As Israel launches a major attack on Iran, Trump's pre-election rhetoric runs into reality
About a month before Election Day 2024 in the United States, tensions in the Middle East escalated as Iran targeted Israel with a ballistic missile attack. Asked about the developments, then-candidate Donald Trump appeared largely focused on himself, insisting that there were no similar events during his White House term — a claim that was demonstrably ridiculous.
But that's not all he said.
Referring to Iranian officials, the Republican argued, 'They have no respect for the [Biden] administration. This would have never happened if I was president.' As part of the same exchange, Trump added that the sooner he was returned to power, 'the safer the world will be.'
The rhetoric was absurd but familiar. In the four years following his 2020 defeat, Trump routinely tried to convince the public that his first term was a time of global peace, stability and tranquility — in part because so much of the world respected his awesomeness, and in part because U.S. foes feared his mightiness. It was an utterly bizarre effort to rewrite recent history, but it nevertheless became a staple of his pre-election pitch.
As MSNBC's Chris Hayes summarized via Bluesky, 'Trump's go-to line about every foreign policy crisis and war — from Russia's invasion of Ukraine, to October 7th, to the Israel's devastation of Gaza — was 'It would never have happened if I was president.''
Ahead of his second inaugural, Trump similarly told Time magazine, 'I think that the Middle East is an easier problem to handle than what's happening with Russia and Ukraine. Okay, I just want to say that up front. The Middle East is going to get solved. ... I think it's more complicated than the Russia-Ukraine, but I think it's, it's, it's easier to solve.'
As the president really ought to know, his rhetoric often has unfortunate confrontations with reality. NBC News reported that the Israeli military launched a massive attack on Iran on Friday, increasing the risk of another war in the Middle East.
The strikes, which killed senior Iranian scientists and top military officials, involved more than 200 fighter jets. They were aimed at Iran's main enrichment facility and targets associated with the country's ballistic missile program, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei swiftly vowed retaliation. Soon after the strikes, Iran launched more than 100 drones towards Israel, Israeli Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said.
The Trump administration, which has spent recent months negotiating with Iran over the future of its nuclear program, made no secret of the fact that it wanted Israel to hold off on launching such a military offensive as the diplomatic talks continued. Netanyahu appears to have ignored those calls.
With this in mind, the State Department made clear after Israel's attack that the United States was not involved in this offensive and was not providing assistance.
The next morning, the American president seemed to undermine his own administration's line with a statement published to his social media platform.
'I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done,' Trump wrote online, putting a spin on his own inability to successfully negotiate a deal. 'I told them it would be much worse than anything they know, anticipated, or were told, that the United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come — And they know how to use it. Certain Iranian hardliner's spoke bravely, but they didn't know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse!'
The Republican suggested that Iran should continue to negotiate with the United States and 'make a deal,' in order to 'save what was once known as the Iranian Empire.' (There was never any such thing as 'the Iranian Empire.' Whether Trump was trying to refer to the Persian Empire was unclear.)
I won't pretend to know what the White House might say or do next, though Politico reports that the broader MAGA movement is largely divided between those who expect the U.S. administration to rally behind Israel and those who want the administration to steer clear of a burgeoning Middle East crisis.
As of this writing, it's unclear whether Joe Biden will tweet, 'They have no respect for the Trump administration. This would have never happened if I was president.'
