‘Bravely Default: Flying Fairy HD Remaster' Review: Not Exactly HD
This HD remaster still retains some of the original game's visual charm.
One of the best role-playing games on the Nintendo 3DS was Bravely Default, a unique little game that's now remastered on the Switch 2, but not without its faults.
The original game was full of charm and adorable character designs by Akihiko Yoshida. The functional premise of the game had you either Default (guard) for each turn or Brave multiple attacks that would put you at a disadvantage on the subsequent turn.
It was a fascinating risk-reward setup that played with the turn-based nature of most modern role-playing games. Coupled with the lovely art style, Bravely Default had a real charm to it that is sadly quite rare these days.
So, to have Bravely Default updated in HD for the Switch 2 was great news. While the stereoscopic 3D elements of the original 3DS game would be lost, you'd still have an updated version available for an even larger audience.
That would be true if more care had been taken with the game.
The enemy character models are overly basic for an HD remaster.
FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™
Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase
Pinpoint By Linkedin
Guess The Category
Queens By Linkedin
Crown Each Region
Crossclimb By Linkedin
Unlock A Trivia Ladder
This is not to say the game is bad, far from it. It plays beautifully, and the main characters still look good in their new HD format, but sadly, most of the other enemies are not so impressive.
This is because the original Bravely Default was developed for the 3DS, with all the graphical restrictions that entail.
In that the polygon count for the main characters and enemies was very restrictive, doubly so because the game had to support the 3D gimmick of the 3DS, effectively doubling up the rendering passes.
All of this is entirely fine for the 3DS, but when you come to something like the Switch 2, which has an enormous graphical capacity relative to the 3DS, you need to do some more work on the characters and enemies to compensate.
Unfortunately, despite this game being a Switch 2 launch title, not enough time and care were taken in increasing the graphical fidelity of the enemies and some of the main characters.
The game's HD backgrounds are still thankfully gorgeous.
While the backgrounds look lovely and most of the main characters look decent, the enemies are very basic, and it is sadly overly jarring.
One of the big elements of Bravely Default's charm was its portrayal of its characters. With the game originally released on the 3DS, the art style leaned into those graphical limitations, and it worked wonderfully.
Here, though, it just really feels off, doubly so when Bravely Default II on the Switch had a really high level of graphical fidelity, especially compared to this release.
So while this new HD version of Bravely Default plays as good as its 3DS forebear, it looks a lot worse than the last Switch entry in the series.
Which, for a launch Switch 2 game, is deeply unfortunate. If only more time and money had been spent on updating the game models to something closer to Bravely Default II or even further than that, then this could have been a very special release.
While, on the one hand, it's great that Bravely Default is widely available again, on the other hand, it does feel underwhelming when it comes to the HD execution.
Overall, Bravely Default: Flying Fairy HD Remaster is still a solid game in terms of how it plays, but it needed more time and money to really make this a proper HD remaster. As such, this feels like a lost opportunity and something that should have been treated with more care.
Bravely Default: Flying Fairy HD Remaster
Platform: Nintendo Switch 2
Developer: Cattle Call
Publisher: Square Enix
Released: 5th June 2025
Price: $39.99
Score: 7/10
Disclosure: Square Enix sent me a copy of this game for the purposes of this review.
Follow me on X, Facebook and YouTube. I also manage Mecha Damashii and am currently featured in the Giant Robots exhibition currently touring Japan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Google AI is worse at Pokemon than I was when I was 5 – taking 800 hours to beat the Elite 4 and having a breakdown when its HP got low
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. If you're someone who thinks AI is almost ready to take over the world, I have some good or bad (depending on your stance on things) news for you: Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro took over 800 hours to beat the 29-year-old children's game Pokemon Blue. There's a Twitch account called Gemini_Plays_Pokemon, a pale imitation of the incredible Twitch Plays Pokemon account that started this trend. First things first: how long did it take the AI to actually complete the game? Well, it was a staggering 813 hours. I feel like you could hit buttons randomly and beat the game faster than that. After some tweaks by the creator of this Twitch channel, the AI managed to halve its time to a still outrageous 406.5 hours. That is actually dead on half the time, which is interesting mathematically but still far too long to beat a game you can win with an overleveled Venusaur. Additionally, as spotted by our friends at PC Gamer, Google DeepMind reported on the Twitch account, and something unusual happens whenever its Pokemon get low on health or power points (PP). Whenever one or both of these conditions are met, "model performance appears to correlate with a qualitatively observable degradation in the model's reasoning capability – for instance, completely forgetting to use the pathfinder tool in stretches of gameplay while this condition persists." This, combined with the AI mistakenly thinking it was playing FireRed and LeafGreen and would need to find the Tea to progress, are part of the reasons it took so long to finish. Honestly, AI just isn't very good at playing Pokemon. Someone else made Claude Plays Pokemon, and that AI spent hours trying to get out of Cerulean city because it kept jumping down a ledge to talk to an NPC it had already spoken to dozens of times. So, these AIs aren't able to beat a game that we could when we barely knew our times tables. Let's not worry about them taking our jobs any time soon. In the meantime, check out the best Pokemon games of all time.
