Bangalore Development Authority engineer files complaint against retired cop for obstruction and threats

Bengaluru: An engineer from Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) filed a complaint with Kumbalagodu police, accusing a retired police officer and his son of obstructing them on duty and for issuing dire threats.
The suspects are identified as Venkateshaiah and his son, whose name has not been identified. The complaint was filed by Ashok Bagi, an assistant executive engineer with Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout division, BDA.
According to Ashok's complaint, he was overseeing the layout work at survey number 43 in Sulikere village near Kengeri. The prime suspect, Venkateshaiah is the owner of site on survey 43 in Sulikere and approached the court after the land was handed over by govt to the engineering department of BDA for taking up the work.
However, the court's orders were passed in BDA's favour, and accordingly, BDA decided to take up the work at the said place, the complaint stated.
"On June 11 morning, we went to the place to begin work. But Venkateshaiah, his son, and others obstructed us. We showed them the court orders, but they did not heed us. Venkateshaiah announced he was a retired police official and knew the rules and regulations. Also, the suspects issued dire threats. Finally, we had to seek the intervention of local police," Bagi's complaint stated.
An investigating officer said they have issued notices to the suspects, directing them to appear before them for investigation.
Follow more information on
Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here
. Get
real-time live updates
on rescue operations and check
full list of passengers onboard AI 171
.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

4 hours ago

• Time of India

247 DNA matches completed, 232 bodies handed over

A Tired of too many ads? go ad free now hmedabad: Civil Hospital authorities announced on Saturday the completion of matches for 247 persons deceased in the AI171 aircraft crash that took place on June 12 in the city. The figure is higher than the 241 persons who died onboard the aircraft, including 229 passengers and 12 crew members. The crash had only a lone survivor in Vishwash Kumar Ramesh who miraculoulsy escaped even as several lives were lost on the ground. The 247 deceased identified so far through the DNA matching process include 175 Indian nationals, 52 British nationals, 7 Portuguese nationals, and one Canadian national. It also includes 12 non-passengers. Dr Rakesh Joshi, medical superintendent of Civil Hospital, said that 232 mortal remains have been handed over to the relatives for last rites so far. "Of the 15 bodies whose DNA has been completed, three bodies have not been received by families as they await DNA match of other family members lost in the plane crash. Six bodies have been prepared for being handed over to their families for the onward journey while families of six victims are expected to arrive on Sunday to claim the mortal remains," he said. "Out of the total, 23 mortal remains have been flown out of the city, whereas the rest are transported to crematoriums or their native places by road." Sources said that based on the figures released earlier, out of 61 foreign nationals on the flight, 60 have been identified, whereas the identification of a British national is still awaited. With all 12 'non-passengers' identified — believed to be the 12 crew members. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Sources added that more than 95% of the persons aboard the ill-fated AI 171 are identified. "Only a few DNA matches are yet to be completed. The process is taking longer due to the nature of the samples, which are highly charred, and extraction of DNA is difficult. However, the teams have managed to use the technology to the optimum and improve the detection rate significantly even in challenging cases," said a state official.

Hindustan Times

8 hours ago

• Hindustan Times

DNA tests identify 247 victims of Ahmedabad plane crash

A total of 247 victims of the horrific June 12 Ahmedabad plane crash have been identified through DNA tests so far and 232 bodies have been handed over to kin, officials said on Saturday. The Gatwick-bound Air India AI171 aircraft crashed into a medical college hostel complex in Ahmedabad's Meghani Nagar on June 12.(Bloomberg) The London-bound aircraft crashed into a hostel complex in Meghaninagar moments after taking off from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport at 1.39 pm that day, killing 270 persons, including 241 on board. One passenger survived. Authorities are carrying out DNA tests to establish the identity of the victims as many bodies were charred beyond recognition as the aircraft burst into flames or damaged on impact. "Till Saturday evening, 247 DNA samples have matched. Relatives of these deceased were contacted. So far, mortal remains of 232 victims have been handed over to families. The process is continuing," Ahmedabad Civil Hospital Medical Superintendent Dr Rakesh Joshi said. The 247 victims who have been identified comprise 187 Indians, 52 Britons, seven Portuguese nationals and a Canadian, said Joshi. Of the 187 Indians, a total of 175 were on board the ill-fated aircraft, he said, adding they belong to areas in Gujarat, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Diu and Nagaland. The state government had earlier stated that samples of 250 victims, including persons on board the ill-fated flight as well as those killed on the ground, were collected for identification.

