Defence sector remains a long-term bet amid strong domestic policy push: Deepak Shenoy
"Our domestic players will see serious revenue increases. But this has been happening the last three years. So, I am not saying that this is suddenly because of what has happened in the last one month. But there is more space to go," says
Deepak Shenoy
, Founder, Capital Mind.
I want to go back to your sectoral views then, you did mention that manufacturing, industrials,
defence
continue to remain your preferred bets. I want to specifically talk about the defence space. The space has been in focus since the Pahalgam attack and stocks have seen a fair bit of rally as well and the
earnings
are also fairly good for most of the companies with especially healthy order books for most of them. So, within this defence space, what are your preferred picks? Could you give us some names?
Deepak Shenoy:
I cannot give you names. We have got a mutual fund license, so we do not do names meaningfully anymore. But the overall sector looks good for the longer term mostly because the focus of even the Indian government is shifting to procure locally from domestic manufacturers.
We have zero foreign dependence during times of conflict. You do not want to be buying from a country that suddenly decides not to support you in a war. So, therefore, the Indian army, the Indian services, the defence ministry also will very surely move towards as close to 100% domestic as possible.
Our domestic players will see serious revenue increases. But this has been happening the last three years. So, I am not saying that this is suddenly because of what has happened in the last one month. But there is more space to go.
There will be a lot more opportunity in defence and we will both do replenishment of whatever has been spent and whatever has been used in the last few weeks or months, but also do new initiatives because increasingly we are getting to know capabilities of people who are hostile countries that are hostile to us and to counter those capabilities we are going to have to build new capabilities and therefore there will be a lot more new work that will go into these defence companies. And as I said most of this work will go locally.
Live Events
So, whether it is an electronics
company
or whether it is a missile company or whether it is a company that does tanks, physical armoured cars or trucks, these are all things that you will see more procurement for lately in the near future and we have bet on a bunch of them. But the idea here is that you have to have a 10-year view into these companies in order to understand, I mean how much space there is. Some of them are expensive so you have to be very careful on what you buy.
But give us some sense that from where do you believe that the next big signal for the markets will come through because, of late, we have been just tracking what President
Trump
has been saying, along with that the earning season was in full swing. But now a lot has really been happening in the bond market as well. From the global markets across, we are getting to hear some comments on how some of these long-term bonds and their demand, how are they shaping up? What is your sense that from six months when you believe that the markets will be a little bit more volatile, which key triggers you will be watching out for?
Deepak Shenoy:
So, I am still watching out for say a good news around the war coming to an end or something of that sort, which would kind of help reduce the uncertainty going forward. Secondly, on the closing down of tariffs, so at some point America is going to have to make a decision on what it is going to do with these tariffs thing and whether it is going to retain them at this 10%, increase them, or change whatever it has to with China as well. Expect that over the next three or four months that will kind of ease down, that is really your trigger.
But honestly, markets look for very sharp and very emotional triggers every day, so that is not going to happen. It is like a lot of very boring stuff comes. Now, for instance, we have reduced interest rates, that was a trigger, but we did not care when it happened and now suddenly we are saying banks are doing well.
But it is a delayed effect so they get good impact for the first six months, then slowly their loans also repriced downwards and that is when they do not make that much. So, we will have to live with lower nims, but higher growth and the banks that will grow the most will make a lot of money. However, these triggers have been kind of ignored by the market for when they happened.
So, we did not think that that would do so well, but now it is starting to come to the fore. We will see this, we will see a change in global inflation. India's inflation will continue to flow downwards in the next few months and world inflation will actually inch upwards, not downwards. So, you will see a very different reaction to interest rates worldwide versus what is happening domestically.
I feel the macro situation is more favourable to India, but this uncertainty needs to get over on tariffs. It will take us another three or four months while whatever Trump says and whatever something else says and all that stuff, after that we will be in a better shape to kind of take more decisions. Markets tend to look a little bit forward. So, you might see the markets will kind of start predicting this a little bit earlier than everybody else.
