Reform UK's Luke Campbell elected Hull and East Yorkshire mayor
Reform UK's Luke Campbell has been elected as the first mayor for Hull and East Yorkshire.The former boxer and Olympic gold medallist was among six candidates running to become the new mayor when voting took place on Thursday.Campbell received 78,398 votes, ahead of Liberal Democrat Mike Ross, who came second with 57,851 votes. He will represent more than 610,000 people who live in the region.
In his victory speech, Campbell thanked voters for turning out for the election and said he was "truly humbled and honoured" to be elected.He also called for unity and said he would "work hard to earn the trust of the wider region".
Conservative Anne Handley came third ahead of Labour's Margaret Pinder, with Kerry Harrison, for the Green Party, in fifth, and Rowan Halstead, of the Yorkshire Party, in sixth.The turnout in East Yorkshire was 32.1% and in Hull 26.4%. The result was announced at the East Riding Leisure Centre Haltemprice.Richard Tice MP, the deputy leader of Reform UK, said Campbell would be a "great mayor" for the region.He said: "He'll have a commonsense approach to bringing people together and have a bullish vision for Hull and East Yorkshire."The sport of boxing requires courage, tenacity, bravery which Luke has in huge abundance."He will rise to the challenge, he'll have good people around him and he'll be very successful."
Luke Campbell: the former boxer turned mayorFollow the latest election updatesAT A GLANCE: What happened overnight and what's still to come?
As head of the combined authority, Campbell will serve for four years in the role, where he will make decisions on housing, public transport, infrastructure, economic development, business, skills and regeneration.He will serve as a direct link to Westminster and act as a political figurehead who can lobby the government for funding and secure investment for the region.The position was established after a devolution deal was approved by government in September for the creation of the Hull and East Yorkshire Combined Authority, which brings together Hull City Council and East Riding of Yorkshire Council. The combined authority will receive £13.4m a year from the government for the next 30 years.Hull City Council and East Riding of Yorkshire Council will retain their independence and continue their work as normal, alongside the combined authority.Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
LIVE: Follow the latest election updatesPOSTCODE LOOKUP: Check the results in your areaSIMPLE GUIDE: When will we know the rest of the results?FULL COVERAGE: Catch up on all our election stories
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘No danger of blowing up Reading': the site building UK's next nuclear weapons
Nestled in the heart of rural Berkshire, the 300-hectare (750-acre) military complex at Aldermaston is an incongruous sight. It comprises a mix of 1950s and 1960s institutional buildings, heated by a steam tube system more familiar in Soviet structures, and a handful of modern offices, several of which are in the process of being built. But the technology inside the complex, one of Britain's most sensitive defence locations, is far from that era of cold-war hostility. The sprawling campus is the largest of three locations where Britain manufactures its nuclear warheads – and where the UK will design and build a £15bn replacement for its current arsenal without making a single explosive test. Armed police with carbine rifles patrol and watch from the rooftops, protecting the nuclear materials and the site's 7,500 employees. The staff work for AWE, the former Atomic Weapons Establishment, whose project is at the heart of Labour plans to revitalise nuclear with weaponry that may last to the 2070s. On Thursday, John Healey became the first defence secretary to visit the site since 2018, arguing that Labour was making a generational decision to support expensive weapons that he and other members of the government hoped would protect the UK by never coming close to being used. 'We've got a government recognising that we need to invest now if we're going to be able to maintain our strength of our independent UK nuclear deterrence in the decades to come,' Healey said, wondering aloud why some of his immediate Conservative predecessors had not come to visit. Labour's previous leader, Jeremy Corbyn, was opposed to nuclear weapons, but under Keir Starmer the party firmly shifted to the pro-nuclear camp long before winning the election. It is now pressing forward with civil nuclear development, giving the go-ahead this month for a new £14.2bn reactor at Sizewell, in Suffolk, as well as the next nuclear bomb. Ministers' commitment to nuclear is one they believe has public backing. At a time of global uncertainty, not least with Israel attacking Iran to prevent the latter acquiring its own nuclear bomb, public support for the UK to maintain its stock of nuclear weapons is growing, they say. Polling conducted by YouGov on behalf of the Ministry of Defence suggests support for Trident, the submarine-based nuclear weapons system, rose to 65% in March 2025, the highest level since sampling for the department began in 2018. Components for Britain's nuclear warhead – known as Holbrook – are designed, tested and built at Aldermaston. The warheads themselves are largely assembled at the nearby Burghfield site, before being transported by road to Coulport, in Scotland. The assembly process is completed there and the Trident missiles, with their British warheads, are loaded on to submarines at nearby Faslane. Operations have begun to scale up at Aldermaston with the initial phases of work on the new warhead under way. About 1,500 employees have joined AWE in the past year, bringing the total number of workers at the state-owned company to 9,500. These are the kind of skilled jobs Labour is eager to talk up. The new device, called Astraea, will not be ready for deployment until the 2030s or 2040s. Its explosive power is not yet known, though independent experts think it will probably be more than the 80-100kt Holbrook, and possibly closer to 475kt, a benchmark set by the most powerful US warhead. For comparison, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, which killed between 70,000 and 140,000 people (estimates vary widely), was 15kt. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion It will be designed at Aldermaston, principally using small test explosions which are then extrapolated by an onsite supercomputer, Damson, to simulate a nuclear blast. One engineer said Damson used 17MW of power, considerably more than the Met Office's supercomputer, which consumes 2.7MW, and AWE says it can perform 4.3 million billion calculations per second. The other key facility on the site is Orion, a set of 12 lasers that, when brought together, can simulate the moment a nuclear bomb is detonated. One scientist said the energy involved was 'no greater than boiling a teaspoon of water' and there was 'no danger of blowing up Reading'. In any event, the lasers come together in a vacuum to safeguard against any possible explosions. Materials intended for the warhead are tested in the laser to see how they will behave when the bomb is blown, though the amounts involved are minute, often a few millimetres in size. To see if they can prepare the experiments, staff members are asked to build a tiny model of a bicycle, with handlebars and spokes. It is not a task for everybody; after six months some employees can manage but others cannot. The question, though, is why a £15bn investment in a new nuclear warhead is necessary, because Holbrook warheads, if regularly refurbished, could continue to be viable. One reason for the upgrade is that the US is designing a new warhead, the W93. The UK and US programmes have operated in parallel, sharing design features to save money, but not fissile materials (plutonium or enriched uranium), which would breach the nuclear non-proliferation treaty to which both countries are signatories. A second reason, said David Cullen, a nuclear expert at the Basic thinktank, was for 'the UK to maintain its position as a member of the nuclear club'. The issue is partly one of skills: 'The capability to deploy warheads atrophies if you don't have warhead designers who have actually made a nuclear bomb,' he added. But that is the cost, in other words, of the UK maintaining a seat near the top of the diplomatic table.
BBC News
42 minutes ago
- BBC News
What can Northamptonshire expect from Reform UK's Doge teams?
They have caused a stir in Donald Trump's US and now Elon Musk-style Doge teams are descending on Northamptonshire's two unitary councils, which are run by Reform UK. What can people in the county expect from them and what have they achieved elsewhere? What is Doge all about? Hardly anyone had heard the acronym Doge before Donald Trump returned to the White House in idea is reported to have surfaced first at a dinner party where Donald Trump's billionaire advisor, Elon Musk, was speaking in Tesla, Space X and X businessman told fellow diners that, if given the passwords to government computers, he could streamline its Trump became President again this year, he set up the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) and put Musk in charge of aim was to end the "tyranny of bureaucracy", save taxpayers' money and cut the US national debt, said has actually happened so far is two million federal workers being offered a deal to leave. What are Reform UK's Doge team doing in Northamptonshire? A preliminary meeting with the Doge team happened this week at West Northamptonshire Council, and it will be descending on North Northamptonshire in the near future following the huge swing from the Conservatives to Reform UK in the May local Reform UK leader, Nigel Farage, who received a hero's welcome when he met his councillors in Corby on Tuesday, explained how it would work."The Doge team comes in and it talks to the officers and says 'we want to look at the books, we want to see what money's been spent on this, what money's been spent on that, we want to see the credit card statements, we want to see the contracts'," he took repairing potholes as an example and said Doge would ask "Who've you assigned to do this job? How long is the contract for? What's the cost? Is it based on results?"He insisted that "not everything about Doge is critical, not everything about Doge is slagging off what's gone before. I'm really hoping that Doge can help everybody".Reform UK said its team in West Northamptonshire would consist of "software engineers, data analysts and forensic auditors". How much is Doge costing taxpayers? The short answer, according to Reform UK, is Arnull, leader at West Northamptonshire, said: "The cutting-edge expertise the Doge team are providing free of charge will make it that much easier to identify waste and free up funds."Martin Griffiths, who leads West Northamptonshire, said: "We're not going to pay a penny [for the Doge review] so that's why our officers are fully in support of this."Some politicians have questioned whether experts would really work for free, and have suggested the pro bono element might not be good for local Lehmann, Green party leader in Kent, the first council to undergo the process, said: "The fact that they have software engineers offering to work 'for free' is of particular concern, given that the data they are forcefully requesting access to would include significant volumes of commercially sensitive information and the personal data of many of Kent's most vulnerable residents." How have opposition parties reacted to Doge in Northamptonshire? The leader of the Labour group on West Northamptonshire Council, Sally Keeble is concerned about the team's accountability and use of has submitted a Freedom of Information request for all communication between the council and the team to be said: "If the Reform administration wants to appoint