Signal app war plan leak broke the law, Texas expert says
The Brief
Government transparency expert says "war plan" leak through app violates law
Use of Signal App by Hegseth prevented creation of "classified record"
HOUSTON - A Texas expert on government transparency requirements believes the leak of "war plans" by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and others may well have violated laws governing retention of government records.
What they're saying
Former Travis County Judge Bill Aleshire helped write Texas's Freedom of Information law.
That statute mirrors in many ways Federal Open Records Law, which demands "record retention" even if the content of the communication between government officials is "highly confidential.
Aleshire says that by using the Signal App, Hegseth and everyone involved in the communication made an end-run around mandated transparency.
"Even in the federal government, it is important for there to be a record made, even if that record must be and is appropriately held confidential. At least, the record is there for those who have access to know what happened," said Aleshire.
Dig deeper
Encryption experts at the University of Houston tell FOX 26, the Signal App is nearly impossible to hack, which means government officials, at all levels, have the capacity to communicate in an unrecorded "black box", but are essentially breaking the law each time they do so.
"We kind of have the worst of both worlds here - the lack of transparency by the use of that app, while on the other hand, spilling the beans to the news media in advance of an attack, exactly what was going to happen, when it was going to happen and who it was going to happen to," said Aleshire.
The Source
FOX 26 Political Reporter Greg Groogan spoke with former Travis County Judge Bill Aleshire.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
White House photos show rare look inside the Situation Room as Trump authorizes strikes in Iran
WASHINGTON (AP) — One image shows President Donald Trump staring straight ahead stone-faced, monitoring the mission that took out three Iranian nuclear enrichment sites on Saturday. In another image, Trump stands as his chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Dan Caine, appears to speak. And whenever Trump is pictured, he is donning a bright red hat blaring his signature campaign slogan, 'Make America Great Again.' The series of photos that the White House published on its X account Saturday gives the public a rare glimpse inside the Situation Room — again stirring the intrigue that occurs any time pictures from the highly secret complex are released. ( Recall the photo of then-president Barack Obama watching the raid that killed Osama bin Laden?) The photos from Saturday portrayed Trump with senior members of his team, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio — doubling as Trump's national security adviser — White House chief of staff Susie Wiles and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. They are gathered around a large wooden table in the main conference room of the Situation Room, known as the 'JFK Room' — named for the president who was in office when the Situation Room was established. Trump is always in sharp focus whenever he is pictured, even as other officials in the foreground — like Hegseth or Vance — are softly blurred. The two officials closest to Trump when he's seated are Vance and Rubio, perhaps underscoring the depth of their influence as Trump deliberated for days whether to strike Iran. But the president isn't always sitting still. At points, Trump was roaming around the room, standing behind his top aide Wiles as Caine appeared to speak. Some photos show Cabinet members sitting still, intently watching something, while others show a relative flurry of activities — the joint chiefs chairman pointing animatedly, Hegseth conferring with another official. There are half-empty water bottles on the wooden conference table, along with disposable cups featuring the White House seal. Colorful highlighters. A thick binder in front of Caine. CIA Director John Ratcliffe had a binder and papers in front of him as well, although his documents appeared to be blurred — certainly for security reasons. Senior administration officials not considered principals were also there. In the back in one photo is Dan Scavino, the president's omnipresent deputy chief of staff. In another, White House counsel David Warrington is pictured. The Situation Room that Trump and his national security team sat in is a vastly different one than from his previous term. The sprawling complex located on the ground floor of the West Wing underwent a $50 million renovation that was completed in 2023. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration continues to eye Greenland over security concerns
The Trump Administration continues to monitor Greenland over its potential role in maintaining security for North America, according to testimony given by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. During his appearance last week before Congress' House Armed Services Committee, Hegseth was asked whether the Pentagon has developed plans to take Greenland — or Panama — by force, if necessary, The Associated Press reported. 'Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any contingency,' Hegseth repeated. While it isn't unusual for the Pentagon to develop 'what-if plans' for conflicts that may never materialize, Hegseth's reported handling of the questions regarding the Greenland issue prompted a direct inquiry from a Republican lawmaker. 'It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?' said Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio. As Hegseth started to repeat his answer about contingency plans, Turner added emphatically, 'I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.' 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats,' Hegseth responded. Added Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., 'Speaking on behalf of the American people, I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland.' One thing that's not unclear: President Donald Trump's interest in Greenland. 'We need Greenland for national security and international security,' Trump said from the Oval Office in March. 'So we'll, I think, we'll go as far as we have to go,' he continued. 'We need Greenland. And the world needs us to have Greenland, including Denmark. Denmark has to have us have Greenland. And, you know, we'll see what happens. But if we don't have Greenland, we can't have great international security.' Trump's focus on the massive, mineral-rich Arctic landmass — which is in an autonomous territory of Denmark — predates his return this year to the White House. The administration is reportedly concerned about growing Chinese and Russian military and commercial activities in the Arctic. 