Digital Trends
6 hours ago
- Digital Trends
In a sea of giant games, Rematch's simplicity is a gift
There are a lot of words I'd use to describe Rematch, the new multiplayer soccer game from Sifu developer Sloclap. It's fun, it's approachable, it's elegant. But there's one word I wouldn't use: ambitious. I don't mean that in a derogatory way; in fact, that's exactly what I love about it. Rematch needs little setup or explanation to get across what it is, which separates it from so many modern, formula-twisting video games. It's an online multiplayer soccer game where teams of three to five, depending on the playlist, compete in six minute matches. The teams are dropped on a basic pitch, the only notable twist of which is that all the sides are walled off. Players pass, block, and shoot and the team with the most points at the end wins. There are no gimmicks, no tricks, and no flourishes like flying cars that make for a cool sales pitch. It's just soccer. Recommended Videos With such an elementary premise on paper, you may be surprised to hear that I'm absolutely loving my time with Rematch so far. At a time where I could be playing the more involved FBC: Firebreak or Splitgate 2, I'm simply opting to kick the ball around. So what is it about Rematch that's grabbing me despite the fact that there's seemingly so little to it? For one, there's a lot more to it than what I've described. Rematch may look shallow at first glance, but there's a lot of depth hidden beneath its surface. As I play, I learn lots of small nuances that beg to be mastered. I can kick the ball away from me if I know a rival is planning to slide kick it from me, forfeiting control for a brief moment only to regain it quickly. I can perform a rainbow flick to fake opponents out, or bounce the ball off a wall to set a teammate up for a goal. These aren't flashy maneuvers by any means, but each one raises the skill ceiling in subtle ways that push me to keep learning. Even with those extra techniques, Rematch's strength lies in simplicity. Those who don't learn how to do any of that can still just pick up a controller and enjoy the simple thrill of kicking a ball into a goal or jumping to block a goal shot. In that way, Rematch is the closest I've felt a modern sports game has come to reaching the ethos of NES classics like Golf and Baseball. Throughout the 1980s, Nintendo loaded its home console up with very fundamental sports simulations that were easy to pick up and play. It would follow up on that philosophy decades later with Wii Sports (and eventually Nintendo Switch Sports), a game that would boil a game as complex as physically Tennis down to its essence. It understood that the joy of hitting a ball with a racket is powerful enough to fuel a video game, no further tricks attached. Rematch carries that same torch; Sloclap could have just called it Soccer had Nintendo not already taken the name in 1985. As I've repeatedly queued up for another round, I've found myself thinking about other games I appreciate and how they relate to Rematch. See, I've spent a long time this year thinking about what I value in video games. It started around the time Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 came out. Like many, I very much enjoyed Sandfall Interactive's impressive debut, but I simply wasn't as high on it as others. For every bit I liked, there was something else that I didn't. I found the whole thing messy, filled with clutter that didn't always work for me. I had conversations with fans at the time where I expressed that critique and would even find some advocates who agreed. However, the refrain I kept hearing was that the RPG's ambition made up for the flaws. I started thinking about that word: ambition. It's something I've heard to describe a lot of critically acclaimed games over the past few years. It was inseparable from Elden Ring and Baldur's Gate 3 during their respective Game of the Year runs. It's being used right now to describe Mario Kart World's divisive open-world component. More and more, 'ambitious' has become a synonym for 'exemplary,' showing that there's a large contingent of players out there who value massive creative swings over functional ones. It's perhaps why Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2 is one of the year's best reviewed games, while Avowed was received like a disappointment for not living up to The Elder Scrolls' scale. Avowed, as it turns out, is one of my favorite games of the year. The pieces that its loudest critics see as thin are what I see as focused. It tells a clear story and does not waste a single one of its RPG systems. Everything is in its right place, a design philosophy that allowed Obsidian to create an elegantly streamlined RPG that still sticks with me. Many of my favorite games this year share a similar strength. Despelote is a 90 minute game where not a second of its runtime feels superfluous. The Midnight Walk doesn't do anything new with the adventure