‘Not based on science': documents show internal government scramble to expand Alberta cougar hunt

Alberta Fish and Wildlife Enforcement shared this photo on their Facebook page on Saturday, March 4, 2018.
A controversial decision last year to substantially increase the number of cougars that can be hunted in Alberta was not based on science, according to government documents obtained by The Narwhal.
Instead, expanded cougar hunting was 'based on direction from [the] minister last year and input from stakeholders,' according to an internal email between senior staff at the Ministry of Forestry and Parks. Those stakeholders were limited to members of the Alberta Professional Outfitters Society and the Alberta Tree Hounds Association.
Internal emails obtained by The Narwhal through four freedom of information requests show senior staff within the ministry said 'social interests, economic effects and departmental mandates' took precedence over 'inventory and monitoring' data for a last-minute increase in cougar hunting quotas.
'Inventory and monitoring information was not the primary element used to inform the process to trigger [the cougar quota] adjustment,' a senior staffer wrote in an email to colleagues.
That directly contradicts heated denials by Forestry and Parks Minister Todd Loewen, who lashed out at his Opposition critic in the legislature earlier this year when she suggested he was not taking science and data into account.
'When it comes to wildlife in this province, I would rather manage wildlife with common sense,' he said in response to accusation of political interference from NDP MLA Sarah Elmeligi. 'I'd rather use biology than the ideology that they use.'
The internal emails reveal a scramble to change the quotas with little clarity on the process.
'The normal process would be for [the Ministry of Environment and Protected Areas] to undertake an updated assessment of a wildlife species population,' then share that information with the Ministry of Forestry and Parks, one senior staff wrote. No new assessment of Alberta's cougar population has been done since 2019.
'I do not believe that we have agreed on a formal process, as of yet, to inform management changes,' the staffer wrote.
'I look forward to the formalization of process,' another staffer wrote in response.
'Me too……….' was the one-line reply.
They were reacting to a change that appeared suddenly just five days before the end of the 2023-24 cougar hunting season.
Staff were also directed to open new areas where hounds could be used to hunt cougars.
'This is a 97.6 per cent increase in area where cougars can be hunted with hounds,' a briefing note obtained by The Narwhal says. The report made it clear that the change was not because any data had shown an increase in the cougar population.
'Cougar density in these new areas is unknown but thought to be low.'
Then, in late 2024, new quotas were set for the 2024-25 season, based on the last-minute increases in March. Those changes represented an almost 40 per cent increase in the total number of cougars that could be hunted across the province as compared to the start of the previous season. At the same time, the province also quietly opened hunting in some protected areas, including Cypress Hills Provincial Park.
The changes also allowed outfitters to expand into new areas — specifically around Canmore, Alta. — with separate and specific licences for guided hunting trips. The move increased the number of cougars that could be killed in those areas, over and above the official quota.
The government referred to that change as the 'Alberta Professional Outfitters Society extension.'
'Several' outfitters with that association, along with the Alberta Tree Hounds Association, are the only stakeholders mentioned as being consulted about the changes.
But even within that limited group, there was pushback on the government's plans.
In the documents, the Alberta Tree Hounds Association expressed concerns the new quotas were 'not based on science or the [cougar] management plans at hand,' and were made at the last minute.
The heavily redacted documents do not provide clarity on what the group's specific concerns were or if any changes came from its objections.
The association's president, Jason Martyn, did not respond to an interview request.
Forestry and Parks Minister Todd Loewen has faced accusations of conflict of interest over hunting
Minister Loewen has been travelling through the U.S. and Europe to promote hunting in Alberta and sell expanded special licences for hunting a range of animals.
