Finland accuses senior crew of Russia-linked vessel in damage of undersea power cable in Baltic Sea
Finnish authorities have accused senior officers of a Russia-linked vessel that damaged undersea cables last year between Finland and Estonia of criminal offenses related to the wreckage.
They say the oil tanker, the Eagle S, dragged its anchor to damage the Estlink-2 power cable and communication links between Finland and Estonia on Dec. 25. The Kremlin previously denied involvement in damaging the infrastructure, which provides power and communication for thousands of Europeans.
The Eagle S is flagged in the Cook Islands, but has been described by Finnish customs officials and the European Union's executive commission as part of Russia's shadow fleet of fuel tankers. Those are aging vessels with obscure ownership, acquired to evade Western sanctions amid the war in Ukraine and operating without Western-regulated insurance.
Russia's use of the vessels has raised environmental concerns about accidents given their age and uncertain insurance coverage.
For the West, the incidents are a test of resolve in the face of what are believed to be widespread sabotage attacks in Europe allegedly linked to Moscow following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
The Eagle S was carrying 35,000 tons of oil and investigators allege it left a drag trail with its anchor for almost 100 kilometers (62 miles) on the sea bed before it was stopped and escorted to the vicinity of a Finnish port.
The senior officers, whose names were not made public, were the master, the chief mate and the second mate, Finnish police said in a statement Friday. The trio was responsible for the safe passage, navigation and operation of the tanker and are suspected of aggravated criminal mischief and aggravated interference with telecommunications.
'The criminal investigation has examined and assessed, among other things, the extent of their responsibility for the condition of the vessel and the degree to which they should have observed the anchor falling into the sea,' said Detective Chief Inspector Sami Liimatainen, who is leading the case for the National Bureau of Investigation.
The investigators' findings have been referred to Finnish prosecutors for possible charges.
The damage to the Estlink 2, which can provide about half of the electricity needs for Estonia in winter, did not disrupt service, although it did drive up energy prices in the Baltic nations.
The cable is about 90 miles (145 kilometers) long and is located at a depth of 90 meters (295 feet) at its deepest point, across one of the busiest shipping lanes in Europe.
The undersea cables and pipelines that crisscross the sea link Nordic, Baltic and central European countries, promote trade, energy security and, in some cases, reduce dependence on Russian energy resources.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Live
40 minutes ago
- North Wales Live
The £50m Brexit Border Post on Anglesey that could end up being a massive white elephant
A facility built to deal with extra red tape caused by Brexit could end up being redundant before it even opens. Leaving the EU in 2020 added bureaucracy on the border between the UK and the European Union. This included sanitary and phytosanitary checks on fresh produce from the EU. The last UK Government delayed implementing the checks over concerns that it would lead to price rises for businesses and consumers. But they did not scrap the checks and work continued on developing the border facilities to carry out the work. In North Wales, the UK Government allocated £47.8m to build the border control post at Holyhead. This would be operated by Welsh Government, as they are responsible for biosecurity, food safety and sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) controls in Wales. Kier Group were handed a £41m build contract last summer and work got underway on the development at Parc Cybi, just outside Holyhead. Work is due to be completed by the autumn. But the site could now turn into an expensive white elephant before it even becomes operational. In May, the UK and EU reached a new SPS agreement as part of efforts to reset their post-Brexit relationship. This agreement aims to reduce trade barriers for food, plants, and animal products by streamlining processes and reducing checks, making trade between the UK and EU cheaper and easier. It should be good news for businesses and shoppers and Holyhead port overall. But it could mean the new facility will not be required as most of the planned checks will not be required. The Welsh Government said: 'We are considering the implications of a potential SPS agreement with the EU on the future implementation of the Border Target Operating Model in Wales. The Deputy First Minister will make a statement to the Senedd in the coming weeks." Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap Iorwerth, MS for Ynys Mon, said 'The chaotic situation regarding the need – or not – for border control posts is symptomatic of the chaos and costs surrounding Brexit as a whole. "Large sums of public money have been spent, Anglesey Council has faced significant pressures, and we even lost the very important truck stop that went to make way for post-Brexit border infrastructure.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Equity investors seeking clarity should be careful what they wish for
