Has Scotland's offshore wind sector been blown off course?
In addition, in a number of countries there has been a reduction or cancelling of offshore auction rounds.
This reflects the binary political decisions in respect of the response to climate change.
There are still many countries pursuing material reductions in carbon emissions year on year, while others are now run by those that wish to defer investment.
It is still the case, however, that offshore wind represents one of the largest technology opportunities to supply renewable electricity at scale and thereby effect system change.
In the UK, there has been consistent support for the further deployment of offshore wind.
The Conservative administration placed offshore wind at the heart of its response to climate change with significant targets set to be achieved by 2030.
The new Labour Government, which came into power last summer, has doubled down on the importance of the delivery of offshore wind. Ed Miliband is a passionate advocate for the sector and has come into power with a focus and zeal to support climate change initiatives.
The new ambition is to achieve installation off at least 43GW by 2030.
The UK's Auction Round 6 was not a great success for offshore wind with just over 3GW of new offshore capacity being supported.
This was equivalent in scale to the number of successful bids for solar technology. This clearly does not reflect either the former or current ambition of the UK Government.
The offshore sector offers significant opportunity to develop UK supply chains both in the delivery of the offshore wind farms themselves, but also in relation to the associated grid infrastructure.
The auction round occurred at a time when the incoming Labour Government was just trying to get its feet under the table.
It was a disappointment in terms of scale.
The new UK Government has provided a new impetus in seeking to deploy as much new offshore wind capacity by 2030. The government has looked to reform the auction rules to see whether they can relax certain rules to allow more projects in to bid.
It is anticipated that this would considerably increase the pool of eligible projects and thus allow the Government to set more meaningful objectives regarding the scale of ambition.
There have been a number of key reforms to the regulation of grid, including the formation of the National Energy System Operator (NESO).
It has been seeking to flex its forward thinking but appears to be heavily influenced by establishing zonal structures. This on the one hand, could genuinely seek to ensure that appropriate investment was targeted at the right time.
There are however concerns that it is potentially the slippery slope to zonal pricing and all the consequences that may have for developing new projects in different parts of the UK. It is also evident that grid remains one of the key constraints to the decarbonisation of our energy system.
Grid connection dates for major offshore projects continue to be pushed back.
The 'Strategic planning' post awards such as ScotWind have not resulted in reductions in grid connection times.
It is however clear that grid remains a focus of both the government and Ofgem and there are genuine attempts to seek to accelerate the establishment of a grid system that can manage low carbon generation sources.
In addition, the Scottish Government is looking to speed up decision making in relation to grid infrastructure and has recently set out a 12 month time period for decision making in respect of key grid projects.
This emphasises the particular drive and ambition that all parties seem to have in delivering an enhanced grid.
It is against that background that the further deployment of offshore wind in the UK faces significant challenges.
As identified earlier, there have been a number of international challenges to the deployment of offshore wind and there continue to be concerns regarding the ability on the supply chain to deliver at the scale of the ambition. In addition, given the international concerns regarding offshore wind, it is now even more imperative that the government does not introduce measures which create a greater risk going forward.
A live example of this is zonal pricing. These would give rise to very significant concern on behalf of the development community.
On a bright note, Flotation Energy received both consent and achieved a CfD for its innovative Green Volt floating project off the east coast of Scotland.
This is a major milestone for floating wind and will further help to develop this critical sector. It is clear that, without the development of floating technologies, there will be a constraint to the overall UK ambition.
Increasingly shallower waters are facing cumulative challenges and the ability to locate development within deeper waters will be important to meet future scales of ambition.
The next year is going to be a very important one for the offshore wind sector and it is clear that what developers want is as much certainty and stability as possible.
This in turn allows developers to properly plan and engage with the supply chains to ensure that viable projects continue to be brought forward in UK waters.
The opportunities are significant, but meaningful delivery is now the key objective of the government. It is also of note that we now have Scottish, Welsh and UK Governments which are very broadly aligned in relation to offshore wind.
