What to know about the impacts of the Supreme Court's ruling on transgender care for youth

The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming surgery for transgender youth in a ruling that's likely to reverberate across the country.
Most Republican-controlled states already have similar bans.
In his
majority opinion Wednesday
, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that Tennessee's ban does not violate the Constitution's equal protection clause, which requires the government to treat similarly situated people the same.
Since President Donald Trump returned to office this year, the federal government has been trying to restrict access.
Here are some things to know about gender-affirming care and the court's ruling:
What is gender-affirming care?
Gender-affirming care includes a range of medical and mental health services to support a person's gender identity, or their sense of feeling male, female, neither or some combination of both. Sometimes that's different from the sex they were assigned at birth.
The services are offered to treat gender dysphoria, the unease a person may have because their assigned gender and gender identity don't match. Studies, including one from 2023 by researchers at institutions including London Children's Hospital and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, have found the condition is linked to depression and suicidal thoughts.
Gender-affirming care encompasses counseling and treatment with medications that block puberty and hormone therapy to produce physical changes. Hormone therapy for transgender men causes periods to stop, increases facial and body hair and deepens voices. The hormones used by transgender women can have effects such as slowing growth of body and facial hair and increasing breast growth. Fewer than
1 in 1,000 U.S. adolescents
receive gender-affirming medications, a study released this year found.
Gender-affirming care can also include surgery, including operations to transform genitals and chests. These surgeries are
rarely offered to minors
.
There are documented uses of genital surgery for adults dating back to the 1920s. But for youth, gender-affirming care has been more common since the 1990s.
What is the controversy?
As a medical consensus emerged in support of gender-affirming care for youth, the issue also became politically divisive in other ways. Some states approved measures to protect transgender people, who make up around 1% of the nation's population.
Many critics dismiss the idea that gender is changeable and lies along a spectrum.
About two-thirds of U.S. adults
believe that whether a person is a man or woman is determined by biological characteristics at birth, an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted in May found.
In the last five years, most GOP-controlled states have passed laws to block transgender girls from sports competitions for girls. About half the Republican-controlled states have now banned transgender people from using school bathrooms that align with their gender identity.
Opponents of gender-affirming care sometimes refer to it as 'mutilation' and say people who transition when they're young
could later regret it.
What could the ruling mean for bans in states besides Tennessee?
In addition to Tennessee, 26 other states have passed bans or restrictions on gender-affirming care for youth. Judges have struck down the bans in
Arkansas
and
Montana
, though the legal fights there aren't over.
All of the laws have been adopted in the past five years and nearly all have been challenged in court.
The Supreme Court's decision means that federal challenges to those laws aren't likely to prevail. However, some of the lawsuits against them are based on arguments rooted in state constitutions, and it's still possible that judges could find more protections in those state constitutions than are in the U.S. Constitution.
What will the ruling mean for states without bans on gender-affirming care?
It probably won't make any difference immediately.
Several of those states have laws or executive orders intended to protect access to gender-affirming care for transgender minors.
But the question about whether the care will continue isn't only about what's legal. It's also about funding.
That's where Trump comes in.
Trump
campaigned last year
pledging to rein in rights of transgender people. He's followed through on many fronts, though court challenges have resulted in some of his efforts being blocked, at least for now.
What has Trump done on transgender issues?
He has ordered that no federal taxpayer money be used to pay for the care for those under 19. Enforcement of that
order is on hold
.
Trump has also tried to
block federal funding
from institutions — including hospitals and the universities that run some of them — that provide gender-affirming care for youth. A judge has blocked that effort while challenges to it proceed.
His administration
published recommendations
that therapy alone – and not medication – be used to treat transgender youth. The position contradicts guidance from major medical organizations. But it could impact practices.
Other actions Trump has taken including initiating the removal of
transgender troops
from military service; ordering that transgender women and girls be kept out of
sports competitions for females
;
erasing the word 'transgender'
from some government websites; and saying the government would recognize people only by their sex at conception.
That's resulted in efforts to
move transgender women inmates to men's prisons
and change how
passports are issued
to transgender and nonbinary people. A judge this week
blocked the Trump administration
from limiting passport sex markers for many transgender and nonbinary Americans.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Axios

