SkinnyTok and the toxic resurgence of glorifying thinness
SkinnyTok is a social media trend filled with unregulated diet advice and worrying mantras. Kate Demolder writes. TW: disordered eating content, eating disorders.
Noticed an uptick in weight-loss-related content on your TikTok algorithm? You're not alone.
A recent slew of reports, along with anecdotal evidence, has indicated that content centred around losing weight and disordered eating has penetrated young people's algorithms, which harks back to pro-ana (short for pro-anorexia, a subculture that promotes eating disorders) content from the early aughts.
This content comes in myriad forms; from creators with large followings who share videos on why "being skinny is a form of self-respect" to smaller accounts who speak in clipped sentences with mantras splashed across photos of thin models like "don't reward yourself with food, you're not a dog," or "a skinny body is rented, not owned".
Naturally, this shift is concerning, but it's also not entirely new. Though the 1990s are chastised for being the birth of thinspo (thin-inspiration content), recent reports suggest that external forces have never been more punitive when it comes to thinness.
Back in 2022, a report from a US nonprofit, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, found that TikTok appeared to be pushing videos about disordered eating to 13-year-old users within as quickly as three minutes of their joining the platform.
A 2024 study, which asked the question " Does TikTok contribute to eating disorders?" showed results that "algorithms for users with eating disorders (ED) delivered 4,343 per cent more toxic ED videos."
Officially, TikTok does not allow content that promotes or glorifies unhealthy or harmful behaviour, policing this through human and AI moderation. In 2022, the platform announced changes to its community guidelines, aimed at cracking down on content promoting "disordered eating".
It has since regularly updated these guidelines, stating that they remove all content "promoting disordered eating and dangerous weight loss behaviors (sic), or facilitating the trade or marketing of weight loss or muscle gain products."
Today, when one types 'thinspo' into the search bar, a prompt says: "You're not alone; If you or someone you know is having a hard time, help is always available" alongside a resources tab and contact details for a national eating disorder charity.
Still, according to its users, the platform is peppered with thinspo-related content. Creators have gotten around platform-led barriers by purposefully misspelling words related to thinness, such as "skinni" instead of "skinny" (a favourite of creator Liv Schmidt, whose account was disabled by TikTok back in September) or insisting their methods are health-centric in place of disordered.
This has been bolstered somewhat by content about Ozempic, Mounjaro and other GLP-1 medications, which were created as a diabetes drug and are now prescribed to people whose health has been impacted by their weight.
The popularisation of this conversation – Ozempic has become common parlance when discussing weight loss and celebrity culture – has seen to further demonise weight gain, with conversations around bigger bodies returning to the bullying, painful rhetoric we saw in the 2000s.
Look no further than the recently-banned 'chubby filter,' which saw users virtually try on a bigger body for entertainment.
TikTok is largely known as a social platform for teenagers, with about 60 per cent of users being Gen Z. This makes the issue of pro-ana content on the app particularly worrying.
"We know that young people, since Covid-19, have been presenting with eating disorders or disordered eating in higher numbers," Carol McCormack, a Clinical Nurse Manager on St Patrick's Mental Health Services' Willow Grove Adolescent Unit, a Mental Health Commission-approved centre, which provides mental health treatment for ages 12–18.
"And while we can't say that social media is the sole reason why eating disorders develop, people would often reference that they would engage with quite a lot of content online that can negatively impact body image and lead to body comparison and body dissatisfaction.
"They also notice that once they interact with or even look at one piece of content, they're fed more and more. Such is the nature of the algorithm, but when you're still developing your sense of self and identity, that can influence in a really impactful way."
In 2021, the Academy for Eating Disorders published an open letter asking social media platforms to reduce online harms. Since then, it's unclear how much has changed.
According to Research and Policy Officer of Bodywhys, Barry Murphy, the entire social media ecosystem as we know it would have to change before pro-ana content could too. "It's part of a wider landscape that's been going on on social media for some time," he says.
"Things like outfit of the day videos, skincare tutorials, curated selfies, fitness progress updates… People might enjoy the storytelling aspect, but they all hark back to the fixed idea that there is one way we should be, physically and culturally."
