Khamenei retreats to bunker as fears of assassination grow: New York Times
According to a report by the New York Times (NYT), Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has taken unprecedented steps to safeguard the continuity of the Islamic Republic.
According to three Iranian officials familiar with his emergency war strategy, Khamenei has largely abandoned electronic communication, opting instead to relay orders through a trusted aide while remaining hidden in an underground bunker.
The move reflects what officials describe as a growing fear of assassination. 'The Democratic People's Republic of Korea strongly denounces the attack on Iran by the US which severely violated the UN Charter with respect for sovereignty,' Khamenei reportedly warned his advisers, echoing fears that both Israel and the United States could be targeting him directly.
Khamenei has reportedly already chosen three high-ranking clerics as potential successors, preemptively guiding the Assembly of Experts on how to proceed if he is killed. His son Mojtaba, a frequently mentioned name in succession rumors, is not among the candidates. Former President Ebrahim Raisi, once a top contender, was killed in a helicopter crash in 2024.
Khamenei's retreat marks a shift in how Iran's leadership operates. For decades, he rarely left his secure residence in central Tehran. But now, after days of 'Israeli' aerial bombardment, much of the capital has emptied out. Key military leaders have been killed, and entire residential blocks housing nuclear scientists and commanders have been reduced to rubble. Iranian officials say these 'Israeli' attacks, combined with sabotage operations by covert agents, represent the most damaging assault since the Iran-Iraq War.
The situation escalated further when the US entered the war. President Donald Trump announced that American forces had destroyed three of Iran's nuclear sites, including the uranium-enrichment facility at Fordo. 'Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's No. 1 state sponsor of terror,' Trump declared in a televised address.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ammon
32 minutes ago
- Ammon
The 'Washington Effect' could decide the AI race
Ammon News - BALTIMORE – Five months into his second presidency, Donald Trump is already ushering in a new era of imperial technological governance in which both domestic and foreign regulatory authorities are subordinated to a US administration increasingly dominated by Big Tech. Silicon Valley has cultivated its political influence through aggressive lobbying and strategic presidential appointments. Now, despite the tech industry's distaste for Trump's tariffs and policy priorities, its efforts are paying off, as Republican leaders work to stymie tech regulation not just in Congress – where legislative progress was always unlikely – but also at the state level and around the world. As part of Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill, lawmakers are considering a decade-long ban that would block US states from regulating AI. The proposed ban would severely undermine efforts to mandate transparency in AI systems, protect consumers from algorithmic price fixing, and curb worker surveillance. Although it's unlikely to survive the Senate's procedural rules, Republican Senator Ted Cruz has pledged to pursue a similar prohibition in future legislation. For the tech industry, federal preemption has long been a reliable strategy for avoiding troublesome state laws. It also dovetails with Republican efforts to centralize AI regulatory authority within the White House. This may explain why the debate over the proposed ban has largely focused not on states' rights, but on geopolitical anxieties. For example, at a congressional hearing on the proposal, lawmakers and expert witnesses turned what should have been a conversation about the role of statehouses in Sacramento and Denver into sprawling diatribes against overregulation in Brussels and authoritarianism in Beijing. If the United States ends up with a patchwork of state AI laws, the argument goes, American companies will struggle to innovate and compete with China. Throughout that hearing, industry speakers repeatedly cited flagship European Union regulations like the GDPR and AI Act, arguing that regulatory overreach has hindered Europe's ability to produce world-class tech companies. The message was clear: to defeat China, the US must not become another Brussels. But is Brussels still Brussels? Well before any discussion of AI preemption, the Trump administration had begun pressuring the EU into watering down tech laws like the Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act. In February, speaking before a room of EU and world leaders at an AI summit in Paris, Vice President J.D. Vance decried the 'onerous international rules' that apply to US businesses. At the same summit, French President Macron signaled his desire for the EU's tech laws to 'simplify' and 'resynchronize with the rest of the world.' There are signs this strategy is working. The EU's recent AI Continent Action Planreflects a softer approach to regulation, and enforcers are scaling back fines on US tech firms. Meanwhile, those same US companies are keeping up the pressure, lobbying the European Commission to keep AI rules 'as simple as possible.' Tech regulation also remains a point of contention in Trump's trade policy. In May, Trump threatened to impose 50% tariffs on EU imports as negotiations over digital taxes and tech regulation remained deadlocked. US politicians often portray the 'Brussels Effect' as a cautionary tale, based on the largely discredited notion that the EU, obsessed with setting de facto global standards, overplayed its hand and ultimately sabotaged its own tech sector. But now we are witnessing the emergence of a 'Washington Effect': a contraction of tech governance at all levels – local, state, and multinational – aimed at shoring up the supremacy of US firms, with regulatory power increasingly concentrated in the federal government's executive branch. In