Trade unions and Scottish Water at standstill in dispute
Representatives from GMB and Unite the Union have expressed frustration as the company's chief executive has not attended pay meetings, and the pay offers proposed to workers 'have effectively meant a wage cut'.
Sam Ritchie, regional officer for Unite the Union, said there was an 'excellent' strike turnout last week.
'There was good weather and good spirits. I think there's also a lot of anger towards Scottish Water and the way that they've treated their workers,' he said.
READ MORE: Pro-Palestine activists target Glasgow office over weapons companies ties
The pay dispute began in July 2024, with surveyed trade union members asking for a flat pay rise of £3000 before strike action took place.
Following negotiations, Unite members were balloted in October of last year and rejected a pay increase of £1200 from Scottish Water.
A pay rise of £1400 was rejected by members in December, which Scottish Water said was its final offer. Since then, it has 'refused to budge'.
ACAS, a human resources consultancy that Scottish Water used to aid negotiations, reportedly asked Scottish Water to return to the negotiation table with a new offer for employees.
Claire Greer, GMB Scotland organiser, said: 'The last ACAS meeting instructed them [Scottish Water] to give one simple pay offer, and one red line for trade unions was that the offer would be no less than it was before.
'This was agreed in good faith, but Scottish Water, combined with ACAS instructions, gave the exact same offer bar £125 in the first year. We're tied in knots, it's a long, drawn-out, complicated offer that they keep putting on the table.'
Greer added that Scottish Water is refusing to negotiate on the first year of the pay deal after unions rejected Scottish Water's pay offer for 2024-2025, now only focusing on pay for 2025-2026.
'This went from being a very simple dispute, to a dispute that is centred around Scottish Water wanting to explain, re-explain, and re-explain again how to do negotiations, and that's not what we want,' she added.
'Scottish Water is very good at holding meetings and talking at its staff, not letting them ask any questions, and saying that it has consulted with staff. That's not how you consult with staff, and that's not how you negotiate'.
The frustration is shared by Ritchie, who says that management is 'out of touch with reality', and that Scottish Water's chief executive has not been present at pay deal meetings with unions.
'Alex Plant received, with his salary and his remuneration package combined, just below half a million pounds,' he said.
'For someone who receives such a large package, I would at least expect that he'd get around the table and listen to the voices of his workers, rather than just those voices that are a part of the board.'
READ MORE: Thousands of people turn out to pro-independence march in Wales
Within his first 10 months in his role as chief executive, Plant received £483,000 from his salary, performance bonuses and benefits, and pension combined.
Ritchie added that 'the arrogance of management is also shocking', and that Plant 'should be treating his workers with dignity and respect'.
'Managers at Scottish Water negotiate their own contracts privately, as they're above pay grade eight. Managers are offered bonuses to retain talent, but what about the workers on the front line?'
The change in Scottish Water's pay anniversary has also proved to be an issue, with the change itself being approved by trade unions, but the way it has changed the pay offer was not.
The 3.4% raise that Scottish Water claimed would be provided came in the form of £1400 for July 2024 to March 2025, but since the change in anniversary date, this has changed to the raise being spread over 12 months, which unions say makes the raise only 2.8%, or £1050 for Scottish Water employees on pay grades 1-6.
On the change the proposed offer would make to workers, trade unions agree that this would not be substantial, with Greer saying: 'Look at the rising cost of household bills, mortgages, rent, that £1400 is not meeting any of that.'
Ritchie added: 'The numbers don't add up, it feels like they're trying to pull the wool over the unions' eyes.'
Scottish Water's chief operating officer, Peter Farrer, said: 'No one benefits from industrial action and our focus is on continuing to deliver for our millions of customers across Scotland.
'Our above-inflation pay proposal is fair and progressive, prioritising the highest percentage increases in the business for those on the lowest salary grades – money that should be in employees' pockets now.
'We met with ACAS and the trade unions on April 15 to explore options to resolve the current dispute. Following that, we made a different, further improved proposal in an effort to reach an agreement.
'This is a good proposal and we are disappointed that union officials have not shared it with their members and given them the opportunity to vote on the offer in a ballot.
'We urge the unions to get back round the negotiating table as soon as possible.'
