Independence police chief critical of current facility after failed vote
INDEPENDENCE, Mo. — Voters said yes to one General Obligation (G.O.) Bond on Tuesday night, but no to two others.
Voters approved $55 million for roads, bridges, and sidewalks. They rejected millions of dollars for other projects, including a new police headquarters.
Police Chief Adam Dustman told FOX4 he's disappointed Tuesday night's vote failed, saying he's asking more from his police officers every single day. The department's current headquarters is just east of Independence Square, known as the Central Police Building.
Revoked student visas worrying international students in Kansas City
'But yet we're placing them in a work environment that is, on the best of circumstances less than desirable and on the worst of circumstances is down right unacceptable and atrocious,' he said Wednesday afternoon.
Chief Dustman says it's his job to try to change the conditions that his officers work in. Before the vote, he showed residents the conditions of the Central Police Building. There's sewage from the pipes there, along with water damage in the main men's locker room.
Tuesday's public safety bond failed by 10% because elections for bonds need to pass with 4/7ths of voters, or just more than 57%. 53% of the residents said no, and 47% of them said yes.
'While it is a risk from the recruitment side, I'm much more concerned about the today, which is the staff that we have here, the incredible men and women that are dedicated, and go out and do their job, and they're going to continue to do their jobs regardless of any sort of vote or you know, lack thereof,' he said.
Chief Dustman added that he's concerned that other Jackson County, Mo. police departments will have better facilities than his with Tuesday's public safety bond failing.
'And you come here and you see the water infiltration and the health and safety issues that are here, there's a toll there and risk for sure,' he said.
Two hours before Chief Dustman spoke, FOX4 talked to City Manager Zach Walker.
'I would say more disappointed,' Walker said when asked if he was surprised that the G.O. Bond for the new police facility failed.
Even though that happened, some Independence Police Department workers will be moving to the city's Utilities Center at 291 Highway and 23rd Street. The new justice center or police department headquarters was supposed to go there, too.
'What we're not able to move, what we don't have space allocated for is the patrol units,' Walker said.
'So, people come in, go to their locker room, get dressed, go out on patrol, the firing range, and then the special operations unit, like the SWAT Team, the K9 Unit, things like that.'
Two-year-old girl overdoses after ingesting methamphetamine, police say
After question 1 failed, FOX4 asked how the city will ask the voters for a new justice center in the future.
'Yes, I do think we will be back. That need is not going away,' Walker said, talking about a new police building.
'We've outgrown the facility that we're in, and we're spread out over several different properties that, like I mentioned before, created a lot of operating inefficiencies.'
The third G.O. bond question Tuesday asked voters to consider $12 million in bonds to upgrade the existing Independence Athletic Complex and improve historic buildings, including the Bingham-Waggoner Estate.
That failed with 55.42% of the vote due to that 57% threshold mentioned above.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
13 hours ago
- The Hill
Supreme Court ruling scrambles battle for transgender care
The Supreme Court on Wednesday delivered a substantial blow to transgender-rights advocates in upholding a 2023 Tennessee law banning gender-affirming care for minors, a decision that could have far-reaching consequences for the future of transgender health in the U.S. but whose impact won't be felt right away. 'The immediate outcome is that it doesn't change anything,' said Kellan Baker, executive director of the Institute for Health Research and Policy at Whitman-Walker, a Washington-based nonprofit. 'It doesn't affect the availability or legality of care in states that do not have bans, and it simply says that states that have decided to ban this care can do so if they survive other challenges.' Twenty-seven Republican-led states since 2021 have adopted laws that ban transition-related care, including puberty blockers, hormone therapy and rare surgeries for minors. Laws passed in Arizona and New Hampshire — the first Northeastern state to have restricted gender dysphoria treatments for youth — only prohibit minors from accessing surgeries, a provision that was not at issue before the Supreme Court. In a 6-3 decision, the high court upheld a lower court ruling that found Tennessee's restrictions do not violate the U.S. Constitution's Equal Protection Clause. The state's law, which allows cisgender children and teens to access medications that it bans for trans minors, makes distinctions based on age and diagnosis, the courts ruled, rather than sex and transgender status. Three Tennessee families, a doctor and the Biden administration, along with attorneys at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Lambda Legal, argued the measure amounts to illegal sex discrimination, warranting heightened review. 