Business Standard

12 hours ago

• Business Standard

DGCA suspends 3 crew rostering heads, warns A-I of licence revocation

In its most serious action yet against Air India following the 12 June crash of flight AI171, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has suspended three senior executives responsible for flight crew rostering and warned that the airline's licence to operate could be revoked if similar violations are detected in future audits or inspections. The regulator issued two documents — an order and a show cause notice — to the airline on Friday (20 June). The order sought the removal of key rostering officials after the DGCA found 'repeated and serious violations voluntarily disclosed by Air India concerning flight crew being scheduled and operated despite lapses in licensing, rest, and recency requirements'. Recency norms require that a pilot must have performed at least three take-offs and landings in the preceding 90 days to remain eligible to fly. The show cause notice was issued to Air India's Accountable Manager, who personally operated two international flights that exceeded the permitted flight duty time limit (FDTL) under existing regulations. FDTL are caps placed on how long a pilot or cabin crew member can be on active duty — including flying and pre/post-flight activities — in a single stretch. They are meant to prevent fatigue, which is a known contributor to human error in aviation. According to the first document issued (order), the violations by key crew rostering officials were discovered during a post-transition review after the airline shifted from the ARMS system to the CAE flight and crew management and rostering system. The DGCA said: 'The voluntary disclosures, while noted, point to systemic failures in crew scheduling, compliance monitoring, and internal accountability.' 'Of particular concern is the absence of strict disciplinary measures against key officials directly responsible for these operational lapses,' it added. The three officials named in the order — Choorah Singh (Divisional Vice-President), Pinky Mittal (Chief Manager — DOPS, Crew Scheduling), and Payal Arora (Crew Scheduling — Planning) — were found to have been 'involved in serious and repeated lapses including but not limited to unauthorised and non-compliant crew pairings, violation of mandatory licensing and recency norms, systemic failures in scheduling protocol and oversight'. The DGCA directed Air India to remove the three from 'all roles and responsibilities related to crew scheduling and rostering' and place them in non-operational roles pending reforms. The airline must also initiate internal disciplinary proceedings and report the outcome 'within 10 days from the date of issue of this letter'. The regulator further warned: 'Any future violation of crew scheduling norms, licensing, or flight time limitations detected in any post-audit or inspection will attract strict enforcement action, including but not limited to penalties, licence suspension, or withdrawal of operator permissions as applicable.' Responding to the DGCA's notices, an Air India spokesperson told Business Standard: 'We acknowledge the regulator's directive and have implemented the order. In the interim, the company's Chief Operations Officer will provide direct oversight to the Integrated Operations Control Centre (IOCC). Air India is committed to ensuring that there is total adherence to safety protocols and standard practices.' In the second document issued (show cause notice), the DGCA said that during a spot check it was observed that the Accountable Manager operated two flights from Bengaluru to London — on 16 and 17 May — both of which 'exceeded the stipulated flight time limit of 10 hours', in violation of a specific rule issued by DGCA in 2019. The 2019 rule limits a pilot's flight duty period on long-haul international sectors to 10 hours to ensure adequate alertness and prevent over-fatigue. Flying beyond this limit without special authorisation or crew augmentation is considered a safety violation. The DGCA notice also cited a second violation, which specified the duties of the Accountable Manager, who is personally responsible for maintaining operational control and ensuring that the airline's internal systems are in full compliance with civil aviation regulations. In essence, the regulator held the executive accountable not just for the flight time breach but also for allowing a lapse in command responsibility over regulatory adherence. The DGCA has asked the Accountable Manager to explain within seven days why action should not be taken against him under aviation rules for the violations listed in the notice. It added that if no response is received in time, the matter will be decided unilaterally based on the available evidence. The enforcement action comes amid heightened scrutiny of Air India's internal systems after the crash of AI171 in Ahmedabad. The aircraft had 230 passengers and 12 flight crew members on board. All but one passenger perished in the crash. Moreover, 34 people on the ground also died as a result of the crash.