I also wanted to get your view on the oil and gas space. On the back of some news flow now with reports suggesting that Israel may be preparing to strike Iranian nuclear facilities which will lead to supply concerns. How do you think one should play this sector?
Deepak Shenoy:
Well, technically, Iran is a supplier, but it is not one of the biggest suppliers in the world.
I would say a lot of threatening will happen, maybe some action and again markets will get excited in the short term, but in the long term you have to look at it from a perspective of how much supply exists and can it meet demand. There seems to be enough supply to be able to meet demand already and a lot of these countries are desperately looking for an opportunity to increase their production because they have decreased production, trying to control prices in the past. So, if there were a loss of one player, then another player will come in to take its place.
So, I do not see meaningful increase in demand for crude, and I do not see meaningful drop in supply for crude. So, I do not think crude prices are going to meaningfully change. There may be some deals. There is some talk about how Venezuela is going to be treated.
There is some talk about discovering more oil in a few other places. All of these things will change supply-demand constraint. So, they may create some short-term imbalances, but I do not think this Iran-Israel thing is meaningful more than a short-term blip.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
US attack on Iranian nuclear sites roils oil market, India braces for possible price surge
New Delhi: Global crude oil prices may face sharp upward pressure when markets open for trade Monday, after the US launched air strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities — Natanz, Fordo and Isfahan — escalating tensions in the Middle East. The strikes have raised concerns of supply disruptions that could hit major importers like India, which depends on overseas oil for more than 85% of its energy needs. In a televised address on Sunday (India time), US President Donald Trump confirmed the direct American assault on Iran's nuclear programme, ending days of speculation about Washington's entry into the Israel-Iran conflict. He warned that further strikes could follow. Read this | Mint Primer: What if the US joins Israel's war with Iran? 'Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight was the most difficult of them all by far, and perhaps the most lethal. But if peace doesn't come quickly we will go to those other targets with precision, speed and skill," Trump said. Hormuz threat puts India's energy security at risk The strikes have amplified fears of a possible Iranian response, particularly threats to block the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow chokepoint through which nearly 20% of global crude oil and liquefied natural gas flows. Energy markets have long feared that any disruption here could trigger a severe supply crunch. 'Concerns remain over whether supplies through the Strait of Hormuz would be blocked. Refiners are keeping a close watch and looking for alternate sources in case supplies through the strait are halted," said an official with a state-run oil marketing company. Read this | Mint Explainer | Strait of Hormuz: Will Iran shut the vital oil artery of the world? Iran currently produces about 3.3 million barrels per day (mbd) of crude oil, exporting 1.8-2.0 mbd. While Iranian oil facilities have reportedly been hit, the extent of damage remains unclear. But the larger risk lies in a broader regional conflict that could pull in other major oil producers in the Gulf, said ratings agency Icra Ltd in a recent report. India could face significant cost pressures even though it no longer buys oil directly from Iran due to US sanctions. Crude supplies from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, all routed via the Strait of Hormuz, account for nearly half of India's total imports. About 60% of its natural gas imports also pass through this critical passage. Since 13 June 2025, when the Israel-Iran conflict began, crude prices have risen from $64-65 per barrel to $74-75 per barrel. Oil is likely to average around $70-80 a barrel in FY26, and a sustained rise from current levels risks a reduction in India's growth forecasts, Icra Ratings Ltd had said on Friday. Read this | India concerned about crude oil supply disruptions in Strait of Hormuz as prices surge after Israel's attacks on Iran 'A sustained flare-up in the conflict poses upside risks for estimates of crude oil prices, and India's net oil imports and the current account deficit. A $10/bbl increase in the average price of crude oil for the fiscal will typically push up net