Hedges capture more carbon than grassland - University of Leeds study
Hedgerows increase soil carbon storage by almost half compared to grassland, according to research from the University of Leeds.The team of scientists analysed soil samples from farms in Yorkshire, Cumbria and West Sussex, to find out how carbon storage under hedgerows compared to that found in adjacent grass fields.The research found that soil under hedges stored on average 40 tonnes more carbon per hectare than grassland.Dr Sofia Biffi, a research fellow in agricultural ecosystems, said the results showed hedgerows could have a positive impact on soil health and soil carbon storage.
"In the past few years, we have witnessed how farmers are engaging with hedge planting. They can see the difference that hedges make to the biodiversity on their farms," she said."They see more birds, bats and pollinators, and they enjoy their flowers, wood and shade. And now they can also know they are playing their part in storing more carbon in the soil."The results were published in the journal Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.Dairy farmer and England chair of the Nature Friendly Farming Network, James Robinson, said it was "good to have the science to back up what we farmers already know".He said: "There is an ever-growing list of reasons to plant and manage hedgerows, from livestock health, crop protection and biosecurity, through to carbon storage."Hedgerows should be seen as a huge asset both to farmers and the landscape and if we manage them in the right way, using traditional hedge laying techniques, we can make them an eternal feature of our rural landscape."The team compromised researchers from the University of Leeds School of Geography and the University of Sheffield's School of Biosciences. They said the data could be used to predict the impact of planting new hedgerows on the UK's net zero targets.About half of Britain's hedgerows were lost between the 1940s and 1990s, mostly in England, due to intensive farming and development.According to the Woodland Trust, around 118,000 miles of hedgerows disappeared in that time.While the loss has slowed since the 1990s, neglect, damage and removal remain big threats.Study co-author professor Pippa Chapman said existing hedgerows needed to be maintained to ensure the carbon stored in the soil does not disappear into the atmosphere. She said: "We have seen some important hedgerow planting commitments from the government, which we hope they will support farmers to achieve in the next few years. "It is not only hedgerow planting that brings so many benefits to farmland but also maintaining the network of hedges and hedgerow trees that we already have."Planting, gapping-up, and hedge laying are all important actions that farmers can take to help protect the carbon stored in soil beneath hedges and the environment."Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North or tell us a story you think we should be covering here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
The farming robot aiming to boost the quality and quantity of crops in Africa
A farm robot that roams fields to alert farmers to crop disease, health monitors for newborns, and sensors to keep beehives healthy are on the shortlist for a prestigious prize for African inventors and entrepreneurs. This year's contenders for the Royal Academy of Engineering's Africa Prize will fight it out for a share of a £60,000 prize fund. The prize, now in its 11th year, is the continent's largest to encourage engineering innovation, with entrants tackling challenges from food insecurity and renewable energy to healthcare. Alumni from the prize have gone on to raise more than £29m in funding and investment to develop their inventions. The shortlist for the 2025 prize includes a 'FarmBot' designed by self-taught Togolese software engineer Sam Kodo, which drives through fields collecting data on soil moisture, plant health and pest activity. Mr Kodo said artificial intelligence linked to a multi-spectral camera would allow the bot to spot early signs of infections and infestations, such as leaf spots or yellowing. The 30-year-old, who has been building robots since the age of 10, told the Telegraph: 'I have a friend who is a farmer who used to notice each year that he had lost half his crop production. 'He reached out to me as an engineer to see if I could help and I came up with the idea of building a robot.' The FarmBot also uses humidity sensors to monitor soil moisture levels, showing farmers where they need to irrigate their crop. Mr Kodo has spent eight months building and testing the robot so far and is hiring it out to farmers. He now hopes to build 50 more over the next three years, widening their deployment into rural areas with more farmers. Engineering and business experts at the academy have selected a shortlist of 16 candidates, from seven countries. This year's shortlist includes entries from Ghana, Nigeria, Mozambique, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and Togo. As well as the FarmBot, other innovations include a bracelet-like device worn by newborns that monitors temperature and signs of fever and transmits real time data to carers, as well as beehive monitors to combat bee colony collapse. Sewu-Steve Tawia, managing partner of the Jaza Rift African venture capital firm and a judge for the past four years, said the prize was looking at both the commercial viability of the inventions and also looking at the impact they were likely to have. Finalists are given business and engineering advice and many from previous rounds have gone on to raise further capital and investment. He said: 'It's always a springboard for a lot of these companies to get to the next level, depending on where they were starting from.' He went on: 'This is such a valuable programme, that if that could be done 10 times more, with a lot more capital provided to the companies, I think that would be more impactful.'
