Silencing America's Voice in the Middle East
The tariff story is big. But whats even bigger? Irans nuclear program. Onthe eve of President Trumps negotiations with Iran, America is about to unilaterally disarm in the war of information and ideas. It makes no sense.
Middle East Broadcasting Networks (MBN),the company I lead, will beforced to close as soon as next week. Congress approved our funding on March 14. Hours later,ourfunding was abruptly and unwisely cut off by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This was done with the apparent approval of Kari Lake, special adviser to the umbrella agency that oversees my company, as well as Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Free Asia. These networks provide honest news to tens of millions of people around the world.We are U.S.-funded. And were being starved of resources.
Since the release of the Heritage Foundations Project 2025, we at MBN have been expecting proposals for reform. Instead, were getting chain-sawed.
MBN had already started restructuring. We slashed spending last fall by 25%. We closed bureaus in the region. We upped our game in technology and AI. We were prepared to do more.Media in the Middle East thrive on a diet of anti-Americanism. MBN isthe U.S.-funded Arabic language alternative.
Thanks now to the administrations knee-jerk andirresponsible decision,Americas adversaries - including Islamic extremists- suddenly have an open field.
Make no mistake: Iran is the big winner in all this. Tehrans proxies across the Middle East can crow about the collapse of American "soft power." Iranian-backed militia in the region already deride our U.S.-funded journalists as"lap dogs."Now they can add to their slurs that we are in ignominious retreat.
Does it matter? We think so. The soft power of open information and honest news has long been a strong complement to the economic tools (both sanctions and rewards) as well as to American military might. Through digital platforms and television, MBN reaches more than 30 million people each week across the Middle East and North Africa. We counter anti-American narratives. We show people the value of independent, uncensored, and responsible media. Is this all too subtle for todays emotive politics? We dont think so. At MBN, we support American foreign policy goals for the price of two Apache helicopters.
This week, our overseer, Kari Lake, was detailed to the State Department. Its hard to know what Elon Musk has against us. Musk has called our federal oversight agency-the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM)-"DOPE,"the Department of Propaganda Everywhere." Not so amusing, considering the stakes. Those of us involved in explaining America to the world believe that whats dopey is abandoning a model that has worked so well to democracys benefit.
We advance American interests and values. Reform and restructure, sure. Annihilation on a whim?
Gutting U.S.-sponsored international media will not help make America great again. At this very moment, when the United States engages Iran on its nuclear program, the last thing anyone should contemplate is unilateral disarmament in the information and ideas space of the violent and volatile Middle East.
Jeffrey Gedmin is president/CEO of Middle East Broadcasting Networks. He worked for a decade at the American Enterprise Institute and is a former president/CEO of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should You Use Your 401(k) To Pay Off Your House?
Saving for retirement, whether it's through an individual retirement account (IRA) or 401(k), is typically top of the list for everyone's financial goals. However, when it comes to long-term personal finances, how can your 401(k) contributions combat your real estate woes? For You: Learn More: Using your 401(k) plan is not generally the best way to pay off your mortgage early or even subsidize your monthly payments. Still, if you're thinking of going in that direction, you should know what the pros and cons are of using your retirement money to get your mortgage paid, along with the steps you should take to do it. Here are the things you should factor into your decision, along with consequences you won't want to overlook. The main benefit to using your traditional 401(k) to pay off your house is that you'll no longer have to worry about making mortgage payments. If you're like most American households, this will provide a significant boost to your monthly cash flow, possibly in the thousands of dollars. You'll also avoid paying potentially tens of thousands of dollars in interest over the life of your mortgage. This alone could make the idea of paying off your home early make sense. Another factor that many overlook when it comes to paying off your mortgage is that it can make the transfer of wealth to your heirs easier and less costly. If you pass on a 401(k) to your heirs, all of the money in the account becomes taxable as your heirs withdraw it. But in a house, your money can potentially pass to your heirs tax-free. This is because upon your death, the cost basis in your house 'steps up' to the current market valuation. If your heirs sell the house, they will likely pay only small or even nonexistent capital gains. That could amount to tax savings of tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars for your beneficiaries. Read Next: In most cases, taking money out of your 401(k) plan to pay off your mortgage is a bad idea. From just a strictly mathematical perspective, you're likely earning more in your 401(k) plan than you are paying in interest on your mortgage. Even if you have a relatively conservative 401(k) allocation, for example, you're likely earning at least 5% on your money. Considering that most existing mortgages are costing homeowners less than 5%, the math doesn't make sense. Another huge drawback is that you'll owe ordinary income tax on any money you withdraw from your 401(k). If you're in a high tax bracket, the combined