This idea is not new, he says. "These trends are likely cyclical, but it's hard to tell the precise origins. Pro-eating disorder content has been around for years, long before broadband and smartphones. Today, there are just more trigger points, like a few years ago when a trend suggested that your waist shouldn't be bigger than the width of an A4 page."
Eating disorders are serious, often life-threatening conditions. They can be developed for any number of reasons, and yet misconceptions about what causes them still persist. As such, exact triggers are hard to pinpoint. But it's clear that social media can play a role. In 2021, a report found that Instagram failed to protect those at risk for eating disorders from pro-ana messaging.
"This content slips through the cracks," Murphy says. "It's hard to say definitely whether platforms are doing enough, but it's our experience that people are frustrated with their annual reports that show how they're policing such content, when much of that content still comes up for people who don't need it.
"What's happening here is a gap between what's written on paper and what's happening in reality. And in reality, this content has been popping up for at least half a decade."
The best and perhaps only way to ensure content won't show up on your algorithm again is to ignore it. This, of course, is easier said than done. The fact remains that the regulation of pro-ana content online is largely left up to the individual, as opposed to the fastest-growing social media platform on the internet to face. However, resources exist. And there are people there to help.
"Platforms like Cybersafe and Webwise are brilliant for those trying to be more aware of what's going on out there and how to engage with it well," McCormack says. "Aside from that, the only thing parents or guardians can do is create an open dialogue about content like this, and try to potentially either dispel what they're looking at, or discuss what well-being is. As well as clarifying what is healthy, and what is not."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
4 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Rise in dangerous summer TikTok ‘wellness' trend that puts Gen Z girls at risk of cancer or even death
EVERY morning, Taylor Lyttle heads to a local beauty salon for a 15-minute sunbed session. After topping up her already deep-mahogany tan, at a cost of £13, the 21 year old then scrolls TikTok to check if her skin is darker than all of her sunbed-using friends. 6 Every morning, 21-year-old Taylor Lyttle pays £13 for a sunbed session - then checks TikTok to see if her tan beats her friends' 6 TikTok influencers claim tanning beds boost vitamin D and mental health — but experts warn it's a dangerous 'wellness' myth putting young women at risk of deadly skin cancer Credit: JACEY AT DEBUT ART 'If I see someone online darker than me, I get annoyed. I love how I look with a tan, it boosts my confidence and I feel more attractive,' she says. Taylor, a hairdresser from Belfast, adds that she's aware of the risks of sunbed use, including skin cancer, but isn't too worried. 'I'm very healthy. I eat well, I look after myself. I've never had any issues since I started using sunbeds five years ago. "I think of it as me-time – it's relaxing and reduces my stress,' she says. READ MORE FROM FABULOUS Like countless other Gen Z girls aged 13-28, Taylor spends hours scrolling posts on TikTok with hashtags like #tanned, #sunnyd and #whatmakesyouhappy, often featuring users bathed in blue UV light. 'It's a problem, but I'd rather die hot than live ugly I guess #yolo #lol #sunbed,' reads one caption. Meanwhile, influencers on the platform claim tanning beds can do everything from boost vitamin D levels to improve your mental health. Not only are many of these claims unproven, some are entirely false, and charities are concerned that marketing tanning as a 'wellness' trend is driving It's big money, too, with the UK's largest tanning chain, The Tanning Shop, growing by 40% since 2018. Most read in Fabulous Alarming time-lapse video reveals how tiny 'dark patch' morphs into melanoma 'Social media encourages us – we look at people's tans online and it gets competitive' Taylor has been using sunbeds since she was 16, even though it's illegal under the age of 18. 'No one ever checked my age,' she says. 'I just paid my money and went in. I guess I was self-conscious about my pale skin and I don't have a lot of confidence. "It's something that helps me. My mum knew I was doing it, but she didn't mind.' It's a social thing as well – we'll often meet at the sunbed salon then have coffee or lunch afterwards. Taylor Lyttle She adds: 'Now, I go most days, spending over £200 month to get my fix. I also use nasal tanning sprays [which contain synthetic hormones such as Last month, Trading Standards issued a warning that tanning nasal sprays could cause 'nausea, vomiting, However, Taylor insists she's never suffered any side effects, and plans to continue using them. 'Social media encourages us,' she says. 