'Having concluded it does not,' Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority on Wednesday, 'we leave questions regarding its policy to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process.' At least 10 legal challenges to state laws prohibiting health professionals from administering gender-affirming care to minors argue the restrictions discriminate based on sex in violation of the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The Supreme Court's ruling Wednesday could potentially weaken, in some cases, that line of attack, but it is not the only approach opponents of the laws have pursued. More than a dozen other lawsuits, including ones arguing equal protection under the U.S. Constitution, claim bans on transition-related health care for minors violate the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause, federal disability law or provisions of a state's constitution. In May, a federal judge struck Montana's ban on gender-affirming care for youth on grounds it violated privacy, equal protection and free speech rights guaranteed by its constitution. 'This ruling allows challenges to other state bans to continue,' said Baker, of Whitman-Walker, 'and they will.' Karen Loewy, senior counsel and director of Lambda Legal's constitutional law practice, told reporters on a Zoom call following Wednesday's ruling that the civil rights organization and others challenging state bans on gender-affirming care have other options at their disposal. 'The Supreme Court did not endorse the entirety of the lower court's ruling; it did not mandate or even greenlight other bans on gender-affirming medical care, even for young people, or other forms of discrimination,' she said. 'It really is about how it viewed Tennessee's in this specific way, and left us plenty of tools to fight other bans on health care and other discriminatory actions that target transgender people, including other equal protection arguments about transgender status discrimination, about the animus-based targeting of trans people.' Loewy added that the court's ruling also left the door open to arguments based on state and federal sex discrimination statutes and parental rights, which the justices did not address Wednesday. Nearly all of the cases brought against youth gender-affirming care bans argue those laws infringe on the rights of parents to make medical decisions on behalf of their children. 'As a parent, I know my child better than any government official ever will,' Samantha Williams, the mother of L.W., a transgender teenager who was at the center of the case before the Supreme Court, wrote in a New York Times op-ed after Wednesday's ruling. The Supreme Court's determination that Tennessee's law does not discriminate based on sex also raises questions about how opponents of transition-related health care for minors will use the ruling to inform their own legal strategies. In Arkansas, the ACLU successfully argued in 2023 that the first-in-the-nation ban on gender-affirming care for minors violated the U.S. Constitution's Equal Protection Clause, as well as its Due Process Clause and the First Amendment's protections of free speech. 'We'll have to see, but it's possible that that ban could stand because the court made that decision on equal protection, as well as on other grounds,' said Lindsey Dawson, director for LGBTQ health policy at KFF, a nonprofit health policy research, polling and news organization. 'This is likely to be an area that's going to face continued litigation and is not settled at this point in time.' In a statement Wednesday, Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin (R) said he is 'preparing an official notification' for an appeals court detailing the implications of Wednesday's Supreme Court decision on the state's ban, which the Legislature passed — and former Republican Gov. Asa Hutchinson initially vetoed — in 2021. 'Because our law is similar to Tennessee's law, today's decision has positive implications for our case before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit,' he said. Montana and Arkansas are the only states whose bans on gender-affirming care for youth remain blocked by court orders, according to the Movement Advancement Project, a nonprofit group that tracks LGBTQ laws. The Supreme Court's ruling Wednesday also declined, as some court watchers had anticipated, to apply the reasoning of its earlier decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, which held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 shields employees from discrimination based on their sex or gender identity. Some lawsuits challenging state bans on care for minors have said the ruling should apply to contexts other than workplace discrimination. Former President Biden's administration similarly sought to use the court's reasoning in Bostock to back new nondiscrimination policies protecting transgender people in health care and sports, arguments largely rejected by conservative political leaders and courts. 'We still don't have a sole understanding of where Bostock might apply outside of Title VII, and it's going to be something that's important to watch,' Dawson said. 'It's certainly something that the Bostock court warned us about,' she said. 'In that decision, the court said, this court is making its ruling and it's quite narrow, but it's going to be for future courts to decide how this applies outside of Title VII. That remains a question mark.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Three decades, one leader - how Eritreans had their hopes dashed
