Assisted dying: MSPs have difficult questions to answer

Ahead of the debate, both backers and opponents expected it to scrape through – narrowly. The best guess being bandied around Holyrood's corridors was 64–62.
In the end, MSPs voted 70 to 56 to progress the Bill to Stage 2.
But were they all voting on the same thing?
Read more from Unspun...
They were supposed to be voting on the general principles of the Bill drafted by McArthur and his team, but some were, it seems, voting on the general principles of assisted dying.
Some MSPs who voted in favour – including Scottish Government minister Jim Fairlie and Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay – said they did so to continue the debate.
But really, the time for debate is over. What is needed now is scrutiny.
Are MSPs up to the task – especially given how little time they have?
For assisted dying to become law, McArthur must shepherd it through all Parliamentary stages before Holyrood dissolves at the end of March next year ahead of the election.
With Stage 2 likely to begin in September, his team says it is confident of completing the process in time.
But Dr Mary Neal, a Reader in Law at the University of Strathclyde, told The Herald that MSPs face a 'massive, mammoth task to try and address all of the really serious issues with the Bill'.
'This particular Bill is just riddled with massive problems – and in some cases, unfixable problems,' she said.
Concerns have been raised over eligibility criteria, the definition of terminal illness, and the complexity of assessing capacity and coercion – including so-called internal coercion.
One of the most significant questions is whether Holyrood even has the power to legislate for assisted dying.
'Is this Bill even legislatively competent? I do not think it is,' said Dr Neal.
Regulation of medicines, poisons and similar matters is reserved to Westminster, meaning Scottish ministers lack the power to specify which substances could be used in assisted dying.
There are also questions over the conscience clause in the Bill, which allows medical professionals to opt out of participating. Regulation of health professionals is also a reserved matter.
Overcoming these issues would likely require a Section 30 order – the mechanism in the Scotland Act that temporarily transfers powers from Westminster to Holyrood.
That is not a straightforward process.
It could become even more difficult if Labour MP Kim Leadbeater's bid to introduce assisted dying legislation in England and Wales fails.
Given opposition from groups such as the Royal College of Psychiatrists, that outcome is far from unlikely.
"I think a lot's going to hinge on the Leadbeater Bill and it's fate," says Dr Neal, "because I think it could have a bearing on the willingness of the authorities at Westminster to grant section 30 orders as needed.
"So it could have a procedural impact on the Bill and a political impact on the Bill, even though, in principle, they're two separate processes."
Is this a fight First Minister John Swinney – who did not vote for the Bill – would be eager to have?
Sign up for Scotland's top politics newsletter and get it directly to your inbox.
Interestingly, Health Secretary Neil Gray told journalists on Tuesday night that the Scottish Government's neutral position on McArthur's Bill would be 'under review' as MSPs move to this next stage.
Tuesday's debate was among the most thoughtful Holyrood has seen: personal, emotional, considered. But now it's time for scrutiny and interrogation and practical considerations.
MSPs did not vote for an ideal – they voted for Liam McArthur's Bill.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Leader Live

