ESA considering freezing or axing missions amid NASA budget cuts
The European Space Agency (ESA) isn't ruling out programme cuts or freezes if proposed budget cuts to the American space agency NASA are passed by the US Congress later this year.
NASA's 2026 technical budget request, which was released last week, details possible cuts to 19 European space research programmes and could impact key technologies that ESA supplies to American Moon missions.
The bill still needs Congress' approval, likely to come this autumn.
Josef Aschbacher, ESA's director general, told journalists on Thursday that the council is 'doing its homework' to analyse what the impacts of possible NASA budget cuts could be and how investments made by its member states could be 'used in the most efficient way,' to respond.
Aschbacher assured that no cuts or cancellations were coming until the US "finalised" its position, but that no matter the decision made by Congress, ESA would be "ready" and "well-prepared" to react.
Carole Mundell, ESA's director of science, said the agency had determined 19 research projects could be impacted by the proposed NASA budget cuts.
Mundell said ESA and its international partners could mitigate the damage to all but three of them: the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), a space probe that measures gravitational waves, Envision, ESA's first mission to Venus to measure its different atmospheres, and NewAthena, the world's largest X-Ray observatory.
LISA and Envision have already been approved by the ESA council for funding, and NewAthena will come before the council but is expected to pass in 2027.
ESA also supplies NASA with certain key parts for the NASA-led Artemis missions that would see humans return to the surface of the Moon for the first time since the 1960s.
The ESA builds European Space Modules (ESMs) that provide electricity and oxygen to Orion, the spacecraft picked by NASA for the Artemis missions to the surface of the Moon.
The ESA is also in charge of the Argonaut, Europe's lunar lander programme that would ultimately support these missions.
It is also contributing three key elements for Gateway, the first international space station to be built around the Moon.
The proposed NASA budget said that it will sustain funding for the Artemis II mission, scheduled for early 2026, and the Artemis III mission in 2027, but future missions would cancel the Gateway and retire Orion in the name of finding a more 'sustainable and cost-effective' lunar exploration strategy.
Daniel Neuenschwander, ESA's director of human and robotic exploration, said the agency continues to fulfill its Gateway and ESM contracts with NASA.
Even if cuts are approved, Argonaut and these European capabilities would still be used to support ESA missions, he added.
Neuenschwander said ESA was now exploring with industry how some replacement technologies could be built in the EU.
For example, the NASA cuts target the Rosalind Franklin ExoMars Rover mission, an ESA programme that drills down to the surface of the Red Planet to dig up organic material for further scientific study.
NASA supplies three parts of the rover's technology, including the Mars Organic Molecule Analyzer (MOMA), an astrobiology instrument that does the sample extraction, and an americium radioisotope heater unit (RHU) to power the vehicle.
Both technologies are not currently available to be produced in Europe, Neuenschwander said, but that engagement is starting to build them. The RHU in particular can also be used for future ESA lunar surface exploration missions, he added.
Neuenschwander said ESA could rely on other partners, like the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), in the short term to supply technologies like the MOMA or RHU, but ultimately the goal is to build the necessary technology in Europe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AFP
3 hours ago
- AFP
Video does not show astronaut exposing 'fake' life in space
"Former Astronaut Karen Nyberg Shows How NASA Fakes Space Flights.." a June 16, 2025 post on X claimed. ideo of a woman in front of a space station-like backdrop watching a chip bag float away from her, side-by-side with the same footage being filmed in front of a green screen. A person in a green body suit is manipulating the bag. garnered thousands of interactions in posts on X, Threads, Instagram and Facebook. The clip in posts making similar claims about Nyberg in French, Spanish and Italian. Image Screenshot of an X post taken June 17, 2025 Nyberg is a retired NASA astronaut who completed two spaceflights during her career, including a 166-day stay on the ISS in 2013 (archived here). But she is not the woman in the green screen video. Comments on the post on X included links to previous debunks from USA Today and PolitiFact who named the woman in the video as Paige Windle. e clip, a person off-camera is heard calling the woman Paige. Windle is the founder of a lifestyle management company and the wife of David Weiss, known online as "Flat Earth Dave," the host of "The Flat Earth Podcast." Contacted by AFP, Weiss confirmed Windle is the one on-camera. "This video never dies. It keeps coming back," Weiss said in a June 17 email. The video was originally posted on Weiss's YouTube channel as part of a series titled "Globebusters," but made no mention of Nyberg (archived here). ook that clip and presented it as Karen Nyberg and it went viral a bunch of times and now it has started again," he said. He said he has repeatedly addressed the false use of the video, sharing with AFP the cover image of a YouTube video he posted in response to the false viral claims (archived here). Image Screenshot of a YouTube video thumbnail sent to AFP by David Weiss on June 16, 2025 Life in microgravity Astronauts onboard the ISS experience microgravity, causing them and objects to float (archived here). At the altitude of the ISS, gravity is 90 percent of the total gravity one feels on Earth, but an absence of air resistance causes all objects in the ISS to fall at the same rate, producing a weightless appearance. The ISS stays afloat because it moves at a speed that matches the curve of the Earth, causing it to "fall around" the planet while staying at roughly the same altitude. The moon's orbit works in a similar way. NASA uses the ISS in part to study how extended time periods in microgravity and impact the human body as it prepares for future long-term missions in On her website, Nyberg features a video she recorded on the ISS where she worked on a quilt (archived here). Unlike in the video filmed in front of the green screen, Nyberg's hair and necklace float throughout the clip due to the microgravity conditions. AFP reached out to Nyberg's representative for comment, but a response was not forthcoming. AFP has previously debunked claims that ISS astronauts faked a video from the station.