2 hours ago

• Axios

Trump admin shortens ACA enrollment window

The Trump administration on Friday narrowed the period to sign up for Affordable Care Act coverage and imposed other restrictions aimed at rolling back Biden-era flexibilities for the program. Why it matters: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services expects the new policies to lower marketplace premiums by about 5% on average, and save taxpayers $12 billion next year. But between 725,000 and 1.8 million people are expected to lose coverage, per CMS's projections. The big picture: Congress is considering codifying many of the same provisions in the massive GOP budget bill that's now in the Senate. That would make them much harder for a future administration to undo. State of play: CMS is shortening the period for enrolling in marketplace insurance by two weeks, starting for plan year 2027. Federal exchanges will then be open for sign-ups from Nov. 1 through Dec. 31 of each year. It's also repealing the monthly opportunity started under the Biden administration for lower-income people to get marketplace coverage. The new rule limits plans' ability to cover gender-affirming care beginning next year. It also excludes Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients from obtaining ACA coverage. CMS said the policies will ensure federal subsidies to offset the cost of ACA coverage only support statutory goals of the law. Yes, but: In response to public comments, CMS is making several of its changes temporary. For plan year 2026 only, CMS will begin charging a $5 monthly premium for consumers who are automatically reenrolled in an ACA plan from one year to the next and would otherwise have fully subsidized coverage. Other changes concerning income verification for enrollees will also end after 2026. Between the lines: Insurance losses from the new policy will be felt hardest in states where "erroneous and improper enrollment is most noticeable," including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Utah, CMS said.

Politico

4 hours ago

• Politico

Senate megabill will strengthen Obamacare, says red state hospital CEO

A provision in a key Senate committee's version of the GOP megabill will backfire against Republicans by forcing red states to consider doing exactly what Republicans don't want them to: expand Medicaid, the CEO of the South Carolina Hospital Association told POLITICO. Republicans have sought to shelter the 10 conservative states that have declined to expand Medicaid to cover more low-income people, as Obamacare encourages with generous federal subsidies. But the Senate bill, in an effort to find the savings needed to extend President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts, would still blow a hole in the budgets of Palmetto state hospitals by reducing what insurers who contract with the state to provide Medicaid services can pay them. States and Washington share the insurance program's costs. 'It affects the viability of the whole system,' said Thornton Kirby, chief executive of the South Carolina Hospital Association, which estimates the Senate proposal will cost the state over $2.3 billion annually. 'If you take away this alternative way to balance the budget, you leave us with only one path…Medicaid expansion,' Kirby said. The Senate is rushing to complete its version of a bill that would enact Trump's agenda using a procedure that requires only a simple majority vote. Trump wants it done by July 4, but with the slim margins in both houses of Congress, the industries affected by the bill are hoping to peel off votes to save themselves from cuts. Republicans can lose no more than three votes in either chamber as long as Democrats remain united in opposition. To make the case that the restrictions on so-called state-directed payments need to go, the hospital association is leaning on three home state Republicans with clout: Sen. Tim Scott, who has a seat on the Finance Committee that has proposed the restrictions; Rep. Russell Fry, who's on the Energy and Commerce Committee that drafted the Medicaid provisions of the megabill the House passed last month; and Henry McMaster, the governor of South Carolina and, Kirby said, a personal friend. 'I don't want to put him in the hot seat,' Kirby said of McMaster. 'He doesn't want to see [Medicaid] upended.' Of Scott, Kirby said he's in touch at least every other day and that the senator and Trump ally 'has been a champion.' 'He understands…he doesn't want to go down that path' of Medicaid expansion, Kirby added. The three Republicans did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Expanding Medicaid could help replace the revenue the Senate provision would take away because it would make many more people — South Carolina now has one of the nation's higher uninsured rates at 9 percent — eligible for the program. Under Obamacare, the federal government picks up 90 percent of the cost for the new enrollees. Under the Finance Committee proposal, state-directed payments to hospitals serving Medicaid patients would fall by 10 percent each year until the total payment rate is only 100-110 percent of the Medicare payment rate. In South Carolina, the current payment rate is more than twice the rate paid by Medicare, the federal health insurance program for elderly people. Hospitals in states that have expanded Medicaid would take an additional hit under the Senate proposal. The Finance Committee would lower the provider tax rate that the 40 states that have expanded Medicaid can levy on hospitals from 6 percent to 3.5 percent. States have used the taxes to boost their federal matching funds, which they have then sent back to hospitals in higher reimbursements. The Senate would freeze the tax rates in states like South Carolina that haven't expanded Medicaid, but would not require them to lower them. The version of the megabill the House passed would freeze the rates for all states, a plan Kirby was willing to accept. On Friday, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) urged GOP leaders to strike the Finance Committee language on Medicaid, warning the crackdown won't clear the House. Republican senators hope to pass their version of the bill next week after which the House would need to pass it before Trump could sign it into law.