The Independent
4 days ago
- The Independent
America set to open Texas ‘fly factory' in bid to breed millions of insects
The US government is poised to open an unusual new facility in Texas by the end of the year: a "fly factory" designed to combat a flesh-eating parasite threatening American cattle. This $8.5 million operation, situated near the Mexican border, aims to prevent infestations of the New World screwworm, a notorious pest whose larvae feed on the flesh of warm-blooded animals. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced on Wednesday that the facility will breed millions of sterile male screwworm flies. These insects will be released into the wild, where they will mate with female screwworms. Crucially, these pairings will not produce viable offspring, thereby preventing the females from laying eggs in animal wounds that would otherwise hatch into destructive, flesh-eating larvae. The Texas plant marks only the second such facility in the Western Hemisphere, complementing an existing operation in Panama. For years, the Panama facility largely succeeded in preventing the screwworm's northward migration, but a breach last year underscored the urgent need for additional measures to safeguard US livestock. The fly's appearance in southern Mexico late last year has worried agriculture and cattle industry officials and veterinarians' groups, and the U.S. last month suspended imports of live cattle, horses and bison from Mexico. The U.S. Department of Agriculture also plans to spend $21 million to convert a facility for breeding fruit flies near Mexico's southernmost border with Guatemala into one for breeding sterile New World screwworm flies, but it won't be ready for 18 months. The U.S. bred and released sterile New World screwworm flies into the wild decades ago, and it was largely banished from the country in the 1960s. Previously, it had been an annual scourge for cattle ranchers and dairy farmers, particularly in the Southeast. 'The United States has defeated NWS before, and we will do it again," Rollins said. She held a news conference at Moore Air Base with Texas and cattle industry officials. Mexican Agriculture Secretary Julio Berdegué said in a post Wednesday on X that Rollins' plan 'seems to us a positive step in different aspects, it will strengthen the joint Mexico-US work.' 'We trust the enthusiasm for cooperation that Secretary Rollins mentioned, and based on objective results and the reports from the USDA mission visiting us this week, we will be able to restart exports of our cattle as soon as possible," he said. The new Texas facility would be built at Moore Air Base, less than 20 miles (32 kilometers) from the Mexico border, and the USDA said it would also consider building a companion fly-breeding center there so that up to 300 million flies could be produced a week. The Panama facility breeds about 100 million a week, and the one in Mexico could breed as many as 100 million as well. The USDA has said the flies have been detected as close as 700 miles (1,127 kilometers) from the U.S. border, and some U.S. agriculture and cattle industry officials have worried that if the migration isn't checked, the flies could reach the border by the end of summer. Pressure from the U.S. prompted Mexico to step up efforts to control the fly's spread. Buck Wehrbein, a Nebraska cattle rancher and the president of the National Beef Cattlemen's Association, said Moore Air Base had a fly-breeding facility in the 1960s that helped eradicate it in the U.S. While there are treatments for New World screwworm infestations, cattle industry officials still worry that farmers and ranchers could see huge economic losses. They, agriculture officials and scientists also said the larva can infest any mammal, including household pets, and it has occasionally been seen in humans. 'The only way to protect the American cattle herd from the devastating threat of New World screwworm is by having a sufficient supply of sterile flies to push this pest away from our border,' Wehrbein said. Texas officials said they are grateful that the U.S. is taking the screwworm threat serious and pleased with the plans for combating it, including the new facility in Texas. Officials in other states are watching the fly's migration as well and see having sterile male flies outnumber the non-sterile one is crucial to checking its migration. 'We have a real concern about wildlife because of their ability to cross the border unchecked somewhat, whether it's feral pigs, deer, wild cattle, whatever the case may be,' Kansas Animal Health Commissioner Justin Smith said in a recent interview. 'There's an opportunity for them to be our exposure risk.'
