Boots Workers Worry About Sycamore Cost Cuts
'We've had several rounds of cost-cutting and it could happen again,' says a Boots worker. Fears are running high as the Nottinghamshire-based chemist prepares to change hands – perhaps twice in quick succession.
The US private equity firm Sycamore Partners is close to finalising a $10 billion (£7.8 billion) deal to take over the listed US owner of Boots, Walgreens Boots Alliance.
Experts say Sycamore is then likely to sell off assets, having previously employed this tactic with varying degrees of success at office supplies group Staples and the former owner of the footwear brand Kurt Geiger, Jones Group. It could look at picking off some aspects of Boots – such as stores, property or brands – but is more likely to sell on the entire business.
Boots – which operates more than 1,800 stores and employs about 51,000 people – including about 6,000 at its headquarters in Beeston, three miles south-west of Nottingham – has already been unsuccessfully put on the block by Walgreens at least twice in recent years, with a valuation of as much as £5 billion.
The company has changed hands several times in the past 20 years. After a merger with Alliance Unichem in 2006, the combined firm was taken over by private equity firm KKR in 2007, before Walgreens first took a 45 percent stake in 2012 and then completed a takeover at the end of 2014.
But there are concerns now that this latest change of ownership could see the chain of stores, many of which already need more investment in equipment, staff and maintenance, take another hit.
Nowhere is that more keenly felt than in Nottingham, where Boots is the city's biggest private-sector employer and has been a key to its identity since founder John Boot opened a small herbalist store on Goose Gate in 1849. The group has been based at its 112-hectare headquarters site in Beeston since 1927.
'There won't be any regret we are no longer part of Walgreens,' one Boots worker said. 'We have always been seen as a small part of that group. Before that Boots was Boots.' However, he adds: 'The fear is more stores close or there is yet another round of reducing staff in stores.'
'Private equity are in it to make money as quickly as they can and are not really bothered about the consequences,' said another.
The high street is very uncertain at the moment. Who will be looking to buy into a retailer with such a huge presence? Boots Worker, Beeston
On Beeston high street, several locals say they used to work for Boots or have friends and family who still do.
Jessica Stanley, 38, is suspicious of private equity firms 'because they are thinking about shareholder profits and not value of the business to the community. I guess I would be concerned there's a risk the company might be gutted.'
Michelle Aduhene, 50, compares any potential change to the closure of bicycle maker Raleigh's Nottingham factory two decades ago. 'They built the university [on the old factory site] and that brought students, but does it bring money? It's worrying.' She points to the hit local businesses that also benefit from Boots' employees' trade could face.
However, several staff tell the Observer they would be quite relaxed about a new regime as they have already survived a lot of cost-cutting and restructuring under its various owners, including Walgreens. 'It all happens so far up the line it won't affect us,' says one.
The vast Boots campus still hints at a huge empire – but much of it is now rented out to other companies, some buildings lie empty and about 17 hectares have been sold off to builder Keepmoat for redevelopment into housing.
Occupants are continuing to move out. Alliance Healthcare, the owner of Boots's former wholesale arm, announced plans to close its warehouse in Beeston next year, shortly after Fareva – the French owner of Boots's former manufacturing arm, which makes products for its No7, Soltan and Liz Earle ranges – exited late last year.
There are rumours that more of the site could be sold for redevelopment, with Boots apparently assessing its vacant properties, although the company does not confirm this. Some locals feared a big swathe of student housing could be built, but local property experts say it would be tough to sell off large expanses of the site because of its complex nature.
It has several stunning listed buildings – including the art-deco former factory, which is now MediCity, a hub for biotechnology, health and beauty startups which has a number of spaces vacant – and modernist glass monolith D10, which until recently housed Fareva.
With Boots' manufacturing and wholesale businesses already hived off, there are few divisions left that can be easily sold. However, the own-label beauty brands, including Liz Earle and No7, became a separate company about 10 years ago and could potentially be attractive to an international beauty specialist, according to industry experts. The No7 brand is now sold in the US via Walgreens and other retailers, but is also seen as key to Boots's appeal in Britain.