'Greenland is growing in importance as we find ourselves in a global competition with China and in a new technological revolution with regards to warfare,' Rebecca Pincus, director of the Wilson Center's Polar Institute and a former adviser to the U.S. Defense Department on Arctic strategy, told RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty earlier this year. 'So, Greenland is important from a missile-defense perspective, from a space perspective, and from a global competition perspective, in which shipping and maritime sea lanes are increasingly important,' she said. As a territory of Denmark, it is part of NATO, but Greenland is pursuing independence from Copenhagen and some experts fear that could open a door for Russia and China to gain a foothold in the country, RFE/RL reported. Last week, Denmark's Parliament approved legislation to allow new U.S. military bases on Danish soil, broadening an existing previous military agreement between the countries. Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen, in a response to lawmakers' questions, wrote that Denmark would be able to terminate the agreement if the U.S. tries to annex all or part of Greenland, The Associated Press reported. Meanwhile, Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen has called U.S. statements about the Arctic island 'disrespectful' — adding that Greenland 'will never, ever be a piece of property that can be bought by just anyone.' Political parties in Greenland, which has been leaning toward eventual independence from Denmark for years, recently agreed to form a broad-based new coalition government in the face of Trump's designs on the territory, reported The Associated Press. The Pentagon, meanwhile, is likely to shift Greenland from U.S. European Command to U.S. Northern Command, the military body responsible for defense of the American homeland, Mexico and Canada, according to Navy Times. The change itself only involves redrawing the maps of U.S. combatant commands and handing over responsibility for the military forces in Greenland, but it has caused angst among some in Denmark who think the administration is trying to draw the territory closer to America. An April poll conducted by the Deseret News/Hinckley Institute of Politics revealed about three-fifths — or 58% — of Utah voters somewhat or strongly oppose the idea of Greenland becoming a U.S. territory. Meanwhile, 42% said they somewhat or strongly support Greenland being annexed into the United States. Utah Republicans indicated slightly more support for Greenland becoming a territory of the U.S., with around 62% saying they somewhat or strongly support the idea, — compared to 13% of Democrats and 23% of independents. Utah voters were also asked what kind of pressure they would be comfortable applying on Greenland in pursuit of it becoming a U.S. territory. Overall, roughly 8 in 10 voters — or 78% — said they don't want the U.S. to apply any pressure on Greenland. At least 16% said they supported economic and political interventions, while 6% said they backed military pressure.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth orders ‘additional capabilities' to Middle East
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Monday that he has directed 'the deployment of additional capabilities' to the Middle East amid escalating tensions in the region. 'Protecting US forces is our top priority and these deployments are intended to enhance our defensive posture in the region,' Hegseth said in a post on social platform X. He did not name the additional capabilities, though earlier on Monday a U.S. official confirmed to NewsNation, The Hill's sister network, that the U.S. military has moved a large number of refueling tanker aircraft to Europe. The move is intended to 'provide options' to Trump amid the escalating tensions, the official added. Pentagon and White House officials have declined to say how many aircraft have been moved, but the flight tracking website AirNav Systems counted more than 31 Air Force refueling aircraft such as KC-135s and KC-46s leaving the United States on Sunday and flying east. The military flights eventually landed at Ramstein Air Base in Germany and in the United Kingdom, Estonia and Greece, according to the website. A Defense official also confirmed to The Hill that Hegseth directed the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group be sent to the Middle East 'to sustain our defensive posture and safeguard American personnel.' Multiple outlets have reported that the action was a pre-planned deployment that had been expedited. The vessel is able to hold some 5,000 personnel and more than 60 aircraft, including fighter jets. U.S. European Command also deployed two destroyers to the eastern Mediterranean Sea on Friday. The vessels can help defend against guided missile strikes. The Navy 'continues to conduct operations in the Eastern Mediterranean in support of U.S. national security objectives,' the official said. The shifted U.S. military assets and personnel comes as the conflict between Israel and Iran has entered its fourth day, with both sides intensifying their assaults following Israel's initial strike on Tehran on Friday. Israel and Iran have taken part in tit-for-tat attacks, open warfare that Israeli officials have said could last 'weeks, not days' and threatens to spark a wider war in the Middle East. Israel last week moved forward with its strikes after accusing Iran of being on the verge of building a nuclear bomb. Since then, the two sides have traded large scale missile attacks back and forth in what has become the deadliest confrontation between the countries, with at least 24 people killed in Israel and more than 220 killed in Iran. White House and Israeli officials have said Israel began the strikes after approval from the U.S. — which has helped defend Israel from Iranian-fired missiles. But even as President Trump has voiced support for Israel, he appears wary of any U.S. involvement in its conflict. The president sidestepped a question Monday as to what it would take for the U.S. military to get involved, telling reporters: 'I don't want to talk about that.' He also urged Tehran to return to talks with the U.S. over its nuclear program 'before it's too late.' 'They should talk, and they should talk immediately,' he said while attending the Group of Seven summit of leading industrialized nations in Canada. Trump a day prior said the United States is not involved in Israel's strikes against Iran, but 'it's possible we could get involved.' He also has made clear Washington's support for Israel, warning that 'if we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before.' Israel, meanwhile, had reportedly urged Washington to help it in eliminating Iran's nuclear program, with its targets including energy installations, missile sites, nuclear infrastructure, command centers and Iran's state television station. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told ABC News's Rachel Scott. The U.S. military already has a large footprint in the Middle East, with nearly 40,000 troops, air defense systems, fighter aircraft and ships. Updated at 7:26 p.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