16 minutes ago

• Leader Live

Assisted dying: BMA says patients should meet end-of-life care doctor first

A motion passed by delegates at the British Medical Association's annual representative meeting (ARM) in Liverpool on Monday proposed a number of changes to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. The proposed legislation for assisted dying cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday and will move to the House of Lords for further debate. As it stands, the Bill would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. British Medical Association (BMA) members have now called for patients to also have an in-person review with an independent palliative care doctor at the very start of the process. Speaking at the union's meeting, Dr Samuel Parker said: 'To ensure patient care needs have been met, and to help detect coercion, any patient requesting assisted dying should be encouraged to attend face-to-face reviews by an independent specialist palliative care doctor before the assisted dying pathway begins. 'This can also ensure whether the patient has received the best quality outcomes prior to preventing their assisted dying.' Dr Sarah Foot added: 'Choice is only a choice if it is an informed choice… this is about making sure that patients know their options, that have had access to palliative care. 'What is uncomfortable is patients choosing to die when they haven't had access to palliative care and don't know what's available to them. 'Our united voice will help influence this Bill in the House of Lords later this year, be proud and proactive and stand up for some of our most vulnerable patients. 'Those who are dying are physically and emotionally dependent on us in society to help safeguard them. They need to be safe and supported.' Dr Parker warned that palliative care in the UK is under-resourced, 'with few specialists, a post-Covid lottery and a shortage of funding'. He said patients deserve rapid access to high-quality care, adding that 'safety and patient welfare are essential'. Dr Foot said: 'Hospices and palliative care does not have enough funding. We cannot live in a society were we fully fund assisted dying, but we don't fully fund hospice and palliative care.' Last week, the Health Secretary – who was one of the most senior opponents of the legislation – warned that legalising assisted dying would take 'time and money' away from other parts of the NHS. Writing on his Facebook page, Wes Streeting said he could not ignore the concerns 'about the risks that come with this Bill' raised by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Royal College of Physicians, the Association for Palliative Medicine and charities representing under-privileged groups. The motion at the BMA ARM also affirmed the right of doctors to decline involvement in the service. An opt-out for all healthcare professionals is already built into the Bill. Speaking of the potential impact of assisted dying on the mental wellbeing of healthcare professionals, Dr Parker called on the BMA to ensure there are 'no subtle pressures' on doctors to participate, and 'no risk of professional sanction or discrimination'. Dr Andrew Green, chairman of the BMA's medical ethics committee, said: 'While the BMA is neutral on the issue of assisted dying – that is whether the law should change or not – we have been engaging with legislation to ensure doctors are represented on a number of key issues. 'This motion reaffirms, and strengthens, a number of the BMA's existing positions, including the right for doctors to decline to participate for any reason should the law change, and the need for any assisted dying service to be funded through new money and not at the expense of other parts of health and social care. 'We have been clear that any future assisted dying provision should be offered via a separate service that doctors must opt in to, and not part of any doctor's existing regular work. This service must come with additional funding, alongside further investment in palliative care, which we know has for too long been under-resourced, leading to huge variations in availability across the country. 'In discussions around Kim Leadbeater's Bill in England and Wales, which has now passed its final stages in the Commons, we have strongly opposed moves to ban doctors from raising the subject of assisted dying with patients, but have been clear that this must be part of a discussion around all options available. 'This motion expands on this, ensuring that patients who may be considering assisted dying are able to access information about all possible treatment and routes available to them.' Meanwhile, research has suggested that almost half (47%) of UK adults surveyed are worried they or their loved ones will have a painful or undignified death. The survey, carried out by Focaldata for King's College London (KCL), found 44% feel worried about the quality of palliative and end-of-life care in the UK, although 46% said they feel confident services will be available when they or loved ones need them. Meanwhile, the polling found 61% of the 2,106 adults asked in March were supportive of the assisted dying Bill which is currently being considered by Parliament for England and Wales. KCL is launching The Impact Centre for Palliative and End-of-Life Care in autumn, a privately-run centre aiming to improve palliative care in the UK, and establish a framework for better care which it said could be applied around the world. The centre, funded by the Kirby Laing Foundation, will be the first of its kind in the UK and will work to 'create long term, systemic change in the delivery of care for dying people'. Centre lead Professor Katherine Sleeman, said: 'Although a wealth of evidence has now been generated on ways to improve experiences and outcomes for people approaching the end of life, too often this evidence is not used to improve care, meaning dying people suffer and those close to them are left to pick up the pieces. 'By closing the gap between evidence and practice, the Impact Centre for Palliative and End-of-Life Care will make a profound and lasting difference for people with life-limiting illnesses and their loved ones, now and in the future.'