'I don't post photos of myself, but we all look at people's tans and it gets competitive. "We watch videos about how to boost your tan and most of us use tanners like nasal sprays. "It's a social thing as well – we'll often meet at the sunbed salon then have coffee or lunch afterwards.' Dr Björn Thomas, a consultant dermatologist and lead for melanoma at Guys' and St Thomas' Hospital, London, is seeing a rising number of young patients. 'We're no longer surprised to see someone aged 19 or 20 with melanoma,' he says. 'Often, they've had lots of exposure to sunbeds. It's an increasing trend among younger generations.' Dr Thomas said there is 'minimal' evidence emerging that a small amount of UV light is good for you. 'The reality is, sunbeds are not safe,' he says. 'The carcinogenic, cancer-causing effect could be significantly higher than if you are getting ambient sunlight out and about. Risks of sunbeds THE promise of a constant glowing tan is too tempting for some people to deny. But while popping to the sunbed shop may seem harmless, people who use tanning beds should be aware of the risks. Approximately 10 per cent of the population of Northern Europe use sunbeds on a regular basis, the World Health Organization says. Some people use them for years on end, accumulating risk of serious disease. We are here to give you the lowdown on sunbeds and if they are safe to use. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), sunbeds are as dangerous as smoking. Like the sun, they give out harmful UV rays that damage the DNA in your skin cells. Over time, this may lead to malignant According to the They report that sunbeds increase the risk of skin cancer by up to 20 per cent, and also state that they have no positive benefits to our health. Cancer Research back this statistic, adding that " there is no such thing as a safe tan from UV radiation". One study found that sunbeds can almost While some people think tanning beds are safer than sitting out in the midday sun, according to The Sunbed Association claim there is not enough evidence to link sunbed use with melanoma, adding: "It is over-exposure and But the WHO says: "The majority of tanning parlours provide inadequate advice to their customers. "The use of eye protection such as goggles or sunglasses should be mandatory. "However, as sunbed users aim to have an even tan, they often decide against protecting any part of their body." Referring to the link with skin cancer, the world health experts add: "Sunbeds for self-tanning purposes have been available for the last two decades and due to the long latency period for "Even though the causes of malignant melanoma are not fully understood, tumour development appears to be linked to occasional exposure to intense sunlight. "Sunbeds subject their users to intermittent high exposures of UVA and UVB radiation – this may provide the ideal setting for the development of malignant skin cancer. "However, the few epidemiological studies that have been carried out to date have not provided any consistent results." Despite the WHO's cautious stance on the skin cancer link, it discourages the use of sunbeds, quoting an expert who said the use of tanning parlours is like "an industrial-scale radiation exposure experiment". Regardless of skin cancer, sunbeds don't just have long-term health risks. Users have reported a range of short-term symptoms including itching, dryness and redness of skin, freckling and photosensitivity. Common outcomes in the longer term, especially in fair-skinned people, may involve blistering of the skin. " Georgia Edwards was diagnosed with melanoma when she was just 19, after finding a bloody mole on her thigh. She'd been using sunbeds for three years. 'I was really young and loved having a tan without the faff of getting all messy using fake tan,' recalls Georgia, now 27, from Horley, Surrey. 'My friends and I would go together for 10 minutes and you'd feel like you'd gone to Spain and back. It became addictive.' Even though she was at school when she started, like Taylor, she says she was never asked for ID. I was called back in and there was a consultant and a Macmillan nurse – I knew it wasn't good news and broke down. Georgia Edwards 'I just put my card into the machine and selected how many minutes I wanted. "I was going three or four times a week, but I could have gone twice a day if I'd wanted. No one stopped me.' Georgia showed her GP the affected mole in March 2017, after going to the doctor for a chest infection, and was immediately referred. After a biopsy, she was diagnosed with stage two melanoma that May. 'I was called back in and there was a consultant and a news and broke down.' Georgia, who works in a rehabilitation centre for children with brain injuries, was referred to London's Royal Marsden Hospital for treatment. 6 Jessica Crowe's sister Tazmyn, left, died aged 31 after years of heavy sunbed use — a tragic reminder of the deadly risks behind the tanning trend 6 Tragically, despite further surgery and medication, Tazmyn's cancer spread, progressing to stage four She had two surgeries to remove the cancer. Fortunately, it hadn't spread. 