India-Pakistan aftershocks: Five strategic reflections to win the story
What came as a surprise to all of us in South Asia, is the sudden promotion of General Asim Munir as Field Marshal for having 'defeated' India in this conflict. He has thus increased his hold on the political, social and economic fields in Pakistan. Furthermore, considering the dislike of the Pakistani people for their politicians, they are perhaps happy to support Munir as the defacto ruler of Pakistan. His continuation in power will mean a regular conflict with India under their 'bleed India by 1000 cuts doctrine'. Thus they will use this path to remain in power and continue with the false perception of claiming victory.
If one looks at India's recent military response to Pakistan's Military-backed terror groups in this context, it has exposed deeper lessons for its strategic posture. While the battlefield may have yielded clear tactical success, the war of narratives, regional and global diplomacy, and long-term threat perception revealed key gaps. In this article, we distil five critical key takeaways and areas that require more serious thinking. These go beyond the immediate military gains; the episode offers deeper lessons on diplomacy, strategic communication, and regional geopolitics. As the dust settles, India must go beyond reaction and embrace a 360-degree or a no-box approach to security, diplomacy, and strategic communication.
Not Against Pakistan, But Against Terror and Its Architects
Let's be clear - India's action targeted terror infrastructure and those protecting it, not the Pakistani people. This distinction is vital. Our conflict is with those who perpetuate violence, primarily elements within the Pakistan military and its proxies who are also designated as terrorist groups under UN Security Council's Resolution1267 Sanctions namely, Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). To this geometry lets add a new faction which is yet to be designated as one by the same committee: The Resistance Front (TRF) who claimed responsibility for the
Pahalgam
Massacre and not the ordinary citizens. Even though they retracted soon after under the obvious pressure of the Pakistani military.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Vietnam: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You)
Container House | Search ads
Search Now
Undo
The Pakistan military benefited the most from this conflict, especially after General Asim Munir's inflammatory April 16th speech which invoked the 'two-nation theory'. It issued a veiled war call, which effectively served to protect whatever little the military was holding and to renew its mandate to dominate the Pakistani populace. Unfortunately, this nuance was won in Pakistan's national discourse, which predictably portrayed the conflict as a patriotic victory making Gen Munir a hero, which resulted in his odd promotion to a Field Marshal.
Now, India must persist in making this distinction clear, especially to the international community and Pakistan's civil society that it's not 'an era of war but there would be zero tolerance towards terror'. Also amplify a narrative that decoupling the Pakistani populace from its military establishment may open future doors for peace and prosperity. Not to be missed, is that many Pakistani Punjabis claim their heritage from Rajputs and Jats and speak in Punjabi language, which negates the theory that Pakistanis are descendants of Arabs and Turks.
Live Events
Narrative Warfare Is the Next Frontier
Pakistan's claim of 'victory' despite clear losses on the ground exposed a major Indian vulnerability: communication strategy. While India acted within the framework of Article 51 of the UN Charter and showcased operational superiority, it faltered in shaping the global and domestic discourse and perception.
Narrative warfare is no longer secondary, it is central to 21st-century conflict vis-à-vis military combat. India must build a comprehensive, integrated communications doctrine that spans traditional diplomacy, digital engagement, and media strategy. Without a timely, fact-based, and emotionally intelligent narrative, operational success risks being obscured by adversarial propaganda.
We have been able to raise the issue of terrorism at the UN, BRICS and SCO, including our Prime Minister's demand for an international convention at the UNGA. This demand should be escalated with pamphleteering about the Pakistan military's conspiracy in promoting disturbances, both within and without.
Surprisingly, no one has criticised Pakistani terrorism but just terrorism. One hopes that the ensuing seven global trips by all Party delegations from India to engage in the required communication with friendly countries would tilt the scales. We are aware that countries would respond on the lines of their national interest, rather than what we may wish them to do.
Nepal's Silence Was a Diplomatic Miss
One may recall that among the twenty-six innocent lives lost in the Pahalgam massacre was also a Nepali tourist, which should have generated regional condemnation if not global. Yet Kathmandu remained diplomatically mute. Whether this was due to internal caution or a failure on India's part to engage proactively, the outcome reflects a missed opportunity.
