Tenecteplase Before Thrombectomy Boosts LVO Stroke Outcomes

HELSINKI — In patients with large vessel occlusion stroke treated within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, outcomes were better in those who received the thrombolytic tenecteplase prior to endovascular therapy than in those who underwent endovascular treatment alone.
Results from the BRIDGE-TNK trial showed that patients who received tenecteplase had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving functional independence at day 90.
Several earlier trials of thrombolysis before endovascular therapy — most using alteplase as the thrombolytic — failed to show significant benefit. Commentators now suggest that the latest findings from the BRIDGE-TNK trial suggested tenecteplase may potentially be a more suitable agent in this clinical scenario.
'Essentially, what our trial showed was that patients who received tenecteplase before endovascular therapy did better than those who did not receive tenecteplase. And it was a highly significant result, supporting the idea that we should give tenecteplase to these patients who are presenting directly to endovascular centers. All patients in this trial were directly presenting to the endovascular center,' said study investigator Thanh Nguyen, MD, director of Interventional Neurology/Neuroradiology at Boston Medical Center, Boston.
The BRIDGE-TNK trial results were presented on May 21 at the European Stroke Organization Conference (ESOC) 2025 and simultaneously published online in The New England Journal of Medicine.
Better Functional Independence
The open-label BRIDGE-TNK trial included 550 patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion who presented within 4.5 hours of symptom onset and were eligible for thrombolysis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous tenecteplase followed by endovascular thrombectomy or endovascular thrombectomy alone.
The primary outcome was functional independence at 90 days, measured on a scale from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Secondary outcomes included successful reperfusion before and after thrombectomy. Safety outcomes assessed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours and death within 90 days.
At 90 days, functional independence — defined as a score of 0-2 on the modified Rankin Scale — was achieved in 52.9% of patients in the tenecteplase-thrombectomy group compared with 44.1% in the thrombectomy-alone group (unadjusted risk ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01-1.43; P = .04).
The time between tenecteplase administration and the start of endovascular therapy was very short — a median of 16 minutes — yet there was still a significant increase in successful reperfusion before thrombectomy in the tenecteplase group (6.1%) vs thrombectomy-alone group (1.1%). Successful reperfusion after thrombectomy occurred in 91.4% of patients in the tenecteplase group and 94.1% in the thrombectomy-alone group.
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours occurred in 8.5% of patients in the tenecteplase-thrombectomy group and 6.7% in the thrombectomy-alone group — a nonsignificant difference. Ninety-day mortality was 22.3% in the tenecteplase group vs 19.9% in the thrombectomy-alone group.
Peter Kelly, MD, professor of neurology at University College Dublin in Dublin, Ireland, who was not involved in the trial, asked Nguyen how the BRIDGE-TNK results should be interpreted in light of previous, 'perhaps inconclusive,' alteplase trials — and why the signals appear to differ between the two agents.
Nguyen said that an individual patient meta-analysis of the alteplase trials suggested a potential benefit of administering the drug before thrombectomy in patients treated very early — within 2.5 hours of symptom onset. However, beyond that time window, the benefit appeared to plateau, with no clear advantage observed.
'I think it depends on what you have available at your hospital. So, if you have alteplase, then you use alteplase. If you have tenecteplase, you use tenecteplase. But if you have the choice between the two, then it would seem reasonable to go with tenecteplase because it's showing superiority over the whole 4.5-hour time window,' Nguyen added.
Discussing why tenecteplase may be more effective than alteplase in this setting, Nguyen explained that tenecteplase is more fibrin-specific and has been associated with better recanalization outcomes.
She added that its bolus administration makes it faster and more convenient than alteplase, which requires an infusion — an important advantage when time is critical for getting patients to the cath lab.
Kelly responded: 'So it might be as simple as that; perhaps it's all down to speed again.' He concluded: 'I think the main take home message is not to withhold thrombolytics in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke on the way to endovascular therapy.'
In response, Kelly suggested the difference in outcomes might simply come down to timing. 'I think the main take-home message is not to withhold thrombolytics in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke on the way to endovascular therapy. So, it might be as simple as that; perhaps it's all down to speed again,' he said.
A Convincing, Positive Result
Commenting on the study for Medscape Medical News , Michael Hill, MD, director of the Stroke Unit for the Calgary Stroke Program, Alberta, Canada, said the results supported the use of thrombolysis before endovascular therapy.
'A meta-analysis of alteplase trials in this situation has suggested a benefit, but this trial with tenecteplase shows a more convincing positive result. This is consistent with previous literature suggesting that tenecteplase may be a more effective thrombolytic agent than alteplase and associated with earlier recanalization.'
He suggested that the benefit of thrombolysis before thrombectomy may not just be due to the earlier opening of the vessel.
'The endovascular procedure can cause some distal embolization into the far parts of the circulation, so having a drug on board, which is going to help manage those microcirculatory occlusions should be beneficial. But that's still theoretical at present,' Hill said.
'I think the totality of the alteplase data also suggest that it is beneficial, but tenecteplase could be better, so we should be giving tenecteplase to these patients heading for endovascular therapy,' he added.
Hill noted that many regions around the world have already adopted tenecteplase as the thrombolytic of choice for stroke treatment.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

