Florida approves conservation of more than 1500 acres of land in Putnam County
Governor Ron Desantis and the Florida Cabinet approved the protection of 34,595 acres of conservation lands Wednesday.
The preservation of these lands was largely possible through the Florida Forever Program. That includes a local parcel in Putnam County.
1,541 acres were acquired within the Etoniah-Cross Florida Greenway Florida Forever Project.
It will connect the Marjorie Harris Carr Cross Florida Greenway with other conservation lands within the Florida Wildlife Corridor. The state says it will also protect key surface water and aquifer recharge areas that flow into the Ocklawaha and St. Johns Rivers.
This land is home to several threatened and endangered species, including Florida black bears, gopher tortoises, sandhill cranes and swallow-tailed kites.
'The natural beauty of Florida enriches the lives of all who call it home, and I thank Governor DeSantis and the Florida Cabinet for their leadership in protecting our state's environment for future generations,' said Florida Department of Environmental Protection Secretary Alexis A. Lambert.
Read: Conservationists obtain coastal land in Crescent Beach, preserve the habitat forever
Other land acquisitions announced today are listed below:
21,625 acres within the Waccasassa Watershed Florida Forever Project in Levy County
7,548 acre conservation easement within the Ranch Reserve Forest Florida Forever Project in Osceola County
A combined 3,881-acres within the Caloosahatchee-Big Cypress Corridor in Collier and Hendry counties
Two of these properties are within the Caloosahatchee-Big Cypress Corridor, reinforcing critical Everglades and Florida panther habitat.
Related: The endangered Florida panther faces the dual threats of urban sprawl and increased traffic
'Conservation Florida thanks Governor DeSantis, the Cabinet, the Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Environmental Protection for continuing to advance critical land acquisitions to protect the Florida Wildlife Corridor and both our wild and agricultural landscapes,' said Traci Deen, President and CEO of Conservation Florida. 'The approval of these land deals supports endangered wildlife, safeguards vital water resources, and helps preserve Florida's rich agricultural heritage, all while strengthening local rural economies and conserving green spaces. Today marks another major win for land conservation and protecting the places that keep Florida wild.'
[DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks]
[SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump blasts Thomas Massie on Truth Social, threatens to primary NKY congressman
Donald Trump and Republican Thomas Massie are continuing to butt heads as the president berated the Northern Kentucky congressman in a recent Truth Social post. Much like he did in May, Trump once again called Massie a "grandstander' in the June 22 post after the representative of Kentucky's 4th Congressional District has repeatedly opposed the administration's policies. "Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky is not MAGA, even though he likes to say he is. Actually, MAGA doesn't want him, doesn't know him, and doesn't respect him. He is a negative force who almost always Votes 'NO,' no matter how good something may be." Trump wrote in the Truth Social post. "MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague!" The two share a complicated history, with Massie upsetting Trump the first time in 2024 after Massie initially endorsed candidate and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis during his 2024 presidential bid, though he did endorse Trump just days before the election. Massie also publicly opposed Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," on Instagram in May, stating that it will add $20 trillion of federal debt over 10 years. Trump's most recent social media reaction followed Massie's fiery response on X to his administration's announcement of the bombings in Iran, calling the act "unconstitutional". Massie went on to say: "When two countries are bombing each other daily in a hot war, and a third country joins the bombing, that's an act of war. I'm amazed at the mental gymnastics being undertaken by neocons in DC (and their social media bots) to say we aren't at war… so they can make war." Massie recently joined Ro Khanna, D-Calif., in introducing a resolution that would block U.S. involvement in the conflict between Iran and Israel without congressional approval. Massie's stance drew a rebuke from Trump himself, who wrote in the June 22 post that Massie is "weak, ineffective" and "disrespectful to our military." Trump again promised to back a Republican primary challenge to Massie. Previously, Massie told The Enquirer, "I think every time that I've made my case to the people, even if it's been contrary to what the president wanted at the time, it's eventually worked out for me. And so I'm going to stick with doing what I think is right and making my case to the people." Massie represents almost two dozen counties in and around Northern Kentucky. All of those counties voted for Trump in the past three presidential elections. But while other GOP politicians have lost reelection after losing Trump's support, Massie has dominated every election cycle since he took office in 2012. He was primaried by two candidates in 2024 and beat them with about 76% of the vote. Enquirer reporter Jolene Almendarez contributed to this story. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Trump fires back at Rep. Thomas Massie in newest Truth Social post
