Trump's administration moves to ban artificial food dyes
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's administration on Tuesday announced plans to ban synthetic dyes from the US food supply -- a move welcomed by health experts and marking a rare point of bipartisan agreement in an otherwise sharply divided political climate.
Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr. has vowed to overhaul America's food system under the banner of his 'Make America Healthy Again' agenda, and the push would phase out the eight approved artificial food dyes by the end of 2026.
It builds upon a prohibition on Red Dye 3 by the government of former president Joe Biden but accelerates the timeline and also asks the National Institutes of Health to carry out comprehensive research on how additives impact children's development.
'For the last 50 years, American children have increasingly been living in a toxic soup of synthetic chemicals,' Food and Drug Administration commissioner Marty Makary said at a press conference, surrounded by young families and MAHA supporters.
He cited studies linking synthetic dyes to conditions including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), diabetes, cancer, genomic disruption, gastrointestinal issues and more
Kennedy, for his part, called the issue of dyes and additives more generally an 'existential' threat.
'When my uncle was president in the 1960s, we had the healthiest people in the world -- and one of the basic assumptions of our country was that because we were robust people... that was responsible for our country being the land of the brave and the home of the free,' he said.
The new plan is largely based on the food industry voluntarily complying, he added, but they have been receptive in talks.
Of the eight synthetic dyes derived from petroleum, Yellow 5, Yellow 6 and Red 40 constitute the lion's share of those in use, Peter Lurie, president and executive director of the nonprofit Center for Science in the Public Interest, told AFP.
They are found in a range of products, from beverages and candies to cereals, sauces and dairy products.
'None of them convey anything of any nutritional significance, and what they're really there for is to mislead -- to make food appear somehow redder, somehow bluer, somehow fruitier or more attractive than it is,' he said.
'And the purpose of all that is to drive up sales, it's not anything that benefits the American public.'
Bipartisan momentum
Momentum has been building at the state level. In March, Republican-leaning West Virginia enacted a broad ban on synthetic dyes, following California's 2024 decision to restrict them in public schools.
While Red Dye No. 3 was previously targeted for phaseout in foods and drugs by 2027 and 2028 respectively due to cancer concerns, the remaining dyes have been linked to behavioral issues such as attention deficit disorder in children.
In Europe, these dyes are not banned outright -- but the requirement to carry warning labels has led many companies to switch to natural alternatives.
Kennedy's stance on synthetic dyes aligns him, unusually, with mainstream scientific consensus -- a departure from his controversial history of promoting vaccine misinformation, downplaying the nation's worst measles outbreak in years, and suggesting bird flu should be allowed to spread naturally among poultry.
Industry opposition may still emerge. Food manufacturers have historically lobbied against tighter regulations, but Lurie believes resistance may be more muted this time.
'The question that industries are wrestling with now is whether or not to oppose this, and you know, the signs that I see are that they may just suck it up in the end,' said Lurie.
He cited 'tepid' statements made when Red 3 was banned and the limited response when Kennedy first warned he would be targeting dyes.