oil imports by ~$13-14 billion during the year, enlarging the CAD (current account deficit) by 0.3% of GDP," Icra noted. India's import bill in FY25 stood at $137 billion, according to the Petroleum Planning & Analysis Cell. "Impact on the import bill will depend on how long the elevated prices sustain. However, a 10% increase in crude prices may lead to a 3% increase in the import bill given that crude oil comprises about 30% of India's total imports. With this, the trade deficit may increase to 0.1-0.2% of GDP. There would be some pressure on the currency but an impact on GDP is not seen as of now," said Madan Sabnavis, chief economist at Bank of Baroda. Icra had also said that changes in crude oil prices are likely to translate faster into higher wholesale and consumer inflation. For every 10% increase in crude oil prices, wholesale inflation could rise by 80-100 basis points, while consumer inflation may increase by 20-30 basis points, depending on the extent of pass-through into retail fuel prices. 'Only about 8% of the energy supplies moving through the strait can be rerouted via alternative corridors," said Prashant Vashisht, vice president at Icra. "If the strait is blocked, India would have to source more from regions like Russia and Nigeria." On Friday, Brent crude futures on the Intercontinental Exchange closed at $77 a barrel, down 2.33% amid earlier uncertainty over US military involvement. Oil market volatility is expected to spike when trading resumes, said Rahul Kalantri, vice president for commodities at Mehta Equities. 'We expect a knee-jerk rally potentially pushing Brent to the $80–$85 range or beyond if further conflict escalates," he said, adding that a full blockade of the Strait could drive prices 10–20% higher. Also read | Oil is warming up, but India's inflation may escape the heat Earlier this month, JP Morgan had warned that a major escalation could push crude oil prices as high as $120 a barrel. However, the bank noted that so far, despite multiple historical threats, the Strait of Hormuz has never been fully closed. 'Crucially, for all of recorded history, crude oil continued to flow," JP Morgan wrote. The Indian government is closely monitoring the evolving situation. The petroleum ministry has held consultations with oil marketing companies to assess the state of domestic supplies and build contingency plans.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Iran-Israel War: India ramps up oil imports from Russia, US in June
NEW DELHI: India has ramped up purchases of Russian oil in June, importing more than the combined volumes from Middle Eastern suppliers such as Saudi Arabia and Iraq, amid market volatility triggered by Israel's dramatic attack on Iran. The US military struck three sites in Iran early Sunday, directly joining Israel which first struck Iranian nuclear sites on June 13. Indian refiners are likely to import 2-2.2 million barrels per day of Russian crude oil in June - the highest in the last two years and more than the total volumes bought from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait, preliminary data by global trade analytics firm Kpler showed. India's oil imports from Russia were 1.96 million barrels per day (bpd) in May. Imports from the United States also rose to 439,000 bpd in June, a big jump from 280,000 bpd purchased in the previous month. Full-month projections for imports from the Middle East stand at around 2 million bpd, lower than the previous month's buying, according to Kpler. India, the world's third-largest oil-importing and consuming nation, bought from abroad around 5.1 million barrels of crude oil, which is converted into fuels like petrol and diesel in refineries. India, which has traditionally sourced its oil from the Middle East, began importing a large volume of oil from Russia soon after the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. This was primarily because Russian oil was available at a significant discount to other international benchmarks due to Western sanctions and some European countries shunning purchases. This led to India's imports of Russian oil seeing a dramatic rise, growing from less than 1 per cent of its total crude oil imports to a staggering 40-44 per cent in a short period. The conflict in the Middle East has so far not impacted oil supplies. "While supplies remain unaffected so far, vessel activity suggests a decline in crude loadings from the Middle East in the coming days," Sumit Ritolia, Lead Research Analyst, Refining & Modeling at Kpler, told PTI. "Shipowners are hesitant to send empty tankers (ballasters) into the Gulf, with the number of such vessels dropping from 69 to just 40, and (Middle East and Gulf) MEG-bound signals from the Gulf of Oman halving."