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Florida's Ron DeSantis signs 2 new laws to stop squatters from taking over hotels, restaurants and businesses
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis recently signed two new laws protecting commercial property owners from squatters. These laws are part of the state's broader effort to crack down on unauthorized occupancy and strengthen private property rights. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) Florida passed legislation to help homeowners deal with squatters last year. But the new measures extend similar protections to business owners, including those who operate hotels, motels, restaurants and retail storefronts. 'It's a big win for the hotel industry, hospitality industry as a whole,' Gil Reyes, regional general manager for the Westin Sarasota, told Fox 13 News. 'We are excited about this bill and what it does. It protects the hotels and innkeepers.' Senate Bill 322 speeds up the process for removing squatters from commercial properties. It also gives law enforcement more authority to act quickly, allows owners to recover their spaces without long legal battles and safeguards against financial losses and property damage caused by squatters. At the same time, Senate Bill 606 specifically targets the hospitality industry. It clarifies that guests can't claim residency after overstaying their welcome at hotels or food establishments, helping prevent drawn-out disputes that previously tied the hands of business owners. One recent case in Sarasota highlighted this challenge. A woman refused to leave the Westin Sarasota, despite causing disturbances in both the pool and dining area. 'She had a lot of erratic behavior .... We asked her to leave. She kept coming back,' the hotel manager said in Florida Cop Cam footage. But the situation escalated to the point where police were called in. The new laws aim to make situations like that easier to resolve, without the need for weeks of legal wrangling or uncertainty. Governor DeSantis framed the legislation as a defense of economic stability and property rights. 'You're either paying or you're not and if you're not, it shouldn't evolve into some major landlord-tenant dispute … I think this is something that will be really good for our economy. Property rights are really important. If you don't have private property rights, you cannot have a free society,' he said at a press conference. State Representative Peggy Gossett-Seidman, who helped push the issue forward, added, 'They run under the radar, because we didn't have the teeth in the statutes to try and remove them in all cases.' Sarasota County Sheriff Kurt Hoffman agreed, noting the disruption caused by unauthorized occupants. 'Those folks are trying to make money, pay their employees, pay their rent. Many times we would come in there and find the facilities destroyed,' he said at the press conference. 'Having that language in there that defines what 'transient' is makes it easier for my deputies to go out and get these folks out.' Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it While squatting has made headlines in states such as New York and California, its true scale remains unclear. According to an informal survey by the National Rental Home Council (NRHC), cities in Georgia, Florida and Texas have more squatters than any other metro areas. The survey reported 1,200 squatters in Atlanta, 475 in Dallas-Fort Worth and around 125 in Orange County, Florida. While there may be little documentation proving the exact number of occurrences, viral videos and high-profile incidents have played a big part in sparking a wave of legislation. 'Some people will make the argument that this is a very rare occurrence. But I think if it happens once or twice, it's unacceptable,' New York Democratic State Sen. Jessica Scarcella-Spanton once said. 'Just seeing the cases that we've seen over the last couple of months in the news is reason enough to move forward with legislation.' Florida joins a growing list of states taking legislative action. New York, Alabama and California have each proposed or passed bills to curb squatting, especially when it affects homeowners or small landlords. Still, some housing advocates worry the laws could be misapplied. There's the potential for new laws to be interpreted incorrectly and be applied to legal tenants who can't make rent, which could actually worsen housing insecurity — which is a valid concern. Even so, Florida's new laws reflect mounting public pressure to act and the desire among lawmakers to respond swiftly. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
State says Miami can't move city election without voter input. Who's right?