Sustainability Times
15 hours ago
- Sustainability Times
'100x More Precise': New NASA Probe Promises Unmatched Exoplanet Scans in Deep-Space Exploration Revolution
IN A NUTSHELL 🚀 NASA's GIRO aims to map exoplanets' interiors using gravity fields and radio signals. aims to map exoplanets' interiors using gravity fields and radio signals. 🌌 The probe operates by detecting subtle changes in gravitational pull through the Doppler effect . . 🛰️ Cost-effective and high precision , GIRO offers 10 to 100 times better accuracy than traditional methods. , GIRO offers 10 to 100 times better accuracy than traditional methods. 🔍 Strategic planning is crucial for GIRO missions, with a focus on precise orbits and planetary protection. The exploration of distant worlds has long been a dream of humanity, and NASA's proposed Gravity Imaging Radio Observer (GIRO) is set to revolutionize our approach. This innovative probe promises to map the interiors of exoplanets and celestial bodies without the need for physical contact. By using gravity fields and radio signals, GIRO aims to uncover the secrets hidden beneath alien surfaces. This low-cost, battery-powered probe represents a significant leap forward in space exploration technology, potentially providing unprecedented insights into the composition and activity of distant planets. Listening to the Universe: How GIRO Works The Gravity Imaging Radio Observer (GIRO) operates by flying in tandem with a host spacecraft near a target celestial body. As the spacecraft and GIRO orbit or fly by a planet or moon, they encounter subtle changes in gravitational pull. These changes, caused by variations in mass within the body, alter their paths slightly. By utilizing the Doppler effect in radio signals, GIRO can detect these changes, effectively 'listening' to the gravity fields. This method allows the probe to map the interior structures of the target, identifying features such as metallic cores, layered rock formations, or even potential volcanic activity. As Ryan Park, principal engineer at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, explains, GIRO acts as a small radio probe reflecting signals sent from the host spacecraft, making it an efficient tool for space exploration. 'Space Needs Nuclear Now': This New Global Race to Harness Atomic Power Beyond Earth Is Accelerating Faster Than Expected A Versatile Tool for Challenging Missions GIRO's design makes it particularly valuable for missions in extreme or hard-to-access environments. Its low-mass, high-accuracy profile allows it to collect detailed data even when time or safety constraints limit mission duration. For instance, GIRO could enable close passes by Uranus' rings or brief flybys of small asteroids. The probe is especially useful when missions can only conduct a limited number of orbits or flybys, making it a flexible addition to broader exploration missions. Park emphasizes that GIRO can be integrated into existing missions, eliminating the need for dedicated gravity-mapping spacecraft. This approach not only saves resources but also enhances the scientific value of exploration missions by adding a gravity science component. 'Nasa Confirms the Unthinkable': China's Giant Water Diversion Project Will Slow Earth's Rotation and Disrupt Global Timekeeping Precision Mapping at an Affordable Cost One of GIRO's most compelling features is its ability to deliver high precision without the high costs typically associated with space missions. According to Park, GIRO can achieve an accuracy that is 10 to 100 times better than traditional ground-based tracking methods. By leveraging lightweight, low-power radio components, GIRO matches the capabilities of previous gravity missions like GRAIL, but at a fraction of the cost and complexity. The probe's spin-stabilized, battery-powered design allows for the deployment of multiple units simultaneously, enhancing data reliability and coverage. This efficiency makes GIRO an attractive option for future missions, providing high-quality data without the need for extensive financial investment. 'It's Growing': NASA Detects Massive Earth Anomaly Expanding Rapidly and Threatening the Entire Continental United States Challenges in Planning and Execution Despite its promising capabilities, missions utilizing GIRO require meticulous planning. Probes must be released into precise orbits to ensure accurate readings and maintain reliable radio contact. Each GIRO unit has a limited battery life, typically around 10 days for missions to outer planets, though solar recharging is possible for inner solar system deployments. Additionally, compliance with planetary protection rules is crucial, as the probes must not risk contaminating celestial bodies with potential for life. The integration of GIRO into a mission could occur within one to three years, but the timeline is subject to factors such as funding, political considerations, and necessary testing. The ongoing development of GIRO underscores the importance of strategic planning and international cooperation in space exploration. As NASA continues to push the boundaries of what is possible in space exploration, the Gravity Imaging Radio Observer stands as a testament to human ingenuity and ambition. By offering a novel approach to mapping distant worlds, GIRO has the potential to transform our understanding of the universe. The probe's development raises intriguing questions about the future of space exploration: How might GIRO's technology be applied to other areas of scientific inquiry, and what new discoveries await us in the cosmos? Our author used artificial intelligence to enhance this article. Did you like it? 4.5/5 (23)