LONDON, June 23 (Reuters) - Financial markets famously hate uncertainty, but getting answers to many of the open questions currently hanging over markets may end up offering investors little comfort. Several recent global developments, including President Donald Trump's April 2 tariff announcement and subsequent 90-day pause as well as the breakout of the Israel-Iran war, have sparked some of the highest levels of uncertainty in decades. If recent U.S. stock market performance is anything to go by, investors seem convinced that everything will work out just fine. Investors will likely get more clarity on several of these issues in the coming weeks, but they may find that this optimism is unwarranted. On July 9, the 90-day pause on Trump's Liberation Day 'reciprocal tariffs' will end, and unless the delay is extended or multiple trade deals are struck, U.S. import tariffs will essentially double from the 10% level today. So far, only the UK has managed to agree on a trade deal, and, even here, there is little clarity about the future of tariffs on UK steel exports. Negotiations with the European Union and Japan have stalled, and the EU has prepared a range of potential retaliatory measures. At the same time, the U.S. Commerce Department is preparing to present its findings on investigations into semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, copper, aircraft, jet engines and a host of other goods, opens new tab. It is widely expected that once these findings are presented, the U.S. government will act quickly to impose additional tariffs or import restrictions. Meanwhile, the Senate is expected to vote on the Trump administration's budget bill in July. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated, opens new tab that in its current form, this bill will add $3.3 trillion in extra debt over the coming decade. Investor confidence in the dollar and the safety of U.S. Treasuries has been shaken recently, partly due to the country's deteriorating fiscal outlook, so this deficit-expanding budget will only add fuel to the fire. And now, the war between Israel and Iran has been thrown into the mix, with the U.S. attacking Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday. Oil prices have increased by roughly 10% since the war broke out, though the price as of June 20 was still in line with the 2024 average. After the U.S. attacks, we could see Iranian retaliation against oil fields in the Middle East or the all-important Strait of Hormuz, which could drive oil prices much higher. With all these moving parts, it is easy to lose sight of what matters right now and what doesn't. While many actions, such as the extension of the 2017 tax cuts in the budget bill, will take years to unfold, the rise in tariff levels could have an immediate impact. The tariffs currently in place (e.g., base tariffs and tariffs on steel, aluminium and autos) could add 0.9 percentage points to U.S. inflation over the next 12 months, as importers are forced to pass tariff costs on to consumers. If there are no additional trade deals struck and tariffs revert to the higher levels announced on Liberation Day, another 0.7 percentage points could be added. And that doesn't even include potential tariffs on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and other goods. The inflation impact from the budget bill will likely be much smaller at roughly 0.1 percentage points over the next 12 months, and an oil price spike to $80 per barrel is apt to have roughly the same impact. Only if oil prices spike to about $100 and remain in that region for the next six months would we have to be seriously worried about an inflation shock from the war in the Middle East. Of course, if all these developments, including a 20% oil price spike, come to pass, U.S. inflation could rise from current levels by up to two percentage points in the next twelve months, dwarfing the likely impact on the UK and euro zone. Despite these concerning figures, U.S. equity investors seem nonplussed. U.S. stock markets, perhaps banking on another TACO moment, have rallied 15% above the level justified by macroeconomic fundamentals, based on my estimates. Over the last 10 years, a deviation of this size was followed by an average decline of 7% in the S&P 500 in the subsequent three months. The gap between performance and fundamentals is smaller in the euro zone and UK, suggesting any mean reversion would be less extreme there. Now, it's possible that everything – from the trade war to the real war – will end well. And stock markets have an uncanny ability to ignore adversity for a long time. However, if much of this uncertainty is resolved negatively, resulting in either higher U.S. inflation or lower growth, U.S. equities' surprising resilience is likely to be challenged. (The views expressed here are those of Joachim Klement, an investment strategist at Panmure Liberum, the UK's largest independent investment bank). Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, opens new tab, your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab, opens new tab and X., opens new tab
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Israel's appetite for war in Gaza threatens its relationship with the European Union