Next week, the Miami City Commission is scheduled to take a final vote on a proposal to move the city from odd- to even-year elections, canceling the upcoming November election and pushing it to 2026 without voter approval. Depending on who you ask, the proposal could be viewed as a common-sense reform measure that will boost the city's low voter turnout, or a power grab by Miami's elected officials, who will get an extra year in office if the change is approved — including those who are term-limited. The issue hasn't just made waves in local political circles. It's raised legal questions that have traveled as far as Tallahassee, pitting the city against Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Florida attorney general. The strained relationship between the governor and Miami Mayor Francis Suarez — who has been lobbying behind the scenes for the election date change — likely doesn't help, either. But beyond the local political drama at play, one question remains: Is it legal for the city to delay its elections without voter input? Last week, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier issued a written opinion saying the city of Miami can't move its election date without voter approval, and DeSantis concurred in a social media post. Uthmeier handed down his opinion in response to a request from City Commissioner Miguel Angel Gabela. 'If the City of Miami is to amend its charter, either to move the date of municipal elections or to change the terms of office for elected officials, then the change may only proceed by a vote of the electors,' Uthmeier said. But in a written opinion the next day, City Attorney George Wysong argued that Miami commissioners were on solid legal ground to move the election date themselves. He cited not only a relevant state law but also a judge's decision in a similar dispute saying such a date change was allowable. In his opinion, Wysong relied in part on a recent case against the city of North Miami. Here's the background: In 2023, council members in North Miami voted to move the date of the local election from odd- to even-numbered years with the goal of attracting more voters to the polls when county, state and federal candidates would also be on the ballot. Council members approved a couple of ordinances to change both the city charter and code to move the local election date to November 2024 — triggering a lawsuit by a handful of North Miami residents. They argued that the date change could not be made without a referendum vote on the city charter because it extended the term limits of sitting council members and the mayor. Their legal challenge failed when a Miami-Dade Circuit Court judge sided with the North Miami Council members, saying their vote on moving the election date was allowed under Florida law. 'The statutory language is clear and unambiguous: the governing statutes authorize a municipality to change its election date, and extend the terms of its sitting council members as a consequence of the election date change, by ordinance and without approval by popular referendum,' Circuit Judge Reemberto Diaz ruled in May 2023. In his ruling, Diaz also cited Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi's legal opinion in 2013 involving a smaller Florida city, Arcadia. 'The Attorney General concluded that the City of Arcadia could amend its charter by ordinance to change the date of its election to coincide with federal, state, and county elections, and to extend the terms of its sitting officers resulting from the date change, without voter approval by referendum,' Diaz wrote. Diaz's decision, the first of its kind in the state of Florida, was affirmed by a three-judge panel of the Third District Court of Appeal in Miami-Dade County. The ruling, however, was not reviewed by the full appellate court or the Florida Supreme Court. Attorney Edward Guedes, who represented the city of North Miami in the case, said that because the appeals court simply upheld the trial court's ruling without elaborating in a written opinion of their own written, 'Technically that kind of decision is not binding precedent.' Nevertheless, Guedes said Florida law allows municipalities to change the election date via ordinance and without voter input. 'It is very, very clear that the Florida Legislature authorized this kind of election date-changing by cities, and to do so by ordinance notwithstanding a charter,' Guedes told the Miami Herald on Friday said. He emphasized that making the change, however, is 'a one-time shot.' 'This isn't just a mechanism for cities to abuse the process and sitting elected officials to continuously extend their terms in office, because it's a one-shot alignment,' Guedes said. 'Once you align, that's it. You're done.' Miami attorney Juan-Carlos Planas, who filed the lawsuit challenging the city of North Miami, said Diaz's ruling was wrong. Planas said the key state law cited by the North Miami Council members when they changed the local election date only applied to non-chartered towns and cities in Florida. Planas said a chartered city like North Miami required a referendum vote for a couple of fundamental reasons. Council members voted to change the city charter by switching the municipal election from odd- to even-numbered years without first holding a referendum vote on the charter itself. And, in doing so, they also extended the members' term limits, again without the referendum vote. Planas, who ran unsuccessfully as a Democrat for Miami-Dade supervisor of elections last year, said the city commissioners in Miami are making the same mistake. 'I do think the city of Miami has to change their charter first before the commissioners vote on changing the election date,' Planas told the Herald on Friday. 'But they have a problem: they can't change the city charter without a referendum vote of the people.' Guedes said changing the election date via ordinance only and without a change to the charter is legally sound, essentially making it so the provision of the charter specifying elections take place in odd years is 'no longer viable.' However, he noted that that approach 'could get complicated.' 'Not because I think the legal outcome will change,' Guedes said. 'It's just that it may create confusion.' Planas also said the Miami commissioners are compounding their mistake by changing the municipal election date by ordinance only, without addressing that it conflicts with the city charter. 'Why aren't they doing that?' he asked.