Earlier this year, he lashed out at Elmeligi in the legislature for suggesting his ties to the hunting industry constituted a conflict of interest. The Opposition critic was forced to apologize for suggesting the minister was engaging in corruption.
Loewen previously ran Todd Loewen Outfitting Ltd., which changed its name to Red Willow Outfitters. Registry documents show it is now run by family members, including his wife, Teena Loewen.
Todd Loewen's November 2024 public conflict of interest disclosure did not specify a financial interest in the business, saying only the company was 'in a management arrangement approved by the Ethics Commissioner of Alberta.'
A month later, following reporting by The Narwhal highlighting the company ownership, it was updated to list Red Willow as an asset of his wife.
Loewen's office did not respond to an interview request or a set of emailed questions, but he has repeatedly pointed to a review by the provincial ethics commissioner clearing him of any conflicts.
A transcript from a June 2024 meeting of a committee reviewing the Conflicts of Interest Act shows the minister wanted clarity around what constitutes a conflict and that he engaged with the ethics commissioner on his specific portfolio and interests.
It also shows the situation was complex and that Loewen was initially barred from making some unspecified decisions and said he had to 'try three times' to remove those restrictions.
Cougar hunt changes were made after consulting with hunting groups, not conservationists
The documents obtained by The Narwhal make it clear the ministry was actively seeking input from hunting groups.
'The minister asked that you hold an online meeting of some houndsmen [he] is aware of (as soon as possible),' a senior staffer wrote to another in November 2024. 'Please reach out to those folks and set up a meeting within a week's time (or whatever is convenient for those guys during hunting season).'
The push to consult with hunting organizations contrasts with how another stakeholder whose emails to the government appeared in the documents says they were treated.
The Narwhal showed the documents to John Marriott, a wildlife photographer and advocate against cougar hunting. He said his emails were included in the correspondence with his name redacted.
'I didn't get any responses from anybody,' he said.
Marriott says the documents make it clear the government was not following the science, or its own cougar management plan.
'These make it very clear that the quota increases for cougar harvest were not from the cougar biologists and the biologists that normally would be making this decision; this was a directive from above,' he said.
Ruiping Luo, a conservation specialist with the Alberta Wilderness Association who also reviewed the documents, echoed Marriott.
'They didn't have any new scientific reasoning for changing the quotas and that is something that we suspected: that these quotas were not based on science and there were other factors, like economics, interfering,' she said.
'The other thing — that I think was, again, expected — was there didn't seem to be a ton of consultation, or even consideration of consultation for other groups, for naturalists and recreation users and for Indigenous groups too. This does affect their Treaty Rights to hunt and trap.'
'Who cares about the science?': ecologists concerned about government's wildlife approach
The increase in cougar quotas is just one of many changes to hunting regulations introduced by the current government. It has opened hunting of 'problem' grizzly bears after a 20-year ban.
It has also lifted quotas on trapping wolverines — citing the need to collect data on how many wolverines are left — and other species.
Marco Festa-Bianchet, a retired professor of animal ecology at the University of Sherbrooke in Quebec, said the decision to increase quotas on cougars without a good idea of the population numbers is troublesome.
'To me, as a scientist, what's really bad about it is just, well, let's just ignore years and years of research and wildlife biology and just say, 'Potentially cougars are bad, let's shoot some more,'' he said.
More broadly, Festa-Bianchet said the government is making decisions on what appears to be a whim.
'It's just the whole approach,' he said. 'It's the same with mountain goats and grizzly bears: just, like, who cares about the science?'
This story is available for use by Canadian Press clients through an agreement with The Narwhal. It was originally published in The Narwhal, a non-profit online magazine that publishes in-depth journalism about the natural world in Canada. Sign up for weekly updates at thenarwhal.ca/newsletter.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CTV News

