Quebec, Newfoundland energy touts Canadian independence to Trump: Hydro‑Québec CEO
ST. JOHN'S — The chief executive of Hydro‑Québec says a sweeping new energy deal with Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro is a signal to the United States that Canada can get "big things done."
Michael Sabia was in St. John's, N.L., Tuesday, where he pitched the draft deal as a turning point in Quebec's relationship with Newfoundland and Labrador, and a step toward Canada becoming an "energy superpower."
"Let's be clear: Canada is under threat," Sabia told a room full of representatives from Newfoundland and Labrador's energy industry.
"This is a time of real economic and political uncertainty. It's a time when Canadians need to work together to build the future," he said. "Ultimately, that's what this deal is about. It's about building now to secure Canada's energy future."
Sabia was speaking to the crowd at a conference held by Energy N.L., Newfoundland and Labrador's energy industry association. He was joined on stage by Jennifer Williams, president and chief executive of Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro.
The two discussed an agreement in principle announced last year that would end a contract signed in 1969 that allows Hydro‑Québec to buy the lion's share of the energy from the Churchill Falls hydroelectric plant at prices far below market value.
The contract has long been a source of bitterness in Canada's easternmost province.
The new arrangement would end the contentious deal 16 years early and see Hydro‑Québec pay for more power while developing new projects with Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro along the Churchill River. Newfoundland and Labrador would also get more power from Churchill Falls.
The memorandum of understanding has its critics. The Opposition Progressive Conservatives have been uneasy with the draft deal, demanding the Liberal government have it independently reviewed. The party also called for a halt to ongoing negotiations of final contracts, saying a proposed national energy corridor could bring better opportunities.
Some in Newfoundland and Labrador have also wondered if Hydro‑Québec can be trusted and whether the province will truly get enough value for its resources.
"Show me a deal where there hasn't ever been skeptics," Williams challenged when asked about those who have criticisms.
Sabia addressed the tangled history of the provinces several times, and said repeatedly that the new arrangement was "balanced" and served the needs of both Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec. Both sides made concessions, he said, adding that the deal contained items neither side wanted.
He refused to elaborate on what those were.
Sabia said the agreement is the "single most important signal we can send to the United States right now," as long as it goes ahead as planned. Williams agreed the proposed projects need to proceed smoothly and quickly, repeating "rigour and speed are not incompatible."
Both said they were heartened by signs from Prime Minister Mark Carney that he would speed up project approvals.
Williams touted the deal's promised economic benefits, which includes $17 billion in revenue to the provincial treasury by 2041. Newfoundland and Labrador expects to be carrying a net debt of $19.4 billion by the end of the current fiscal year.
"We have to take this opportunity now," Williams told reporters after the event. "If we don't, something this momentous may not come again for a very long time, and who will we have to blame? We have got to take this moment on."
Officials hope to have final agreements hammered out next year. In the meantime, preliminary topographic and soil studies are expected to begin in Labrador this summer, Sabia said.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 3, 2025.
The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
7 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Iranian Canadians and others watch and worry after U.S. strikes on nuclear sites
Iranian Canadians and Jewish groups turned worried eyes to the Middle East on Sunday, as U.S. strikes against three Iranian nuclear sites raised fears of escalating violence. Nimâ Machouf, a member of a Montreal Iranian women's association, said family members in Iran are living 'from one bomb to another.' 'I'm very worried because this will only accelerate the violence in the region,' she said in a phone interview. 'It will further aggravate the problem and take us further away from peace.' Machouf, who is also an epidemiologist and former NDP candidate, believes the strikes will only hurt the people who are fighting to free themselves from Iran's repressive regime. Attacks from other countries means that Iran's people 'are not protected by their government, nor protected by others, by the international community,' she said. 'So people feel abandoned by everyone, everywhere.' The United States inserted itself in Israel's war against Iran early Sunday as it launched strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. Prime Minister Mark Carney wrote on social media that U.S. military action was designed to alleviate the 'grave threat' Iran's nuclear program represents to international security. 'Canada has been consistently clear that Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon,' he wrote. But Carney said the situation in the Middle East was 'highly volatile,' and urged the parties to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution. The interim president of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs described Iran's nuclear program on Sunday as a 'grave danger to global peace and security.' 