Ancient trees are shipped to the UK, then burned – using billions in ‘green' subsidies. Stop this madness now

How green is this? We pay billions of pounds to cut down ancient forests in the US and Canada, ship the wood across the Atlantic in diesel tankers, then burn it in a Yorkshire-based power station.
Welcome to the scandal of Drax, where Britain's biggest polluter gets to play climate hero. The reality is that billions in public subsidies has enabled Drax to generate electricity by burning 300m trees. Now the government is trying to force through an extension that would grant Drax an estimated £1.8bn in public subsidies on top of the £11bn it has already pocketed, keeping this circus going until at least 2031.
This isn't green energy. The mathematics alone should horrify anyone who cares about value for money or the environment. Burning wood creates 18% more CO2 emissions than coal. Even if you replant every tree Drax destroys, it takes up to a century for new growth to reabsorb the carbon released. We're supposed to reach net zero by 2050, not 2125.
Yet through circus-trick accounting, all of Drax's massive emissions magically disappear from Britain's climate ledger. They've simply been wished away – counted as 'zero', while the company becomes our largest single contributor to climate breakdown.
Extraordinarily, this scandal unites opposition across the political spectrum. From the Greens to Reform, from the Morning Star to the Daily Telegraph, there's rare consensus that Drax represents everything wrong with our approach to climate policy.
The Labour-dominated public accounts committee condemned Drax as a 'white elephant' that's been allowed to 'mark its own homework' while claiming 'billions upon billions' in subsidies. A Lords committee agreed, saying parliament needs to see key documents before approving any more funding.
I don't agree with Ed Miliband on everything – we clearly have different views on nuclear power. I respect the energy secretary's commitment to tackling climate crisis, and it is worth noting that the further subsidies are half of what was previously on offer for Drax. But that's exactly why continuing to subsidise Drax at all is so disappointing.
When Miliband announced his plans to 'ramp up' biomass burning back in 2009, he was genuinely trying to find alternatives to fossil fuels. But 16 years on, this policy has gone badly astray. What was meant to be a bridge to renewable energy is actually making emissions worse.
If, on Monday, the House of Lords votes to extend this unabated wood burning for another four years, what is to stop these subsidies being extended again and again? And why should the government deal with a firm as untrustworthy as Drax? Perhaps most damning is what Drax refuses to reveal. After the BBC's devastating Panorama investigation into the company's destruction of Canadian primary forests, Drax asked auditor KPMG to investigate, hoping for a clean bill of health. However, the evidence was so damning that the reports are still being hidden from the public.
If Drax has nothing to hide, why not publish these reports? A former top Treasury official turned whistleblower accused it of deliberately concealing unsustainable practices to secure subsidies. The case, now settled, raises questions of dishonesty that should disqualify any company from public funding.
The extra billions Drax is seeking could help build enough wind and solar capacity to power millions of homes. It could create permanent jobs in genuine renewable industries, not temporary employment destroying irreplaceable ecosystems. Every pound spent subsidising tree burning is a pound not invested in technologies that could actually deliver net zero. While other countries race ahead with wind, solar and battery storage, we're burning money on the most primitive fuel known to humanity.
There's a huge loophole in the government's pledge to stop Drax burning trees from primary forest. Their restrictions on Drax only apply to subsidised electricity supplied to the grid. Drax wants to power private data centres but there is no plan that prevents it from destroying ancient forests to power 21st-century AI searches.
That means Drax could be cutting down even more primary forests than it does today. MPs have lost trust in the government's ability to hold Drax to account – the criticism from parliamentary committees has been brutal.
The environmental movement didn't fight to establish renewable energy so politicians could facilitate the burning of ancient forests that took millennia to grow. Real climate action means making hard choices, not hiding behind accounting tricks that make our emissions disappear on paper while making them worse in reality.
It is time for Labour MPs to speak up; the fight for net zero is hard enough. More subsidies for Drax's wood burning in the name of sustainability is just more fuel on that fire.
Dale Vince is a green energy industrialist and campaigner