Scotsman

17 minutes ago

• Scotsman

Industrial strategy 'will drive tens of thousands of new jobs in Scotland', as business power cut promised

Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Sir Keir Starmer's industrial strategy will "drive tens of thousands of new jobs" in Scotland, the Scottish Secretary has claimed. Ian Murray said the areas featured in the decade-long plan "are really a microcosm of the entire Scottish economy". The strategy includes specific funding to train people for work in defence, engineering, digital and construction roles. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish Secretary Ian Murray | PA Meanwhile, electricity costs for thousands of businesses will be cut by up to 25 per cent by scrapping green levies to help them compete with foreign rivals. The Prime Minister said the plan marked a 'turning point for Britain's economy' by supporting key industries where there is potential for growth. Launching the strategy on Monday at the site of the former Cockenzie power station in East Lothian, which is being redeveloped with UK government funding, Mr Murray said: "The big positive thing from a Scottish perspective is the eight sectors that are part of that industrial strategy, developed with business and sectors, are really a microcosm of the entire Scottish economy. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What does the future hold for Cockenzie after its famous chimneys were brought down in 2016? "So whether it be defence, professional services, financial services, life sciences, AI, all of those kinds of parts of the Scottish economy are key. Scotland will drive a lot of this industrial strategy." Mr Murray added: "It's a really good news story for the Scottish economy and will drive tens of thousands of new jobs." 'Stifling growth' But Mr Murray argued policies pursued by the Scottish Government, such as its opposition to new nuclear power, risked stifling this growth. He pointed to the 10,000 jobs promised as part of the Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk. "That investment could be coming to Scotland, but it's currently not because of the de facto ban on nuclear here," Mr Murray said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Likewise with defence. We have a very, very big defence footprint in Scotland. In fact, the SDR [strategic defence review] and the investment in defence will disproportionately benefit Scotland in terms of jobs and that growth. "We have to look at that as an economic opportunity. But if that is stifled, it's not going to happen." UK ministers target SNP over munitions UK ministers have criticised the Scottish Government's policy of not providing public funding for munitions. Sir Keir said the decade-long plan would deliver 'the long-term certainty and direction British businesses need to invest' during an 'era of global uncertainty'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He said: 'This industrial strategy marks a turning point for Britain's economy and a clear break from the short-termism and sticking plasters of the past.' The strategy's key areas The strategy focuses on eight areas where the UK is already strong and there is potential for further growth: advanced manufacturing, clean energy, creative industries, defence, digital, financial services, life sciences, and professional and business services. Manufacturers have warned 'crippling' power costs are far higher for UK businesses than competitors overseas. From 2027, a new British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme will cut costs by up to £40 per megawatt hour for over 7,000 manufacturing firms by exempting them from levies on bills including the renewables obligation, feed-in tariffs and the capacity market.

Glasgow Times

21 minutes ago

• Glasgow Times

British Business Bank invests in entrepreneurs in £6.6bn funding commitment

The UK Government's development bank has revealed the investment plans as part of Sir Keir Starmer's 10-year industrial strategy announcement. On Monday, the Prime Minister said he will cut electricity costs for thousands of businesses as part of the strategy, in a bid to help accelerate economic growth. The British Business Bank has seen its total financial capacity grow to £25.6 billion since the most recent spending review. 🆕 The Government has confirmed £6.6bn of new capital for the British Business Bank to boost growth. A new £4bn initiative, British Business Bank Industrial Strategy Growth Capital, will be invested across eight growth-driving sectors. Read more: — British Business Bank (@BritishBBank) June 23, 2025 It has said its latest £6.6 billion investment commitment will particularly help the rapid growth of small business across the UK. The Government said £4 billion will be invested through the new Industrial Strategy Growth Capital initiative, focusing on eight target sectors including advanced manufacturing, clean energy, digital, and life sciences. A further £2.6 billion will be aimed at supporting entrepreneurs across the UK, providing funds to help address regional funding gaps. Louis Taylor, chief executive of the British Business Bank, said: 'We welcome today's announcement by the secretary of state to deliver British Business Bank industrial strategy growth capital, as well as the reforms to the Bank's governance and financial framework. 'Using our market expertise and reach, we have a critical role to play in supporting smaller businesses in the eight growth-driving sectors to grow and stay in the UK. 'To deliver the Government's growth mission it is also critical that our most promising entrepreneurs can access the finance they need to grow their businesses, no matter what their background or where they are located across the nations and regions of the UK.'