Capvidia Expands Model-Based Definition (MBD) Interoperability with QIF-Enabled NX Software
Article content
HOUSTON — Capvidia, a pioneer in Model-Based Definition (MBD) and digital interoperability, announces full integration support for the latest Siemens' NX™ software release. This significant advancement enhances the enablement of Model-Based Characteristics (MBC) via the QIF standard, reinforcing the digital thread from design to quality and manufacturing across OEMs and their global supply chains.
Article content
With this release, Siemens' NX software becomes the first major CAD platform to natively support intelligent PMI ballooning and Model-Based Characteristics using QIF.
Article content
With this release, Siemens' NX software becomes the first major CAD platform to natively support intelligent PMI ballooning and Model-Based Characteristics using QIF. As the only CAD-neutral standard designed for end-to-end digital metrology and quality workflows, this integration represents a groundbreaking development in the industry.
Article content
Capvidia's flagship solution, MBDVidia, fully supports this advancement with bidirectional interoperability. Model data exported from NX via QIF can be validated, enriched, and returned, facilitating true closed-loop feedback between design, quality, and manufacturing.
Article content
'Capvidia has been instrumental in shaping QIF adoption across industries. With MBDVidia, we provide the trusted backbone for verifying and exchanging model-based data between CAD, CMM, and PLM systems,' said Tomasz Luniewski, CEO of Capvidia. 'The integration between NX and MBDVidia is the first step of fully realizing the end-to-end automation and traceability from design to manufacturing.'
Article content
Key Benefits of the NX–MBDVidia Integration:
Article content
Downstream Automation: MBDVidia automates inspection planning, First Article Inspection (FAI) reports, and metrology workflows using NX-generated QIF data—reducing manual rework and setup time.
Upstream Intelligence: MBDVidia sends validated and enriched QIF data back into NX to improve product quality and enable design-for-inspection.
Cross-CAD Interoperability: MBDVidia supports native MBD across Siemens' NX, PTC Creo, SOLIDWORKS, and Autodesk Inventor—ensuring full compatibility across design, quality, and manufacturing systems.
Article content
By aligning with QIF and supporting model-based characteristics, Siemens' and Capvidia jointly enable manufacturers to reduce errors, eliminate redundant effort, and accelerate their transition to the Model-Based Enterprise (MBE).
Article content
To learn more about how Capvidia is enabling model-based collaboration at scale, visit www.capvidia.com. To learn more about NX, visit https://plm.sw.siemens.com/en-US/nx/ About Capvidia Capvidia is a global leader in Model-Based Definition (MBD) and Model-Based Enterprise (MBE) solutions, specializing in CAD translation, validation, and digital product definition. With a strong focus on interoperability and standards compliance, Capvidia empowers engineering and manufacturing organizations to improve data accuracy, streamline workflows, and drive digital transformation. Trusted by leading OEMs and suppliers worldwide, Capvidia continues to push the boundaries of MBD innovation.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Better Cybersecurity Stock: CrowdStrike or SentinelOne?
Artificial intelligence (AI) may have many benefits, but it's also making it easier for hackers, online criminals, and other digital malefactors to threaten businesses, and those threats are getting more potent. Keeping them at bay requires a lot of funds to be devoted to cybersecurity, making companies like CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) and SentinelOne (NYSE: S) excellent investment opportunities. But is there an advantage to buying one over the other now? How do these two approach cybersecurity? Both companies' base products are AI-powered protection platforms that analyze digital activity and learn to spot the threats among the normal activity. They deploy their software to network endpoints -- in other words, laptops, smartphones, and other devices that can access a client's internal network. By protecting these devices, companies make it harder for cyberattackers to gain access to their internal networks, where they might steal sensitive information, delete files, interfere with systems, or even lock them down with ransomware to extort payments from their victims. While endpoint protection is how both companies land clients, each bolsters its offerings with an array of other cybersecurity products that clients can use to create a protection suite tailored to their unique situations. Since these two direct competitors offer highly similar product types, it's hard to declare either a winner on this front from an investor perspective. Winner: Tie. CrowdStrike is much larger than SentinelOne From a sheer size perspective, CrowdStrike is the clear winner. During its fiscal 2026 first quarter, which ended April 30, CrowdStrike's annual recurring revenue (ARR) rose to $4.4 billion. SentinelOne's ARR of $948 million in its fiscal Q1 was less than a quarter of that. While size doesn't always matter, in this case, it does. Because so many more companies use CrowdStrike's platform, it's more likely that any given IT professional will have at least one contact already on its client list. If CrowdStrike is doing a great job with those clients, word will spread, and it will likely receive more serious consideration in future cybersecurity bidding processes. This advantage cannot be understated. Indeed, it's one of the reasons why CrowdStrike's growth has remained strong despite its size. Winner: CrowdStrike SentinelOne is growing more quickly than CrowdStrike, but just barely In terms of growth rates, SentinelOne is slightly outperforming CrowdStrike in this category. However, this should be no surprise because SentinelOne is a much smaller company. In fiscal Q1, SentinelOne's ARR rose 24% year over year, while CrowdStrike's increased 22% year over year. While I will give the point to SentinelOne, it's important to understand that CrowdStrike is growing from a much larger base than SentinelOne, making this close call all the more impressive for CrowdStrike. Winner: SentinelOne Neither company is massively profitable Due to its smaller size and focus on top-line growth, SentinelOne is far from profitable, while CrowdStrike has achieved intermittent profitability (although it reverted to a negative operating margin and a loss in its most recent quarter). S Operating Margin (Quarterly) data by YCharts. SentinelOne is far from breaking even, but CrowdStrike was in this same position about five years ago. There's no reason not to expect SentinelOne to follow a similar path to profitability, but it will take some time. Meanwhile, CrowdStrike should eventually turn a profit again, as it has proven that it can do that. Winner: CrowdStrike SentinelOne looks like a bargain CrowdStrike is leading this battle of the stocks so far, but SentinelOne is about to change the narrative with one jaw-dropping metric. CrowdStrike is the most popular cybersecurity stock in the market, and as a result, it has been bid up to expensive levels. From a price-to-sales (P/S) standpoint (the best metric to use to compare these companies since CrowdStrike flips between profitable and unprofitable, while SentinelOne is years away from profits), CrowdStrike has gotten far more expensive than SentinelOne over the past few years. S PS Ratio data by YCharts. CrowdStrike stock is now five times more expensive than SentinelOne, which is hard to believe, considering they compete in the same industry and are growing at nearly identical rates. This leads me to believe that CrowdStrike's stock has been overly hyped up while SentinelOne has been forgotten. While I'm OK with valuing CrowdStrike at a premium due to its market leadership position, this is far too great a premium to pay. SentinelOne is a dirt-cheap stock, and CrowdStrike is almost too expensive to consider. While I have been a long-term CrowdStrike bull, I'd be a bit cautious about buying the stock at its current lofty valuation. As a result, I think SentinelOne is the better cybersecurity investment right now. Should you invest $1,000 in CrowdStrike right now? Before you buy stock in CrowdStrike, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and CrowdStrike wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Is Cathie Wood Actually Right About Tesla Stock?