genre, but it excels at feeling like a playable folktale. Rift of the NecroDancer is a fairly typical rhythm game, but one that is perfectly sharpened. All of these games rank far above Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 on my personal Game of the Year tracker. I'm not sure where Rematch will land on that list, but my current obsession with it is consistent with the other games currently topping my charts. I appreciate the fact that Sloclap walked into the project with a very clear vision and set out to fine tune that as much as possible rather than dress it up in flashy distractions. At this point in my artistic tastes, I just prefer something that executes on a clear creative vision. It's why Videoverse and Venba were in my top five favorite games of 2023, while Baldur's Gate 3 wasn't. I do respect ambition in games, but I've come to value restraint even more. Rematch doesn't take 100 free shots only to miss half of them. It winds up a few careful shots and puts them square in the goal each time. It only takes one point to win a game soccer if you play your cards right. Rematch is out now PS5, Xbox Series X/S, and PC.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
REMATCH: An undeniably fun but flawed game with bags of potential
REMATCH, the football video game developed by French studio Sloclap, generated a huge amount of hype during its beta period earlier this year, but has it delivered on the hype upon full release? The online multiplayer game draws immediate comparisons with Rocket League but, despite its appearance, it's less arcade action and more of a pure football simulation. Advertisement You take full control of a single footballer and their actions during 3v3, 4v4 and 5v5 matches. Whereas in EA FC everything is almost automatic, the ball moving between players and darting towards the goal like a magnet, here it is completely up to you to put the ball in the right place. The skill bar is set very high. It's very easy to underhit a pass or send a shot totally waywards. That's because REMATCH plays a lot more like a third-person shooter than your traditional sports game, aiming your shots with a reticle as you would in Helldivers 2 or Grand Theft Auto. Confusingly, passes are instead aimed with the analog stick. Getting used to this takes a lot of practice and patience, but once you do it can lead to tonnes of fun and fluid gameplay. That said, the control scheme is not intuitive, although Sloclap say that button mapping is on the way. I can't say I've gotten particularly good at the game just yet and my struggles have been compounded by consistent glitching. During one of my turns in net I was ready to collect a harmless long punt up the field, only for the game to stutter momentarily and so the ball flew past me into the goal. Read – Wirtz explains why he chose Liverpool over Bayern and Man City Regardless, I've been coming back for more, eager to try more tricks and flicks, maybe finally pull off a bicycle kick after bouncing the ball off the wall, and get one of those sweet, sweet overtime wins at the end of a back-and-forth contest. Advertisement As enjoyable as REMATCH is, there is a distinct lack of content on offer. There's the online matches, practice mode, character customisation (and the monetisation that comes with that) and… that's it. Not even a single player mode. For the £20.99 price tag you might be forgiven in expecting there should be more available at launch. Its free-to-play equivalents provide a wider array of content, although they have obviously been around longer. Still, Sloclap could be in danger of losing the attention of their already large player base. One day after launch they revealed REMATCH attracted one million unique players across all platforms. On Steam it peaked at over 92,000 players on its first day, retaining the majority of them over the following days. How long before they crave something new and move on to the next thing? Another drawback is the fact there is no crossplay at the time of writing, meaning you can only play with players on your system of choice. Again Sloclap say that will be remedied in due course. Advertisement REMATCH is an undoubtedly entertaining game set against some wonderful artwork, with arenas ranging from your standard giant bowl stadium to the desert and, my personal favourite, a jungle (sometimes it even changes between goals). But it does come with its flaws. You will definitely be seeing viral clips of this game pop up on your feed over the next few weeks, and potentially months, maybe even years – if it can meet its vast potential. Rating: 7/10 Platforms: Xbox Series X|S (GamePass subscription required), PlayStation 5 (PS Plus subscription required), Windows PC. Read – Every footballer signed for £100m as Wirtz joins Liverpool See Also – The most expensive sales in Bundesliga history Follow The Football Faithful on Social Media: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | TikTok