'I had a wide, local incision to cut out the mole and surrounding area as it was quite deep in my skin and close to the lymph nodes,' she says. 'I have a 12cm scar on my leg and, eight years later, I'm still regularly checked as there's a high risk of it returning. 'I was young and naive. I thought it wouldn't happen to me. That was my mindset. Young people simply aren't aware of the dangers, and in years to come there's going to be a mass of people getting diagnosed. "Influencers promoting sunbeds have no idea of the dangers, they don't realise it could cost someone their life.' 'I lost my sister and best friend to sunbed use' Jessica Crowe knows only too well the the pain sunbeds can bring. Her sister The mum of three died in March 2023, aged just 31, having used sunbeds up to twice a day when she was younger. 'When we were teenagers, Tazmyn would use them all the time,' recalls Jessica, 31, a healthcare assistant and mum to Poppi, 14, and Memphis-Cub, two. 'I went with her a couple of times, but I'd just burn, so I stopped going. She was the tanned one and she loved it. "But after her diagnosis, she'd often say: 'Why did I do it?' She immediately stopped using them and regretted ever having gone on one.' Five years after her diagnosis, the cancer returned to her lymph nodes – reaching stage three. "Pregnant with her third child at the time, Tazmyn delivered her son 10 weeks prematurely in order to have further cancer treatment, almost losing him to a pulmonary haemorrhage. Tragically, despite further surgery and medication, Tazmyn's cancer spread, progressing to stage four, and in March 2023 Still grieving, Jessica, from Northern Ireland, says she finds social media posts advocating sunbed use and tan-boosting products distressing. 'It makes me so sad and angry. They make it sound like having a sunbed is harmless, when it's not. "As a family, we learned that the hardest way. Everything that Tazmyn went through began with sunbed use. "I was devastated when we lost her. I still am. She wasn't just my sister, but my best friend. 'My daughter would never use a sunbed, as she knows what happened to her aunt, but her friends do – some are only 13. "They are easily influenced by TikTok and Instagram.' This high-intensity UVA radiation can lead to genetic changes and mutations over time, which can build up and increase the risk of skin cancer. Susanna Daniels, CEO of Melanoma Focus The charity Melanoma Focus recently revealed that almost a third of people aged 16 and over in the UK use sunbeds, and that figure rises to 52% among 18-21 year olds. "More worryingly, only 47% of that age group understood that sunbeds increase their risk of skin cancer – and 20% even believed it could decrease the risk. 'These figures are really concerning,' says Susanna Daniels, CEO of Melanoma Focus. 'There is a swathe of misinformation on social media. Rather than being good for your health and increasing levels of vitamin D, as some influencers claim, most sunbeds mainly emit UVA radiation – which damages the DNA in skin cells – rather than UVB, which is required for vitamin D production. 'This high-intensity UVA radiation can lead to genetic changes and mutations over time, which can build up and increase the risk of skin cancer. In 2009, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified UV radiation from commercial tanning beds as a type 1 carcinogen – putting it in the same category as smoking and 'As a charity, we are very concerned about this widespread misinformation circulating on social media. "This has been on the rise in recent years and it may be leading people to make harmful choices.' Despite hearing stories like Tazmyn's, Taylor says she has no plans to ditch her TikTok tan any time soon. 'I sometimes worry about the risk and I do check my moles, but I'm young and I put it to the back of my mind,' she confesses. 'People drink, smoke, vape or eat junk food. Lots of things we do are bad, but we do it anyway. For me, a tan is worth the risk.' 'If young people aren't making the right choices, we need to help them' Meanwhile, Jessica has a very different message. 'I'd like to see sunbeds banned like they are in other countries such as Australia, or at least some restrictions so they are not promoted online,' she says. 'When you're young, you don't think about the risks, but if young people aren't making the right choices, we need to help them.' 'Skin cancer took my sister from me and robbed her children of their mother. "My message to young women is: please stop using sunbeds, and ignore these influencers promoting them. Your life is worth more than a tan.' Call the Melanoma helpline on 0808 801 0777, 1-2pm and 7-9pm Monday-Friday, 7-9pm on Sundays ( 6 Georgia Edwards was diagnosed with melanoma when she was just 19, after finding a bloody mole on her thigh. She'd been using sunbeds for three years 6 Georgia had two surgeries to remove the cancer, one leaving this scar on her leg, but fortunately, it hadn't spread Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club.