It is likely to be the critical technology in achieving 2030 ambitions and it is now up to the government to ensure that a proper framework is provided and that this provides the stability for the forward investment required to make this investment happen.
Colin Innes is a confirmed speaker at All-Energy 25, the UK's largest renewable and low-carbon energy exhibition and conference, taking place in Glasgow on 14-15 May. Visit Shepherd and Wedderburn's All-Energy hub at
www.shepwedd-allenergy.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
42 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
'Russian roulette': Councillor speaks on Glasgow road crossings
Councillor Robert Mooney, Labour representative, said disabled Glaswegians are treated as an 'afterthought' as many crossings don't have working rotating cones — a tactile device which lets visually impaired people know when it is safe to cross — or audible signals. He has warned that someone will be killed if action isn't taken to address the problem. The council's transport convener, Angus Millar, SNP, said the council is 'committed' to replacing or installing the cones across the city. 'That will be done on an ongoing basis as the funding is available,' he added. In late 2021, it was revealed that 403 of 890 signal-controlled junctions across the city did not have a tactile cone. By July 2022, the council said 150 did not have features like rotating cones. Councillor Mooney said crossing roads in the city is 'like playing Russian roulette' for visually impaired people. 'Russian roulette': Councillor speaks on Glasgow road crossings (Image: Newsquest) READ NEXT: I tried Glasgow's newest food and drink tour - my verdict He explained: 'I was up at Cathedral Street a few months ago, I couldn't see whether the green man was on. 'The tactile cone wasn't working. I'd waited for some amount of time, there was a bus stopped at the traffic lights. "I said to myself, 'the green man must be on', I walked out and a bus came in the next lane, stopped about an inch from me. 'If I'd walked out a bit later, I wouldn't be here today. Somebody is going to get killed if this isn't addressed.' He also said the council's accessible design forum has not met since October, but the redevelopment of the city's public realm is 'moving on at a massive pace'. Millar said the forum holds talks about 'general principles around design' and lessons are fed into the design of different projects, which are then subject to consultation. He added: 'Disabled people and others are engaged with on active travel projects. "We have, on active travel projects, a really robust process of engagement with the local community and all stakeholders, including disabled people and their representative groups.'
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Fettes College may cut jobs after Government's VAT decision
The private school in Edinburgh said it needs to run its operations "as efficiently as possible". Jobs at a prestigious Scots private school may be lost as it looks to cut costs following the UK Government's introduction of VAT on school fees. Fettes College in Edinburgh said the decision was one of the reasons it took the 'difficult' decision to 'right size our staffing model'. The Scotsman reported that the school – attended by former prime minister Tony Blair – has opened a consultation process for both teaching and operational staff in order to reduce numbers. The most recent accounts show 751 students in August 2024, down from 780 the previous year. academic year, inclusive of VAT. The Labour government imposed VAT on private education and boarding fees, effective from January 1. Ministers argue that removing the VAT exemption will benefit the wider education sector, including the 94% of pupils who attend state schools. A spokesman for Fettes College said the sector is facing a 'tough time' and appealed for privacy for the staff involved. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. The spokesman said: 'Various factors have conspired to increase costs on all organisations and schools are not immune, particularly with the recent imposition of VAT on school fees and rise in national insurance contributions. 'Despite being financially very well managed with a strong student roll, these factors are having an impact on our costs and numbers, and we are obliged to run our operations as efficiently as possible. 'These headwinds obviously affect our families too and our parents need to be certain that we are taking the necessary decisions to run the school efficiently and to use their money effectively. 'A consultation process began in May to right size our staffing model. This difficult decision may result in some redundancies. 'We will continue to provide the highest standard of educational experience, delivering our innovative vision for the school and maintaining our position as a leader in the sector.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ancient trees are shipped to the UK, then burned – using billions in ‘green' subsidies. Stop this madness now
