Silicon Valley isn't joining Musk's Trump-bashing — yet
SAN FRANCISCO — The roiling spat between Elon Musk and Donald Trump that erupted Thursday hasn't opened the floodgates for other tech world elites to start bashing the president — yet.
Thousands of miles away from Washington, Silicon Valley leaders gathered for a tech conference in San Francisco instead tiptoed around direct questions about White House policies and hurried to offer praise where they could.
That was clear Thursday when Bloomberg's Emily Chang asked RJ Scaringe — CEO of Tesla rival Rivian — if the beef could cause Musk's company to fall out of favor, and create an opening for his own electric carmaker to capture more market share.
'Ah geez. It's a good one,' Scaringe said at the conference, hosted by Bloomberg Tech, with a smile. "It's dynamic. It's interesting.'
The cautious rhetoric from Scaringe and others underscores the delicate balance still in play between the tech world and President Donald Trump. Luminaries like Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang have cheered the administration's America First approach, and Trump has welcomed leading members of the industry into his inner circle, even as his policies like sweeping tariffs threaten their bottom lines.
Whether that dynamic starts to change now that Musk has opened the door for criticism, as someone once close to the president, remains an open question, though there were signs of tech skepticism of the White House narrative at the event on Thursday.
Michael Kratsios, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology and a veteran of billionaire Peter Thiel's tech investment firm, sent a conference room into a fit of laughter by deflecting on the Trump-Musk fallout.
'I can't speak to that particular instance,' he said of the split, instead launching into a defense of what he described as the president's ability to turn tech bros into 'generally' amicable teammates in his quest for a 'golden age of American innovation.'
'What's so unique about this particular election versus ones many years ago is that folks who may not necessarily have been considered to be on the same team a few years ago are all now united behind the president to drive this innovation for the country,' Kratsios continued. As he spoke, he drew a few scoffs from around the room.
Scaringe also declined to criticize the possibility of tax credits for electric vehicles going away under Trump's megabill — the issue that the president argues set Musk off.
'I think it's easy to get caught into the day-to-day of which tariffs are moving which way, and some of the language that's used around electric vehicles,' Scaringe said. 'But really, the administration wants to see investment in U.S. technology, investment in U.S. jobs … So in all of our discussions with administrations, we try to focus on that part of it.'
He did admit that with tariffs swirling, Rivian now has a daily meeting on what has changed in the last 24 hours on the international trade front.
Tech leaders were also hesitant to make entirely negative comments regarding various visa restrictions from the administration, which pose a threat to an industry of largely foreign-born employees.
Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi, after declaring himself 'absolutely pro-immigration generally for the U.S.,' tempered his stance and that of his workers.
'There's no question that we should secure our borders, and so I think from that standpoint, we're very supportive. Our drivers and couriers have been quite supportive of President Trump as well, for similar reasons,' Khosrowshahi said. 'There is a dialogue for us to be had, which is what is the right level of immigration in this country?'
He admitted that Trump's constant ridiculing of Canada as the 51st state had an 'initial significant effect' on reducing travel into the U.S. from its northern neighbor, some of which has continued. But he also stretched to find a silver lining, arguing Canadians are just boycotting the U.S. and Uber is a global business.
Rich Wong, a venture capitalist at San Francisco firm Accel, praised the Federal Trade Commission's new direction under the Trump administration as breathing life back into business mergers and acquisitions.
'The change of the administration … as it relates to the FTC, I think it's perceived as having a little more openness to large-scale M&A among certain players,' Wong said. 'That's opened up the appetite for a number of acquirers to engage, whereas before they were pretty stalled.'
Another person who declined to criticize the president was Daniel Lurie, the Democratic mayor of San Francisco, whose city is facing a budget shortfall and potential loss of billions of federal funding.
Asked about those financial headaches during the event, Lurie said: 'I can only control what I can control.'
'If I worried about what was coming from Washington or Sacramento, I wouldn't be able to do my job because it changes every hour,' he added. 'So I'm staying focused on San Francisco.'
