Trump has a big, beautiful reason to push for lower rates
The Federal Reserve held its policy interest rate steady this past week and maintained its median projection of two quarter-point rate cuts by year end, exactly as expected.
And nearly as predictably, President Donald Trump renewed his tirade against Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not slashing rates, adding increasingly personal insults and calling him 'stupid" and 'truly one of the dumbest, and most destructive, people in Government."
Such taunts have brought past rivals to heel (such as 'Little Marco" Rubio, now serving as Secretary of State), but the tactic is unlikely to work with the Fed.
While nearly every president has preferred lower interest rates to bolster the economy on their watch, Trump's motivation in pushing for lower interest rates relates to his administration's top domestic policy priorities on taxes and spending. With the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill passed by the House of Representatives estimated to boost the nation's debt by an additional $3 trillion, the most intractable part of the budget is the interest expense on that burgeoning debt.
In a post on Truth Social Thursday, Trump asserted that rates 'should be 2.5 points lower, and save $BILLIONS on all of Biden's Short Term Debt."
The previous administration under former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen tilted borrowing to Treasury bills after the bond market sent the benchmark 10-year yield to close to 5% in October 2023, creating worries about absorbing the supply of intermediate- and long-term debt. This was criticized by, among others, the current Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent.
The chart here shows the sharp ascent in the federal government's interest tab. That rise is the result of the surge in the total debt, which passed $37 trillion this past week, and the increase in short-term interest rates, from near zero percent at the beginning of the decade. The average cost of the Treasury's overall debt has more than doubled from the low of early 2022, to 3.35% at the end of March.
Drawing on his years of experience as a heavily leveraged real estate operator, Trump said on Wednesday that he would 'go very short-term...wait 'til this guy gets out, get the rates way down, and then go long-term." That presumably would be when Powell's term as Fed Chair ends next May, at which point Trump could install his own choice to lead the central bank.
(The White House and the Treasury didn't respond to Barron's queries about coming changes in government borrowing plans. Treasury Deputy Secretary Michael Faulkender told Barron's colleague Matt Peterson on Friday that the department will continue to work with the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee to set the best mix of maturities without specifying any changes.)
Even if the Fed under Trump's next pick were to sharply lower its short-term rate target, there is no certainty that intermediate- and long-term Treasury yields would follow. Indeed, after the Fed cut its federal-funds target a full percentage point last year, to the current range of 4.25% to 4.5%, the benchmark 10-year yield rose more than a full point.
The president's focus on interest rates and their role in the massive federal budget deficit has been a topic here for months. Just after November's presidential election, this column foresaw that the president-elect would lean on the Fed to curb Uncle Sam's mounting interest expense and the rising tide of red ink.
Trump's badgering is having no discernible effect so far, however.
The new Summary of Economic Projections from the Federal Open Market Committee, released this past Wednesday, showed no change in the median expectation of a total of two quarter-point fed-funds rate cuts by the end of 2025. But the so-called dot plot of guesses showed that seven Fed officials were anticipating no change, with eight looking for two cuts. In the previous SEP released in March, there was a tighter consensus around two cuts by year end.
Other presidents have been notably more successful in getting the Fed on board with them. When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, he acceded to the advice of then-Fed Chair Alan Greenspan to curb the budget deficit, which Greenspan suggested would lower long-term interest rates.
Clinton privately railed that his policies were subject to the whims of a bunch of 'f—ing bond traders," according to Sebastian Mallaby's biography of Greenspan, The Man Who Knew. Still, Clinton went along, supporting the Fed's independence along with a strong dollar, and left office with a budget surplus after the dot-com boom.
One prominent Fed governor, Christopher Waller, said on Friday that a rate cut could be on the table as early as the July 29-30 Federal Open Market Committee meeting. In a CNBC interview, Waller noted that recent inflation readings have been well contained while the Trump tariffs may be a one-time price boost, rather than indicative of sustained inflation, and that the labor market may be vulnerable to slowing. Waller, formerly the research director at the St. Louis Fed, was nominated by Trump to the Fed in 2020, and has been mentioned as a possible successor to Powell.