hit to your nest egg can approach 50%, meaning your $100,000 withdrawal to pay off your mortgage is really only worth $50,000. The last significant drawback to paying off your mortgage this way is that it will wreak havoc on your retirement savings plan. When you take money out of your 401(k), you not only lose the actual amount you withdraw, but you also miss out on its future growth. If you take $100,000 out of your 401(k) at age 40, for example, you'll be missing out on 25 years of growth, assuming you plan to retire at 65. At even just a 6% annual rate of return, that money could have grown to nearly $450,000 by age 65. If you're looking to analyze the real damage that a withdrawal can cause to your retirement plan, look at the total amount you'll be losing in the future, not just the amount you're planning to withdraw today. The bottom line is that if you're considering drawing down your 401(k) plan to pay off your house, keep these dos and don'ts in mind: Compare the interest rate you're earning in your 401(k) with the rate you're paying on your mortgage. Have a plan for what to do with the excess cash flow if you pay off your home. Factor in the tax ramifications of withdrawing from your 401(k), including any penalties. Replace the money you withdrew from your 401(k) plan as rapidly as possible by maxing out your contributions. Fritter away the extra money in your monthly budget after paying off your mortgage. Pay off your home with your retirement money if you have a low-rate mortgage. Decimate your nest egg if you have no plan to restore it. Forget that the real amount you're withdrawing from your 401(k) should include potential future gains as well. Caitlyn Moorhead contributed to the reporting for this article. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on Should You Use Your 401(k) To Pay Off Your House? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Greenpeace joins anti-Bezos protest with Venice banner complaining about billionaire tax breaks
ROME (AP) — Greenpeace on Monday joined the smattering of protests in Venice against the upcoming wedding of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez. A half-dozen protesters unfurled a giant banner early Monday in St. Mark's Square reading: 'IF YOU CAN RENT VENICE FOR YOUR WEDDING YOU CAN PAY MORE TAX.' Local police quickly folded it up and took it away. The demonstration followed other anti-Bezos initiatives last week including a banner draped from the San Giorgio bell tower, one from the lagoon city's famous Rialto Bridge and posters plastered up around town complaining about the upcoming wedding and the effects of overtourism on Venice. The 'No Space for Bezos' movement — a play on words also referring to the bride's recent space flight — has united a dozen Venetian organizations including housing advocates, anti-cruise ship campaigners and university groups. Activists argue the wedding exemplifies broader failures in municipal governance, particularly the prioritization of tourism over resident needs. Greenpeace said it teamed with the British group 'Everyone Hates Elon,' which has smashed Teslas to protest Elon Musk, for Monday's banner. Greenpeace said it wanted to draw attention to the comparitively low taxes many billionaires pay while allegedly exacerbating the climate crisis with environmentally unsustainable lifestyles. Italian and Venetian officials have strongly criticized the protests and welcomed the Bezos-Sanchez nuptials, which are scheduled for later this week. Over the weekend, as the protests continued to make headlines in Italy, a Venetian environmental research association, Corila, said Bezos' Earth Fund was supporting its work with an 'important donation.' Corila, which unites university scholars and Italy's main national research council in researching Venetian protection strategies, wouldn't say how much Bezos was donating but noted contacts began in April, well before the protests started.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-Iranian retaliation against U.S. forces could come soon, U.S. officials say
By Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The United States believes Iran could carry out retaliatory attacks targeting American forces in the Middle East soon, although the U.S. is still seeking a diplomatic resolution that would see Tehran forgo any attack, two U.S. officials said on Monday. One of the officials, who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity to discuss the assessment, said Iran's retaliatory attack could happen within the next day or two. Iran has threatened to retaliate after U.S. bombed its nuclear sites over the weekend. U.S. officials have warned Iran against hitting back at the U.S. and President Donald Trump said after the strikes that any retaliation by Iran against the U.S. would be met with a force far greater than that used in the weekend U.S. attacks. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, said on Sunday that the U.S. military had increased protection of troops in the region, including in Iraq and Syria. The United States has a sizeable force deployed to the Middle East, with nearly 40,000 troops in the region. Some of them operate air defense systems, fighter aircraft and warships that can detect and shoot down incoming enemy missiles but their positions are vulnerable to attack. Reuters reported last week that the Pentagon had moved some aircraft and ships from bases in the Middle East that may be vulnerable to any potential Iranian attack. That included aircraft being removed from the 24-hectare Al Udeid Air Base, in the desert outside the capital Doha. It is Middle East's largest U.S. base and houses around 10,000 troops. Tehran has vowed to defend itself and retaliate. But, perhaps in an effort to avert all-out war with the United States, it had yet to target U.S. bases or choke off a quarter of the world's oil shipments that pass through its waters by closing the Strait of Hormuz.