Boots has been offering services such as obesity clinics and vaccinations, so there are new areas for potential growth
Store closures then would be an obvious way to go – as evidenced by the complete exit of rival chemist chain Lloyds from the high street after it was bought by private equity.
Boots has already closed more than 300 outlets in recent years but it still has a very high number of stores. Any new owner is likely to look closely at the chain's property footprint, given the rising costs of high street retail, the shift of trade to online, and competition from discounters such as Savers, Lidl and Home Bargains.
Over a quarter (27 percent) of Boots staff surveyed in a poll by campaign group Organise said they feared their job would be less secure and more than a third (36 percent) said they felt conditions could get worse in the event of a takeover.
As one worker puts it: 'Because the high street is a very uncertain place at the moment, who is going to be looking to buy into a retailer with such a huge high street presence?'
A listing on the stock exchange is seen as unlikely, given the current volatile situation on public markets and scepticism about growth in consumer companies, so a private sale is seen as more likely.
'Boots has improved dramatically in recent years,' says one source who knows the business well, pointing to the chain's greater focus on beauty counters and use of technology to grab a share of the online market.
'But Boots is very hard to grow as it has got such big market share in most of the markets it is in, and is incessantly under attack from emerging market players. As its market share is so high there is almost only one way to go.
'Someone could run it for cash and slowly underinvest in stores but it has been through that already.'
In recent years, the brand has ridden a strong beauty market, reporting a 1.6 percent rise in sales in the three months to the end of February. Underlying sales at its pharmacies and its retail business, excluding the impact of currency and store closures, both rose about 5 percent, while Boots.com sales soared 20 percent.
But staff say that government contracts for pharmacy services make it difficult to cover costs, and Boots has already reduced pharmacy trading hours in many stores, so counters can be closed even when the rest of the store is open.
Workers also point to poor maintenance in some stores and fewer staff, meaning tills are unattended or increasingly automated, which they say is not good for older shoppers.
Previously interested parties include India's Reliance Industries and restructuring expert Apollo Global Management. CVC, Bain Capital and Asda owner TDR Capital also looked at the group but balked at the then mooted price of at least £5 billion.
Stefano Pessina, the entrepreneur behind all the deals at Boots since it merged with his Alliance Unichem business in 2006, is likely to be kingmaker. Those who know him suggest he could keep a stake in Boots and may want to be involved in its future – if he sees a way to make money from it.
Not everyone is so sceptical. Another source who knows Boots well argues: 'There is as much a case for investment as there is for stopping it. It could go more digital.'
With an ageing UK population and the Labour government's increased focus on primary healthcare, where Boots has been increasingly offering services such as obesity clinics and vaccinations, there are new areas for potential growth.
'Boots is thriving, not just surviving, and if it was able to use more of its cash, who knows? There is a change in emphasis in the UK and, on a 10-year view, there is a big opportunity,' says the source.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
32 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Lincoln Yards site is poised for new chapter, but debate over what went wrong with the stalled project continues
The war of words over what went wrong with developer Sterling Bay's grand vision for its Lincoln Yards development on the North Side continues, even while the city waits to see what will happen with the sprawling site. Former Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot recently fired back at Sterling Bay, saying company leadership blamed their project's failure to launch on her one-term administration. Axios reporter Justin Kaufmann interviewed Lightfoot in May at the Hideout, a music club adjacent to the 53-acre site, and asked her about Sterling Bay's failure to build the controversial Lincoln Yards project. She ripped company CEO Andy Gloor for having 'repeatedly lied about me in public,' blaming her administration for the development's lack of progress. 'The truth is, I think they never actually had the financing to pull the deal off,' Lightfoot said. 'I don't think they ever had it.' Sterling Bay says financing the project was possible. 