India's 'neighbourhood first' policy needs sharper execution. Moments like these demand swift, behind-the-scenes diplomacy to build regional consensus against terrorism. A coordinated South Asian stance on cross-border terrorism is in our collective interest.
Why Doesn't Pakistan's Public Speak Out?
Terrorism has devastated Pakistan itself for a long time. For instance, the Rawalpindi school massacre in 2014, in which more than 130 children were killed brutally, remains a tragic marker of this shared trauma. Similarly, the 2009 Lahore police academy attack, and 2016 Lahore Gulshan-e-Iqbal Park bombing killing many innocent children and civilians is devastating and the list goes on. Yet, there is a conspicuous absence of public empathy from Pakistan when India suffers, though some people did speak out.
This silence stems from decades of militarised indoctrination and a political narrative that legitimises violence against India. Hillary Clinton's warning still resonates: 'You can't keep snakes in your backyard and expect them only to bite your neighbours.'
India must engage with Pakistan's civil society, diaspora, and intellectual class to foster a counter-narrative that challenges the status quo. Empathy must be reintroduced into the regional discourse. But first, Pakis' need to stand in one-voice against homegrown terrorism.
A Third Front Is Emerging, and this is looking alarming!
While India remains vigilant on its western and northern borders, a third vector of strategic concern is emerging in the east. Just in the wake of the recent conflict, a Turkiye-backed group in Bangladesh circulated a map of 'Greater Bangladesh', incorporating Indian territories in Assam, Meghalaya, and West Bengal.
Similarly, incendiary remarks from a retired Bangladeshi Major General followed on his Facebook profile, and we quote 'If India attacks Pakistan, Bangladesh should occupy the seven states of Northeastern India'.
All these reflect ideological vulnerabilities and external influences that could destabilise India's eastern frontier. Turkiye, Azerbaijan, China and Pakistan are increasingly operating in a coordinated ideological axis. India must urgently recalibrate its engagement.
Proactive diplomacy with Dhaka, enhanced intelligence-sharing, and public diplomacy will be key to neutralising this threat. The goal must be clear: preserve regional stability and prevent fringe elements from dictating national narratives.
In conclusion, Pakistan's economic fragility, water stress, and internal insurgencies may tempt its military establishment to externalise internal failures through adventurism. Meanwhile, global powers like the U.S. continue to view Pakistan as a strategic lever due to its location, despite Islamabad's consistent export of instability and terror.
India must, therefore, invest not just in kinetic capability but in resilience, regional and global partnerships, and narrative dominance. The next war may not be over land or airspace or underwater but over perception, psychology, influence, and legitimacy.
Lastly, as Operation Sindoor continues the message is simple: India will not invite a war. But if it is forced upon us, we will not only defend our borders, but we will win the story.
Views expressed are personal. The Authors work for CUTS International, a 42-year old global public policy, research and advocacy group with regional offices over four continents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Harvard and Trump administration resume talks to resolve ongoing feud
Harvard University and the Trump administration have resumed discussions to resolve a long-standing dispute that escalated into funding cuts , legal battles , and political tensions. The talks, which restarted this week at the White House , aim to find common ground after months of confrontation over federal funding , campus policies , and academic independence, according to a report by the New York Times. During the meeting, Harvard officials presented a PowerPoint outlining recent actions on antisemitism, admissions, and viewpoint diversity. In response, White House representatives listed further steps they expect the university to take. A letter from the administration followed, detailing conditions for a possible agreement. Harvard has not yet commented on its response. Sources close to the matter say the negotiations restarted after other academic leaders urged Harvard to reengage with the administration. The outreach also followed public remarks by Education Secretary Linda McMahon, who signaled readiness for talks. Although the terms of any potential deal remain unclear, both sides have indicated interest in finding a resolution. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:-:- Loaded : 0% 0:00:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - -:-:- 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 'Swing is King': Mr. Hemant's Strategy Finally Explained in Free Session TradeWise Learn More Undo Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that 'very possible that a Deal will be announced over the next week or so.' However, two people familiar with the talks said a deal in the immediate future is unlikely. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Internally, Harvard officials are weighing the risks of continued conflict. According to those briefed on the discussions, university leaders fear that ongoing tension with the federal government could shrink Harvard's influence and budget. Key concerns include funding cuts, visa restrictions on international students , and federal investigations. Live Events You Might Also Like: Federal judge blocks Trump effort to keep Harvard from hosting foreign students One individual close to Harvard emphasised, 'The university is not going to compromise its values or First Amendment rights.' A possible agreement being explored could see restoration of a portion of the federal research funding withdrawn earlier this year, and a halt to legal actions. In exchange, Harvard may be asked to make stronger commitments on antisemitism, admissions reform, and ideological diversity. The discussions mark a shift from April, when Harvard cut off talks after receiving a letter from the administration demanding wide-reaching changes. The letter proposed merit-based hiring and admissions, a halt to diversity programs, and ongoing oversight through 2028. Harvard rejected those terms, leading to lawsuits and public sparring. Since then, the administration has continued to cut research funding and challenge Harvard's ability to admit international students. Meanwhile, the university has faced increasing pressure from within to find a less confrontational path forward. You Might Also Like: How Trump has targeted Harvard's international students - and what the latest court ruling means A potential deal may also serve as a model for other universities seeking to avoid similar conflicts. According to sources, multiple elite colleges are in private discussions with the Trump administration over funding and campus policies. On social media, Trump described a possible agreement as 'mindbogglingly HISTORIC' and 'very good for our Country.' He later praised Harvard's leadership for acting 'extremely appropriately' during negotiations. The legal case regarding Harvard's funding cuts is ongoing, with a hearing scheduled for July 21 in Boston.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Dollar edges higher vs yen amid focus on Middle East unrest
The U.S. dollar rose to a three-week high against the safe-haven yen and gained ground on the Swiss franc on Friday amid signs tension in the Middle East is easing after Iran backed continued discussions with Europe on its conflict with Israel. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Tehran backed further talks with Germany, France, Britain and the EU and would be prepared to meet again in the near future following talks in Geneva. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Access all TV channels anywhere, anytime Techno Mag Learn More Israel and Iran have been waging a week-long air battle as the Israeli government seeks to thwart Tehran's nuclear ambitions, and market participants are nervous about possible U.S. attacks on Iran, sparking a surge in the greenback. The dollar index, which measures the U.S. currency against six peers, including the Swiss franc, the Japanese yen, and the euro, is poised to rise 0.6% this week. On the day, however, the index remains flat after a Federal Reserve governor said rate cuts should be considered as soon as July, given recent inflation data. Live Events "The market's already expecting two rate cuts. That was just confirmed by the Fed this week. So, Mr. (Chris) Waller coming out and saying that, would indicate that it's coming sooner rather than later," said Joseph Trevisani, senior analyst at FX Street. Iran said on Friday it would not discuss the future of its nuclear programme while under attack by Israel, as Europe tried to coax Tehran back into negotiations. Meanwhile, the White House said on Thursday that President Donald Trump would decide on the potential involvement of the United States in the conflict in the next two weeks. That helped soothe nervous investors worried about an imminent U.S. attack on Iran, even though the prospect of a broadening Middle East conflict kept risk appetite in check. Brent crude fell more than 2%, but at around $77 a barrel, it was close to the January peak it hit last week. The drop supported the currencies of net oil-importing economies such as the euro and the yen. The euro rose 0.3% at $1.1534, while the yen fell 0.29% to 145.88 per dollar. The recent spike in oil prices added a new layer of inflation uncertainty for central banks across regions, which have been grappling with the potential impact of U.S. tariffs on their economies. Although the Federal Reserve this week