pursuit of global tech dominance, former President Joe Biden – a staunch advocate of the US-led liberal world order – worked with allies to coordinate 'AI safety networks' and reconfigure key lines of tech hardware production. By contrast, as historian Jake Werner observed, Trump 'conceptualizes the economy as a market where those with bargaining power squeeze profit out of those who lack it, rather than as a supply chain in which power accumulates at strategic nodes associated with scarce goods or technologies.' With its decision to abandon Biden's semiconductor export restrictions, the Trump administration has shown that it sees no need to weaponize access to high-end graphics processing units (GPUs) to bring other countries to the table; nor does it show much interest in multilateral coordination. Speaking about the recent EU tariff announcement, Trump was characteristically blunt: 'I'm not looking for a deal. We've set the deal.' That same logic is playing out in US domestic politics. Gone are Biden's 'legislative convenings' that brought together state lawmakers to address nationally significant issues. Instead, Republicans want to turn the White House into the central clearinghouse for all AI policy, even if that means banning state officials from introducing protections against abusive practices. These measures complement each other: while administration officials pressure foreign governments to ease up on US firms, Congress moves to block state-level oversight altogether. Washington, in short, is being positioned as the only place where decisions can be made. The irony is this: even in an age of regulatory retreat, federal authority will shape the future trajectory of US tech. 'Winning the AI race,' a vague and largely undefinable goal, will depend as much on US state power and political coercion as on private investment. However slim the prospects for multilateral collaboration may be, the Washington Effect is rapidly diminishing them. Much will depend on how China responds. Still, with the exception of those who stand to profit directly from the tech arms race, the outlook is bleak: as nationalist rhetoric intensifies, the interests of dominant tech firms increasingly outweigh the vision of an innovation system that serves the public good. The US likes to cast itself as the world's foremost champion of democracy and innovation. But its strategy for achieving AI primacy depends on imperial overreach and the unchecked expansion of executive power. The Trump administration isn't favoring red states over blue, or cooperating with European allies to beat China. Instead, it is seeking to strip power from state authorities and foreign partners alike, prioritizing predation over effective governance.
Ammon
an hour ago
- Ammon
U.S. launches strikes on 3 Iranian nuclear facilities, Trump announces
Ammon News - On June 22, 2025, President Trump announced that the U.S. had conducted airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—in coordination with Israel He called the operation a 'very/spectacular military success,' saying the sites were 'completely and totally obliterated,' and confirmed that all U.S. planes had returned safely.
Jordan News
an hour ago
- Jordan News
King Chairs Meeting with Heads of Authorities and Security Leaders - Jordan News
King Chairs Meeting with Heads of Authorities and Security Leaders King: Jordan will not allow anyone to exploit current regional developments to cast doubt on its firm positions regarding the causes of the nation. اضافة اعلان King stresses the importance of preserving internal unity and strengthening national spirit. King instructs state institutions to work on mitigating the negative economic impacts of the ongoing regional escalation. King reaffirms Jordan's position calling for intensified international efforts to reach a comprehensive de-escalation. King: Resolving disputes between countries and de-escalation must be pursued through diplomatic frameworks, dialogue, and negotiations. His Majesty King Abdullah II on Sunday affirmed that Jordan will not allow anyone to exploit the current regional developments to question the Kingdom's firm and consistent positions on the causes of the Arab nation. During a meeting he chaired at Al Husseiniya Palace with the heads of the three branches of government and security agency leaders, His Majesty underscored the importance of maintaining internal unity and reinforcing national spirit. The King directed all state institutions to work toward alleviating the negative effects of the current serious regional escalation, particularly in the economic sphere. His Majesty reiterated Jordan's call for intensifying international efforts to achieve a comprehensive de-escalation, stressing that resolving conflicts between countries and reducing tensions must occur within diplomatic frameworks, dialogue, and negotiations. The King once again emphasized that achieving lasting stability and peace in the region is not possible without resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict—the core conflict in the region. He renewed the call for stepped-up international efforts to reach a ceasefire in Gaza, reduce tensions in the West Bank and Jerusalem, and pave the way for a political horizon toward a just and comprehensive peace based on the two-state solution. The meeting was attended by Prime Minister Dr. Jaafar Hassan, Senate President Faisal Al-Fayez, House of Representatives Speaker Ahmad Al-Safadi, President of the Judicial Council Mahmoud Al-Ababneh, and President of the Constitutional Court Mohammad Al-Ghazo. Also present were Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Major General Yousef Ahmad Al-Huneiti, Director of the General Intelligence Department Major General Ahmad Hosni, and Director of Public Security Major General Dr. Obaidallah Maaytah. The meeting was attended as well by Chief of the Royal Hashemite Court Yousef Hassan Al-Issawi, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates Ayman Safadi, and Director of His Majesty's Office, Engineer Alaa Al-Bataineh. — (Petra)