Once hailed as part of a new generation of reformist African leaders, Eritrea's president, who recently marked 32 years in power, has long defied expectations. Isaias Afwerki now spends much of his time at his rural residence on a dusty hillside some 20km (12 miles) from the capital, Asmara. With the cabinet not having met since 2018, all power flows through him, and like a potentate he receives a string of local officials and foreign dignitaries at his retreat. It is also a magnet for ordinary Eritreans hoping in vain that Isaias might help them with their problems. The 79-year-old has never faced an election in his three decades in power and there is little sign of that changing any time soon. But things looked very different in the 1990s. Isaias was 45 when, as a rebel leader, his Eritrean People's Liberation Front (EPLF) defeated Ethiopia in 1991. Those who fought in the war are remembered each year on Martyrs' Day, 20 June. Tall and charismatic, he inspired hope both at home and abroad. In 1993, following formal independence, Isaias appeared on the international stage as head of state for the first time. It was in Cairo, where he attended a continental leaders' summit, that he lambasted the older generation of African leaders "who wanted to stay in power for decades". He vowed that Eritrea would never repeat the same old failed approach and promised a democratic order that would underpin the social and economic development of his people. His stance won him plaudits from Eritreans and diplomats alike. Riding the euphoria of the early years of independence and enjoying a glowing international reception, Isaias sought closer relations with the West. In 1995, after inviting the Eritrean leader to the Oval Office, US President Bill Clinton expressed appreciation for the country's strong start on the road to democracy. Eritrea had just begun drafting a new constitution expected to establish the rule of law and a democratic system. Isaias was supposed to be a "transitional president" until a constitutional government was elected. The new constitution was ratified by a constituent assembly in May 1997. But just as Eritreans and the world were expecting national elections in 1998, war broke out between Eritrea and neighbouring Ethiopia over a disputed border. Isaias was accused of using the war as a justification to postpone the elections indefinitely. He had promised a multiparty democratic system and his resolve was tested after a peace agreement was reached in 2000. Several of his cabinet ministers, including former close friends and comrades-in-arms, began to call for reform. In an open letter issued in March 2001, a group of senior government officials, who later became known as the G-15, accused the president of abusing his powers and becoming increasingly autocratic. They called for the implementation of the constitution and national elections. Starting from the mid 1990s, Eritreans had tasted some freedom, with emerging newspapers carrying critical voices — including from within the ruling party, that had been renamed the People's Front for Democracy and Justice (PFDJ). The transitional national assembly had decided when elections would take place, an electoral commission was being formed and proposed political party laws were under debate. The country seemed to be on a slow path towards democratisation. However, this fragile opening abruptly closed in September 2001, while the world's attention was focussed on the 9/11 attacks in the US. In a single morning, the authorities shut down all independent newspapers, effectively silencing critical voices. Many editors and journalists were detained and never seen again. Simultaneously, the government arrested 11 of the G-15, including three former foreign ministers, a chief of staff of the armed forces and several members of the national assembly. They have not been seen or heard from since. The hopes of many Eritreans were dashed. But Isaias had already moved away from introducing democratic changes. "I had never had any intention of participating in political parties," he said in April 2001. "I don't have any intention of participating in a political party now, and I won't have any intention of participating in a political party in the future." He also described the democratic process as a "mess", saying that the PFDJ was "not a party. It is a nation". For many, it became clear the president would not allow democratic reforms to take hold. The silencing of critics and the failure to hold elections, earned him and his country pariah status. However, his supporters say he was unfairly targeted by Western nations and praise him as a symbol of national liberation. In 2002, he unofficially dissolved the transitional assembly that was meant to hold him accountable and in effect did the same with the cabinet in 2018. Some aging ministers with no real authority now lead weak government agencies, and several ministries - including defence - remain without ministers. Many wonder why the independence hero took such a repressive turn. Abdella Adem, a former regional governor and senior ambassador, says Isaias never believed in democracy and has always been obsessed with power. He led the EPLF with an iron fist even before independence, according to Mr