A version of this story first appeared in California Decoded, POLITICO's morning newsletter for Pros about how the Golden State is shaping tech policy within its borders and beyond. Like this content? POLITICO Pro subscribers receive it daily. Learn more at www.politicopro.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
25 minutes ago
- CNBC
Some lawmakers in both parties question the legality of Trump's Iran strikes
WASHINGTON — Several members of Congress in both parties Saturday questioned the legality of President Donald Trump's move to launch military strikes on Iran. While Republican leaders and many rank-and-file members stood by Trump's decision to bomb Iran's major nuclear enrichment facilities, at least two GOP lawmakers joined Democrats across the party spectrum in suggesting it was unconstitutional for him to bomb Iran without approval from Congress. "While President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional," Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, who usually aligns with Trump, said on X. "I look forward to his remarks tonight." Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., said in response to Trump's social media post announcing the strikes: "This is not Constitutional." Massie introduced a bipartisan resolution this week seeking to block U.S. military action against Iran "unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force against Iran" passed by Congress. In brief remarks from the White House on Saturday night, Trump defended the strikes but did not mention the basis of his legal authority to launch them without Congress' having given him that power. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., reacted in real time during a speech in Tulsa, Oklahoma, slamming Trump's actions as "grossly unconstitutional." "The only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress. The president does not have the right," Sanders told the crowd, which broke out in "no more war!" chants. Some Democrats called it an impeachable offense for the president to bomb Iran without approval from Congress. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., said Trump's move is "absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment." "The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers," she said on X. "He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations." Rep. Sean Casten, D-Ill., said on social media: "This is not about the merits of Iran's nuclear program. No president has the authority to bomb another country that does not pose an imminent threat to the US without the approval of Congress. This is an unambiguous impeachable offense." Casten called on House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to "grow a spine" and protect the war powers reserved for Congress. Johnson said Trump respects the Constitution as he sought to lay the groundwork to defend his decision to act unilaterally. "The President fully respects the Article I power of Congress, and tonight's necessary, limited, and targeted strike follows the history and tradition of similar military actions under presidents of both parties," he said in a statement. Johnson's remarks, along with support for Trump's move offered by Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., indicate that Trump may have sufficient political cover to avoid blowback from the Republican-controlled Congress. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Trump "failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East." But he stopped short of labeling the military action illegal or unconstitutional. House Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., was more direct on the legal question. "The power to declare war resides solely with Congress. Donald Trump's unilateral decision to attack Iran is unauthorized and unconstitutional," said Clark, the No. 2 Democrat. "In doing so, the President has exposed our military and diplomatic personnel in the region to the risk of further escalation." Appearing Saturday night on MSNBC, Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., who co-authored the resolution with Massie, wondered whether the anti-war voters who support Trump would back his move. "This is the first true crack in the MAGA base," he said, noting that Trump's rise in the 2016 primaries was aided by his move to slam President George W. Bush for the Iraq war.
Boston Globe
29 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Senators Markey and Warren decry Trump's Iran strikes as unconstitutional
'Only Congress can declare war — and the Senate must vote immediately to prevent another endless war,' Warren said. Fellow Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey agreed, calling the strike 'illegal' for having lacked congressional approval. He said in a statement that Saturday's attack may set back Iran's nuclear ambitions, but added that not only can the country 'rebuild its program,' it 'will now be highly motivated to do so.' 'A diplomatic solution remains the best way to permanently and verifiably prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon,' Markey said. Chants of 'No More War' broke out at a Bernie Sanders rally in Tulsa, Okla., after the Vermont Senator read Trump's 'alarming' social media post announcing the strikes. 'The American people do not want more war, more death,' he said. Advertisement Massachusetts Peace Action, a Cambridge-based advocacy group, called for state leaders to speak out. The organization specifically called on Congressional leaders to pass the war power resolutions filed by Senator Tim Kaine and Representative Thomas Massie to prevent further US military action. 'We call on Massachusetts political leaders to speak out strongly against President Trump's lawless military adventure,' the organization wrote on Saturday night, shortly after the US attack on Iran. Brian Garvey, the organization's executive director, said an 'emergency event' was being planned outside Park Street Station at 1 p.m. Sunday, in protest of the strikes. Advertisement 'This direct attack by the United States on Iran a dramatic escalation by President Trump,' Garvey said in a phone call Saturday night. 'It's incredibly dangerous, it's unnecessary, and frankly, it's illegal.' Garvey said the founding fathers were explicit in giving Congress the power to declare war, adding that this is 'not how the government is supposed to work.' 'It is perhaps especially terrible because this is a president who ran saying he was going to seek peace,' he said. 'Back in 2016, he said the Iraq War was a big fat mistake. I fear that what he is leading us into could be even worse than that debacle and quagmire.' Garvey said he was 'fearful' for the US service members stationed in the Middle East, and 'outraged' that the strikes threatened their safety. Camilo Fonseca can be reached at
Bloomberg
30 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Gives National Address on Iran Airstrikes
President Donald Trump gave a national address Saturday evening speaking on the joint Israeli airstrikes in Iran. He said Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities were 'completely and totally obliterated' and that this bombing would be the most difficult by far. (Source: Bloomberg)