Novo Nordisk A/S: CagriSema 2.4 mg / 2.4 mg demonstrated 22.7% mean weight reduction in adults with overweight or obesity in REDEFINE 1, published in New England Journal of Medicine

Data presented simultaneously at the American Diabetes Association's® 85th Scientific Sessions, showed mean weight reduction in the highest range of efficacy observed with existing weight loss interventions1 When adhering to treatment, weight loss of ≥5%, ≥20%, ≥25%, and ≥30% was observed in 97.6%, 60.2%, 40.4% and 23.1% of patients respectively at 68 weeks1* The REDEFINE clinical programme is ongoing to further investigate efficacy and safety of CagriSema, including recently initiated REDEFINE 112 Bagsværd, Denmark, 22 June – Today, The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) published results from Novo Nordisk's phase 3 REDEFINE 1 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of investigational CagriSema plus lifestyle interventions for weight loss in adults with obesity or overweight who have a weight-related medical complication and without diabetes.1 REDEFINE 1 met its co-primary endpoints and achieved statistically significant and clinically meaningful weight loss at 68 weeks in patients taking CagriSema versus placebo.1 These data, along with the related phase 3 REDEFINE 2 study conducted in adults with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes, were presented today during a scientific symposium at the American Diabetes Association's (ADA) 85th Scientific Sessions and published in NEJM. 'In REDEFINE 1, participants saw significant and clinically meaningful weight loss under a protocol that allowed investigators to maintain patients on a submaximal dose if deemed best for the patient. We also witnessed low, single-digit discontinuation rates due to adverse events in both REDEFINE 1 and 2,' said Martin Holst Lange, executive vice president and head of Development at Novo Nordisk. 'These results reinforce our confidence in CagriSema, and we continue to study the potential of this combination through the REDEFINE trials.' CagriSema is an investigational product that combines the GLP-1 RA, semaglutide, with an amylin analogue, cagrilintide. The REDEFINE 1 trial found that treatment with CagriSema resulted in greater weight loss of 22.7% at 68 weeks versus 2.3% in the placebo group if all patients adhered to treatment.1* When evaluating the treatment effect regardless of adherence, those treated with CagriSema achieved statistically significant weight loss of 20.4% at 68 weeks versus 3.0% for the placebo group.1** In addition, a supportive secondary analysis showed that half (50.7%) of trial participants with obesity treated with CagriSema reached the threshold for non-obesity (BMI < 30 kg/m2) at the end of treatment, from a mean BMI of 38 kg/m2 at the start of treatment. In the placebo group,10.2% reached that threshold at 68 weeks.1 Select confirmatory secondary endpoints showed that if all participants adhered to treatment 40.4% of those receiving CagriSema achieved a body weight reduction of ≥25%.* Additionally, 23.1% lost ≥30% of their body weight.1* When applying the treatment policy estimand, 34.7% of participants treated with CagriSema achieved ≥25% body-weight reduction and 19.3% achieved ≥30% body-weight reduction.1** In a prespecified analysis of 252 participants, the relative reduction in fat and lean soft-tissue mass from baseline to week 68 was -35.7% (fat mass) and -14.4% (lean soft-tissue mass) for those treated with CagriSema versus –5.7% and –4.3% for the placebo group, respectively.1 "In REDEFINE 1, CagriSema provided weight loss in the highest range of efficacy observed with existing weight loss interventions,' said lead investigator Timothy Garvey, MD, professor of medicine and director of the Diabetes Research Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. 'Investigators were allowed some flexibility in dose adjustments to balance efficacy and safety, but regardless of dose adjustments participants lost significant weight. These findings are relatable to clinical practice, where dosing is often adjusted based on individual needs and clinical judgement.' Safety data generated in the REDEFINE 1 and 2 trials were comparable with the GLP-1 RA class. Overall, discontinuation rates due to adverse events were low, with 6% for CagriSema versus 3.7% for placebo in REDEFINE 1 and 8.4% with CagriSema versus 3% with placebo in REDEFINE 2.1,3 In REDEFINE 1, adverse events were mainly gastrointestinal (79.6% in the CagriSema group vs. 39.9% with placebo), including nausea (55% vs. 12.6 %), constipation (30.7% vs. 11.6%), vomiting (26.1% vs. 4.1%) and were mostly transient and mild-to-moderate in severity.1 Results from REDEFINE 2, a phase 3 study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of CagriSema plus lifestyle interventions in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D), were also simultaneously presented during a scientific symposium at the ADA's Scientific Sessions and published in NEJM.3 In REDEFINE 2, if all participants adhered to treatment, the estimated mean change in body weight from baseline to week 68 was –15.7% with CagriSema versus –3.1% with placebo.3* When