Why travel insurance is a must for seniors
Travel insurance can be a huge help to anyone, especially older travelers who may have a greater risk of health issues or unexpected travel disruptions and greater concerns about protecting their finances.
CNBC Select explores why travel insurance is so important for seniors and the policies to consider if you're over 65.
Whether you have private insurance or Medicare, your U.S. health care plan probably isn't valid abroad. That's where your travel insurance policy's medical coverage is invaluable. It will cover the cost of doctor's visits, hospital stays, prescriptions and more. If you need to be flown somewhere for treatment or get back home, a good policy will also cover the cost of medical evacuation.
We recommend buying a policy with at least $100,000 in emergency medical coverage and $250,0000 in evacuation coverage. If you're visiting far-flung locales or are particularly concerned about your health, however, look at policies with higher limits.
Travel Insured International has some of the highest limits we've seen. Plans cover up to $250,000 in emergency medical expenses and $1 million for evacuation or repatriation.
Single-trip and multi-trip/annual policies and cruise insurance. Add-ons include Cancel for Any Reason coverage and a travel inconvenience benefit
Add-on to Worldwide Trip Protector Deluxe or Platinum plan that reimburses 75% of nonrefundable costs when purchased within 21 days of initial trip payment
Available if policy is purchased within 21 days of initial trip deposit.
A standard travel insurance policy won't cover pre-existing conditions if they force you to change your plans or seek medical treatment.
A pre-existing condition is any injury, illness or chronic condition that requires treatment or medication, including diabetes, arthritis, cardiac disease or COPD. If you file a claim, your provider will typically look back 60 to 180 days before you enrolled to see if there were any changes in your medical status.
You can get a pre-existing condition waiver, however, which prevents your insurer from reviewing your records when processing a claim. Many companies offer waivers but require travelers to be medically able to travel and to buy their policy within two weeks of booking. We like Nationwide for its more generous 21-day window in which you can buy coverage and still receive a waiver.
Single- and multi-trip plans and cruise insurance, plus add-ons like CFAR and rental car coverage.
Add-on to Prime plan that reimburses 75% of nonrefundable trip costs if purchased within 21 days of booking (Not available in New York or Washington state)
Available with single-trip plan purchased within 20 days of initial trip deposit (14 days for cruise insurance)
Even if you don't have a medical issue on your trip, you might have to cancel your plans because of a health condition, death in the family or other emergency.
Trip cancellation and interruption coverage are among the best reasons to get travel insurance. A comprehensive plan will reimburse up to 100% of your nonrefundable costs if you need to cancel and up to 150% if you need to cut your trip short.Read your policy's terms to see what events are covered, but common scenarios include:
If you're concerned about your situation being covered or don't want to have to submit proof, a Cancel For Any Reason (CFAR) policy will refund a portion of your expenses, regardless of why you scraped your plans.
Most CFAR plans limit you to 50% to 75% of your nonrefundable costs, but Allianz reimburses 80% of expenses.
Single-trip and multi-trip/annual policies and a rental car plan. OneTrip Prime and Premier plans include coverage for one child 17 or younger when accompanying a covered adult.
Reimburses 80% of nonrefundable trip costs if you cancel at least 48 hours before departure.
Included if policy is purchased within 14 days of initial deposit
Read our review of Allianz Travel Insurance
Cruises are particularly popular with retirees, who enjoy the convenience, entertainment and relaxing atmosphere, and have the funds and free time to devote to an extended excursion.
Viking, Holland America and Cunard all market cruises aimed at older travelers.Cruises come with specific risks, though, including the ship breaking down or you missing your connection. We love Seven Corners' cruise insurance policies, which include up to $250 a day for missed connections, $5,000 for an itinerary change and $250 each time the ship is disabled or misses a port of call. Plus, Seven Corners gives you 20 days to buy a policy with a pre-existing condition waiver and covers travelers up to age 99.
The best way to estimate your costs is to request a quote
Policies provide missed and delayed tour/cruise connection coverage. Cancel for any reason coverage and pre-existing conditions waiver are also available if you buy your plan within the specified time. ***CFAR and IFAR are subject to certain eligibility criteria and are not available in all states
Yes
Many travel insurance companies put age restrictions on their policies, limiting coverage to travelers under 79 or even 65. The cost of a policy can also be much more expensive for older travelers.