'The financing mechanism and the capital partners were in place before she took office, with the largest core fund in the country as Lincoln Yards' partner,' a Sterling Bay spokesperson said Friday. Sterling Bay gave up control of Lincoln Yards' northern half earlier this year to its lender Bank OZK. Chicago-based residential developer JDL Development is negotiating to take over both the northern and southern halves of the nearly vacant megadevelopment site. Gloor first spoke out as Lightfoot was leaving office in 2023. He said her administration was slow in issuing needed approvals, setting the project — which originally called for thousands of apartments and offices, including skyscrapers of up to 600 feet, riverfront parks and a life sciences complex — back by several years. 'She fought the development, which is so puzzling to me because the economic impact in terms of construction jobs, permanent jobs and the ability to compete with some other cities,' he said, according to Bloomberg. 'It's in the $8 to $10 billion if you add it all up.' Sterling Bay began buying up properties along the North Branch of the Chicago River between North Avenue and Webster Avenue about 10 years ago. City Council approved the developer's vision in 2019, including the creation of a tax increment financing district, just as former Mayor Rahm Emanuel was leaving office. The approval sparked outrage among some community activists, who complained the plan would funnel hundreds of millions of tax dollars from city coffers to Sterling Bay. But the company said it would have needed to spend nearly $500 million upfront reconstructing neighborhood bridges, roads and the riverfront before getting reimbursed by the city. Lightfoot told Kaufmann that she had dropped her objections to Emanuel's 2019 deal with Sterling Bay in exchange for some modest changes. But in the first few weeks of her administration, Sterling Bay 'came back to us and said, 'You know, we actually need a billion more dollars. Will you agree to that?' Not surprisingly I said, 'You're out of your effing mind.'' 'To say we ever asked her for 'a billion more dollars' is patently false,' the Sterling Bay spokesperson said. Sterling Bay's 2019 redevelopment agreement with the city anticipated using a special service area to help fund the needed infrastructure at Lincoln Yards. These local taxing districts are used in many neighborhoods to fund improvements such as landscaping, cleanups and added security services, but Lightfoot objected to using an SSA for extensive infrastructure work. 'Unfortunately, former Mayor Lightfoot is celebrating hundreds of millions of dollars in investor losses and billions more in economic opportunity lost under her watch,' the Sterling Bay spokesperson added. 'That is her legacy.' The pandemic and a slump in the office market, followed by soaring interest rates, made it even more difficult to secure development financing. Sterling Bay did manage to complete one building, an eight-story structure dedicated to life sciences that stands alone at 1229 W. Concord Place, but its 300,000 square feet of lab space has been empty since construction wrapped up in 2023. Lightfoot told Kaufmann that vacancy shows the problems with Lincoln Yards went deep, and had nothing to do with her. 'You've got a high-rise building over here that was supposed to be a new life sciences building that doesn't have one tenant,' she said. 'They're liars. They never had the money.'
Business Wire
40 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Lead Bank Taps Prelim to Modernize Digital Onboarding for Consumers and Businesses
SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Prelim, a Silicon Valley-based fintech known for its award-winning omnichannel onboarding solutions, is now working with Lead Bank, a Kansas City-based financial institution, to elevate its digital banking experience. Lead will deploy Prelim's platform across its client portfolio, replacing its in-branch deposit account opening system and powering its digital applications. This unified onboarding experience will serve everyone from individual consumers and commercial businesses to fintech clients, streamlining account access while maintaining the high touch service Lead is known for. The rollout enhances Lead's client acquisition channels and introduces robust self-service tools designed to meet the expectations of today's digitally minded banking clients. "What impressed us about Lead Bank is their unique position at the intersection of established banking expertise and digital innovation," said Heang Chan, co-founder and CEO of Prelim. "Their approach to client relationships aligns perfectly with our technology philosophy—creating solutions that remove barriers rather than adding complexity. The Midwest has emerged as a significant hub for financial innovation, and Lead Bank's forward-thinking leadership team is proof of why. This partnership will deliver immediate benefits for their clients while providing our team with valuable insights from a bank that truly understands how to balance tradition with transformation." Under the leadership of CEO Jackie Reses and a management team that includes several former executives from Square Financial Services and Block Inc. (formerly Square Inc.), Lead has undergone a bold transformation to building technology-first, compliant banking infrastructure designed to power the next generation of fintech and embedded finance. As the expectations for financial services continue to evolve, community banks like Lead Bank are demonstrating that