Forbes

4 hours ago

• Forbes

How A Brain Bleed Decades Ago May Have Affected The Former President

TOPSHOT - US President Joe Biden looks on as he participates in the first presidential debate of the ... More 2024 elections with former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump at CNN's studios in Atlanta, Georgia, on June 27, 2024. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP) (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Over the past month or so, the media on both sides of the aisle have been filled with reports of concern about President Biden's cognitive decline while in office. This supports the observations of millions of Americans who watched the presidential debate last year. Several tell-all books have also been published pointing out episodes of decreased mental acuity—especially during the last two years of his administration. Several political leaders have been quoted as to the president's declining mental condition the last two years of his term. Many have volunteered episodes of forgetting names of key administration officials. Reports have also stated that the president may have forgotten several executive orders dealing with the environment that he had signed weeks earlier. The key event that may explain much of the cognitive issues being may have been a life- threatening event that occurred in the 1980's, when, then-senator Biden, had emergent brain surgery on a leaking brain aneurysm in February, 1988 repaired by Dr. Eugene George and Dr. Neal Kassell. The leaking brain aneurysm led to a subarachnoid hemorrhage, or bleeding in the space between your brain and a thin membrane that covers and protects it. A CT brain scan reveals a subarachnoid hemorrhage with clear signs of bleeding. getty In May of 1988, President Biden returned to the operating room to have a second smaller aneurysm managed by the same surgical team. Both were 'open procedures' where a clip was placed to manage the aneurysm. However, in the modern era of neurosurgery, brain aneurysms are preferentially managed (when possible) with less invasive procedures commonly referred to as endovascular procedures where coils are placed to prevent blood flow into an aneurysm by threading a thin catheter through an artery in the wrist or groin without the need to open the skull and dissect and potentially compromise brain tissue. There are currently no long-term studies on cognitive dysfunction related to traditional 'open procedures' compared to minimally invasive approaches known such as endovascular procedures. Endovascular coiling of aneurysm. Aneurysm treatment. Endovascular therapy. Vector poster getty Known complications related to leaking aneurysms (weakened or 'ballooning of blood vessels) also include spasm of small blood vessels in the brain. Such spasm of small blood vessels in the brain can also result in cognitive issues related to repairing and stabilizing such blood vessel abnormalities, whether by traditional opening of the skull (craniotomy) or even novel endovascular neurosurgical approaches. However, the risk of complications is generally known to be higher after a traditional or 'open-type' procedure which involves opening the skull in an invasive manner. What's clear is that the President of the United States is also the most observed individual on the planet and that changes in mental sharpness can be observed and reported by thousands of outlets in comparison to a similar patient who might be enjoying retirement. Cognitive dysfunction is a common complication of a brain bleed (such as a subarachnoid hemorrhage), which occurs when an aneurysm leaks or ruptures. This affects most people to some degree. Cognitive dysfunction can take a number of forms, such as problems with retrieval of memories prior to—but also after the bleeding occurrence. Equally concerning are issues remembering new information or facts. Brain damage associated with leaking or ruptured aneurysms may, in some cases, increase your risk of developing dementia. Research has also implicated surgery and the type of anesthesia utilized. Many studies have reported an association between multiple general anesthetics and dementia; this association remains controversial . Contemporary reports from the late 1980's do report some changes in then-Senator Biden. Alzheimer's disease is the most common dementia , followed by vascular dementia. Vascular and Alzheimer's dementia lead to impairment in number of executive functions including word-finding difficulties, deficits in reading comprehension, confusion and impaired focus and attention. The end result are alterations in brain protein structures, the result of the abnormal processing and organization of normal proteins in the brain. Vascular dementia is primarily caused by cerebrovascular disease due to atherosclerosis leading to irregular or abnormal blood flow to critical brain structures. There is also a large amount of research supporting the risks of developing dementia and Alzheimer's disease from traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) from playing football, soccer, lacrosse, wrestling, boxing and other contact sports. According to the Alzheimer's Association, research has provided a link between moderate to severe TBIs and a greater risk of developing some form of dementia years later. The symptoms of vascular dementia depend on the location and amount of brain tissue involved. They may appear suddenly after the acute event or slowly manifest over time. Symptoms of Dementia: Increased trouble doing normal daily activities because of problems with focus, communication or inability to follow directions. Memory problems: short-or long-term memory can be affected. Confusion which can get worse at night (so called sundowning syndrome) Personality changes. Mood changes such as depression or irritability. Stride changes when walking too fast of shuffling steps. Problems with movement, balance or both. Diagnosing dementia or Alzheimer's in any patient begins with evaluation by a skilled neurologist, along with specific blood biomarkers, specialized MRI scans, along with cognitive testing known as the The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Alzheimer's Disease is characterized by the presence of beta-amyloid , an abnormal substance which form sticky plaques on the brain which may result in death of brain cells. Testing for the presence of beta-amyloid plaques in the brain via specific blood biomarkers and MRI scans is critical in determining the extent of functional impairment. Individuals reviewing the last few years of President Biden's term might reflect on some of the events detailed in personal accounts made public in Jake Tapper's new book, Original Sin , that may serve as insight to stratify risk of cognitive impairment in older persons with previous neurologic events, even if they occurred many decades in the past. Dr. Peter J. Papakadakos , Professor of Anesthesiology and Director of Critical Care at University of Rochester Medical Center, contributed to this article.