Letters to the Editor: Pausing environmental requirements to save money on housing now means we'll pay later
To the editor: Elected officials get political benefits from demonstrating generosity to victims of disasters ("California should move faster on clean energy. Some lawmakers want to take a break," April 10). Within the context of climate change, this can prove short-sighted, even counterproductive. Sadly, the level of general understanding of the climate emergency is insufficient to protect and defend long-term legislation when it conflicts with short-term, anti-climate demands. This is particularly true when people are grieving the loss of a home — or an entire neighborhood.
I credit columnist Sammy Roth for bravely going where his deep understanding inexorably leads him. Existing regulations already are insufficient to meet the state's emissions goals. Meanwhile, the financial benefits of Assembly Bill 306 to homeowners, if any, is paltry compared to the long-term costs of increased air pollution (unhealthy), increased CO2 emissions (warming), sluggish electrification (slowed transition to clean energy) and decades of energy-inefficient new and existing homes (wasted resources).
The concept of affordability has to broaden to include the cost of other neighborhoods going up in smoke, some for a second time. There is no time left for procrastinating on the mandate that the climate emergency represents. Elected officials should stand behind their recently passed, forward-thinking climate legislation.
Gary Stewart, Laguna Beach
..
To the editor: Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas is on the wrong track, if he thinks he can help California housing costs with a six-year pause on new clean energy rules. I have news for him: Global warming is caused by greenhouse gas emissions, and stopping clean energy rules makes the problem even worse later. Rivas needs to find other savings in housing costs. These could include building smaller houses and apartments at greater densities. Better city planning is also needed, starting with public transportation. Global warming is immune to our concerns about lowering housing costs.
Carl Mariz, Irvine
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
Federal judge to deny Trump administration's motion to dismiss lawsuit over block on wind projects
A federal judge in Massachusetts said Wednesday he plans to deny a motion by the Trump administration to dismiss a lawsuit over its blocking of wind energy projects, siding with a coalition of state attorneys general. Led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, attorneys general from 17 states and Washington, D.C. are suing in federal court to challenge President Donald Trump's Day One executive order halting leasing and permitting for wind energy projects. Judge William G. Young said during a hearing that he plans to allow the case to proceed against Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, but will dismiss the action against Trump and cabinet secretaries other than Burgum named as defendants. Advertisement 3 Judge William G. Young said he plans to deny a motion by the Trump administration to dismiss a lawsuit over its blocking of wind energy projects. Los Angeles Times via Getty Images He said he thinks states do have standing to sue, which the federal government had argued against. The states can proceed with claims that blocking permits for wind energy projects violates the Administrative Procedure Act, which outlines a detailed process for enacting regulations, but not the Constitution, Young said. Advertisement Young said his rulings from the bench were tentative and reserved the right to alter them in writing his formal opinion. The coalition of attorneys general sued to ask that a judge declare the executive order unlawful and approve an injunction to stop federal agencies from implementing it. They argued that Trump doesn't have the authority to halt project permitting and doing so jeopardizes the states' economies, energy mix, public health and climate goals. The government is arguing that the states' claims amount to nothing more than a policy disagreement over preferences for wind versus fossil fuel energy development that is outside the bounds of the federal court's jurisdiction. Advertisement 3 The lawsuit presented to the court challenges President Trump's executive order halting the leasing and permitting for wind energy projects. AP Department of Justice Attorney Michael Robertson said in court that the wind order paused permitting, but didn't halt it, while the Interior secretary reviews the environmental impact and that this effort is underway. He said states have not shown that they were harmed by a specific permit not being issued. Turner Smith, from the Massachusetts attorney general's office, countered that the government has provided no end date and that Trump's order imposes a 'categorical and indefinite halt.' Advertisement 3 Despite the federal government's case, Young acknowledges that the states do have the right to have their case heard in court. AP She said states have been harmed and pointed to a offshore wind project for Massachusetts, now pushed back by two years because its three outstanding permits are delayed due to the wind order. She said Massachusetts can't meet its targets for procuring offshore wind energy without the SouthCoast wind project. Wind is the U.S.' largest source of renewable energy, providing about 10% of the electricity generated in the nation, according to the American Clean Power Association. Trump prioritizes fossil fuels and said last week that his administration would not approve wind energy projects except in cases of emergency. The administration had ordered a Norwegian company, Equinor, to halt construction on a fully permitted offshore wind project in New York, though Equinor has been allowed to resume work. The coalition includes Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington state and Washington, D.C.