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
32 minutes ago
- USA Today
Oil hits five-month high after US hits key Iranian nuclear sites
SINGAPORE - Oil prices jumped on Monday, local time, to their highest since January as Washington's weekend move to join Israel in attacking Iran's nuclear facilities stoked supply worries. Brent crude futures rose $1.88 or 2.44% at $78.89 a barrel as of 1122 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude advanced $1.87 or 2.53% at $75.71. Both contracts jumped by more than 3% earlier in the session to $81.40 and $78.40, respectively, five-month highs, before giving up some gains. The rise in prices came after President Donald Trump said he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes over the weekend, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer. Market participants expect further price gains amid mounting fears that an Iranian retaliation may include a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of global crude supply flows. Iran's Press TV reported that the Iranian parliament approved a measure to close the strait. Iran has in the past threatened to close the strait but has never followed through on the move. "The risks of damage to oil infrastructure ... have multiplied," said Sparta Commodities senior analyst June Goh. Although there are alternative pipeline routes out of the region, there will still be crude volumes that cannot be fully exported out if the Strait of Hormuz becomes inaccessible. Shippers will increasingly stay out of the region, she added. Brent has risen 13% since the conflict began on June 13, while WTI has gained around 10%. The current geopolitical risk premium is unlikely to last without tangible supply disruptions, analysts said. Meanwhile, the unwinding of some of the long positions accumulated following a recent price rally could cap an upside to oil prices, Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank, wrote in a market commentary on Sunday. (Reporting by Siyi Liu in Singapore; Editing by Himani Sarkar)
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Contradicts His Own Vice President On 'Regime Change' In Iran
Shortly after Vice President J.D. Vance disputed the US's interest in 'regime change' in Iran, President Donald Trump signaled openness to a shake-up in the country's leadership. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!,' Trump wrote in a Sunday evening Truth Social post. Trump's statements come after Vance and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth emphasized that US strikes on Iran were an 'intentionally limited' operation focused on eliminating the country's nuclear capabilities – and not fueling a larger conflict. 'Our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change,' Vance said in a Sunday NBC News interview. 'This mission was not, and has not, been about regime change,' Hegseth told reporters during a Sunday briefing. Trump's post on Sunday notably muddied the administration's position. Last week, Trump had written that the US knew where Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was hiding, but that 'We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' Previously, Trump has also criticized the US's role in wars that spurred 'regime changes' in Iraq and Afghanistan. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, meanwhile, has said that 'regime change' in Iran is not a goal of the attacks his country has launched, though it could be a 'result.'
Politico
38 minutes ago
- Politico
Oil prices jump as market awaits Iran response to attacks
Oil prices surged Sunday evening to the highest levels since President Donald Trump returned to office as energy markets digested the U.S. military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities — and the risk that Tehran may try to disrupt the flow of crude oil out of the Middle East. U.S. crude oil futures rallied more than 6 percent to peak at $78 a barrel, more than $1 higher than the price on Jan. 20 when Trump was inaugurated. That jump is likely to filter through to gasoline prices just as drivers prepare to hit the road for the long July 4th weekend next week. Trump had campaigned on promises to lower consumer energy prices as part of his 'energy dominance' agenda, but the current average pump price of nearly $3.22 a gallon for regular gasoline is about 10 cents above the price when he was inaugurated — and likely to climb this week. How much higher oil prices might go now depends on how Tehran responds to the attacks. Iran's parliament's voted to close the Strait Of Hormuz, the narrow waterway at the mouth of the Persian Gulf where a quarter of the world's seaborne oil passes, but only an appointee of Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei can make that determination. Even if that were to happen, the impact on the oil market would depend on whether Iran and its allies are satisfied harassing the oil tankers traversing Hormuz or resort to a full-scale campaign to block traffic altogether. Reports that the White House gave Iran a head's up on the bombings and said there wouldn't be more to follow suggests the Trump administration is trying to avoid a full-scale war — and helping to keep oil prices in check. Energy analysts have said a disruption in the shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz could send oil prices above $100 a barrel. 'This choreography underscores that both sides want to calibrate this crisis, not lose control of it,' said Scott Modell, chief executive officer at energy and geopolitics analysis firm Rapidan Energy Group. 'We expect Iran's response to be stage-managed: think harassment of commercial shipping, symbolic seizures of tankers, and limited rocket fire on US military outposts — but not a full-scale campaign to choke energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz.' Some market analysts are confident that even if the fighting does escalate, the United States, OPEC countries such as Saudi Arabia and other suppliers will have enough product to meet demand. But others are warning that a price increase may have only just begun. 'True, these oil market dynamics indicate that investors have incorporated a greater risk premium to account for the increased probability of an oil supply shock,' BCA Research analyst Roukaya Ibrahim said in a note. 'Yet the more important question is whether this pricing adequately reflects the level of risk. Our sense is that crude price pressures will remain tilted to the upside over the near term.'