an hour ago

• CTV News

Mike Pemberton wins Yukon Liberal leadership race, will be next premier

Yukon Liberal Party Leader and premier-designate Mike Pemberton poses in this undated handout photo. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Handout - Yukon Liberal Party (Mandatory Credit) WHITEHORSE — WHITEHORSE -- Mike Pemberton has been named the new leader of the Yukon Liberal Party and will be the territory's 11th premier. A local businessman and longtime party insider, Pemberton won the leadership race by 13 votes over former Kwanlin Dun First Nation Chief Doris Bill. Pemberton told supporters gathered Thursday night at the party's convention in Whitehorse that they have an opportunity to build on eight years of strong leadership and First Nations partnerships. '(It's) an opportunity to grow together, to grow our party, to show our strong track record of economic growth, our commitment to public safety, affordability and the well-being of all communities, big and small,' he said. No date has been set for when Pemberton will be sworn in as premier but he will have little time to make his mark before he is running in the next territorial election. That election must take place on or before Nov. 3 and Pemberton has previously told The Canadian Press that he would likely call it before that deadline. In his acceptance speech Thursday he said there was 'hard work and new challenges ahead.' 'I commit to having genuine conversations with Yukoners across the territory, and building a platform that not only reflects Yukoners' wants and needs, but inspires them as well,' he said. Pemberton is chair of the Yukon branch of the federal Liberal party and was vice-president of the territorial party before stepping aside to run for leader. He will replace outgoing Premier Ranj Pillai who announced earlier this year that he would not be seeking re-election and would step down after his successor was chosen. The party said 873 ballots were cast at the leadership convention, with Pemberton getting 442 votes, 429 people voting for Bill, and two ballots being spoiled. Following the votes being announced, Bill said she was disappointed. 'I really tried to reach out across the Yukon, because I believe that it's Yukoners that should vote for their leader,' she said. Had she won, Bill would have been Yukon's first Indigenous premier and first to be born in the territory. She said she hopes that can still be achieved by someone. 'I hope someday. You know, this may have been the closest we've ever gotten as a people to that particular job,' she said. The Liberals hold a minority government in Yukon with eight of the 19 available seats in the legislature. Opposition Yukon Party Leader Currie Dixon congratulated Pemberton on his win and thanked Bill for putting her name forward. 'Making the choice to enter politics is never an easy one. With increased public scrutiny and time away from family, the sacrifices are many, but our democracy requires that dedicated citizens answer the call to serve our communities,' he said in a statement. By Ashley Joannou and Isabel Ruitenbeek This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 19, 2025

CTV News

2 hours ago

• CTV News

Brampton Mayor calls for terror designation of India-based Bishnoi gang

Brampton Mayor Patrick Brown is calling on Ottawa to label the Lawrence Bishnoi gang a terrorist organization, warning the India-based group has entrenched itself in Peel Region and is linked to a number of criminal activities. Brown made the comment during an interview with calling the Bishnoi gang a 'horrible criminal organization.' His comments come just days after British Columbia Premier David Eby made a similar request of Ottawa and promised to formally write Prime Minister Mark Carney about the matter. 'We've had a number of Bishnoi-related criminal activities in Peel Region,' Brown told CTV News Toronto. 'We know they're happening across the country because we actually are in close contact with other law enforcement, particularly in B.C., where there's activity with the same criminal network.' Bishnoi himself has been imprisoned in India since 2014 but the country's counterterrorism law enforcement agency, the National Investigation Agency, has previously said that he continued to operate his 'terror-syndicate' from behind bars and through an associate in Canada. Brown said that the gang Bishnoi leads employs a global network of '700 shooters' and is actively recruiting vulnerable residents in Peel and beyond — a level of criminality he suggests is 'akin to a terrorist organization.' Brown further alleges that he is directing criminal activity throughout Canada. 'This is not a Brampton issue, Mississauga issue, a Toronto issue… This is transnational crime,' he told 'Whether it is crime syndicates from Mexico or crime syndicates from India, we are dealing with transnational crime increases in recent years that is a new challenge to our ability to push out criminality.' An opportunity for 'greater investigative tools' Just this week, a new report from Canada's spy agency labelled India as one of the 'main perpetrators' of foreign interference and espionage. The report also pointed to a link between government agents and 'criminal networks to sow violent activity in South Asian communities in Canada.' It's reality that Brown says the Ottawa should not turn a blind eye to. 'I think diplomacy is important, trade is important but if another country wanted us to turn a blind eye to transnational crime in order to achieve that, I think that would be something that's beyond what we should be comfortable with,' he said, Brown says classifying the Bishnoi network as a terrorist entity under Canada's Criminal Code would empower police to act more decisively. 'The listing would mean greater investigative tools, resources, collaboration with multiple agencies, intelligence sharing,' he said. 'There's just a number of things that are triggered by that designation.' He also says the threat has gripped his local community, particularly residents of South Asian descent who recognize the Bishnoi name from headlines in India. 'We have a lot of residents of South Asian background who are terrified by it,' Brown said. 'It's at the behest of PRP, who I've got great confidence in, but it's also at the behest of residents of mine that I know feel terrified by the brazen nature of their activity in Canada.' Already, Brown's office has submitted several recommendations to Ottawa to bolster public safety, including Criminal Code amendments, bail reform, and stronger intelligence sharing between agencies. He says increased federal involvement is essential. 'You can't fix public safety unless you get all levels of government owning their part and doing their part,' he said. 'The Government of Canada, since they're in charge of Public Safety Canada, CBSA and RCMP, there's certainly a lot they can do to be part of the solution.' With files from The Canadian Press.