'Eliminating this threat is an essential step toward achieving a safer Middle East and a more secure and peaceful world,' wrote Noah Shack, who urged the federal government to 'stand strong against the Iranian threat.' Kaveh Shahrooz, a lawyer and a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, says many Iranians are worried about the impact the U.S. decision will have on civilians. 'I think there's quite a bit of (concern) simply because there's a lot of unknowns,' he said. Shahrooz said Iran's regime offers virtually no protection to its own citizens in the form of air raid sirens or shelters, and internet has been cut off. 'So there's a lot of fear about what we will find out once internet connection is restored and we're able to talk to our families again,' he said. He said feelings among Canada's Iranian diaspora vary, from anger at the strikes to support for U.S. actions. 'Among the people who are not supportive of Iran's regime, I think there are some who are cheering and who are saying this was long overdue,' he said. 'And they're happy to see the Iranian regime's nuclear program effectively dismantled and to see that regime humiliated.' Machouf, on the other hand, called any suggestion that Israel will 'liberate' Iran's people a 'masquerade' and said regime change must come from within. Gur Tsabar, a spokesperson with Jews Say No to Genocide, said a rally called 'Hands Off Iran' was organized for Sunday afternoon in Toronto to demand sanctions on Israel and a two-way arms embargo. He described recent Israeli and American actions in Iran as 'beyond disturbing.' Tsabar said the rally scheduled for Sunday afternoon is co-organized by 16 groups, including the Iranian Canadian Congress, Palestinian Youth Movement, Jews Say No to Genocide and a number of labour unions. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 22, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
These Energy Dividend Stocks Print Money
Fee-based arrangements support 90% of Energy Transfer's earnings. Kinder Morgan gets about 95% of its earnings from stable sources. Williams receives roughly 91% of its earnings from predictable contracts. 10 stocks we like better than Energy Transfer › Cash flows across the energy sector tend to be more variable due to commodity price volatility. However, some energy stocks just print money because their business models have minimal direct exposure to commodity prices. That gives them the cash to pay lucrative dividends. Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET), Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI), and Williams (NYSE: WMB) operate money-printing energy midstream assets. Because of that, they're ideal options for investors seeking to generate passive income. Energy Transfer operates a nationwide footprint of crucial midstream assets. Its more than 130,000-mile pipeline network moves oil, natural gas, and other commodities from production basins to market centers in the U.S. and beyond through its export terminals. Fee-based contracts and government-regulated rate structures support 90% of its earnings. Because of that, the master limited partnership (MLP) prints cash. The midstream giant generated more than $2.3 billion in distributable cash flow during the first quarter and distributed about $1.1 billion of that money to investors. Energy Transfer used its retained cash flow to invest in expansion projects ($945 million of growth capital spending) and maintain its strong balance sheet. The MLP is investing heavily to expand its already massive midstream footprint. It's spending $5 billion on growth projects this year, which are expected to come online through the end of next year. That should drive a meaningful uptick in its stable cash flows in 2026 and 2027. Energy Transfer's growing sources of stable cash flow should enable the MLP to continue increasing its distribution. It's aiming to raise its more than 7%-yielding payout by 3% to 5% per year. Kinder Morgan owns an irreplaceable energy infrastructure portfolio. It operates one of the largest natural gas pipeline networks in the country and is a leader in handling refined petroleum products and transporting carbon dioxide. Take-or-pay contracts, which entitled Kinder Morgan to payment regardless of volumes or prices, back 64% of the company's cash flow. Meanwhile, hedging contracts that guarantee prices lock in another 5% of its cash flow. Kinder Morgan also gets 26% of its earnings from fee-based sources, most of which have minimal exposure to volume fluctuations. As a result, the company's assets pump out a lot of stable cash flow each quarter. Kinder Morgan generated $1.2 billion in cash flow from operations during the first quarter, covering its dividend outlay of $642 million by roughly 2 times. That enabled it to retain meaningful excess free cash flow to fund expansion projects. The pipeline giant currently has $8.8 billion worth of expansion projects under construction, which are expected to enter commercial service through 2030. They will grow the company's sources of stable cash flow, which should enable it to continue increasing its more than 4%-yielding dividend. Williams operates one of the country's largest natural gas infrastructure platforms. It owns key interstate pipelines (including the Transco system that supplies gas to major markets along the East Coast). It also has gathering and processing (G&P) operations in key production basins, as