innovation isn't limited to the largest financial institutions in the nation. By working with Prelim, Lead is reinforcing its commitment to meeting clients where they are—whether that's in a branch or through sophisticated digital channels. ABOUT PRELIM Prelim is a leading Silicon Valley fintech company providing omnichannel onboarding solutions for consumer deposit accounts, business deposit accounts, treasury services, and more. Prelim solutions empower banks, credit unions, and other financial institutions to digitize the customer journey from onboarding to servicing, improving the employee journey by automating internal operations such as reviewing, processing, underwriting, and servicing. Built by banking experts, Prelim's white-labeled platform delivers a better customer experience through process automation for identity verification, issuing services from the core, and more. For more information, please visit
Los Angeles Times
43 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Hollywood is in bad shape. You wouldn't know it from CEO pay
Warner Bros. Discovery is in poor shape — so much so that Chief Executive David Zaslav has decided to unwind the 2022 merger he orchestrated by splitting the company in two. But Zaslav himself is doing just fine, to the chagrin of shareholders. In a rare searing rebuke, investors recently cast a symbolic vote disapproving of Zaslav's 2024 compensation package, which rose 4% to $51.9 million compared with the year before. The package, approved by the company's board of directors, ensured that Zaslav remained one of the nation's highest-paid corporate leaders. Proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services, known as ISS, described the company's executive compensation packages as 'an unmitigated pay-for-performance misalignment.' The situation renewed scrutiny of the compensation levels for leaders of the top entertainment companies, which remain high compared with peers in other industries. Although 2024 was a bad year for Hollywood, it was a very good year for some of the industry's top executives, according to a survey of data by Equilar, which studies executive pay, for The Times. The median compensation for those executives for 2024 was $33.9 million, up 7% from 2023, Equilar said. That's about double the median compensation of CEOs at S&P 500 companies, which was $17.1 million last year. The compensation data include stock options, base salaries, bonuses and other perks for CEOs from Netflix, Fox Corp., Roku, Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., AMC Networks, Comcast, Warner Bros. Discovery and the Walt Disney Co. Paramount was excluded from the median data because of a change from one CEO to three in April 2024. 'The compensation packages remain somewhat out of whack based on the good old days where the margins were substantially higher,' said Evan Shapiro, a former NBCUniversal executive who now runs his own company. 'The Hollywood era got used to very specific — some would argue irrational — pay packages and never readjusted itself when the business went haywire.' Pay packages increased for Netflix co-CEOs Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters, reflecting the streaming giant's strong performance. The value of Sarandos' pay package went up 24% to $61.9 million, while Peters' went up 50% to $60.3 million. Other executives whose compensation increased included Bob Bakish, who was ousted as CEO of Paramount in April 2024. He had a package worth $86.96 million in 2024 (which included his roughly $69 million severance), up 178% from $31.3 million a year earlier. Disney chief Bob Iger, who spent 2024 mounting a turnaround for the Burbank-based company, earned $41.1 million, up 30% from the previous year. During the year, Disney had renewed strength at the box office and achieved streaming profitability after years of losses. Fox Corp.'s CEO Lachlan Murdoch's total pay rose 9% to $23.8 million, while Roku CEO Anthony Wood got a bump of 37% to $27.7 million. Others got a pay cut. Comcast CEO Brian Roberts' 2024 compensation declined 5% to $33.9 million, primarily due to a lower cash bonus. AMC Networks CEO Kristin Dolan had a 40% drop to $8.7 million last year related to a $6.8-million equity award she received in 2023 tied to her promotion to CEO. Lionsgate CEO Jon Feltheimer earned $18.2 million in the company's fiscal 2024 year, down 15% compared with $21.5 million from fiscal 2023. For 2024, the highest-paid chief executives among publicly traded media and entertainment companies compiled by Equilar for The Times were Bakish, Zaslav, Sarandos, Peters and Iger. Most of the companies declined to comment or referred The Times to proxy statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Fox Corp. did not return a request for comment. The increase in pay reflects a broader trend at publicly traded companies. Compensation is increasing as companies try to align pay with performance by handing out large stock awards, said Amit Batish, senior director of content for Equilar. Certain awards such as stock options typically benefit executives only if the stock goes up. Some executives are also adding security perks after the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson last year, he said. Several Hollywood executives had pay packages last year that were worth substantially more than the median, Equilar said. With so much change and disruption happening in the entertainment business and plenty of competition for skilled leadership, companies believe they need to pay up to hold on to executive talent. 