READ MORE: Case of tuberculosis confirmed at Scottish school
On the 'progressive' offer, Greer said: 'We completely disagree, and that's our members, the joint trade unions, GMB, everyone that's providing support is in complete disagreement with this.
'There are other public bodies across the pay sector that have gone on strike for higher pay offers than this, we've yet to find a pay offer lower than this.'
Ritchie backed this claim: 'The NHS were offered 5.5%, the Irish equivalent to Scottish Water were offered 5.5% or £1500 to all staff, we're seeing failing water companies down south get offered 4%.'
On returning to the table, Greer said: 'The trade unions haven't left the table, we've been open to any offer or suggestion, we've not backed ourselves into a corner here, we're not being precious about what we're willing to do. But we won't come back for the same offer, that's just a waste of everyone's time.
'There's no time for trickery and sleight of hand when it comes to pay talks. Everyone's there for the same reason, everyone wants these people back at work, so let's do it properly.'
Industrial action is set to continue, with the next strikes taking place on May 2 and 6 across Scotland.
Greer confirmed that 'workers right across the whole spectrum of jobs at Scottish Water, from the daily admin and office type roles right out to the more industrial roles' will be on strike.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
Pope Leo urges international diplomacy to prevent 'irreparable abyss'
VATICAN CITY, June 22 (Reuters) - Pope Leo on Sunday said the international community must strive to avoid war that risks opening an "irreparable abyss", and that diplomacy should take the place of conflict. U.S. forces struck Iran's three main nuclear sites overnight, joining an Israeli assault in a major new escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. "Every member of the international community has a moral responsibility: to stop the tragedy of war before it becomes an irreparable abyss," Pope Leo said during his weekly prayer with pilgrims. "No armed victory can compensate for the pain of mothers, the fear of children, the stolen future. Let diplomacy silence the weapons, let nations chart their future with peace efforts, not with violence and bloody conflicts," he added. "In this dramatic scenario, which includes Israel and Palestine, the daily suffering of the population, especially in Gaza and other territories, risks being forgotten, where the need for adequate humanitarian support is becoming increasingly urgent," Pope Leo said.
The Herald Scotland
11 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Mahmoud Khalil speaks out after being released from ICE custody
"Your words of support, your messages, have kept me going," Khalil said in brief remarks. "Still, the fight is far from over." He planned to continue speaking out against what he called a genocide in Gaza, and American support, including from Columbia, for Israel's siege of the Palestinian territory after the 2023 Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel. Israel has denied this accusation, though some human rights observers have reached this conclusion. At the airport, Khalil approached the crowd to take a Palestinian flag from a friend, then draped it over the stroller of his son Deen, who was born 2 months ago, while Khalil was detained in Jena, Louisiana. Asked if he had a message for the Trump administration, Khalil said, "My existence is the message. Palestinian existence is a message." A day earlier, a federal district judge in New Jersey ordered Khalil's release after over three months in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody following his advocacy at the Ivy League campus. The order marked a blow to the Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian student protests. Ocasio-Cortez said Khalil's detention by the Trump administration was solely political. "It is an affront to every American," she said. "We will continue to resist the politicization and the continued political persecution that ICE is engaged in. We welcome Mahmoud home." Why was Khalil in ICE detention? Khalil, a lawful permanent resident born in a Syrian refugee camp, was a student negotiator and spokesperson for pro-Palestinian demonstrators in spring 2024. Students called on Columbia to divest from its investments in Israel that helped propel war efforts. Israel's siege of Gaza has killed 55,700 Palestinian people, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's health ministry. The mounting death toll came after Hamas-led attacks in Israel that killed 1,200 people and took 251 others hostage, Israeli tallies show. Critics, including university administrators, accused the protesters of creating an unwelcoming environment for Jewish students. Organizers have denied accusations of antisemitism, and Khalil spoke out against antisemitism on CNN. Columbia's encampment demonstrations triggered similar protests on college campuses across the country. On March 8, federal agents detained Khalil, without a warrant, at his university-owned apartment building lobby in Manhattan. His wife Noor Abdalla, who is born in the United States and was 8 months' pregnant then, was by his side as they returned from dinner with friends. In recorded cell phone video, Abdalla repeatedly asked agents why he was being taken and what agency