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Trump has a big, beautiful reason to push for lower rates
The Federal Reserve held its policy interest rate steady this past week and maintained its median projection of two quarter-point rate cuts by year end, exactly as expected. And nearly as predictably, President Donald Trump renewed his tirade against Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not slashing rates, adding increasingly personal insults and calling him 'stupid" and 'truly one of the dumbest, and most destructive, people in Government." Such taunts have brought past rivals to heel (such as 'Little Marco" Rubio, now serving as Secretary of State), but the tactic is unlikely to work with the Fed. While nearly every president has preferred lower interest rates to bolster the economy on their watch, Trump's motivation in pushing for lower interest rates relates to his administration's top domestic policy priorities on taxes and spending. With the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill passed by the House of Representatives estimated to boost the nation's debt by an additional $3 trillion, the most intractable part of the budget is the interest expense on that burgeoning debt. In a post on Truth Social Thursday, Trump asserted that rates 'should be 2.5 points lower, and save $BILLIONS on all of Biden's Short Term Debt." The previous administration under former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen tilted borrowing to Treasury bills after the bond market sent the benchmark 10-year yield to close to 5% in October 2023, creating worries about absorbing the supply of intermediate- and long-term debt. This was criticized by, among others, the current Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent. The chart here shows the sharp ascent in the federal government's interest tab. That rise is the result of the surge in the total debt, which passed $37 trillion this past week, and the increase in short-term interest rates, from near zero percent at the beginning of the decade. The average cost of the Treasury's overall debt has more than doubled from the low of early 2022, to 3.35% at the end of March. Drawing on his years of experience as a heavily leveraged real estate operator, Trump said on Wednesday that he would 'go very 'til this guy gets out, get the rates way down, and then go long-term." That presumably would be when Powell's term as Fed Chair ends next May, at which point Trump could install his own choice to lead the central bank. (The White House and the Treasury didn't respond to Barron's queries about coming changes in government borrowing plans. Treasury Deputy Secretary Michael Faulkender told Barron's colleague Matt Peterson on Friday that the department will continue to work with the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee to set the best mix of maturities without specifying any changes.) Even if the Fed under Trump's next pick were to sharply lower its short-term rate target, there is no certainty that intermediate- and long-term Treasury yields would follow. Indeed, after the Fed cut its federal-funds target a full percentage point last year, to the current range of 4.25% to 4.5%, the benchmark 10-year yield rose more than a full point. The president's focus on interest rates and their role in the massive federal budget deficit has been a topic here for months. Just after November's presidential election, this column foresaw that the president-elect would lean on the Fed to curb Uncle Sam's mounting interest expense and the rising tide of red ink. Trump's badgering is having no discernible effect so far, however. The new Summary of Economic Projections from the Federal Open Market Committee, released this past Wednesday, showed no change in the median expectation of a total of two quarter-point fed-funds rate cuts by the end of 2025. But the so-called dot plot of guesses showed that seven Fed officials were anticipating no change, with eight looking for two cuts. In the previous SEP released in March, there was a tighter consensus around two cuts by year end. Other presidents have been notably more successful in getting the Fed on board with them. When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, he acceded to the advice of then-Fed Chair Alan Greenspan to curb the budget deficit, which Greenspan suggested would lower long-term interest rates. Clinton privately railed that his policies were subject to the whims of a bunch of 'f—ing bond traders," according to Sebastian Mallaby's biography of Greenspan, The Man Who Knew. Still, Clinton went along, supporting the Fed's independence along with a strong dollar, and left office with a budget surplus after the dot-com boom. One prominent Fed governor, Christopher Waller, said on Friday that a rate cut could be on the table as early as the July 29-30 Federal Open Market Committee meeting. In a CNBC interview, Waller noted that recent inflation readings have been well contained while the Trump tariffs may be a one-time price boost, rather than indicative of sustained inflation, and that the labor market may be vulnerable to slowing. Waller, formerly the research director at the St. Louis Fed, was nominated by Trump to the Fed in 2020, and has been mentioned as a possible successor to Powell. The Fed's semiannual report to Congress, released on Friday, said that the job market was in 'solid shape," with labor supply constrained by slower immigration and lower labor-force participation, points emphasized by Powell in his post-FOMC press conference. He will be grilled by the House Financial Services Committee on this and other topics on Tuesday, followed by testimony before the Senate Banking Committee the next day. Congressional inquisitors surely will want to know about how the Fed will deal with White House pressures on monetary policy. Write to Randall W. Forsyth