applying the treatment policy estimand, the estimated mean change in body weight from baseline to week 68 was –13.7% with CagriSema versus –3.4% with placebo.3** A greater proportion of participants receiving CagriSema, compared with placebo, reduced their body weight by >5% (83.6% vs. 30.8% of participants), ≥10% (65.6% vs. 10.3%), ≥15% (43.9% vs. 2.4%), and ≥20% (22.9% vs. 0.5%;).3 The safety results from CagriSema in REDEFINE 2 were similar to those reported in REDEFINE 1.3 The REDEFINE clinical programme will continue to assess the efficacy and safety of CagriSema. Most recently, Novo Nordisk initiated the REDEFINE 11 trial with the first patient visit occurring in early June 2025. REDEFINE 11 will explore further weight loss potential and safety of CagriSema 2.4 mg / 2.4 mg through a longer trial duration and other protocol changes compared to REDEFINE 1 and 2. * Based on the trial product estimand; this estimand estimates what the effect would be if all participants adhered to treatment ** Based on the treatment policy estimand: treatment effect regardless of treatment adherence About CagriSemaCagriSema is being investigated by Novo Nordisk as a once-weekly subcutaneous injectable treatment for adults with overweight or obesity (REDEFINE programme) and as a treatment for adults with type 2 diabetes (REIMAGINE programme). CagriSema is a fixed-dose combination of a long-acting amylin analogue, cagrilintide 2.4 mg and semaglutide 2.4 mg. About the REDEFINE clinical trial programmeREDEFINE is a phase 3 clinical development programme with once-weekly subcutaneous CagriSema in obesity. REDEFINE 1 and REDEFINE 2 have enrolled approximately 4,600 adults with overweight or obesity. REDEFINE 1 was a double-blind, placebo-and active-controlled 68-week efficacy and safety phase 3 trial of once-weekly CagriSema, cagrilintide 2.4 mg and semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo in 3,417 adults with obesity or overweight with one or more comorbidities and without type 2 diabetes. REDEFINE 2 was a double-blind, randomized, placebo- and controlled 68-week efficacy and safety phase 3 trial of once-weekly CagriSema versus placebo in 1,206 adults with type 2 diabetes and either obesity or overweight. Multiple REDEFINE clinical trials are currently underway including: REDEFINE 3, an event-driven cardiovascular outcomes phase 3 trial; REDEFINE 4 an 84-week head-to-head efficacy and safety phase 3 trial of once-weekly CagriSema versus once-weekly tirzepatide; and REDEFINE 11, a phase 3 trial with longer duration and other protocol changes compared to REDEFINE 1 and 2. About obesity Obesity is a serious chronic, progressive, and complex disease that requires long-term management.4-6 One key misunderstanding is that this is a disease of just lack of willpower, when in fact there is underlying biology that may impede people with obesity from losing weight and keeping it off.4,6 Obesity is influenced by a variety of factors, including genetics, social determinants of health, and the environment.7,8 Novo Nordisk is a leading global healthcare company founded in 1923 and headquartered in Denmark. Our purpose is to drive change to defeat serious chronic diseases built upon our heritage in diabetes. We do so by pioneering scientific breakthroughs, expanding access to our medicines, and working to prevent and ultimately cure disease. Novo Nordisk employs about 77,400 people in 80 countries and markets its products in around 170 countries. For more information, visit Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn and YouTube. Contacts for further information Media: Ambre James-Brown +45 3079 9289 abmo@ Liz Skrbkova (US) +1 609 917 0632 lzsk@ Investors: Jacob Martin Wiborg Rode +45 3075 5956 jrde@ Ida Schaap Melvold +45 3077 5649 idmg@ Sina Meyer +45 3079 6656 azey@ Max Ung +45 3077 6414 mxun@ Frederik Taylor Pitter +1 609 613 0568 fptr@ References: Garvey WT, Blüher MD, Contreras CKO, et al. CagriSema in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. New England Journal of Medicine 2025. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2502081 A Research Study to Look at How Well CagriSema Helps People Living With Obesity Lose Weight and Maintain Weight Loss in the Long-term. Last Accessed: June 2025. Available at: Davies MJ, Harpreet S, Bajaj MD, et al. CagriSema in Adults with Overweight or Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine 2025. Kaplan LM, Golden A, Jinnett K, et al. Perceptions of barriers to effective obesity care: results from the national action study. Obesity. 2018;26(1):61-69. Bray GA, Kim KK, Wilding JPH; World Obesity Federation. Obesity: a chronic relapsing progressive disease process. A position statement of the World Obesity Federation. Rev. 2017;18(7):715-723. Garvey WT, Mechanick JI, Brett EM, et al. American association of clinical endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity. Endocr Pract. 2016;22 (Suppl 3):1-203. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adult obesity facts. Last accessed: June 2025. Available at: World Obesity Federation. World Obesity Atlas 2023. Last accessed: June 2025. Available at: Attachment PR250622-ADA-CagriSema