The Fed's semiannual report to Congress, released on Friday, said that the job market was in 'solid shape," with labor supply constrained by slower immigration and lower labor-force participation, points emphasized by Powell in his post-FOMC press conference. He will be grilled by the House Financial Services Committee on this and other topics on Tuesday, followed by testimony before the Senate Banking Committee the next day.
Congressional inquisitors surely will want to know about how the Fed will deal with White House pressures on monetary policy.
Write to Randall W. Forsyth randall.forsyth@barrons.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
2 F-5 jets downed, key military sites hit: Israel gives 24-hour recap; shares video of strikes on Iran
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) on Sunday said it had destroyed two Iranian fighter jets and eight ballistic missile launchers in a sweeping overnight operation that targeted dozens of military installations across Iran. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The strikes, carried out by 20 Israeli fighter jets, reportedly hit key sites including Dezful and Isfahan airports. According to the IDF, the Israeli Air Force bombed two Iranian F-5 fighter jets at Dezful Airport, while missile launchers prepared for imminent strikes on Israel were also neutralised. 'This morning, the IAF struck missile launchers ready to launch toward Israeli territory, soldiers in the Iranian Armed Forces, and swiftly neutralised the launchers that launched missiles toward Israel,' the IDF said in a statement. Additional targets included explosive production sites, weapons storage and air defence systems. Military infrastructure at Isfahan Airport was also hit to prevent the Iranian Air Force from using the facility. The escalation came just hours after the United States entered the fray, striking three nuclear sites in Iran — Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz — in a coordinated effort with Israel. President Donald Trump declared that Iran's nuclear programme had been 'completely and fully obliterated,' although no independent damage assessment has yet been released. Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation confirmed the attacks but said its programme would continue. The UN nuclear watchdog reported no signs of radioactive leakage but confirmed it would continue monitoring. Following the US strikes, Iran launched a retaliatory barrage of 40 missiles targeting Israeli cities, including Haifa and Tel Aviv. Over 80 people were reportedly injured. Israel said it had 'swiftly neutralised' the launchers responsible and began a new wave of strikes on western Iran. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Trump described the joint offensive as a historic moment. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three nuclear sites in Iran… All planes are safely on their way home,' he posted online. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised the US President's bold move, calling it a decision that 'will change history.' Meanwhile, Iran's foreign ministry condemned the attacks, warning that the US had 'launched a dangerous war' and reserved the right to respond 'with full force.' The situation has sparked growing international concern, with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres calling the strikes a 'dangerous escalation' and warning of 'catastrophic consequences.'
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
What are the nuclear contamination risks from attacks on Iran?
President Trump announced U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, including Fordow, joining earlier Israeli attacks. Experts suggest limited contamination risks from strikes on uranium enrichment facilities, mainly chemical rather than radiological. Gulf states are especially concerned about potential contamination of desalinated water sources if the Bushehr reactor is hit, prompting high alert and emergency plans. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads WHICH IRANIAN NUCLEAR SITES HAVE BEEN HIT SO FAR? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads WHAT RISKS DO THESE STRIKES POSE? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads WHAT ABOUT NUCLEAR REACTORS? WHY ARE GULF STATES ESPECIALLY WORRIED? President Donald Trump said Iran's main nuclear sites had been "obliterated" in military strikes overnight, including on the deeply buried Fordow facility, as the U.S. joined attacks launched by Israel on June have said military strikes on Iran's uranium enrichment facilities pose limited risks of contamination, and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said on Sunday no increased off-site radiation levels had been reported following the U.S. U.S. military struck sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Trump said Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities had been "completely and totally obliterated". The attacks follow previously announced Israeli attacks on nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan, Arak and Tehran says it aims to stop Iran building a nuclear bomb and the U.S. says Tehran would not be allowed to get such weapons. Iran denies ever seeking nuclear international nuclear watchdog IAEA has previously reported damage to the uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, the nuclear complex at Isfahan that includes the Uranium Conversion Facility and to centrifuge production facilities in Karaj and has also attacked Arak, also known as Khondab. The IAEA said Israeli military strikes hit the Khondab Heavy Water Research Reactor, which was under construction and had not begun operating, and damaged the nearby plant that makes heavy IAEA said it was not operational and contained no nuclear material, so there were no radiological effects. Heavy-water reactors can be used to produce plutonium which, like enriched uranium, can be used to make an