'I think they're ready to change,' said Kennedy. 'They want clear guidelines, they want to know what they can and can't do, and we're going to give them that.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Israel says it has delayed Tehran's nuclear programme by 2 years
Western powers have repeatedly expressed concerns about the rapid expansion of Iran's nuclear programme. (EPA Images pic) JERUSALEM : Israel claimed today it has already set back Iran's presumed nuclear programme by at least two years, a day after US President Donald Trump warned that Tehran has a 'maximum' of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes. Trump has been mulling whether to involve the US in Israel's bombing campaign, indicating in his latest comments that he could make a decision before the two-week deadline he set this week. Israel said today its air force had launched fresh air strikes against missile storage and launch sites in central Iran, as it kept up a wave of attacks it says are aimed at preventing its rival from developing nuclear weapons – an ambition Tehran has denied. 'According to the assessment we hear, we already delayed for at least two or three years the possibility for them to have a nuclear bomb,' Israel's foreign minister Gideon Saar said in an interview published today. Saar said Israel's week-long onslaught will continue. 'We will do everything that we can do there in order to remove this threat,' he told German newspaper Bild. Top diplomats from Britain, France and Germany met their Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi in Geneva yesterday and urged him to resume talks with the US that had been derailed by Israel's attacks. French foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot said, 'We invited the Iranian minister to consider negotiations with all sides, including the US, without awaiting the cessation of strikes, which we also hope for.' But Araghchi told NBC News after the meeting that 'we're not prepared to negotiate with them (the US) anymore, as long as the aggression continues'. Trump was dismissive of European diplomatic efforts, telling reporters, 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this.' Trump also said he's unlikely to ask Israel to stop its attacks to get Iran back to the table. 'If somebody's winning, it's a little bit harder to do,' he said. Any US involvement would likely feature powerful bunker-busting bombs that no other country possesses, aimed at destroying an underground uranium enrichment facility in Fordo. On the streets of Tehran, many shops were closed and normally bustling markets largely abandoned yesterday. A US-based NGO, the Human Rights Activists News Agency, said yesterday – based on its sources and media reports – that at least 657 people have been killed in Iran, including 263 civilians. Iran has not updated its toll since Sunday, when it said that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. Since Israel launched its offensive on June 13, targeting nuclear and military sites but also hitting residential areas, Iran has responded with barrages that Israeli authorities say have killed at least 25 people. A hospital in the Israeli port of Haifa reported 19 wounded, including one person in serious condition, after the latest Iranian salvo. Israel's national public diplomacy directorate said more than 450 missiles have been fired at the country so far, along with about 400 drones. Iran's Revolutionary Guards said they had targeted military sites and air force bases. 'Madness' Western powers have repeatedly expressed concerns about the rapid expansion of Iran's nuclear programme, questioning in particular the country's accelerated uranium enrichment. The International Atomic Energy Agency said that while Iran is the only country without nuclear weapons to enrich uranium to 60%, there was no evidence it had all the components to make a functioning nuclear warhead. The agency's chief, Rafael Grossi, told CNN it was 'pure speculation' to say how long it would take Iran to develop weapons. Britain's foreign secretary David Lammy said the conflict was at a 'perilous moment' and it was 'hugely important that we don't see regional escalation'. Arab League foreign ministers gathered in Istanbul late yesterday to discuss the war, Turkish state news agency Anadolu said, on the eve of a weekend gathering of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). Switzerland announced it was temporarily closing its embassy in Tehran, adding that it would continue to fulfil its role representing US interests in Iran.
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Anwar urges restraint after US attack on Iran's nuclear sites
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said the US's involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict is only worsening the situation. PETALING JAYA : Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has raised concerns over the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel after US forces struck three of the republic's nuclear sites. Anwar stressed that for genuine resolution, pressure must be placed on Israel to stop its provocative and violent actions against other nations. 'When they launch attacks and kill the people of Iran, there will inevitably be retaliation. Our position is one of fairness. 'In Gaza, the killings continue and it includes women and children. Now Israel is attacking Iran, which has decided to fight back. The involvement of outside powers, including the US, is only worsening the situation,' he told reporters after an event in Kuching today. Anwar, who also serves as finance minister, warned that a closure of the Strait of Hormuz would have dire consequences on the global economy. 'To me, what matters most are human lives and justice. 'The question is, if Iran is not allowed to respond, why allow Israel to (continue) acting in such a manner?' he said. Earlier today, AFP reported US president Donald Trump as saying that 'Tehran's nuclear programme had been obliterated' after US forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites – Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow – in a 'very successful attack'. After days of deliberation and long before his self-imposed two-week deadline, Trump's decision to join Israel's military campaign against Iran represents a major escalation of the conflict. In a speech that lasted just over three minutes, Trump said Iran's future held 'either peace or tragedy', and that there were many other targets that could be hit by the US military. Yemen's Houthis had said they will target US vessels and battleships in the Red Sea if the Trump administration gets involved and continued to support the Israeli attack on Iran, according to a statement published on a Houthi spokesman's official Telegram account. Shell Plc CEO Wael Sawan and Petronas group CEO Tengku Muhammad Taufik Aziz have in the past week warned of rude shocks to global trade and oil prices following the escalating conflict around the Strait of Hormuz, a major transit route. In a separate statement, opposition leader Hamzah Zainudin said Perikatan Nasional strongly condemned the acts of aggression carried out by both Israel and the US against Iran. The Malaysian government, he said, must take a firmer and more resolute stance by calling for an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council to halt the actions of Israel and the US. 'Malaysia must also urgently engage with like-minded nations in a concerted and principled effort to address this crisis in a just, fair, and rules-based manner.'