they represented. They gave her no responses before taking Khalil, who appeared calm in footage. His detention triggered waves of protests in New York City calling for his release. Eventually, Khalil arrived to a Louisiana ICE detention center, where he'd stay for over 3 months. During that time, his son was born and other international students were detained in the Trump administration's sweeping crackdown on immigration. Khalil's case was the first of several high-profile incidents in which pro-Palestinian student activists were detained by immigration authorities and targeted for deportation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio alleged Khalil participated in "antisemitic protests and disruptive activities" that "undermine U.S. efforts to combat anti-Semitism." Rubio cited an obscure provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 to revoke Khalil's green card on the basis that he threatened American foreign policy interests. What did the judge rule in Khalil's case? Federal district Judge Michael Farbiarz of New Jersey ruled June 11 that Rubio had no authority to detain or deport Khalil on foreign policy grounds. Farbiarz said the government's other argument, that Khalil "fraudulently or willfully" misrepresented material facts on his application for permanent residency, could still be used to detain him. On June 20, Farbiarz called Khalil's months-long detention in a Louisiana detention center potentially punitive. "Extraordinary circumstances" warranted Khalil's release, Farbiarz said. Among those were findings that Khalil - who has no criminal record nor has been charged with any crimes - didn't pose a flight risk or a danger to others in the community. Farbiarz, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, also raised concerns about the chilling effect his detention had on free speech, and the ability of an immigration judge to take on such issues. Justice Department lawyers didn't object to evidence presented. They also didn't present proof alleging Khalil committed violence, property destruction or incitement to violence, Farbiarz added. After the ruling, the Trump administration disputed Farbiarz's order, arguing he had no authority in immigration removal proceedings. Meanwhile, administration officials said Khalil was twice removable on foreign policy grounds - namely over accusations of antisemitism and support for the Hamas militant group, and that he misrepresented information to obtain legal status. While Farbiarz has ruled out the foreign policy argument, the court is considering information he submitted to immigration officials. Khalil's lawyers have called the administration's allegations "meritless." Khalil has a pending lawsuit in New Jersey federal court against the Trump administration. Khalil's lawyers say the Trump administration violated his constitutional rights around free speech and due process. A day after his arrival to Newark, demonstrators planned to rally in New York City in support of Khalil. Columbia didn't respond to an email request for comment. Smiling alongside his wife and son, who he'd only seen once during his detention, he looked at the crowd and vowed to continue demonstrating. "This is why I will continue to protest with every one of you," Khalil said. "Not (even) if they threaten me with detention, even if they would kill me, I would still speak up for Palestine." Contributing: Michael Karas, The Bergen Record; Michael Loria, USA TODAY.
Daily Record
14 hours ago
- Daily Record
Humza Yousaf says Westminster must review its 'moral compass' over Palestine Action ban
Humza Yousaf said Westminster's decision to ban Palestine Action, effectively branding them a terrorist organisation, was unacceptable. The UK government's move to ban a protest group which broke into an RAF base has been described as a 'shameful abuse' of terrorism law. Humza Yousaf said Westminster's decision to ban Palestine Action, effectively branding them a terrorist organisation, was unacceptable. The group broke in to RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and sprayed two military planes with red paint. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is preparing a statement for tomorrow which would make it illegal to be a member of the group if it passes in Parliament. Yousaf said the move had 'deeply angered' him. He said: 'We have a UK government that believes protestors who are demonstrating against genocide are terrorists and should be put on a terror proscribed list, but yet Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the international criminal court, is not only not proscribed on that list but is actively sold weapons by our government. 'As a former justcie secretary and someone who believes in civil tells me that the UK Government needs to seriously recalibrate its moral compass, but I also question whether its got a conscience whatsoever.' Fellow former justice secretary and now Alba party leader Kenny MacAskill said: 'Proscribing daft lads and lassies for opposing genocide while refueling the machines causing it is perverse and disgusting.' Prime Minsiter Keir Starmer condemned Palestine Action 's activity on Friday as 'disgraceful'. The group was previously behind a stunt at Trump Turnberry where they sprayed pro-Palestinian slogans on the golf course and damaged the turf. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