The Guardian
5 days ago
- The Guardian
Key crop yields could fall due to climate crisis even if farmers adapt, study finds
Some of our critical staple crops could suffer 'substantial' production losses due to climate breakdown, a study has found, even if farmers adapt to worsening weather. Rice, maize, soy, wheat, cassava and sorghum yields are all projected to fall by as much as 120 calories per person per day for every 1C the planet heats up, according to new research in Nature, with average daily losses that could add up to the equivalent of not having breakfast. The study found rising incomes and changes in farming practices could stem the losses by about a quarter by 2050 and by one-third by 2100 – though they would not stop them entirely. 'In a high-warming future, we're still seeing caloric productivity losses in the order of 25% at global scale,' said Andrew Hultgren, an environmental economist at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and lead author of the study. 'It's not as bad as a future where adaptation doesn't happen at all, but it's not this rosy 'agriculture is going to benefit from climate change' kind of picture.' Farmers are among those hardest-hit by extreme weather events, but scientists have struggled to quantify what climate breakdown will do to food production. A major source of uncertainty is the extent to which farmers will adapt to hotter temperatures by changing which crops they use, when they plant and harvest them, and how they grow them. The team of researchers from the US and China used data from 12,658 regions across 54 countries to capture the extent to which food producers have adapted to different changes in the climate. They applied these historical relations to models simulating future crop production as temperatures rise and economies grow, and compared the losses to a hypothetical world in which global heating stopped in the early 2000s. In an extreme heating scenario, the study found, the relative yield for a crop such as soy would fall by 26% by 2100, even after accounting for adaptation, rising incomes and the effect of plants growing faster due to extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. A more realistic heating scenario – closer to the level that current policies will cause – would lead to yield losses of 16% for soy, 7.7% for wheat and 8.3% for corn, the study found. Rice is the only one of the six crops the researchers studied for which yields would rise because of climate change, with an expected gain of 4.9%. The global population is projected to rise from about 8 million today to 10 million by the end of the century, increasing demand for food as carbon pollution warps weather patterns. The researchers found the greatest losses would hit modern-day breadbaskets with highly productive lands, but added that people in poorer countries would be among the ones least able to afford food. 'In a lot of climate impact studies, the global poor get hurt, and that's true here too,' said Hultgren. 'What is different from a lot of the previous work out there is that relatively rich, well-to-do portions of the world that are bread baskets are actually hit the hardest.' The research, which uses econometric methods to gauge the total effect of adapting, contrasts with previous studies that explicitly model biophysical interactions. A study in Nature Communications in 2022 using the latter approach found timely adaptation of growing periods would increase actual crop yields by 12%. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Jonas Jägermeyr, a researcher at Columbia Climate School and co-author of the study, said the new research did not cover adaptation options that are not implemented today and that its results were likely to be pessimistic. 'Empirical impact studies are known to be overly pessimistic when it comes to far-into-the-future scenarios,' he said. 'Process-based models show the importance of plant growth interactions that cannot be empirically trained on historical data.' But such models have also been criticised for exploring what is theoretically possible without reflecting real-world constraints, such as market failures, human error and the availability of funds. 'The findings [of the new study] are reasonable but represent one end of a legitimate scientific debate,' said Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei, a crop scientist at the Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research. He added: 'I view these results as a valuable empirical reality check showing we cannot assume perfect adaptation will save us – even if the truth likely lies between their pessimistic projections and [other researchers'] optimistic ones.'
