"Captain's Job Is To...": R Ashwin Schools Rishabh Pant Over Jitesh Sharma-Digvesh Rathi Incident
The Jitesh Sharma -Digvesh Rathi incident during the Royal Challengers Bengaluru vs Lucknow Super Giants game on Tuesday once again gave rise to debates regaring a controversial mode of dismissal in cricket. LSG spinner Digvesh tried to run out RCB's Jitesh at the non-striker's end on the final ball of the 17th over of the innings. While TV umpire concluded it as not out based on the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) laws, the camera showed that LSG captain Rishabh Pant too intervened there and decided to withdraw the appeal. Speaking about the incident, former India all-rounder Ravichandran Ashwin has backed the young player.
"As an owner of LSG, I will be thinking that I need Jitesh Sharma's wicket. If he has stepped outside the crease, he is out. Now let me dive into the technicality of the incident. Is he justified in being out if he stepped outside the crease before Digvesh Rathi got into the delivery stride? Yes. Would it be bad for RCB? Yes, again, because they would not have liked Rathi or Pant if they did that. Now let's dive into the real-case scenario. When Rathi landed his front foot, Jitesh was inside the crease. So, this was not out. After breaking the stumps, umpire Michael Gough asked him whether he was appealing, and not whether he was sure. He said, 'Yes, I'm appealing.' So the decision went to the third umpire, and the right decision was made," said Ashwin on his YouTube channel ' Ash ki Baat '.
Ashwin felt that Pant should not have asked for the withdrawl of the appeal as it was within the rules of cricket.
"Until now, everything was right. But after that, commentators started saying that 'Pant has withdrawn the appeal - what an amazing act of sportsmanship.' Grow out of this," he said.
"I am a big fan of Pant. I'm clarifying it yet again before being targeted by people. But think, you are the father of Rathi, and his captain, in front of crores of people, criticised him. He actually went over the board because a captain's job is to back a bowler and not make him feel small.
"Stop this vilification of the youngster in front of crores of people. Do we do that to anybody else? Why does a bowler have to look small? It's actually a humiliation. And what will happen is that he will never do this again."
Notably, Ashwin had himself been a victim of the criticism for effecting such a dismissal back in IPL 2019. Playing for Kings XI Punjab, Ashwin had run out then Rajasthan Royals batter Jos Buttler at the non-striker's end during his bowling.
Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Rishabh Pant To Get Banned? ICC Investigates Heated Ball Change Outburst During IND vs ENG Headingley Test
Tensions boiled over on Day 3 of the 1st Test between England and India at Headingley as India's vice-captain Rishabh Pant found himself in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons. Following a denied ball-change request, Pant's animated reaction sparked a wave of controversy that could lead to disciplinary action from the International Cricket Council (ICC). Meet our new vice captain — LSG×Shreyansh (@LSGfam_) June 22, 2025 The flashpoint occurred late in the 61st over of England's innings, just after Harry Brook executed a cheeky ramp shot over the slips for four off Mohammed Siraj. Immediately after the boundary, Pant approached on-field umpire Paul Reiffel, urging a ball change due to what he believed was an altered shape. Reiffel, using the standard ball gauge, deemed the ball fit for play and denied the request. The decision did not sit well with Pant, who tried to plead his case further. Upon Reiffel's refusal, Pant flung the ball back-handed into the turf and stomped away visibly annoyed—eliciting boos from the Headingley crowd. What Does the ICC Code of Conduct Say? Pant's actions could potentially violate two separate articles under the ICC Code of Conduct: Article 2.8: Pertains to 'showing dissent at an umpire's decision.' Clause (a): For obvious and excessive disappointment. Clause (h): For prolonged or aggressive discussion with the umpire. Article 2.9: Prohibits 'throwing a ball at or near an umpire in an inappropriate and/or dangerous manner.' Both articles carry Level 1 or Level 2 sanctions, which could include fines, demerit points, or in extreme cases, a brief suspension. Though Pant did not appear to aim the ball directly at the umpire, the ICC could interpret the back-handed throw and storm-off as an inappropriate display of dissent. Reactions from the Commentary Box The incident didn't go unnoticed in the commentary box. 'When you start wanting to change the ball every now and then, it's a clear indication that nothing's happening. We want something to happen. And that was frustration from Pant,' said former India coach Ravi Shastri, adding context to Pant's visible irritation. Meanwhile, former England batter Mark Butcher weighed in with a more critical tone: 'He's a showman, and maybe this was partly to fire up the crowd. But I don't think Paul Reiffel appreciated it. There was no need for that reaction.' Impact on the Match and Momentum Shift Interestingly, the drama surrounding the ball incident seemed to inject energy into the Indian side. Just an over later, Siraj struck a crucial blow by removing England skipper Ben Stokes, reducing the hosts to 276/5 in reply to India's massive first-innings total of 471. The umpires, perhaps re-evaluating the condition of the ball, conducted multiple ball inspections soon after the confrontation. Shubman Gill and Jasprit Bumrah were seen joining the discussion with match officials, underlining the lingering tension. What Happens Next? Will Pant Be Punished? While the ICC has not yet issued an official statement, any decision will likely be made post-match. Given the nature of Pant's reaction—passionate but not overtly hostile—it's plausible that a Level 1 sanction (a reprimand and/or fine) could be handed out rather than a harsher penalty. Historically, similar reactions have been handled with minor disciplinary measures, especially when intent to harm or directly insult an official is absent. However, the ICC may still act to reinforce standards of player conduct, particularly for team leaders like Pant.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