CNN

2 hours ago

• CNN

How your AI prompts could harm the environment

AI Sustainability Climate change EconomyFacebookTweetLink Follow Sign up for CNN's Life, But Greener newsletter. Our limited newsletter series guides you on how to minimize your personal role in the climate crisis — and reduce your eco-anxiety. Whether it's answering work emails or drafting wedding vows, generative artificial intelligence tools have become a trusty copilot in many people's lives. But a growing body of research shows that for every problem AI solves, hidden environmental costs are racking up. Each word in an AI prompt is broken down into clusters of numbers called 'token IDs' and sent to massive data centers — some larger than football fields — powered by coal or natural gas plants. There, stacks of large computers generate responses through dozens of rapid calculations. The whole process can take up to 10 times more energy to complete than a regular Google search, according to a frequently cited estimation by the Electric Power Research Institute. So, for each prompt you give AI, what's the damage? To find out, researchers in Germany tested 14 large language model (LLM) AI systems by asking them both free-response and multiple-choice questions. Complex questions produced up to six times more carbon dioxide emissions than questions with concise answers. In addition, 'smarter' LLMs with more reasoning abilities produced up to 50 times more carbon emissions than simpler systems to answer the same question, the study reported. 'This shows us the tradeoff between energy consumption and the accuracy of model performance,' said Maximilian Dauner, a doctoral student at Hochschule München University of Applied Sciences and first author of the Frontiers in Communication study published Wednesday. Typically, these smarter, more energy intensive LLMs have tens of billions more parameters — the biases used for processing token IDs — than smaller, more concise models. 'You can think of it like a neural network in the brain. The more neuron connections, the more thinking you can do to answer a question,' Dauner said. Complex questions require more energy in part because of the lengthy explanations many AI models are trained to provide, Dauner said. If you ask an AI chatbot to solve an algebra question for you, it may take you through the steps it took to find the answer, he said. 'AI expends a lot of energy being polite, especially if the user is polite, saying 'please' and 'thank you,'' Dauner explained. 'But this just makes their responses even longer, expending more energy to generate each word.' For this reason, Dauner suggests users be more straightforward when communicating with AI models. Specify the length of the answer you want and limit it to one or two sentences, or say you don't need an explanation at all. Most important, Dauner's study highlights that not all AI models are created equally, said Sasha Luccioni, the climate lead at AI company Hugging Face, in an email. Users looking to reduce their carbon footprint can be more intentional about which model they chose for which task. 'Task-specific models are often much smaller and more efficient, and just as good at any context-specific task,' Luccioni explained. If you are a software engineer who solves complex coding problems every day, an AI model suited for coding may be necessary. But for the average high school student who wants help with homework, relying on powerful AI tools is like using a nuclear-powered digital calculator. Even within the same AI company, different model offerings can vary in their reasoning power, so research what capabilities best suit your needs, Dauner said. When possible, Luccioni recommends going back to basic sources — online encyclopedias and phone calculators — to accomplish simple tasks. Putting a number on the environmental impact of AI has proved challenging. The study noted that energy consumption can vary based on the user's proximity to local energy grids and the hardware used to run AI partly why the researchers chose to represent carbon emissions within a range, Dauner said. Furthermore, many AI companies don't share information about their energy consumption — or details like server size or optimization techniques that could help researchers estimate energy consumption, said Shaolei Ren, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of California, Riverside who studies AI's water consumption. 