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites sparks worldwide condemnation
This handout satellite picture provided by Maxar Technologies and taken on June 22, 2025, shows Iran's Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP), northeast of the city of Qom, after US strikes on the site. President Donald Trump said US air strikes early on Sunday, June 22 "totally obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites, as Washington joined Israel's war with Tehran in a flashpoint moment for the Middle East. -- Photo by Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies / AFP KUALA LUMPUR, June 22 (Bernama) -- A wave of condemnation has followed the United States' recent airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, with global powers and regional states warning of a widening conflict and urging an immediate return to diplomacy. According to Anadolu Ajansi (AA), China strongly condemned the US for targeting Iranian nuclear sites safeguarded by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In an official statement, the Foreign Ministry said the strikes "seriously violate the purposes and principles of the UN Charter' and have intensified tensions in the Middle East. Beijing called for dialogue and restraint from all parties. Saudi Arabia voiced deep concern, describing the attack as a violation of Iran's sovereignty. In a statement, the Foreign Ministry urged all parties to pursue de-escalation and called on the international community to intensify efforts toward a political resolution. Oman said the strikes constituted a "serious violation of international law and the UN Charter.' The Foreign Ministry stressed Iran's right to develop peaceful nuclear energy under international supervision and warned that continued escalation could widen the conflict. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun said the attacks risk expanding tensions that threaten stability across the region. He called for restraint and serious negotiations, stressing Lebanon's unwillingness to bear the cost of further conflict. Iraq condemned the US strikes, calling them an act of escalation that "goes beyond the borders of any country.' Government spokesman Basim al-Awadi warned that military solutions would only lead to destruction and instability. Qatar expressed deep concern, warning that further escalation could lead to "catastrophic consequences' for the region. It called for an immediate halt to hostilities and urged renewed diplomatic engagement. Egypt warned of grave consequences resulting from the escalation, with its Foreign Ministry calling for respect for international law and a peaceful resolution to the crisis. Latin American leaders from Chile, Cuba, Venezuela, Colombia, and Bolivia condemned the US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, describing them as violations of international law and a threat to global stability. Pakistan condemned the strikes as a violation of international norms and reaffirmed Iran's right to defend itself under the UN Charter. Islamabad expressed concern over the deteriorating situation and called for restraint. France expressed concern over the US attacks, with Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot stating on X that Paris was not involved in the operation. He urged all parties to avoid widening the conflict and to prioritise diplomatic solutions. Bahrain shifted to online learning and remote work in response to rising tensions, advising citizens to avoid unnecessary travel. The Interior Ministry cited public safety concerns amid heightened regional risks. European Council President Antonio Costa urged restraint and compliance with international law, stating that diplomacy is the only viable path to peace. He warned against actions that could endanger nuclear safety. Switzerland called for an immediate return to negotiations and full respect for the UN Charter. The Swiss Foreign Ministry said the escalating conflict poses a serious threat to civilian lives and infrastructure. Ireland's Deputy Prime Minister Simon Harris warned that the risk of a wider Iran-Israel conflict is "more real than ever.' He stressed the need for de-escalation and highlighted the safety of Irish peacekeepers in Lebanon. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz called on Iran to begin immediate talks with the US and Israel to avoid further bloodshed. He urged a diplomatic solution to prevent broader conflict. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and urged "immediate' de-escalation. Modi reiterated that diplomacy remains the only path toward regional peace and stability. Turkiye said it is deeply concerned over the consequences of the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. The Foreign Ministry emphasised that peace must be sought through dialogue, not armed confrontation. - Bernama