National Post

2 hours ago

• National Post

Randall Denley: Ontario's 'historic' spending under Ford sure isn't producing results

Article content The Ontario government's finances are a paradox. The PC government regularly boasts about 'historic' levels of spending, but faces constant complaints about underfunding, especially from the health-care, education and post-secondary sectors. Article content What's the real picture? Article content Article content In fact, budget figures show that revenue and spending have increased dramatically since Premier Doug Ford was first elected. In 2019–20, his first full-year budget, total government revenue was $156.1 billion. This year, it's projected to be $219.9 billion, a 41 per cent increase. Spending has gone up by about the same percentage, from $164.8 billion in 2019–20 to a projected $232.5 billion this year. Article content With such a large spending increase, it's hard to believe that anything could be underfunded, but discouragingly, that is the case. Article content Article content Ontario's per capita spending on health care is second lowest in the country. Per-student funding for Ontario universities is the lowest in Canada. The province does a bit better on public education, with the sixth highest per-student funding nationally. Article content Those are disappointing numbers. One would expect more from the country's biggest province. Article content It's not like the Ford government is restraining spending to balance the books. Far from it. That first Ford budget had a $9-billion deficit and the current one projects a deficit of $14.6 billion. Article content A new report card on this year's budget gives Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy a grade of D- for his performance on the critical issues of debt, debt interest payments, spending increases and tax relief. Article content The Canadian Taxpayers Federation report notes that Bethlenfalvy's latest budget increases debt by $22 billion, and says that by the end of the budget year, debt will have reached $461 billion. That's about $28,472 per person, the second highest in the country. Net interest payments will cost Ontarians just over $1,000 per person this year, the fourth highest in the country. Spending is up 7.9 per cent, third highest among provinces. Article content Article content The only moderately bright note in the taxpayers' report card was tax relief, where the Ford government finally made permanent a longstanding 5.7 cent per litre gas tax cut. Article content Article content Unfortunately, that cut is not typical of the Ford government's performance on taxes. Promises made in 2018 to cut corporate taxes and personal income taxes remain unfulfilled. Ontario's combined federal/provincial top marginal tax rate of 53.53 per cent is the third highest of any jurisdiction in Canada or the U.S. Article content Here, at least, there is some reassuring news. The health, education and post-secondary sectors have all benefited substantially from the increased tax take. In 2019–20, health spending was $63.7 billion. In 2025–26, it is projected to be $91.1 billion. Comparing the same two time periods, education has gone from $30.2 billion to $41 billion and post-secondary spending will rise from $10.5 billion to $13 billion.