'You can't really say AI consumes this much energy or water on average — that's just not meaningful. We need to look at each individual model and then (examine what it uses) for each task,' Ren said. One way AI companies could be more transparent is by disclosing the amount of carbon emissions associated with each prompt, Dauner suggested. 'Generally, if people were more informed about the average (environmental) cost of generating a response, people would maybe start thinking, 'Is it really necessary to turn myself into an action figure just because I'm bored?' Or 'do I have to tell ChatGPT jokes because I have nothing to do?'' Dauner said. Additionally, as more companies push to add generative AI tools to their systems, people may not have much choice how or when they use the technology, Luccioni said. 'We don't need generative AI in web search. Nobody asked for AI chatbots in (messaging apps) or on social media,' Luccioni said. 'This race to stuff them into every single existing technology is truly infuriating, since it comes with real consequences to our planet.' With less available information about AI's resource usage, consumers have less choice, Ren said, adding that regulatory pressures for more transparency are unlikely to the United States anytime soon. Instead, the best hope for more energy-efficient AI may lie in the cost efficacy of using less energy. 'Overall, I'm still positive about (the future). There are many software engineers working hard to improve resource efficiency,' Ren said. 'Other industries consume a lot of energy too, but it's not a reason to suggest AI's environmental impact is not a problem. We should definitely pay attention.'

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

A radio signal from the beginning of the universe could reveal how everything began

A radio signal from the early universe could allow us to understand how everything that surrounds us began. The signal – known as the 21-centimetre signal – could finally let us understand how the first stars and galaxies switched on, and brought the universe from darkness to light. 'This is a unique opportunity to learn how the universe's first light emerged from the darkness,' said co-author Anastasia Fialkov from Cambridge University, in a statement. 'The transition from a cold, dark universe to one filled with stars is a story we're only beginning to understand.' The signal comes to us from more than 13 billion years ago, just a hundred million years after the Big Bang. The faint glow is created by hydrogen atoms that fill up the space between regions of space where stars are being formed. Scientists now believe they will be able to use the nature of that signal to better understand the early universe. They will do that with a radio antenna called REACH – the Radio Experiment for the Analysis of Cosmic Hydrogen – which will try and capture radio signals to reveal data about the beginnings of the universe. To better understand how that project might work, researchers created a model that predicted how REACH as well as another project called the Square Kilometre Array will be able to provide information about the masses and other details of the first stars. 'We are the first group to consistently model the dependence of the 21-centimetre signal of the masses of the first stars, including the impact of ultraviolet starlight and X-ray emissions from X-ray binaries produced when the first stars die,' said Professor Fialkov. 'These insights are derived from simulations that integrate the primordial conditions of the universe, such as the hydrogen-helium composition produced by the Big Bang.' 'The predictions we are reporting have huge implications for our understanding of the nature of the very first stars in the Universe,' said co-author Eloy de Lera Acedo, Principal Investigator of the REACH telescope. 'We show evidence that our radio telescopes can tell us details about the mass of those first stars and how these early lights may have been very different from today's stars. 'Radio telescopes like REACH are promising to unlock the mysteries of the infant Universe, and these predictions are essential to guide the radio observations we are doing from the Karoo, in South Africa.' The work is described in a new paper, 'Determination of the mass distribution of the first stars from the 21-cm signal', published in the journal Nature Astronomy.