
China Ousts Another High-Ranking Military Leader as Purge Deepens
A senior member of the Chinese military elite has been removed as delegate to the Communist Party-run legislature, a development that casts a shadow over the fate of another longtime ally of leader Xi Jinping.
China announced the decision late on Wednesday to expel Adm. Miao Hua in an online statement from the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress.
China's defense ministry said in November 2024 that Miao was suspended from office and placed under investigation for 'serious violations of discipline,' a euphemism for corruption and disloyalty. Analysts have
Since coming to power in 2012, Xi has initiated a crackdown on corruption aimed at purging Party officials and military generals deemed corrupt or disloyal. The drive led to the downfall of numerous high-ranking military officers linked to his
The latest military purge, however, has claimed some of Xi's longtime allies, such as Miao,
Miao held the position of director of the Political Work Department for seven years before being suspended last November. This crucial role oversees the military's ideological loyalty to the Communist Party and is key in determining the promotion of senior military officers.
Related Stories
3/27/2025
4/28/2025
He has served as a member of the Party's Central Military Commission (CMC) since October 2017.
The CMC commands the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and represents one of the highest echelons of power in China. When Xi unveiled the leadership lineup following the 20th Party congress in October 2022, two vice chairmen and four members were on the CMC.
As of Wednesday night, Miao remains listed as a CMC member on the Ministry of Defense's website, though the link to his profile has been disabled. In contrast, clicking on the names of other CMC members still brings up their previous news articles. A
Experts who track China's military interpreted Wednesday's announcement as an indicator of Miao's downfall.
'It seems to be an official acknowledgment that Miao Hua has either been found to be corrupt, politically disloyal, or is preparing to take any actions against Xi Jinping,' Shen Ming-Shih, a research fellow at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a think tank funded by the Taiwanese government, told The Epoch Times.
Miao is the second CMC member to be purged, following former defense minister Li Shangfu, who was
The removal of Miao came amid growing speculation about the fate of Gen. He Weidong, the vice chair of CMC and a member of the Politburo, the Party's second-highest tier of power.
He, the military's No. 3 officer, has missed at least three key political events this month in which all CMC leaders were expected to appear. The most recent one was the Politburo's study session on April 25. Footage broadcast on state television CCTV showed that the session was attended by Politburo's all 24 members except top diplomat Wang Yi, who was on a visit to Kazakhstan, and He Weidong.
In mid-March, two Chinese commentators, citing their sources close to the Party's top ranks, told The Epoch Times that He was
Gen. He Weidong, vice chairman of China's Central Military Commission (CMC), attends the opening ceremony of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference in Beijing on March 4, 2025.
Pedro Pardo/AFP via Getty Images
The defense ministry has said they were '
'We have responded to this question before,' Zhang Xiaogang, the ministry's spokesman, told reporters.
The official silence has only deepened the intrigue, with analysts comparing the response to that of the reported purge of Adm. Dong Jun, the current defense minister, which Beijing dismissed as '
For Taiwanese researcher Shen, who has long studied China and the PLA, the general's continued absence from major events indicates that he may have fallen from grace.
Nevertheless, Shen said if the general were confirmed to have been purged, it would embarrass Xi, whose ties with He date back over two decades in Fujian, a coastal province in southern China.
'The CMC initially had seven members, but now only has four left. Xi Jinping is also embarrassed now,' Shen said.