Abdella, who now lives in exile in London. "He systematically weakened and removed leaders with public legitimacy and struggle credentials who could challenge his authority." To some surprise, in May 2014, Isaias announced plans for a new constitution, later saying that the constitution ratified in 1997 was "dead". But no progress has been made since then. The proposal to write a new constitution may have been triggered by an attempted coup by senior military officers in 2013. They drove tanks into the capital and seized control of national TV and radio stations for several hours. Realising the attempt was failing, they tried to broadcast a call to implement the 1997 constitution and release political prisoners. But security forces pulled the plug mid-broadcast. Many officials - including the mines minister, a governor, diplomats and a general - were detained. The leader of the coup killed himself to avoid arrest. Zeraslasie Shiker, a former diplomat, left his post in Nigeria and sought asylum in the UK. His boss, Ambassador Ali Omeru, a veteran of the independence war, was later detained and remains unaccounted for. Governments that lock people up "like Isaias Afwerki's do not allow genuine political and social institutions or the rule of law", says Mr Zeraslasie, now a PhD candidate at the UK's Leeds University. "The indefinite suspension of Eritrea's constitution and the collapsing of government institutions into the office of the president must be understood in this context." Isolated internationally, Isaias withdrew from the global stage. He stopped attending summits such as the UN General Assembly and African Union meetings. The country's economy has "struggled", according to the World Bank's assessment last year. "Economic activity is constrained by underdeveloped infrastructure, limited competition due to state dominance, and strict import controls," the authors said, adding that the financial sector remained "weak". Isaias himself acknowledged problems in an interview with state TV in December last year. "A subsistence economy will lead us nowhere. Currently, we are not in a better position than many other African countries in this regard," he said. Isaias also refuses humanitarian aid, citing fears of dependency that would undermine his principle of "self-reliance". For many Eritreans, especially young people trapped in indefinite national service, which the authorities justify because of a series of conflicts and tense relations with its neighbours, daily life is a nightmare. Under a repressive regime, they face a future with little hope or freedom. Disillusioned by the lack of political progress and exhausted by forced conscription and state violence, many risk their lives to escape in search of freedom. Over the past two decades, hundreds of thousands have fled, crossing deserts and seas to find safe haven. Eritreans are currently the third most common nationality to be granted refugee status in the UK. In his independence day speech last month, Isaias gave no hint of any of the changes many Eritreans hope to see. There was no mention of a constitution, national elections or the release of political prisoners. At the same time there was no concrete plan to turn round the country's moribund economy. Despite criticism at home, President Isaias retains support among parts of the population, particularly within the military, ruling party networks and those who view him as a symbol of national independence and resistance against foreign interference. The president also has strong backing among some in the diaspora, who believe Western powers are conspiring to undermine Eritrea's hard-won independence. As frustration grew in Eritrea, Isaias retreated from Asmara in 2014 to his home that overlooks the Adi Hallo dam whose construction he closely supervised. As Isaias nears 80, many fear what could happen next. An apparent attempt to groom his eldest son to succeed him was reportedly blocked at a 2018 cabinet meeting, since when no further meetings have been held. But there is no obvious succession plan or a credible opposition in the country who could replace the current regime, leaving many to find it hard to imagine a future without Isaias. "The president's office is what's holding the country from collapse," warns Mr Zeraslasie. During this year's Easter holiday, Isaias was seen kissing a cross during a church mass in Asmara. Some believe he is seeking spiritual redemption, others hope he may release political prisoners. For now, however, Isaias remains firmly in control, while Eritreans continue their long and anxious wait for change. Why Eritreans are at war with each other around the world Eritrea viewpoint: I fought for independence but I'm still waiting for freedom Reporting on Africa's most secretive state Eritrea President Isaias Afwerki 'both charismatic and brutal' 'I haven't seen my parents for 17 years' Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica Focus on Africa This Is Africa
Bloomberg
5 days ago
- Bloomberg
Kosovo Premier Calls on Trump to Press Serbia to Normalize Ties
Kosovo's Prime Minister Albin Kurti called on US President Donald Trump to pressure neighboring Serbia into normalizing relations with his country, whose independence Belgrade does not recognize. Kurti said that the two countries had already signed a deal in 2023 but that it was being violated and ignored by Serbia.