How green is this? We pay billions of pounds to cut down ancient forests in the US and Canada, ship the wood across the Atlantic in diesel tankers, then burn it in a Yorkshire-based power station. Welcome to the scandal of Drax, where Britain's biggest polluter gets to play climate hero. The reality is that billions in public subsidies has enabled Drax to generate electricity by burning 300m trees. Now the government is trying to force through an extension that would grant Drax an estimated £1.8bn in public subsidies on top of the £11bn it has already pocketed, keeping this circus going until at least 2031. This isn't green energy. The mathematics alone should horrify anyone who cares about value for money or the environment. Burning wood creates 18% more CO2 emissions than coal. Even if you replant every tree Drax destroys, it takes up to a century for new growth to reabsorb the carbon released. We're supposed to reach net zero by 2050, not 2125. Yet through circus-trick accounting, all of Drax's massive emissions magically disappear from Britain's climate ledger. They've simply been wished away – counted as 'zero', while the company becomes our largest single contributor to climate breakdown. Extraordinarily, this scandal unites opposition across the political spectrum. From the Greens to Reform, from the Morning Star to the Daily Telegraph, there's rare consensus that Drax represents everything wrong with our approach to climate policy. The Labour-dominated public accounts committee condemned Drax as a 'white elephant' that's been allowed to 'mark its own homework' while claiming 'billions upon billions' in subsidies. A Lords committee agreed, saying parliament needs to see key documents before approving any more funding. I don't agree with Ed Miliband on everything – we clearly have different views on nuclear power. I respect the energy secretary's commitment to tackling climate crisis, and it is worth noting that the further subsidies are half of what was previously on offer for Drax. But that's exactly why continuing to subsidise Drax at all is so disappointing. When Miliband announced his plans to 'ramp up' biomass burning back in 2009, he was genuinely trying to find alternatives to fossil fuels. But 16 years on, this policy has gone badly astray. What was meant to be a bridge to renewable energy is actually making emissions worse. If, on Monday, the House of Lords votes to extend this unabated wood burning for another four years, what is to stop these subsidies being extended again and again? And why should the government deal with a firm as untrustworthy as Drax? Perhaps most damning is what Drax refuses to reveal. After the BBC's devastating Panorama investigation into the company's destruction of Canadian primary forests, Drax asked auditor KPMG to investigate, hoping for a clean bill of health. However, the evidence was so damning that the reports are still being hidden from the public. If Drax has nothing to hide, why not publish these reports? A former top Treasury official turned whistleblower accused it of deliberately concealing unsustainable practices to secure subsidies. The case, now settled, raises questions of dishonesty that should disqualify any company from public funding. The extra billions Drax is seeking could help build enough wind and solar capacity to power millions of homes. It could create permanent jobs in genuine renewable industries, not temporary employment destroying irreplaceable ecosystems. Every pound spent subsidising tree burning is a pound not invested in technologies that could actually deliver net zero. While other countries race ahead with wind, solar and battery storage, we're burning money on the most primitive fuel known to humanity. There's a huge loophole in the government's pledge to stop Drax burning trees from primary forest. Their restrictions on Drax only apply to subsidised electricity supplied to the grid. Drax wants to power private data centres but there is no plan that prevents it from destroying ancient forests to power 21st-century AI searches. That means Drax could be cutting down even more primary forests than it does today. MPs have lost trust in the government's ability to hold Drax to account – the criticism from parliamentary committees has been brutal. The environmental movement didn't fight to establish renewable energy so politicians could facilitate the burning of ancient forests that took millennia to grow. Real climate action means making hard choices, not hiding behind accounting tricks that make our emissions disappear on paper while making them worse in reality. It is time for Labour MPs to speak up; the fight for net zero is hard enough. More subsidies for Drax's wood burning in the name of sustainability is just more fuel on that fire. Dale Vince is a green energy industrialist and campaigner