Luo Ya contributed to this report.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


American Military News
an hour ago
- American Military News
Two Tibetan Buddhist monastery leaders sentenced for Dege dam protests
This article was originally published by Radio Free Asia and is reprinted with permission. Authorities have sentenced two senior Tibetan monastic leaders to three- and four-year prison terms for their roles in rare 2024 public protests against a planned Chinese hydropower dam project, two sources in the region told Radio Free Asia. Sherab, the abbot of Yena Monastery in Dege county's Wangbuding township in Kardze Tibet Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan province, was sentenced to four years in prison and Gonpo, the chief administrator, sentenced to three years, said the sources, who requested anonymity for fear of reprisals. It wasn't immediately clear when the sentences were handed down. The sources said Gonpo was in critical condition due to torture in detention and has been transferred to an intensive care unit in Chengdu's West China Hospital. The two heads of Yena Monastery were detained with hundreds of Tibetan monks and local residents in February 2024 for peacefully appealing for a halt to the construction of the 1,100-megawatt Gangtuo dam on the Drichu river (or Jinsha, in Chinese) that would submerge several monasteries of historical significance, including Yena and Wonto monasteries, and force the resettlement of communities in at least two major villages. Many of the protestors who were detained were reportedly severely beaten during interrogations with some requiring medical attention, sources told RFA at the time. Most were released by the following month but key monastic and village leaders whom authorities suspected of playing a leading role in the protests – like Wonto Monastery's senior administrator Tenzin Sangpo and village official Tenzin – were transferred to a larger county detention center. Yena Monastery has faced particularly severe repression. Authorities have targeted monks for 'focused rectification and re-education' of their political ideologies and for their role as 'serious informants,' sources told RFA. 'The government really went all-out against Yena Monastery, as if venting their anger,' the first source told RFA. Officials said the two monastery leaders should be 'severely punished' specifically for their decision to seek and hire legal representation. In 2024, video emerged of Yena Monastery's abbot Sherab holding both his thumbs up in the traditional Tibetan gesture of begging, as he, other Tibetan monks and local residents publicly cried and pleaded before visiting officials on Feb. 20 not to proceed with the planned project. Collective imprisonment The area on either side of the Drichu river remains under strict surveillance more than a year after the protests, with movement restrictions imposed on the monks and residents of the monasteries and villages at Wangbuding township, sources told RFA. Authorities have established multiple checkpoints at the border between Tibetan areas in Sichuan and the Tibet Autonomous Region, strictly controlling all entry and exit, they said. Only Tibetans holding transit permits issued by the police are allowed passage through the checkpoints installed on roads leading to monasteries like Yena and Wonto that are located near the river, sources said. Even ethnic Han Chinese with transit permits are prohibited from entering, they added. 'The whole area has been effectively sealed off, with nearly 4,000 residents and monks in the villages and monasteries near the river in a state of collective imprisonment, having lost all freedom of movement,' said the second source. During periods considered politically sensitive by Chinese authorities – such as around the anniversary of the March 10 Tibetan Uprising Day of 1959 or the birthday of the Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, on July 6 – surveillance is even more heightened, sources said. During 'sensitive periods,' Tibetans without local household registration are refused entry, while local villagers traveling from rural areas to Dege county seat must apply for transit permits, and are often still refused, sources said. The Gangtuo Dam – which is planned to be located at Kamtok (Gangtuo, in Chinese) in Dege county – is part of a Chinese government project to build a massive 13-tier hydropower complex on the Drichu, with a total planned capacity of 13,920 megawatts. Chinese officials had indicated after last year's protests that the project would proceed as planned but sources said there's no clarity yet on when the construction would be started or if it would at all. 'Even if the project ultimately does not move ahead, the monks and residents of the surrounding villages have already been deeply harmed,' said the first source.

Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
‘There is not a singular voice': On trade, countries don't know who in Trump's circle to listen to
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer have all been meeting with foreign officials seeking agreements to stave off the crushing tariffs President Donald Trump has threatened to impose next month. But Trump's three-headed negotiating team is often working at cross purposes, or at least that's how it seems to 11 foreign officials, business leaders and advisers on trade talks, who say they are receiving mixed messages from different departments, in what one person close to the talks described as a contest for Trump's loyalty. Their differing approaches have occasionally slowed down progress, the foreign officials say, like when the Commerce Department tightened restrictions on some Chinese technology in May, quickly derailing an agreement with Beijing that was negotiated by Bessent. 'We have been shuffled around, there is no doubt about that,' said one diplomat from a country in Asia, granted anonymity to candidly discuss the state of talks. 'There is not a singular voice on this or most things from what's been observed.' It underscores the hurdles that remain as the White House hurtles towards a July 8 deadline to achieve its promise of '90 deals in 90 days,' after the president paused a plan to levy tariffs on roughly 60 trading partners. The most experienced negotiator, Greer, is the furthest from Trump's ear. Bessent and Lutnick are closer to the president — but lack the in-the-weeds expertise on trade. Foreign officials and industry leaders are struggling to find anyone willing to engage on technical details and many doubt their concerns are reaching the right official — let alone being relayed to Trump. 'From what I hear from foreign delegations, this does not seem to be working at all and is why there aren't a bunch of deals being concluded,' Inu Manak, a trade policy expert at the Council on Foreign Relations, said. 'It sounds like Commerce, Treasury and USTR are negotiating different things without keeping each other in the loop.' The White House and its allies have adamantly defended the Trump administration's use of not one, but three primary trade negotiators as they race to hash out new deals, saying that Bessent, Lutnick and Greer are working together to present proposals to the president, who is the ultimate dealmaker. 'It's very natural. The administration has always worked the team on trade, and I'm not surprised that there's many people working on the same issue,' said Everett Eissenstat, who was deputy director of the National Economic Council during Trump's first term. 'Everybody wants to help the president meet his objectives, and then when the president says, 'these are priorities,' they're all going to jump and try to engage and deliver.' The White House views Bessent and Lutnick as the 'big picture' negotiators while Greer brings the technical expertise, though aides say they see all three men as equals. Aides say Lutnick has joined talks with China and Japan, which were originally only under the purview of Bessent, because of the role the Commerce Department plays in setting sector-specific tariffs on products like cars and steel. To the extent there is any disconnect in negotiations, aides attribute it to the challenges of implementing the details of some of the more general policies agreed to by one of Trump's Cabinet officials. 'I think the mixup may come from the fact that trade stuff is obviously very nuanced and very legalese once you get into the nitty-gritty of it,' said one White House official, granted anonymity to discuss strategy. 'When you start getting into the details, that's when things get tied up a little more. But that's not a division-of-labor issue. That's just sort of the nature of how these negotiations go.' The Treasury Department, the Commerce Department and the U.S. Trade Representative's office declined to comment. But the confusion felt by foreign officials continues to cloud the negotiations. Some countries worry that any concessions they make could be abruptly reversed or that new demands might be introduced late in the process. The Trump administration has directed Greer's office to focus more intimately on smaller economies that are viewed as less of a priority; any agreements still require presidential approval. Commerce and Treasury have taken roughly equal roles in negotiations with some of the largest trading partners, such as the European Union, Japan and China, two people close to the White House said. The result is a less streamlined approach for countries that are viewed as the most critical targets. 'The three of them had slightly different opinions in the negotiations and it was a bit confusing,' said a person familiar with trade talks with both Japan and South Korea. That mixed messaging seems to reflect internal rivalries between Trump's top trade negotiators, they said. 'I think it's a loyalty contest, where they're all trying to give Trump more of what he wants,' he said. After Trump threatened to increase tariffs on the European Union, citing a lack of progress between the two countries, his call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen resulted in the U.S. establishing a clear structure for different levels of talks — Lutnick for the sectoral tariffs, like those on cars; and Greer for the 'reciprocal' tariffs, including a baseline 10 percent duty the U.S. has levied on all trading partners, as well as potentially higher tariff Trump might tack on after his July deadline passes. That structure reflects each man's responsibilities over trade policy. While Greer is the administration's top trade official — and has been a factor in nearly all of the negotiations — Bessent has been tapped to lead discussions with Asian countries. Meanwhile, because the industry-specific tariffs fall under the Commerce Department, Lutnick is in charge of any efforts to lower tariffs on automobiles and steel, as well as pending tariffs on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, lumber and copper. The rotating cast has frustrated Japan, a country that the administration has repeatedly insisted is close to a deal. 