stuck with its forecast of two interest rate cuts this year, Chair Jerome Powell warned of "meaningful" inflation ahead. Analysts saw the central bank's delivery as a "hawkish tilt" further underpinning the greenback's gains this week. The Swiss franc was flat at 0.8166 per dollar but was set for its largest weekly drop since the third week of April, after the country's central bank lowered interest rates to 0%. Investors were, however, taken aback by an unexpected 25-basis-point interest rate cut by Norges Bank, and the krone is down more than 2% against the dollar this week. Though geopolitical tensions were the main market focus this week, concerns about a trade war and the impact it may have on costs, corporate margins, and overall growth are ever-present, as Trump's early July tariff deadline looms. These concerns have weighed on the dollar, which is down about 9% this year. Currencies positively correlated to risk sentiment, such as the Australian and New Zealand dollars, were down 0.3% against the buck. Elsewhere, the yuan was flat at 7.1820 after China kept benchmark lending rates unchanged as expected. Sterling was flat at $1.3471, paring earlier gains after British retail sales data showed volumes recorded their sharpest drop since December 2023 last month. "The default setting may be position adjusting," said Marc Chandler, chief market strategist at Bannockburn Global Forex. Currency bid prices at 20 June 07:32 p.m. GMT Descripti RIC Last U.S. Pct YTD Pct High Low on Close Change Bid Bid Previous Session Dollar <=USD 98.701 98.67 0.04% -9.02% 98.898 98.5 index > 36 Euro/Doll 492 Dollar/Ye 175 Euro/Yen 16 Dollar/Sw 55 Sterling/ 457 Dollar/Ca 88 Aussie/Do 452 Euro/Swis 86 Euro/Ster 27 NZ 65 llar Dollar/No 003 Euro/Norw 265 Dollar/Sw 93 Euro/Swed 65
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
S&P 500, Nasdaq finish lower; investors uneasy about Middle East conflict
The S&P 500 and Nasdaq ended lower on Friday, with investors on edge over the Iran-Israel conflict heading into the weekend, as the U.S. considers whether to get involved. Trading was choppy for much of the session. The S&P 500 also ended lower for the week, while the Nasdaq registered a weekly gain. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 23.7% Returns in last 5 years with Shriram Life's ULIP Shriram Life Insurance Undo Iran said it would not discuss the future of its nuclear program while under attack by Israel, as Europe tried to coax Tehran back into negotiations. The White House said on Thursday that President Donald Trump will decide in the next two weeks whether the U.S. will get involved in the Israel-Iran air war, adding pressure on Tehran to negotiate. "Investors are a little bit nervous about buying stocks right in front of this situation and, more specifically, right in front of this weekend," said Rick Meckler, a partner at Cherry Lane Investments in New Vernon, New Jersey. Live Events Israel's attacks have been aimed at suppressing Tehran's ability to build nuclear weapons. A week into its campaign, Israel said it had hit dozens of military targets. Tech-related megacap stocks, including Nvidia, were among the biggest negatives on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 35.16 points, or 0.08%, to 42,206.82, the S&P 500 lost 13.03 points, or 0.22%, to 5,967.84 and the Nasdaq Composite lost 98.86 points, or 0.51%, to 19,447.41. For the week, the Dow was little changed, the S&P 500 was down 0.2% and the Nasdaq was up 0.2%. Friday's volume was higher than the recent average. The day marked a "triple-witching" event, which is the simultaneous expiration of stock options, stock index futures, and stock index options contracts that takes place once every quarter. U.S. exchanges' volume was 20.91 billion shares, compared with the 18.06 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days. Investors also weighed comments from Federal Reserve officials after the Fed on Wednesday left interest rates unchanged and Fed Chair Jerome Powell warned inflation could pick up pace over the summer as Trump's tariffs work their way to consumers. Fed Governor Christopher Waller said he felt the inflation risk from tariffs was small, and that the Fed should cut rates as soon as its next meeting. Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin took a more tempered view, saying there was no urgency to cut rates. Kroger shares jumped 9.8% after the grocery chain increased its annual sales growth forecast. Shares of Accenture fell 6.9% after the IT services provider said new bookings decreased in the third quarter. Declining issues outnumbered advancers by a 1.1-to-1 ratio on the NYSE. There were 102 new highs and 59 new lows on the NYSE. On the Nasdaq, 1,894 stocks rose and 2,651 fell as declining issues outnumbered advancers by a 1.4-to-1 ratio. (Additional reporting by Kanchana Chakravarty and Sukriti Gupta in Bengaluru; Editing by Devika Syamnath and Rod Nickel)