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

15 minutes ago

• Telegraph

Pro-Palestine nutritionist gives anti-Israel diet advice

A nutritionist is under investigation after calling for the boycott of Israeli dates. Joan Faria, who runs nutrition clinic Empowered Nutrition, shared a recipe for stuffed dates with almond butter dipped in dark chocolate on social media. But the nutritionist wrote at the bottom of her business Facebook post for the recipe: ' Please boycott Israeli dates – if you can find Zaytoun, buy these as they support farmers in Palestine. These dates were Moroccan.' The bottom section of the post has since been deleted after Ms Faria was requested remove the remarks by the professional body for nutritionists – the British Association for Nutrition and Lifestyle Medicine (BANT). UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) complained to BANT, claiming Ms Faria breached their code of conduct, which states that members should conduct themselves in an 'honourable and courteous manner' and should be a 'professional and independent health specialist'. BANT said they requested that Ms Faria remove the section of her post mentioning the boycott and would be 'reinforcing their professional standards'. 'Unsolicited advice' The letter from UKLFI to BANT, seen by The Telegraph, claimed: 'We believe that by urging a boycott of Israeli dates brings BANT into disrepute. Ms Faria has not demonstrated an honourable and courteous manner, in particular to any Jewish, Israeli or Zionist clients or others who may follow her, or who may see her Facebook post.' It adds: 'By urging people to boycott Israeli dates, Ms Faria has offered unsolicited advice, which is not appropriate for a nutritionist.' The letter also claimed the nutritionist breached Section 29 of the 2010 Equality Act, which states: 'A service-provider must not, in relation to the provision of the service: Harass a person requiring the service, or a person to whom the service-provider provides the service.' The letter adds: 'Ms Faria is creating a hostile and offensive environment for any Jewish, Israeli or Zionist clients or potential clients, by expressing her hostility to Israeli-produced dates and commanding her followers to boycott them.' The letter also pointed out that Jews, Israelis and Zionists have protected characteristics of race, religion or belief according to Section 4 of the 2010 legislation. UKLFI also complained to the regulator, the Complementary and Natural Healthcare Council (CNHC), who told The Telegraph they had 'launched an investigation into the complaint' which was at an 'early stage'. 'She is not prioritising the health of her patients' In a second letter to the CNHC, UKLFI claimed Ms Faria was breaching their code of conduct by not 'respecting privacy and dignity', not following a 'legal duty to promote equality' and not 'avoiding unfair discrimination'. The letter said: 'If Ms Faria is allowing her own beliefs and values to prejudice her clients' care and wellbeing, she is discriminating against products of Israel, for no nutritional or health-based reason. 'She is likely to discriminate against other Israeli products and medicines, which may be the detriment of her patients. 'She is not prioritising the health of her patients, but instead prioritising her own political position. 'If she feels so strongly about her political cause that she boycotts Israeli products on her professional social media pages, she is also likely to treat Israeli or Jewish patients in a less favourable manner.' The boycott calls also drew condemnation from other Jewish groups, with the Campaign Against Antisemitism saying: 'A nutritionist should not be injecting her own inflammatory politics into dietary advice. 'Boycotts like this have real-world effects on the Jewish community. 'The regulator is absolutely right to take this seriously, and we will monitor the outcome with interest.' 'Putting political interests before those of patients' Russell Langer, director of Public Affairs at the Jewish Leadership Council, added to The Telegraph: 'Over the past 20 months, far too many workplaces, including those responsible for the welfare of Jewish and Israeli clients, have seen attempts to import a foreign conflict to the detriment of community cohesion. 'We therefore welcome BANT's confirmation that they will reinforce their professional standards and not allow their members to promote divisive boycotts of Israel in their work.' Caroline Turner, director of UKLFI, said: 'We are pleased that the regulatory bodies for nutritionists are tackling the issue of boycotts and appear to be cracking down on any members who advocate boycotting Israeli food or other items, putting their own political interests before those of their clients and patients.' Israel is a significant exporter of dates, with Medjool dates being a prominent variety. Exports were worth over £174m in 2023, with the UK being a key export destination. 'Always check the label' Various groups, such as the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign (PSC), have launched boycott campaigns and guidance, saying dates should only be bought from Palestinian sources. One bit of PSC guidance says: 'Always check the label when buying dates. Don't buy dates that are produced or packaged in Israel or its West Bank settlements. If no country of origin can be found on the box, check the retailer's website.' Last month, Co-op members urged the retailer to stop selling Israeli products as soon as this summer. Three-quarters of voters backed a motion urging the board to show 'moral courage and leadership' by removing Israeli products from its shelves. Responding to the result, the Co-op announced at its annual general meeting that the motion was advisory, but confirmed it was reviewing its sourcing policy. The CNHC added: 'CNHC Registrants have a legal duty to promote equality and must make sure that their own beliefs and values do not prejudice their clients' care and wellbeing.' A spokesman said: 'The Registrant has been invited to provide her written representations in response to the Complaint.' Ms Faria said: 'Because the CNHC investigation is at an early stage and ongoing, I will not be responding at this stage.'