France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Trump 'Golden Dome' plan tricky and expensive: experts
Trump announced plans for the space-based system last month, saying it would eventually cost around $175 billion and would be operational by the end of his term in 2029. The planned defence shield's name is a nod to Israel's Iron Dome that has intercepted thousands of short-range rockets since 2011. But the US defence system would intercept much bigger intercontinental threats. The plan comes after a 2022 Department of defence study pointed to advances by China and Russia. Beijing is closing the gap with Washington when it comes to ballistic and hypersonic missile technology, while Moscow is modernising its intercontinental-range missile systems and developing advanced precision strike missiles, it said. Trump has claimed the "Golden Dome" will be "capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from other sides of the world". But analysts are sceptical. "I'm not holding my breath," said Thomas Withington, an associate fellow at the RUSI defence think tank. "The challenges are so significant at this stage that they may simply be unrealistic to surround in the timeframes that the Trump administration envisages." 'Poster child for waste' Thomas Roberts, of the Georgia Institute of Technology, said the "Golden Dome" plan was based on being able to detect when a long-range missile was fired. A missile's so-called "boost phase" -- which produces a heat blast that lasts one to two minutes and can be observed from space -- is the best time to deploy defences, he said. "If you had an enormous constellation of interceptors in orbit at all times, they could be readily de-orbited -- or systematically removed from orbit -- to strike an intercontinental ballistic missile," he said. But Todd Harrison, from the American Enterprise Institute, said this would require a massive number of satellites. "It takes about 950 interceptors spread out in orbit around the Earth to ensure that at least one is always in range to intercept a missile during its boost phase," he said. But that means that if an adversary launches a salvo of ten missiles, some 9,500 interceptors would be needed to ensure at least ten are within range. "Given that China has about 350 intercontinental ballistic missiles and Russia has 306 -- not including their sub-launched ballistic missiles -- scaling a space-based interceptor system to meet the threat quickly becomes impractical." The non-partisan US Congressional Budget Office estimates that, just to stop "one or two intercontinental ballistic missiles", the United States would need a constellation of satellites costing between $161 billion to $542 billion. The US military could spend billions of dollars on research only for the next administration to nix the project, Harrison warned. "Golden Dome could become the poster child for waste and inefficiency in defence," he said. The plan also calls for developing satellites able to fire lasers at missiles to avoid too much debris on impact. But a European defence contractor said on condition of anonymity that such lasers are "still beyond what even the Americans are capable of doing". "It's just an excellent way to give the US (defence) industry substantial funding so they can increase their technological lead without necessarily aiming for actual operational deployment," the contractor said. 'Global arms race'? Trump's plan is reminiscent of President Ronald Reagan ambition for a Strategic Defense Initiative in the 1980s, which also sought to place interceptor satellites in space. China and Russia, which both have nuclear weapons, have slammed the latest plan as "deeply destabilising". Nuclear-armed North Korea has called the plan a "very dangerous" threat. Julia Cournoyer, research associate at Chatham House, said the plan was risky as adversaries would likely see it "as an attempt to undermine the logic of nuclear deterrence". "If Washington is perceived to be developing a shield that could one day neutralise a retaliatory nuclear strike, it risks triggering a dangerous global arms race," which would exacerbate rather than reduce risk. Withington said Trump might be hoping to use the plan as leverage for talks with China and Russia. "It may be that the Trump administration is hoping that this would bring both countries to some kind of negotiating table to talk about a reduction of nuclear warhead sizes or to revitalise the arms control agenda," he said.