Doge, they should put the organisation through a transparent procurement process with safeguards in place for people's personal data." Helen Harrison, who leads the Conservative opposition in North Northamptonshire, has said she would welcome any efficiencies but believed the review should be carried out by council officers rather than an external Harris, who leads the Liberal Democrat group in the North, said: "We understand that during the visit on Friday, 13 June the Doge team asked for no information, were provided with no information, didn't share a plan, and yet proclaimed that they were already 'starting to save taxpayers money'." Harris added: "It begs the question why taxpayers are paying cabinet member allowances, including basic councillor allowances of around £424,000 to the [Reform UK] administration."It's their job to lead, set strategy and establish savings, not the responsibility of an unelected group of individuals."West Northamptonshire's Independent councillor Ian McCord said he had written to the council leader to ask whether advice had been sought about the legal standing of the Doge unit, and whether data held by the council would be safe. What effect has Doge had elsewhere? NIgel Farage is adamant that the Doge approach is said: "Already, in other counties, we have found examples of pretty egregious expenditure."In Derby, where there is a cabinet member for council efficiency (Doge), the party claimed to have made efficiency savings equating to £6,000 per later admitted that figure was a mistake and was more like £4,000 per day. An unlikely winner so far from the Doge initiative has been the public sector workers' union to data released to Sky News, weekly new memberships increased by an average of 272% in the week after the May election results were a weekly average of 12 new members at North Northamptonshire the union saw the figure shoot up to 27 in the week following the has admitted that efficiencies may be more difficult to find in Northamptonshire's two unitary councils, which came into being in 2021, than in some older politicians have pointed out that councils already face regular audits so Doge teams would simply duplicate that the available evidence, though, two things look certain: Northamptonshire will go through the Doge process, and it will still be controversial. Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Why are less Scots having babies? The answer is very obvious
Making Scotland an easier place to be a parent could help tackle historically low birth rates. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scots are not having enough babies. In 2023, statistics showed the birth rate had fallen to 1.3 babies per woman - a historic low. At this point, our population is being sustained by migration. There are a lot of reasons for this, but poor parental leave and extortionate childcare costs are glaringly obvious factors here. This has been a hot topic in Holyrood this week. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Less Scots are having babies. On Thursday, Green MSP Mark Ruskell said he was 'embarrassed' at only being able to offer his staff two weeks of paternity leave. He said: 'I know the law is two weeks, but public institutions should go further. Reflecting on my own experience, two weeks is just not enough.' Two days earlier, Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said too many women were being forced out of politics because of poor childcare options. She said: 'If we can't keep a hold of mums in politics, we lose a really strong voice for other mums out there struggling with childcare. If we can't do it for mums in Parliament, we can't do it for mums outside Parliament.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Two weeks ago the campaign group The Dad Shift demonstrated en-masse outside Holyrood demanding better parental leave policies. Most of these policies are reserved to Westminster, but it is clear there is a desire for change amongst Scots, including inside the devolved Scottish Parliament. Almost everyone - with the exception of UK Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch - will agree that maternity and paternity leave is far too low. Statutory maternity leave after the first six weeks is just £187.18 a week - for fathers, it is two weeks at the same rate. Considering the median weekly earnings in Scotland in 2024 was £738.70, it is obvious new parents are taking a massive financial hit here. But the length of time is a problem too, particularly for new dads. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad An obvious flaw in the system comes when you look at something as common as Caesarean sections. It takes around six weeks to recover and yet, for four of those weeks, mums are expected to get on with things on their own. We also need to remember that if dads take more time off work, mothers are less likely to take career breaks, which in turn would help close the gender pay gap. The Dad Shift wants to see six weeks of paternity leave at regular pay as the norm. This is what has been recommended to Westminster's women and equalities committee. Across Europe, the average paternity pay is eight weeks and the UK is ranked at the bottom. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Let us look at another sticking point - childcare. Yes, in Scotland parents can get 1,140 hours of funded childcare, but for most this is only after the child turns three. It also works out at around 22 hours a week, somewhat short of the up to 40-hour working week for the average Scot. The campaign group Pregnant Then Screwed found 75 per cent of mothers paying for childcare say it does not make financial sense for them to work. One in three are in debt because of childcare and one in four say childcare costs are more than 75 per cent of their take home pay. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Four in ten Scots who have an abortion cite spiralling childcare costs as one of their reasons.