atom to Reuters before the U.S. strikes took place, experts said Israel's attacks had posed limited contamination risks so Dolzikova, a senior research fellow at London think-tank RUSI, said attacks on facilities at the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle - the stages where uranium is prepared for use in a reactor - pose primarily chemical, not radiological enrichment facilities, UF6, or uranium hexafluoride, is the concern."When UF6 interacts with water vapour in the air, it produces harmful chemicals," she said. "In low winds, much of the material can be expected to settle in the vicinity of the facility; in high winds, the material will travel farther, but is also likely to disperse more widely. The risk of harmful chemicals being dispersed is lower for underground facilities."Simon Bennett, who leads the civil safety and security unit at the University of Leicester in Britain, said risks to the environment were minimal when subterranean facilities are hit because you are "burying nuclear material in possibly thousands of tonnes of concrete, earth and rock".James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said that before uranium goes into a nuclear reactor it is barely radioactive. "The chemical form uranium hexafluoride is toxic ... but it actually doesn't tend to travel large distances and it's barely radioactive," he on enrichment facilities were "unlikely to cause significant off-site consequences", he said, while stating his opposition to Israel's major concern would be a strike on Iran's nuclear reactor at Bushehr on the Gulf of catastrophe rippled through the Gulf on June 19 when the Israeli military said it had struck a site in Bushehr, only to say later that the announcement was a says it wants to avoid any nuclear Wakeford, honorary professor of epidemiology at the University of Manchester, said that while contamination from attacks on enrichment facilities would be "mainly a chemical problem" for the surrounding areas, extensive damage to large power reactors "is a different story".Radioactive elements would be released either through a plume of volatile materials or into the sea, he of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said an attack on Bushehr "could cause an absolute radiological catastrophe".For Gulf states, the impact of any strike on Bushehr would be worsened by the potential contamination of Gulf waters, jeopardising a critical source of desalinated potable Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is on high alert to monitor for any possible environmental contamination after the attacks, said a source with knowledge of the matter. There have been no signs of radiological contamination so far, the source said, adding that the GCC had emergency plans in place in case of a threat to water and food security in the the United Arab Emirates, desalinated water accounts for more than 80% of drinking water, while Bahrain became fully reliant on desalinated water in 2016, with 100% of groundwater reserved for contingency plans, authorities is also 100% dependent on desalinated Saudi Arabia, a much larger nation with a greater reserve of natural groundwater, about 50% of the water supply came from desalinated water as of 2023, according to the General Authority for some Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia, Oman and the UAE have access to more than one sea to draw water from, Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait are crowded along the shoreline of the Gulf with no other coastline."If a natural disaster, oil spill, or even a targeted attack were to disrupt a desalination plant, hundreds of thousands could lose access to freshwater almost instantly," said Nidal Hilal, professor of engineering and director of New York University Abu Dhabi's Water Research Center."Coastal desalination plants are especially vulnerable to regional hazards like oil spills and potential nuclear contamination," he said.
India.com
35 minutes ago
- India.com
Global Leaders React After US Strikes Irans Nuclear Sites
The United States bombed Iran's three nuclear facilities early Sunday which broke out global silence and triggered urgent global leaders to react on the matter of US intervention in the Middle East war. Earlier, US President Donald Trump claimed the attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. Trump stated, "There is not another military in the World that could have done this", adding, "Now is the time for peace." World Leaders Reactions Iran Iran strongly condemned the US airstrikes, with Foreign Minister Abbad Araghchi sharing a post on X and saying, "The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior." United Nations UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed grave alarm over the use of force by the United States, warning that further escalation could lead to disastrous consequences. 'There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control – with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world,' Guterres said in a statement posted on X. Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia shared a statement in a post on 'X' and wrote, 'The Kingdom of Saudia Arabia is following with great concern the developments in the sisterly Islamic Republic of Iran, represented by the targeting of Iranian nuclear facilities by the United States of America.' United Kingdom Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Keir Starmer shared a post on X and urged Iran to come back to the negotiating table. 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat,' he said. Israel Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised US President Donald Trump for what he described as a 'bold and historic' military operation targeting Iran's three nuclear sites including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. "Congratulations, President Trump. Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history," Netanyahu said.