Seven Corners will approve coverage for travelers up to age 99 and Faye and Travelex don't have any age restrictions at all.
One single-trip plan with optional add-ons for pet care, adventure sports and damage to vacation rentals
Up to 75% reimbursement of nonrefundable trip costs if purchased within 14 days of initial trip deposit.
Available if policy is purchased within 14 days of initial trip deposit.
Essential, Advantage and Ultimate policies plus last-minute Travel Med Go plan and standalone plans for emergency medical and flight coverage. Upgrades include rental car, pet and adventure activities coverage
Upgrade with Ultimate plan covering 75% of nonrefundable trip costs if purchased within 21 days of initial deposit and 31 days of departure.
Included with Ultimate plan if purchased within 21 days of initial deposit
Travel insurance averages between 4% and 10% of your total nonrefundable trip expenses. Because of increased risk, seniors pay on the higher end of that range.
CNBC Select gathered rate quotes for a 65-year-old traveler and a 30-year-old traveler taking the same one-week $3,000 excursion to London and looking for $250,000 in medical coverage and $1 million in evacuation coverage. While the 30-year-old's rate was about 4.4% of their nonrefundable trip expenses, the 65-year-old was quoted a rate of about 7.3%.
There can be a significant difference in price among carriers, so using a travel insurance marketplace like Squaremouth can help you compare rates in minutes.
SquareMouth is a travel insurance marketplace that allows you can compare top-rated providers, including Berkshire Hathaway, Nationwide, Seven Corners and Tin Leg.
Yes
Read our SquareMouth travel insurance review
The best policy for any traveler depends on your specific needs, the length and location of your excursion and other factors. Our top picks for travel insurance for seniors includes Travel Insured International, Nationwide, Seven Corners, Allianz and Faye.
Some companies allow you to buy a policy up until a day or two before your departure, although enrolling within two weeks of booking ensures you have access to a pre-existing condition waiver and other benefits.
Travel insurance typically costs between 4% and 10% of your nonrefundable trip expenses. For seniors, a policy will more likely be on the higher end of that range. We found coverage for a 65-year-old on a one-week vacation in London was 7.3% of the total expense.
Money matters — so make the most of it. Get expert tips, strategies, news and everything else you need to maximize your money, right to your inbox. Sign up here.
At CNBC Select, our mission is to provide our readers with high-quality service journalism and comprehensive consumer advice so they can make informed decisions with their money. Every travel insurance review is based on rigorous reporting by our team of expert writers and editors with extensive knowledge of travel insurance products. While CNBC Select earns a commission from affiliate partners on many offers and links, we create all our content without input from our commercial team or any outside third parties, and we pride ourselves on our journalistic standards and ethics.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Adams administration changes course on Medicare Advantage
Beat Memo Mayor Eric Adams announced he will not move forward with a contentious effort to cut costs by shifting retired city workers to a Medicare Advantage plan, bringing a sudden end to a four-year saga. 'We have heard concerns from retirees about these potential changes at numerous older adult town halls and public events, and our administration remains focused on ensuring that New York City remains an affordable place to live,' Adams said in a statement Friday. Just two days earlier, the state Court of Appeals ruled in City Hall's favor in a lawsuit over the Medicare Advantage transition, handing Adams a rare win in the long legal battle to implement a plan he inherited from former Mayor Bill de Blasio. But Adams said the city had found other ways to address health care costs. He did not offer specifics, but City Hall announced a plan earlier this month to save $1 billion annually by designing a new health coverage option with EmblemHealth and UnitedHealthcare for the majority of active city workers. 'Since the mayor has decided not to proceed with the Medicare Advantage plan, this fulfills the unions' obligation to generate Medicare-eligible retiree health care savings,' Henry Garrido, executive director of public employee union DC 37, said in a statement. 'The savings from the abandoned plan must not come at the expense of our members.' Many elected officials applauded Adams' decision, which comes shortly before a planned kickoff event for his reelection campaign. Local lawmakers and municipal retirees plan to celebrate the news today in City Hall Park, but they are already eyeing their next steps: continuing to lobby for legislation that would permanently protect their health benefits. The bill, which is spearheaded by Council Member Christopher Marte, has 17 co-sponsors. 'While this decision is welcome, we have to codify our success,' Marte said in a statement. 