out there, and I thought why not? I was earning a few thousand a day,' she continued. 'Ollie thinks it's a bizarre concept that all these men will pay money to see his wife's boobs, and he gets the benefits of IVF.' What is hand, foot and mouth disease? Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is a viral infection characterised by sores in the mouth and a rash on the hands and feet. The condition is not related to foot-and-mouth disease found in farm animals. It is most common in children under five, with outbreaks occurring at nurseries and schools. HFMD can be passed through the air or coming into close contact with a person who hasn't washed their hands after using the bathroom. Signs and symptoms: Fever Sore throat Fatigue and weakness Painful, red, blister-like lesions in mouth Irritability in infants and toddlers Loss of appetite Treatment: HFMD is usually not serious and does not require treatment. However, it can cause secondary infections if skin is scratched. Treatment focuses on adequate fluid intake, a soft diet and painkillers, if necessary.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
NHS survey overstates mental health crisis in children, say experts
A leading consultant has criticised official data that claims that more than one in five school children has mental health problems as 'nuts' and 'pernicious'. A new report by the Department for Education on the rise in pupils not attending school links it to increased levels of mental illness among young people. It cites NHS data showing that 21 per cent of children aged eight to 16 have a 'probable mental health problem'. The figure has been widely publicised and is part of the justification for the government's policy to put councillors in every secondary school. But experts warn that the calculation is based on 'subjective' questionnaire data and could be exaggerating the prevalence of mental health issues among young people. The Strengths and Difficulties survey used in the NHS data gives children multiple choice questions on their emotional state, concentration levels, conduct and relationships to assess their mental wellbeing. Pupils are asked questions such as: 'Have you recently felt capable of making decisions about things?'; 'Have you recently felt that you are playing a useful part in things?' and 'Do you sometimes feel anxious in certain situations?'. Response options are 'not true', 'somewhat true', or 'certainly true'. Children who score 17 or above out of 40 are recorded as having 'probable mental health problems'. However, Professor Dr Joanna Moncrieff, an academic at University College London and a practising psychiatrist for the NHS, has questioned the method and the labelling of children as mentally ill. 'Anyone scoring above the average in this survey is deemed to have a probable mental health problem – I mean that's nuts,' she told The Telegraph. 'It is a really good illustration of how misleading this whole mental health debate can be. Saying that the reason children are not going to school is because of mental health problems is oversimplifying to the extent that you are not saying anything. By saying it is a mental health problem, you think you've explained it, but you really haven't.' Dennis Hayes, a professor of education at Derby University and co-author of The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education, described the data method as 'shoddy' and 'crude'. 'It is as bad as the little questionnaires in OKAY magazine,' he said. 'I went through some of those questions. One is 'do you sometimes feel anxious in certain situations?' Yes, all the time! So, I don't think this is the way to proceed.' Prof Hayes said children and adults are being taught to see normal anxieties as ' mental health problems '. 'Multiple choice surveys merely confirm a cultural belief that we are all unwell,' he said. 'It's a terrible and destructive thing. It creates introverted children and young people who can't cope.' Prof Moncrieff said labelling children can limit them: 'People think they've found an explanation, but they haven't; they have just acquired a label and labels can be really pernicious because they limit you,' she said. 'You think 'I have this thing, therefore I can't possibly do this and I can't possibly do that'. It is really worrying.' Another academic, Frank Furedi, emeritus professor of sociology at the University of Kent, argued that children who registered concern about their lives, or the state of the world, were not necessarily exhibiting signs of mental illness. 'What used to be called problems of life, problems of existence, are now framed in the language of psychology, and we tend to medicalise our personal problems,' he said. 'So, we no longer have shy people; we have people with social phobia. We no longer have kids who are just very energetic; we have ADHD. We are inciting young people to feel unwell. To me, the mental health industry is actually complicit in creating a mental health problem.' Long waiting lists Concerns have also been raised that the data method, and others like it, could be leading to a crisis in the already overstretched Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS), leaving referrals with the most serious mental health conditions stuck on long waiting lists. Almost one million children and young people had active referrals for CAMHS in England, figures from 2022-23 show. A third were on waiting lists, while 40 per cent had their referral closed before accessing support. Nearly 40,000 children experienced waits of at least two years. The most common reason for a referral for mental health treatment was cited as anxiety. 'I don't work with children, but we have quite a lot of young people coming through from CAMHS and we are absolutely overwhelmed with referrals,' said Prof Moncrieff. 'I would say anecdotally that there are people coming through who are less unwell (than in the past). Then we have the whole question of how we help; is it really helpful or might it be harmful? I don't think it is a good thing for lots of people to be on antidepressants or other forms of drug treatment.' Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, has pledged to provide school counsellors in all secondary schools in England. Campaigners say this does not go far enough and want mental health professionals at primary level too. But Prof Moncrieff said the move could have unintended negative consequences. 'The worry is that they could end up identifying and labelling more kids and sending them off to CAMHS,' she said. 'The best case scenario is counsellors reduce the need because pupils have someone to talk to and that helps. But I do worry that we have such a mental health-obsessed culture now that most people think they are doing the right thing by labelling children and referring them.'