Los Angeles Times
3 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump claims voting fraud by undocumented immigrants. True or False?
After nearly a week of protests in Los Angeles against recent federal immigration enforcement sweeps in the city, President Trump doubled down on his administration's efforts to detain and deport undocumented immigrants, claiming they are a key voting bloc in Democratic according to Los Angeles County election officials, that's simply not true. Los Angeles Times reporter Karen Garcia fact checks Trump's false claims about voting.
Eater
4 days ago
- Eater
Dozens of Armed ICE Agents Swarm Popular Swap Meet in Santa Fe Springs
On June 14, 2025, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents conducted a raid at the Santa Fe Springs Swap Meet. The decades-old market caters to a mostly Latino crowd, selling art, clothing, household goods, clothing; it also features a food court with drinks, beer, ice cream, menudo, burgers, tacos, and wings. ICE entered the building at 3:30 p.m., reports the Los Angeles Times , just before a scheduled Father's Day concert. According to the report, 50 to 80 agents in tactical gear with guns searched the site for undocumented immigrants as multiple helicopters circled overhead. Federal agents detained dozens of people and arrested several, reports ABC-7. Santa Fe Springs is a historically Latino city in south Los Angeles County that borders Whittier, Norwalk, Downey, and Pico Rivera. ABC-7 spoke to witnesses who saw ICE agents asking questions to the crowds while walking through the swap meet crowds. L.A. Taco estimates that between 40 and 50 people were detained. ICE's large-scale immigration sweeps throughout Southern California escalated starting June 6 in Los Angeles and at farms in Ventura County. The Los Angeles Times reports that President Trump vowed to expand immigration enforcement actions in major 'Democrat-controlled' cities, including Los Angeles. ICE raid protests, local law enforcement, and curfews Local protests began almost immediately in the wake of the immigration raids. Starting on June 6, large groups of residents gathered in Downtown Los Angeles, one week before the nationwide No Kings protest on June 14. The Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department were on hand at these demonstrations before Trump sent in the National Guard and the Marines on June 8 and June 13, respectively. City officials announced a curfew for a small section of Downtown, limiting access to Chinatown, the Fashion District, and Skid Row from 8 p.m. until 6 a.m. the following day. As a result, many restaurants are losing thousands of dollars in revenue. A spokesperson for Camelia shared that due to the lack of curfew guidance from the City of Los Angeles, the Arts District restaurant will open from 4 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Downtown restaurants have lost revenue since officials launched the curfew on TK. Camelia will run specials from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. with a $12 martini or champagne, half price oysters, half price burger, plus the whole menu available for an early dinner (or late lunch). Camelia's regular Japanese bistro menu resumes the remainder of its service. Los Angeles restaurants cope with ICE raids Eater spoke with two restaurant owners, who wish to remain anonymous for fear of their businesses being targeted by ICE, who say they limited or closed their operations to protect their employees from potential harassment or detention. Meanwhile, the owner of Panadería La Colmena in North Hollywood says that her mostly Latino customers are not purchasing baked goods that typically sell out daily, according to Fox-11. New protocols for restaurant owners As many restaurants and street vendors pause operations, nonprofits like the Independent Hospitality Coalition shared a set of protocols for operators to follow. In a video on Instagram, Valerie Confections owner Valerie Gordon shared how she was implementing the protocols at her bakeries in Glendale and Echo Park. Los Angeles taqueros disappear from the streets L.A. Taco reports that ICE is conducting arrests at taquerias. The publication reports that one of the earliest raids was on June 12 at East LA food truck Jason's Tacos. The owner told L.A. Taco that ICE detained all of his employees. Angel's Tijuana Tacos also took precautions last week by shuttering all of its street stands and only operating its standalone location in Anaheim.