well as other related infrastructure. Highly regulated transmission and deepwater assets account for 48% of Williams' cash flow, giving it a very stable foundation. Meanwhile, fee-based G&P assets supply it with another 43% of its cash flow. Williams also layers in hedges to backstop its more price-sensitive assets. The gas infrastructure company generated nearly $1.5 billion in available funds from operations during the first quarter. That covered its more than 3%-yielding dividend by a super comfy 2.4 times. Williams' lower dividend payout ratio enabled it to retain lots of cash to fund expansion projects and maintain its financial flexibility. Williams is working on a huge slate of growth projects. It has several projects underway to expand Transco and its other gas transmission pipelines, and it's connecting new deepwater projects in the Gulf to its infrastructure. Williams is also building a natural gas power plant to support the rising power demand of AI data centers. These projects will fuel cash-flow growth through 2030, giving Williams more power to increase its dividend. Energy midstream companies like Energy Transfer, Kinder Morgan, and Williams primarily operate fee-based assets that print cash. Because of that, these energy infrastructure companies can pay attractive and growing dividends. That makes them ideal options for investors seeking stable and steadily rising passive income streams. Before you buy stock in Energy Transfer, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Energy Transfer wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Matt DiLallo has positions in Energy Transfer and Kinder Morgan. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Kinder Morgan. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. These Energy Dividend Stocks Print Money was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
Why Williams Just Bet Their Future on James Vowles - And Why It Matters
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Williams F1 announced a contract extension for its team principal, James Vowles, securing his future with the team. Vowles joined the team back in 2023. Many in the paddock considered it a backmarker team, forever doomed to struggle at the bottom of the grid. He was comfortable at Mercedes, excelling as an important figure within the team as the Motorsport Strategy Director. A move to Williams represented a massive risk for Vowles — considering how poorly the team had performed in the past. Team principals rarely get a second chance in F1. He would have one shot at establishing himself as a quality leader of a racing team. Vowles could have waited for another chance, but he believed in the project and new ownership. He gained enough confidence based on those two factors to dive into the deep end with Williams. Williams Team Principal James Vowles walks in the garage during qualifying ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Canada at Circuit Gilles-Villeneuve on June 14, 2025 in Montreal, Canada. Williams Team Principal James Vowles walks in the garage during qualifying ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Canada at Circuit Gilles-Villeneuve on June 14, 2025 in Montreal, Canada. Photo byThe move paid off for Vowles - he solidified himself as a team principal, and Williams is progressing up the grid. Almost halfway through the season, Williams sits fifth in the Constructors' standings, the highest it has been since 2016. Before the former Mercedes official took over, the British racing team's points-scoring performances were considered mere blips on the radar. This season, the team's expectations are to score points at every race. The change in expectations comes from a new car development philosophy. Rather than make a car only suited for a specific track type - under Vowles' leadership - the team designed the FW47 to be balanced and versatile across the calendar. Vowles brought a new mindset for the team, pushing expectations higher every season and demanding more from the entire team, from the engineers to the pit crew. He diligently evaluated the performance of the entire team. He kept those who contributed and removed anyone who did not fit the team's new direction. I am absolutely delighted to have signed a new long-term contract with Atlassian Williams Racing. Remaining at Williams was never in doubt, but I'm really pleased to have formalised it. This team has felt like home from the moment I walked through the door. It really is a… — James Vowles (@JV_F1) June 19, 2025 The cost cap brought an element of parity to Formula 1, giving smaller teams like Williams a fighting chance against the top flight. Everyone in the F1 paddock noticed the revolution happening at Williams, which has led to some shocking acquisitions. The most notable believer in the Williams project is Carlos Sainz Jr. Sainz was one of the most accomplished free agents on the market last season, and after all the top teams were full, he was left looking for the best of the rest. Despite massive interest from other teams, Sainz chose to believe in Vowles and joined Williams. The tangible progress Williams has made under Vowles' leadership makes him the team's most valuable asset, more than the drivers or engineering teams. Vowles injected energy and belief into the team. He introduced a methodical and practical approach that created a faster car on track. Vowles is an architect who can craft a well-oiled racing machine, making him worth every penny of the extension for a Williams team that has been stuck in mediocrity.