Cathie Wood's Ark Invest has been one of the most vocal supporters of and investors in Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA), and it's no secret in the investing world that Ark has a $2,600 price target on the stock for 2029. Still, what does that target mean, and does Ark's reasoning make sense? Here's the lowdown. Ark Invest's $2,600 price target The investment company's price target won't be "right," but then again, it's not supposed to be. It's an expected case scenario produced by a Monte Carlo simulation. In other words, Ark plugged numerous variables into an algorithm and ran a vast number of computer simulations to model a range of randomized outcomes. It's not necessary to get into the weeds about how these simulations are done; suffice it to say that on the bearish side, Ark's model shows a 25% chance that Tesla's stock price will be $2,000 or less in 2029, and on the bullish side, it finds a 25% chance that it will be $3,100 or more. Roughly in the middle lies Ark's expected value of $2,600 for the shares. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » The modeling itself is almost certainly wrong, simply because it relies on variables that are incredibly hard to predict. To illustrate just how challenging it can be to make accurate stock forecasts using this kind of simulation, let's revisit the predictions Ark made in 2021 and 2023 for Tesla's share prices in 2025 and 2026, respectively. Tesla's current stock price in 2025 is about $320. Data source: Ark Invest presentations. Tesla's stock price is currently far below even the bearish scenario Ark simulated in 2021, and it would have to increase by 806% to hit the bear case scenario for 2026 that was projected in 2022. All of which is not to criticize Ark, because modeling the long-term value of a speculative growth stock like Tesla is incredibly difficult. The point is not to take the targets too literally. But if investors can't take such price targets as gospel, is there anything to be gleaned from Ark's analysis? As a matter of fact, there is. Where Ark's model makes sense The key points from the model that investors can take away are the following: Tesla's share price is highly sensitive to the timing and scaling of its robotaxi and Full Self-Driving (FSD) capabilities. The $2,600 price target for 2029 assumes that at that point, 88% of Tesla's enterprise value (market cap plus net debt) will be attributable to its robotaxi business, and just 9% to its electric vehicle (EV) sales. The message is clear: Don't buy Tesla stock unless you believe there's a good chance its robotaxi service (which may already be operating in its first market by the time you read this) won't be successful. Everything is riding on the company's robotaxi bet. Tesla's robotaxis Tesla's unsupervised Full Self-Driving (FSD) system is unproven, as is its robotaxi concept. Notably, it has yet to begin volume production of its dedicated robotaxi, the Cybercab. Moreover, there are myriad regulatory hurdles and safety concerns to overcome. Simply put, Tesla's robotaxi business is risky. And if it fails, it will likely set Tesla back significantly. Buyer beware. That said, while Tesla is a speculative growth stock -- remember, buyers at this point are investing primarily for its robotaxi business, not its electric vehicle business -- it's a growth stock with a difference. Tesla continues to dominate the EV market, and rivals such as Ford Motor Company and General Motors, have withdrawn from the robotaxi race. The auto industry as a whole has invested billions into the various efforts to develop a fully autonomous vehicle, and Tesla has not been alone in overpromising and underdelivering on it. Yet Tesla is launching its robotaxi service, and it has the vehicles, the data hoard, and the cash reserves to make it work. It's also ideally placed to start producing lower-cost EVs (which can be used as robotaxis controlled by unsupervised FSD systems), and the company says it's set to begin volume production of the Cybercab in 2026. Where Wood might be right Ark Invest is correct that the robotaxi business will be the key to Tesla's longer-term valuation and also the future of the auto industry. If -- and it's a big if -- Tesla can get the technology right, then there's significant upside for the stock, because all the other operational ingredients are in place for the company to make it work. That's where Wood and Ark might be right after all. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $373,066!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,158!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $664,089!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon. See the 3 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
CTV QP: ‘We need to fight for every job in the steel sector': Minister Joly
Watch Industry Minister Melanie Joly on the comments about the recently announced countermeasures falling short against U.S. steel tariffs.