In Israel, it can seem like only one other place really matters. Washington DC is on the other side of the world but provides Israel with weapons, the backing of the most powerful military in the world, and a critical diplomatic shield in forums like the United Nations. Yet the country's economy is bound far more closely to Europe than to the United States. A third of its trade is with the European Union, key academic work is supported by grants from the EU's multi-billion dollar Horizon research fund, and it is the top destination for Israelis who want to travel. 'Geography doesn't change, and not having any partners apart from UAE in the region means Europe will always be the gateway. The US will always be 8,000km away,' said one western diplomat. These ties have never translated into much political clout for Europe though, in part because the continent has long been hobbled by divisions over policy on Israel. Critics of Israel's illegal settlements and more recently its war in Gaza have repeatedly been outweighed and outvoted by a combination of older member states like Germany and Austria who are bound to Israel by history, and newer member nations, particularly Hungary, drawn by a shared ethno-nationalist vision. 'To have leverage implies that you are willing and able to use it,' said Josep Borrell, former EU policy chief. 'If you can live in an illegal settlement and still travel freely to Europe, and export [products] to Europe, how do we expect them to take our condemnations seriously?' When three of Israel's staunchest historic allies – France, the UK and Canada – last month threatened to take action over Israel's war in Gaza, prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused their leaders of siding with Hamas and fuelling antisemitism. He sounded like a man who considered his country invulnerable, the target of his attacks, toothless and irrelevant, or perhaps both. For many years, that might have been a reasonable judgment, based on a sense that Israel could take European support for granted. The relationship has been so close that two decades ago Javier Solana who was the EU's foreign policy chief, described Israel as an unofficial member, more integrated than then-candidate nation Croatia. 'Politically, we feel like an afterthought for Israel's leaders,' said one European diplomat, of attempts to influence policy. In recent months however the scale of death and destruction in Gaza, and the violence of messianic settlers in the West Bank, has shifted public opinion and political calculations across the bloc. Among steps taken so far, the UK has sanctioned two cabinet ministers, France has toyed with unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state, and the European Union backed sanctions on extremist settlers. Now, more consequentially, the EU is weighing up whether to try using the full weight of its economic leverage to shift Israeli policy. Last month the Netherlands, traditionally one of Israel's staunchest European allies, requested an urgent review of whether Israel had breached human rights obligations that underpin its free trade deal with the bloc. Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, the framework that allows free trade, free travel and academic collaboration, lays out respect for human rights and democratic principles as an 'essential element' of the relationship. Their request won backing from 17 EU member states, an unexpectedly large group. Some of that support came at the last minute, said one diplomat involved in discussions, amid a growing sense that unless Europe imposes a cost for ignoring its concerns Israel will continue to take the allies on its doorstep for granted. The EU's foreign policy service found 'indications' of rights violations, according to a report copy seen by the Guardian. Support for concrete action will be tested on Monday when the EU's top diplomat Kaja Kallas presents it to foreign ministers. Although it does not call for immediate sanctions and is not the first time EU diplomats have reached this conclusion – there were similar findings made twice last year – it comes at a time of unprecedented domestic pressure in Europe. 'The situation (In Gaza) keeps getting worse, and the vast majority of Europeans want to see more than just words. Even in Germany three out of four people, across the political spectrum, are in favour of suspending arms sales. So the governments talk the talk, but are they ready to walk the walk?' said Borrell, the former top diplomat. 'Being a community of values … is the EU's greatest lever, but we are losing it with our inconsistency.' The association agreement overall cannot be suspended without a unanimous vote, which is not feasible at present. But individual components can be paused with the backing of voters representing a 'qualified' majority of member states and population inside the European Union. Any form of sanctions would also need the backing of commission president Ursula von der Leyen. The Council can only vote on proposals that come from the Commission, and she sets the agenda for their meeting. She has criticised the war, describing the targeting of civilians as 'abhorrent', and saying the 'disproportionate use of force' cannot be justified, but has not embraced moves to sanction Israel. Several European governments are calling for steps that range from cutting off Israel's tariff-free access to markets and ending Israeli universities' access to research funds to halting Israeli tourists' visa-free travel to holiday destinations. The trade relationship is unbalanced, which gives Europe room to inflict more pain than it would suffer through cutting off access to its markets. Israel's advanced weapons and cyber intelligence products may be sought after, but in overall trade for the EU it ranks behind other Mediterranean nations including Morocco and Algeria, in 31st place. Diplomats hope some other potential measures might generate indirect pressure on the government inside Israel, through their impact on voters. A halt to visa-free travel to Europe, would be deeply unpopular and felt immediately. 'Maybe there is a bit of hope that in combination with this initiative, it also seems like things are changing in Israeli society,' said one European official, citing growing demonstrations inside Israel against Palestinian civilian casualties. 'People don't want their country to be a pariah state.'