YouTube's NFL coverage winning over Gen Z viewers, claims CEO Neal Mohan
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel YouTube's NFL coverage is proving to be a hit with Gen Z viewers, according to CEO Neal Mohan . Speaking about the platform's growing role in sports streaming, Mohan said broadcasting NFL games on YouTube is helping the league connect with a younger, digital-first highlights, livestreams, and exclusive content tailored for mobile consumption, the NFL's presence on YouTube has become a key part of its outreach noted that Gen Z fans are engaging with the sport in new ways - through shorts, creator reactions, and interactive content - making YouTube an essential bridge between the league and its next generation of a recent conversation with Ankler Media founder Janice Min, Mohan said that the NFL's presence on YouTube enables games to exist alongside a wide array of creator-driven sports content - the very type of material that younger audiences actively seek out on the platform."We actually aged down the NFL's audience on our platform," claimed YouTube secured the rights to NFL Sunday Ticket , it didn't just make the service more accessible to those previously limited by DirecTV - it also created a gateway to a younger Sunday Ticket remains a premium subscription mainly appealing to die-hard fans, YouTube's broader platform reach offers the NFL a chance to engage new CEO further highlighted that the upcoming Week One matchup between the Chiefs and Chargers in Sao Paulo, Brazil, set to stream for free globally on September 5, marks a major milestone. By removing paywalls and broadcasting to a worldwide audience, the NFL hopes to draw in a fresh, younger fan base.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
IND vs ENG: Could Rishabh Pant face ICC ban after heated clash over ball change?
Rishabh Pant throws ball in frustration after umpire denies change During a tense moment in England's innings at Headingley, India's vice-captain Rishabh Pant faces potential ICC sanctions after displaying frustration over an umpire's decision regarding a ball change request. The incident unfolded after the penultimate delivery of the 61st over when Mohammed Siraj was hit for four by Harry Brook 's ramp shot over the slips, leading to Pant's animated protest and subsequent actions that could breach multiple ICC Code of Conduct articles. The situation escalated when Pant, dissatisfied with the ball's condition, approached umpire Paul Reiffel for inspection. Despite Reiffel's examination with a ball gauge indicating no issues, Pant persisted in his appeal for a ball change. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Upon the umpire's rejection of his request, Pant reacted by throwing the ball back-handed onto the ground before leaving the scene, prompting boos from the Headingley crowd. Former India coach Ravi Shastri, commenting on the incident, stated: "When you start wanting to change the ball every now and then, it's a clear indication that nothing's happening. We want something to happen. And that was frustration from Pant." IND vs ENG: Rishabh Pant opens up on chemistry with Shubman Gill and England challenge Mark Butcher , co-commentator, responded: "I'm not sure there was any need for that. (We) know that he's a showman and part of that is probably in order to get a reaction from the crowd, but I'm not sure Paul Reiffel appreciated it very much." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Pant's actions could potentially violate two specific articles of the ICC Code of Conduct. Article 2.8 addresses dissent at an umpire's decision, which could be classified as either a Level 1 or Level 2 offense, particularly under clause (a) for showing excessive disappointment and clause (h) for engaging in prolonged discussion about the decision. The second possible violation falls under Article 2.9, which specifically prohibits "throwing a ball at or near an umpire in an inappropriate manner." This offense also carries potential Level 1 and Level 2 sanctions. Quiz: Who's that IPL player? The controversy continued to impact the game as the umpires conducted multiple ball checks in the following over. Team members Shubman Gill and Jasprit Bumrah were observed discussing the issue with officials. The match situation at the time showed England at 276-5 in response to India's first-innings total of 471, with Mohammed Siraj managing to dismiss Ben Stokes shortly after the incident. The incident highlights the growing tensions in the match and raises questions about player conduct and its consequences under ICC regulations. The governing body's response to Pant's actions remains to be seen as the match continues to unfold at Headingley. Follow all the live updates, scores, and highlights from the India vs England Test match here . Game On Season 1 kicks off with Sakshi Malik's inspiring story. Watch Episode 1 here