The Sun

15 minutes ago

• The Sun

Reform on course to win next election with over a third of voters backing Nigel Farage, bombshell new poll reveals

REFORM are on track to win the next election, according to a new poll. More than a third of voters said they will support Nigel Farage's party, as reported by the Telegraph. Figures revealed 34 per cent of poll takers voted for Reform, ahead of 25 per cent who were in favour of Labour. It also emerged only 15 per cent of users elected the Conservatives. This marks the biggest breakthrough for Reform in a poll and in response Mr Farage told The Telegraph: 'This poll shows Reform can and will win the next general election.' The news outlet estimated if the poll was taken in four years time, Farage would win more than 400 seats and a majority. It could see the party leader win his place as the UK's next Prime Minister. The research also suggested Labour would lose around 270 seats, while the Conservatives would have less than 10. Despite the stats, it is important to bare in mind opinion polls and seat numbers are very hard to correlate. A Reform UK source said: 'This is big Reform majority territory.' Meanwhile, Gideon Skinner, senior director of UK politics at Ipsos, said: 'The last year has indeed been a long time in politics, with our first voting intention poll since the election showing just how much the political landscape has transformed since then. 'Reform UK has continued to build on its success, helped by high levels of enthusiasm among its own support and among working class voters in particular, and taking votes from both Labour and especially the Conservatives, who show little sign of recovery.' He added: 'The disappointment with Labour is clear, even among those who voted for the party in 2024. "We know from Ipsos research how difficult it has been to shift entrenched public pessimism over the cost of living, immigration, and the state of public services, and so far, Britons do not think Labour is delivering the tangible change they were hoping for in 2024. "This is reflected in satisfaction ratings for the government and Prime Minister that - while not quite the worst Ipsos has ever seen - are well below the average we usually see coming up to a one year anniversary. "Indeed, they look remarkably similar to the poor ratings received by Gordon Brown in 2008 after the financial crash. Labour will be hoping that the Spending Review will start to switch the narrative to a more positive one of renewal, but the challenge they face is significant. "This research also marks a new methodological approach for Ipsos, using our online KnowledgePanel based on gold-standard random probability sampling, and other changes we have made since the general election. "As with any individual survey it is important to remember that margins of error apply, and results should be interpreted in the round along with other sources of data. "As always, Ipsos will continue to review this new approach, and may make further refinements in the future if necessary." 1 is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video. Like us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.

BBC News

28 minutes ago

• BBC News

Cheltenham in takeover talks with ex-Burnley chairman

Former Burnley chairman Mike Garlick has entered into a period of exclusivity with Cheltenham Town over a potential takeover of the League Two Robins announced in October last year that they were looking for "substantial" investment., externalGarlick left the Burnley board in 2023 after 17 years at Turf Moor, including eight as club chairman during which time the Clarets twice won promotion to the Premier 61-year-old also owns Gibraltar top-flight club St Joseph's and third tier Spanish side FC finished 15th in the fourth tier last season. In a statement on the club website,, external Cheltenham said their principal shareholders had "signed a letter of intent including a period of exclusivity" with Garlick."The board and principal shareholders have worked tirelessly over the last nine months to find the right investor who can secure the financial future of the club whilst at the same recognising and maintaining its identity and community values," said chairman David Bloxham."We are delighted to enter into a period of exclusivity with Mike Garlick and believe his interest in the club will herald an exciting future for the club and its fans."In October, Bloxham said three of the club's four biggest shareholders were willing to sell their stakes if the "right" new investment was found.