'Our retirees deserve certainty, dignity, and care—not corporate shortcuts and backroom deals.' ON THE AGENDA: — Thursday at 11 a.m. The state will hold its annual forum on the 1332 waiver. — Thursday at 3 p.m. NYC Health + Hospitals' board of directors meets. GOT TIPS? Send story ideas and feedback to Maya Kaufman at mkaufman@ and Katelyn Cordero at kcordero@ Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. What you may have missed — The state plans to bar health insurance companies from paying brokers a commission for enrolling people in the Essential Plan starting next year, POLITICO Pro's Maya Kaufman reported. Independent insurance brokers are mobilizing in opposition to the little-noticed policy change, which was tucked into a 73-page information booklet for health plans about 2026 participation in the NY State of Health insurance marketplace. Odds and Ends NOW WE KNOW — Melanoma cases are on the rise in women under 50. TODAY'S TIP — Get ready for scorching temperatures this week by taking these precautions. STUDY THIS — Via WaPo: The 'sitting-rising test' could be an early indicator of how long you'll live, according to new research. What We're Reading — Insurers pledge to ease controversial prior approvals for medical care. (New York Times) — More employers are giving workers money to buy their own health insurance. (AP) Around POLITICO — CMS finalizes plan to narrow Obamacare enrollment and DACA sign ups, David Lim reports. — Via POLITICO's Jordan Cairney: Provider tax crackdown is a no-go in the House, Hawley warns. MISSED A ROUNDUP? Get caught up on the New York Health Care Newsletter.
Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
New Study Finds Senior Patients Managed by Women Physicians in a Value-Based Care (VBC) Model Have Equal or Better Clinical and Quality Outcomes and Less Healthcare Utilization
WESTERVILLE, Ohio--(BUSINESS WIRE)--agilon health (NYSE: AGL), the trusted partner empowering physicians to transform health care in our communities, today announced the publication of new peer-reviewed data examining the impact of gender differences of primary care physicians (PCPs) on patient outcomes, healthcare utilization and revenue using different Medicare payment models, specifically value-based care (VBC) and fee-for-service (FFS). Research was published in the May 16, 2025, issue of the JAMA Health Forum. In the study, researchers identified nearly 900 PCPs, of whom 40% were women, at 15 practice groups across seven states who deliver care through agilon's VBC model. Researchers then examined claims data from approximately 225,000 Medicare Advantage (MA) patients who were treated by these physicians, as well as the corresponding Stars quality data from national and regional payors. When comparing men and women PCPs in the same practice groups, researchers found that patients managed by women PCPs in a VBC model experience equal or better clinical and quality outcomes and less healthcare utilization, and the women physicians earned more per patient. 'The reversal of the gender gap under value-based payment implies that these models may be better aligned with desirable practice patterns that are more common in women, like spending more face-to-face time with patients in office visits,' said study author Ishani Ganguli, MD, MPH, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Specifically, researchers observed the following: Outcomes: Senior patients managed by women PCPs experienced better key clinical outcomes, as evidenced by better hemoglobin A1C control and receipt of more eye exams for those with diabetes, compared to patients seen by men PCPs. Of note, similar patient outcomes were observed for blood pressure control and adherence to statin medication for cholesterol management between the two groups. In terms of quality scores, women PCPs had higher composite Stars quality scores, but lower provider rating scores than their men counterparts. Utilization: While the number of primary care visits were similar between the two groups, visits to the emergency room (ER) and hospitalizations were substantially lower for patients seeing women PCPs compared to those seeing men PCPs. Revenue: Compared to men PCPs in their own practice groups, women PCPs earned more per patient in the VBC model and similar amounts under the FFS model. 'As a woman physician, I believe VBC allows us the opportunity to leverage the relationships we develop with our patients, which correlates to improved outcomes, and the ability to be paid because of those important connections,' said study author Victoria DiGennaro, DO, Pioneer Physicians Network, Akron, OH. 'Our partnership with agilon health and implementation of its VBC model have been instrumental in enabling both of those to happen.' agilon's VBC model, which puts the physician at the center, is known as the Total Care Model. The Total Care Model takes the same physicians, the same patients and the same payors, and moves them from the challenges of FFS into a total care relationship, which results in high-quality care and improved patient clinical and quality outcomes, lower healthcare costs and healthier communities. It encompasses long-term partnerships, a purpose-built platform and a Physician Network that helps physicians overcome obstacles and transition to VBC. 