Extra.ie
11 hours ago
- Extra.ie
New weight loss pill set to rival 'fat jab' shows promising results in early trials
A new weight loss treatment that can be taken as either a daily pill or a weekly injection has shown very promising results in initial trials, according to a new study. In one of the tests, 125 adults were assigned weekly injections of a drug called 'AMYCRETIN', and early results showed that those receiving the 60 milligram dose lost nearly a quarter of their body weight over 36 weeks. 'Amycretin' is a 'unimolecular long-acting GLP-1 and amylin receptor agonist' under development by Novo Nordisk, to provide a treatment for adults with obesity and as a treatment for adults with type 2 diabetes. Pic: Shutterstock If the initial results turn out to be effective in the long run, this may make 'Amycretin' a more effective treatment for obesity than other weight loss drugs like Weygovy and Ozempic. Another trial enrolled 144 adults to test the 'pill version' of 'Amycretin'. Those who took the 100 milligram daily tablet lost an average of 13.1 percent of their weight over 12 weeks. Novo-Nordisk, who are heading up the research into this new medication says initial trials suggest Amycretin could be on the market by next year. Pic: Getty Images The strongest prescription weight loss medication currently approved by the FDA is Semaglutide, marketed under brand names like Wegovy and Ozempic (for diabetes, also used off-label for weight loss).
The Irish Sun
14 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
New ‘Ozempic pill' is better than ‘skinny jabs' and helps you lose weight even faster, study suggests
A NEW 'Ozempic pill' leads to faster weight loss than the popular 'skinny jabs', studies have suggested. The new weight loss medication, which can also be offered by injection, can help patients lose a significant amount of weight. Advertisement 1 The new weight loss pill has seen promising results in early trials Credit: Getty An early study found that patients who received amycretin as a weekly jab lost 24% of their body weight after 36 weeks of treatment. But initial trials assessing a tablet form of the jab saw promising results with patients losing an average 13% of bodyweight in just three months. This suggests the drug leads to greater weight loss than Wegovy, the 'sister jab' of Ozempic. Such treatments have been called transformative by NHS leaders. Advertisement Read more Health news It's estimated that around 1.5 million Brits currently receive weight loss jabs through specialist weight loss services or private prescriptions. But weight pills offer a new hope to millions looking to lose weight as the injections put additional pressure on an overstretched NHS. However, further clinical trials are needed before the treatment can be made available in the UK. This could take several years and there's no guarantee that regulators will approve the use of the drug. Advertisement Most read in Health Amycretin, made by Novo Nordisk, contains semaglutide, the same active ingredient as Ozempic and Wegovy and helps control blood sugar and appetite. It targets specific receptors in the body - the GLP-1 and amylin receptors - helping you feel full and stops overeating. An early trial published in The Lancet found that 125 adults taking weekly injections containing higher doses of the drug lost nearly a quarter of their body weight after 36 weeks. It also showed signs of improving blood sugar levels. Advertisement However, there were some mild to moderate side effects including nausea and vomiting but these were resolved by the end of the treatment. Experts said that the medicine appeared "safe and tolerable" but further studies were needed to fully assess the drug. But a second trial, also published in The Lancet, assessed the drug in tablet form in 144 people. Those taking the highest dose of 100mg lost 13% of their body weight over four months. Advertisement Weight Loss Jabs - Pros vs Cons The authors wrote: "Amycretin effectively lowered body weight and improved metabolic and glycaemic parameters in people who were overweight or obese. "Longer studies with more participants are warranted for evaluation of the safety and efficacy of amycretin in individuals living with obesity and type 2 diabetes, and to optimise the dosing regimen." As with the first trial, there were also some mild to moderate side effects including loss of appetite and similar gastrointestinal issues. It comes as a separate study examined the effects of the weight-loss jab, Wegovy, at higher doses. Advertisement The researchers found that giving patients 7.2mg of Wegovy once a week led to an average weight loss of 21%, with a third of participants losing 25% of their body weight over 72 weeks. The studies were also presented to the American Diabetes Association's Scientific Sessions in