'Especially in the entertainment industry that's constantly evolving, with streaming services taking over, there's constant fluctuations in the market, so companies are looking to find ways to keep their executives on board and motivated,' Batish said. Sky-high executive compensation has resurfaced debate about a subject that has been simmering since even before the 2023 strikes led by writers and actors — the widening pay gap between executives and workers. Many entertainment workers have left Southern California due to the lack of work, as more productions are moving out of the area due to increased costs. Disney, Warner Bros. Discovery, NBCUniversal and Paramount have continued to lay off employees. Some entertainment workers struggling to find jobs have adopted the saying 'Persist to '26,' replacing last year's 'Survive 'til '25.' 'Any survey of executive pay, generally there's a disconnect between what people see in their own checking accounts and when they see what executives, particularly for top Fortune 500 companies, earned,' said David Smith, a professor of economics at the Pepperdine Graziadio Business School. 'There's often discontent with the chasm between the rank and file and CEOs.' Zaslav became a symbol of that ire in 2021 when his compensation package was valued at $246.6 million, which included stock options tied to the merger. The value of his 2024 compensation was much lower at $51.9 million, but still higher than other executives such as Disney's Iger. Following the nonbinding shareholder 'say on pay' vote, Warner Bros. Discovery pledged to address shareholder concerns. Those changes are expected to lower Zaslav's future payouts. Similarly, Disney and Netflix in recent years have been hit with negative shareholder votes on the pay, leading to adjustments. Zaslav's target annual cash bonus opportunity will shrink from $22 million to $6 million after splitting Warner Bros. Discovery in two, separating studios and streaming services from linear cable networks, the company said. Zaslav's base salary would remain $3 million. 'We structured the new compensation packages to address shareholders' feedback by fostering pay-for-performance alignment,' Warner Bros. Discovery board chair Samuel A. Di Piazza Jr. said in a statement. While Warner Bros. Discovery worked on retiring $4.4 billion in debt through cost-cutting and launched its streaming service Max (which is being rebranded back to HBO Max) in 70 markets last year, the company also had some fumbles, including losing the NBA on its TV networks. 'It appears the board may have been out-negotiated,' said Lloyd Greif, chief executive of Los Angeles investment bank Greif & Co. 'They created incentives that did not directly translate into a higher stock price, or higher revenue and EBITDA growth' — referring to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. 'So,' he added, 'you have to look at the results and say, the board blew the call.' The company's compensation committee said it took into account Zaslav's performance across different goals including revenue, cash flow, enhancing the motion picture slate, cost controls, launching Max globally and securing talent. Warner Bros. Discovery's revenue in 2024 fell 5% to $39.3 billion, compared with 2023. Adjusted earnings excluding certain items fell 11% during that same time period. The stock price declined about 7% in 2024. 'It just sends a very bad message to your teams,' said Paul Verna, vice president of content at research firm Emarketer, adding that leaders should inspire their teams amid challenges facing the industry. 'It's very hard to do that when you're firing thousands of people but not really absorbing any pain yourself in your own compensation.' The committee saw the loss of the NBA U.S. TV rights as a positive, saying it resulted in a 'more efficient long-term relationship with the league,' according to the company's proxy filing. When the compensation committee evaluated those figures, it took out costs related to a joint venture called Venu Sports that was meant to launch in 2024 but was scrapped, as well as new sports rights programming and packages. That irked some groups, including ISS, though some executive compensation experts said it is not uncommon for companies to factor out some costs deemed to be out of the executive's control. The reverberations of the shareholder vote continue. It could cause the board to put pressure on the compensation committee to improve its performance or activist shareholders to target the company for a proxy contest, Lawrence Cunningham, director of the University of Delaware's Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance, wrote in an email to The Times. 'Shareholder votes on pay, even when non-binding, send a signal that can be important,' Cunningham wrote. 'A 60% no vote is huge.'