'In addition to agilon's Physician Network, another benefit of our partnership has been the focus on women physicians, which includes a Women Physician Leadership Council,' added Dr. DiGennaro. 'Many women physicians want to practice medicine as they were trained, while finding that critical work-life balance, and I'm proud to be a voice for them through my involvement on the Council.' Study design In this cross-sectional study, researchers examined PCPs with primary care specialties who participated in agilon's Total Care Model. A total of 872 PCPs (352 of whom were women) working in 15 practice groups in seven states (Ohio, Texas, New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, North Carolina and Michigan) were included, along with 223,810 MA patients. Women and men PCPs had similar education, years of experience and specialties. There are several limitations to the study. First, results may not generalize beyond physicians who participate in risk arrangements. Second, MA patients represent only a portion of doctors' patient panels. And, finally, researchers cannot observe how individual practice groups translated MA payments to take-home wages (though comparing PCPs within the same practice groups mitigates this concern). About agilon health agilon health is the trusted partner empowering physicians to transform health care in our communities. Through our partnerships and purpose-built platform, agilon is accelerating at scale how physician groups and health systems transition to a value-based Total Care Model for their senior patients. agilon provides the technology, people, capital, process and access to a peer network of 2,200+ primary care physicians that allow its physician partners to maintain their independence and focus on the total health of their most vulnerable patients. Together, agilon and its physician partners are creating the healthcare system we need – one built on the value of care, not the volume of fees. The result: healthier communities and empowered doctors. agilon is the trusted partner in 30 diverse communities and is here to help more of our nation's leading physician groups and health systems have a sustained, thriving future. For more information, visit and connect with us on LinkedIn.
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
American insurers to optimize prior authorizations
A group of major health care insurers, including Humana, whose CEO Bruce Broussard is pictured here, agred to streamline the prior authorizations process. File Photo by Oliver Contreras/UPI | License Photo June 23 (UPI) -- Major American insurers announced Monday that they have agreed to speed up and smooth out the processes involved with the reception and administration of health care by streamlining the prior authorization process. The AHIP health insurance industry trade association explained in a press release that dozens of large insurers such as Blue Cross Blue Shield, Humana, Cigna and UnitedHealthCare have voluntarily agreed to "streamline, simplify and reduce prior authorization," a move intended to better connect patients to necessary care while cutting down on the clerical loads of providers. "The health care system remains fragmented and burdened by outdated manual processes, resulting in frustration for patients and providers alike," said AHIP President and CEO Mike Tuffin. According to the companies, 257 million Americans should benefit from the changes, which will be implemented across markets, and include commercial coverage and some Medicare and Medicaid plans. "Health plans are making voluntary commitments to deliver a more seamless patient experience and enable providers to focus on patient care, while also helping to modernize the system," he added. Prior authorization requires that providers attain approval from a patient's insurance company before they can conduct services or treatments. The press release said that such authorizations can lead to the denial or delays of medically necessary care, while also causing "physician burnout." The plan is to create a "common standard" in regard to the submission of electronic prior authorization requests by the beginning of 2027, at which point at least 80% of authorization request approvals will be receive real time responses. Individual plans will also reduce claim types that are subject to prior authorization requests by 2026. "We are encouraged by this collective commitment to reform prior authorization practices," said Executive Vice President and CEO of the American Academy of Family Physicians Shawn Martin. "Physicians have long advocated for reforms that help ensure that patients receive timely, medically necessary care and reduce administrative burden, including the elimination of unnecessary prior authorizations." However, prior authorizations aren't going away, and insurers involved with the change are scheduled to meet with U.S. Heath and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz Monday.