'Why does the trio of Bessent, Greer and Lutnick need to come out for one minister? It's unclear who [of them] talks to Trump,' said one Japanese official. Some of that confusion was on display in London last week, when Bessent, who was appointed as the lead negotiator with China, had to leave early to testify in front of Congress. That left Lutnick and Greer to wrap up discussions with the Chinese, who had been told Bessent would be the point person for the negotiations. The shifting landscape has left some observers wondering whether the U.S. will be able to secure a substantive deal with China — and if the administration even wants one. So far, the U.S. has only secured a written deal with the UK, which represents less than 3 percent of the U.S. total trade. 'What else is going to stick?' said Derek Scissors, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who focuses on China policy. 'I don't believe in the capacity of either Secretary Bessent or Secretary Lutnick to write an agreement with China of any specificity. Jamieson can if he's allowed to, but he's the least politically important of the three,' Scissors said. 'Bessent has no China background. And Lutnick, well, I'll just let that dot fade into the distance in terms of his abilities.' Throughout the tariff talks, White House aides have pushed back on those characterizations and noted that the president trusts all of his advisers. Businesses representing the technology and manufacturing sectors are similarly bemoaning the lack of clarity, and have faced roadblocks during attempts to shape a wide range of trade policy from tariffs to export controls. 'We are seeing the legitimate difficulties from engaging with 100-plus governments all at the same time,' said one corporate lobbyist representing the tech sector. 'We're six months into this administration and we're still working out personnel and different policy approaches, and it's not clear how exactly different agencies … are coming at this,' the lobbyist said. But, even as the deadline for higher tariffs approaches, the White House appears nonplussed by the lack of deals. The stock market has settled since its quick drop in early April, when Trump launched his 'reciprocal' tariffs of as high as 50 percent on certain trading partners. Republican lawmakers, while quietly pushing for deals, have not raised much public criticism. 'We're all encouraging the president and USTR and the White House to make sure these trade agreements are rapidly being considered and resolved,' said Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas). 'So we hope that in the queue, that there are lots of things going on.' And, perhaps most importantly, Trump believes high tariffs are good policy, Eissenstat pointed out. 'One of the things that people forget is that the president's happy if this all ends in tariffs. He's said it.' Koen Verhelst, Phelim Kine and Doug Palmer contributed to this report.


The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Ex-ambassador to Russia: Putin, Xi will celebrate Trump's ‘preemptive war' in Iran
Former U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul warned on Saturday of how U.S. strikes on Iran could influence U.S. adversaries around the world. In an interview on MSNBC, McFaul said Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping would be glad to see the U.S. engaging in 'preemptive' strikes. 'I think we've really got to understand our other interests in the world that might be affected by this attack today. This is a preemptive war. The world does not support preemptive wars. We learned that in 2003,' McFaul said, referring to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, which was launched based on the theory that Saddam Hussein's regime had weapons of mass destruction and threatened America. 'Putin will be celebrating this because he did his own preemptive war in Ukraine and now it's like, well, this is just what great powers do. Maybe Xi Jinping is going to think the same. He's going to say, 'Well, if they can do it here, we can do it in Taiwan,'' McFaul added. Trump announced on Saturday evening that the U.S. had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites and said, 'NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' McFaul, in the interview, said he wishes the president 'well' in his aim to bring about peace, saying that outcome is possible but not likely. 'I hope he can bring about an agreement as soon as possible. It's happened before — capitulation after an attack like this — so it could happen, but it's not what I'm predicting,' McFaul said. 'The idea that they will now sit down and negotiate with us some long-term deal in the immediate run, I think, is highly unlikely,' he added. McFaul said it's 'good news' that the U.S. strikes, according to Trump, 'totally obliterated' the Iranian nuclear facilities, saying, 'I applaud that.' 'That's good news for today, but we need to think about what are the first, second, third and fourth order consequences after this,' McFaul added. 'Most immediately, they are going to retaliate, and I hope we are prepared to prevent that and prevail against our forces in the region.'